地球观测知识枢纽：内涵、关键技术与展望

赵利民; 苗晨; 邢进; 李国庆; 侯宇葵; 刘闯; 李家国; 陈兴峰; 刘军; 杨健; 周翔; 顾行发

doi:10.11834/jrs.20222302

浏览量 : 0 下载量: 188 CSCD: 0 更多指标

R-PDF
PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

地球观测知识枢纽：内涵、关键技术与展望
Earth Observation Knowledge Hub： Implications， Key Technologies and Perspectives
2022年页码：1-20
网络出版日期： 2022-12-16 ，
DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20222302

扫描看全文

赵利民，苗晨，邢进，李国庆，侯宇葵，刘闯，李家国，陈兴峰，刘军，杨健，周翔，顾行发.XXXX.地球观测知识枢纽：内涵、关键技术与展望.遥感学报，XX（XX）： 1-20

ZHAO Limin，MIAO Chen，XING Jin，LI Guoqing，HOU Yukui，LIU Chuang，LI Jiaguo，CHEN Xingfeng，LIU Jun，YANG Jian，ZHOU Xiang，GU Xingfa. XXXX. Earth Observation Knowledge Hub： Implications， Key Technologies and Perspectives. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， XX（XX）：1-20
赵利民，苗晨，邢进，李国庆，侯宇葵，刘闯，李家国，陈兴峰，刘军，杨健，周翔，顾行发.XXXX.地球观测知识枢纽：内涵、关键技术与展望.遥感学报，XX（XX）： 1-20 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20222302.

ZHAO Limin，MIAO Chen，XING Jin，LI Guoqing，HOU Yukui，LIU Chuang，LI Jiaguo，CHEN Xingfeng，LIU Jun，YANG Jian，ZHOU Xiang，GU Xingfa. XXXX. Earth Observation Knowledge Hub： Implications， Key Technologies and Perspectives. National Remote Sensing Bulletin， XX（XX）：1-20 DOI： 10.11834/jrs.20222302.

摘要

智能化地共享和复用地球观测应用实践所形成的知识，有序促进应用要素的高通量流动，是激活和释放地球观测系统效能的关键。地球观测知识枢纽（Earth Observation Knowledge Hub， EOKH）将分散的应用要素有机耦合，形成专题知识集合的协同设计与吞吐能力，是地球观测成果治理与智能服务的研究前沿。针对地球观测组织（Group on Earth Observations， GEO）发展GEO知识枢纽（GEO Knowledge Hub， GKH）得到的启示，结合地球观测知识本体研究最新进展，系统解析了EOKH的内涵与特征，梳理了发展EOKH的技术需求与挑战，分析存在的关键问题及其应对策略。在此基础上，提出了EOKH系统架构原型，结合地球观测知识包转移复用和知识推理2个EOKH典型应用场景进行了原理实现与概念验证。最后，就如何促进地球观测知识“人-机-物”要素的协同共生，提出了我国发展EOKH的相关认识与思考。文章认为，探索“人在回路”的高通量知识协同生产与转移技术，以及“知识驱动”的成果复用技术，是提升地球观测隐性知识可解释性、促进EOKH服务质量与发展力的必要举措。

Abstract

ObjectiveIntelligently sharing and reusing the knowledge developed by application practices are the keys to break through technical barriers and fully activate and release the effectiveness of Earth observations (EO). The Earth Observation Knowledge Hub (EOKH)

which is used to organically couple decentralized knowledge bases

is a research frontier for the governance and intelligent service of global EO applications. In the design of Group on Earth Observations (GEO)

the GEO Knowledge Hub (GKH) is intended to provide authoritative

validated and reproducible content for evidence-based reporting on policy commitments and decision making. Thus

The GKH offers a platform for users to discover

learn about and employ methods

analytical tools and applications; it also provides opportunities for the GEO community to collaborate and provide mutual assistance related to GKH contents. However

important lessons have learned during the implementations

such as the sensitive issue of intellectual ethics

and how to profit GKH from the recent technological advances in information technologies. In response to the problems and insights encountered by GEO in developing GKH

we systematically analyzed the connotation and characteristics of EOKH

sorted out the fundamental needs and challenges for the development of EOKH in China.MethodFirstly

we systematically analyzed the connotation and characteristics of EOKH. The paper argues that EOKH is the intersection node of high-throughput trusted EO knowledge in knowledge sharing networks. It has 3 typical features

which are connectivity

high throughput and lightweight computing. Its core mission is to identify and transfer valuable research in a timely manner and to promote high throughput of application packages. Secondly

we sorted out the fundamental needs and challenges for the development of EOKH in China. Considering the latest progress in the study of EO ontology

we also analyzed the possible key technical problems and gave strategies to cope with them. On this basis

the system architecture prototype of EOKH is proposed which drawn on the system design concept of representational state transfer (REST)

and an ontology model of conceptual EO knowledge and a formalization model of process-oriented EO knowledge are established.ResultThe paper argues that EOKH should be in an open collaborative environment where humans in the loop. The key technologies are system metrics

knowledge transfer

knowledge reuse

and knowledge exploration and visualization. Transfer and reuse of knowledge packages can greatly enhance the ease of development and reuse of EO application practices. Ontology modeling helps to formalize the intrinsic connection between the human-cyber-physical systems of EO application and enhances the interpretability of higher-order complex problems.

Conclusion

EOKH transforms knowledge sharing from point-to-point at element-level to group collaborative at system-level

which not only reduces the cost of cross-industry and socially integrated EO applications

but also avoids repetitive research inputs

helps break through technical barriers and cognitive obstacles

and releases the effectiveness of satellite digital economy services more comprehensively. The article argues that connecting the EO knowledge in the human-cyber-physical systems

exploring high-throughput knowledge co-production and transfer technology in a "humans-in-the-loop" environment are necessary to enhance the interpretability of tacit EO knowledge and promote the competitiveness and activeness of EOKH.

关键词

知识枢纽地球观测本体知识包知识复用人-机-物人在回路

Keywords

Knowledge hubEarth observationsontologiesknowledge packagesknowledge recusingcyber-physical-social systemshumans in the loop

references

Abdalla G, Damasceno C D N, Guessi M, Oquendo F and Nakagawa E Y. 2015. A Systematic Literature Review on Knowledge Representation Approaches for Systems-of-Systems//9th Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures and Reuse (SBCARS). Belo Horizonte, BRAZIL: IEEE: 21-22. [DOI: 10.1109/SBCARS.2015.18http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SBCARS.2015.18]

Albinet C, Whitehurst A S, Jewell L A, Bugbee K, Laur H, Murphy K J, Frommknecht B, Scipal K, Costa G, Jai B, Ramachandran R, Lavalle M and Duncanson L. 2019. A Joint ESA-NASA Multi-mission Algorithm and Analysis Platform (MAAP) for Biomass, NISAR, and GEDI. Surveys in Geophysics, 40(4): 1017-27. [DOI: 10.1007/s10712-019-09541-zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09541-z]

Aldana-Martin J F, Garcia-Nieto J, Roldan-Garcia M D and Aldana-Montes J F. 2022. Semantic modelling of Earth Observation remote sensing. Expert Systems with Applications, 187(C): 115838. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115838]

Arvor D, Belgiu M, Falomir Z, Mougenot I and Durieux L. 2019. Ontologies to interpret remote sensing images: why do we need them? Giscience & Remote Sensing, 56(6): 911-939. [DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2019.1587890http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2019.1587890]

Bathelt H, Malmberg A and Maskell P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31-56. [DOI: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa]

Bloom N, Jones C I, Van Reenen J and Webb M. 2020. Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? American Economic Review,110(4): 1104-44. [DOI: 10.1257/aer.20180338http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180338]

Bohle S. 2014. Online repository for lab notebooks. Nature, 506(7487): 159-159. [DOI: 10.1038/506159ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/506159e]

Carroll S R, Herczog E, Hudson M, Russell K and Stall S. 2021. Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures. Scientific Data, 8(1): 1-6. [DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0]

Chen X F, Zheng F J, Guo D, Wang L L, Zhao L M, Li J G, Li L, Zhang Y H, Zhang K N, Xi M and Li K T. 2021. Review of machine learning methods for aerosol quantitative remote sensing. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 25(11): 2220-2233

陈兴峰, 郑逢杰, 郭丁, 王莉莉, 赵利民, 李家国, 李雷, 张玉环, 张凯南, 奚萌, 李凯涛. 2021. 气溶胶定量遥感的机器学习方法综述. 遥感学报, 25(11): 2220-2233 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20210451http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20210451]

Chen X F, Zhao L M, Zheng F J, Li J G, Li L, Ding H N, Zhang K N, Liu S M, Li D H and de Leeuw G. 2022. Neural Network AEROsol Retrieval for Geostationary Satellite (NNAeroG) Based on Temporal, Spatial and Spectral Measurements. Remote Sensing,14(4): 980. [DOI: 10.3390/rs14040980http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14040980]

Cheng X Q, Liu S H and Zhang R Q. 2022. Thinking on New System for Big Data Technology. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 37(1): 60-67

程学旗, 刘盛华, 张儒清. 2022. 大数据分析处理技术新体系的思考. 中国科学院院刊, 37(1): 60-67 [DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20211117005http://dx.doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20211117005]

Cheng X Q, Mei H, Zhao W, Wan W S B, Shen H W and Li G J. 2020. Data Science and Computing Intelligence: Concept, Paradigm, and Opportunities. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35(12): 1470-1481

程学旗, 梅宏, 赵伟, 华云生, 沈华伟, 李国杰. 2020. 数据科学与计算智能：内涵、范式与机遇. 中国科学院院刊, 35(12): 1470-1481 [DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20201116005http://dx.doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20201116005]

Chu, J S G and Evans J A. 2021. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(41). [ DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021636118http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021636118]

De Simone F, D’Amore F, Bencardino M, Carbone F, Hedgecock L M, Sprovieri F, Cinnirella S and Pirrone N. 2021. The GOS4M Knowledge Hub: A web-based effectiveness evaluation platform in support of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Environmental Science & Policy 124:235-46. [DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.06.021http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.06.021]

Editorial Office of Journal of Global Change Data & Discovery. 2017. Guidelines of Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository. Journal of Global Change Data & Discovery, 1(3): 253-261.

《全球变化数据学报》(中英文)编辑部. 2017. 全球变化科学研究数据出版与共享指南. 全球变化数据学报, 2017, 1(3): 253-261 [DOI: 10.3974/geodp.2017.03.01http://dx.doi.org/10.3974/geodp.2017.03.01]

Esch T, Asamer H, Bachofer F, Balhar J, Boettcher M, Boissier E, Angelo P d', Gevaert C M, Hirner A, Jupova K, Kurz F, Kwarteng A Y, Mathot E, Marconcini M, Marin A, Metz-Marconcini A, Pacini F, Paganini M, Permana H, Soukup T, Uereyen S, Small C, Svaton V and Zeidler J N. 2020. Digital world meets urban planet – new prospects for evidence-based urban studies arising from joint exploitation of big earth data, information technology and shared knowledge. International Journal of Digital Earth ,13(1): 136-57. [DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2018.1548655http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2018.1548655]

Esch T, Üreyen S, Zeidler J, Metz–Marconcini A, Hirner A, Asamer H, Tum M, Böttcher M, Kuchar S, Svaton V and Marconcini M. 2018. Exploiting big earth data from space – first experiences with the timescan processing chain. Big Earth Data, 2(1): 36-55. [DOI: 10.1080/20964471.2018.1433790http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2018.1433790]

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2018. OSPP-REC: Open Science Policy Platform Recommendations, Publications Office. [DOI: 10.2777/958647http://dx.doi.org/10.2777/958647]

Evers H D, Gerke S and Menkhoff T. 2010. Knowledge clusters and knowledge hubs: designing epistemic landscapes for development. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(5): 678-89. [DOI: 10.1108/13673271011074836http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673271011074836]

GEO Secretariat. 2019. 2020-2022 GEO Work Programme Summary Document (Version 4.1). In, 120-1. Canberra, Australia: Group on Earth Observations.

GEO Secretariat. 2020a. Draft Implementation Plan for the GEO Knowledge Hub. In 16th Programme Board Meeting. Geneva, Switzerland.

GEO Secretariat. 2020b. GEO Knowledge Hub Implementation Plan. In 17th Programme Board Meeting. Virtual meeting: GEO.

GEO Secretariat. 2021a. GEO Statement on Open Knowledge. In 21st Programme Board Meeting. Virtual meeting: GEO.

GEO Secretariat. 2021b. Report on the Development of the GEO Knowledge Hub. In 21st Programme Board Meeting. Virtual meeting: GEO.

Gill K S. 2020. Pearl, Judea and Mackenzie, Dana: The book of why: the new science of cause and effect (2018). AI & SOCIETY, 35(3): 767-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-00971-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00971-7]

Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D and Moore R. 2017. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202: 18-27. [DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031http://dx.doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031]

Gu X F and Yu T. 2018. Application-oriented Space Remote Sensing Scientific Argumentation Theory, Method and Technology. Beijing: Science Press

顾行发, 余涛. 2018. 面向应用的航天遥感科学论证理论、方法与技术. 北京：科学出版社

He G J, Wang G Z, Long T F, Peng Y, Jiang W, Yin R Y, Jiao W L and Zhang Z M. 2018. Opening and Sharing of Big Earth Observation Data: Challenges and Countermeasures. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33(8): 783-90

何国金, 王桂周, 龙腾飞, 彭燕, 江威, 尹然宇, 焦伟利, 张兆明. 2018. 对地观测大数据开放共享：挑战与思考. 中国科学院院刊, 33(8): 783-90 [DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.08.003http://dx.doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.08.003]

Hogan A, Blomqvist E, Cochez M, Amato C D, Melo G D, Gutierrez C, Gayo G E L, Kirrane S, Neumaier S, Polleres A, Navigli R, Ngomo A C N, Rashid S M, Rula A, Schmelzeisen L, Sequeda J, Staab S and Zimmermann A. 2021. Knowledge Graphs. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4): 71:1-:37. [DOI: 10.1145/3447772http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3447772]

Horsburgh J S, Aufdenkampe A K, Mayorga E, Lehnert K A, Hsu L, Song S L and Jones A S. 2016. Observations Data Model 2: A community information model for spatially discrete Earth observations. Environmental Modelling & Software, 79: 55-74. [DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.01.010http://dx.doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.01.010]

Howells J R L. 2002. Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, 39(5-6): 871-84. [DOI: 10.1080/00420980220128354http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980220128354]

IEEE Standards Association. 2011. IEEE Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and Information Technology Operation with the Electric Power System (EPS), End-Use Applications, and Loads. IEEE, 1-126. [DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.6018239http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.6018239]

Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Tsinghua University. 2020. Blockchain Development Research Report. Beijing (清华大学人工智能研究院. 2020. 区块链发展研究报告. 北京) static.aminer.cn(访问日期：2022.05.01)

Janowicz K, Haller A, Cox S J D, Phuoc D L and Lefrancois M. 2019. SOSA: A lightweight ontology for sensors, observations, samples, and actuators. Journal of Web Semantics, 56: 1-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2018.06.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2018.06.003]

Jay E. Aronson. 2003. Expert Systems. Encyclopedia of Information Systems, New York: Elsevier: 277-289. [DOI: 10.1016/B0-12-227240-4/00067-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227240-4/00067-8]

Ji S S, Pan S R, Cambria K, Marttinen P and Yu P S. 2022. A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(2): 494-514. [DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843]

Jordan M I. 2019. Artificial Intelligence—The Revolution Hasn’t Happened Yet. Harvard Data Science Review. [DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.f06c6e61http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.f06c6e61]

Klein T, Nilsson M, Persson A and Håkansson B. 2017. From Open Data to Open Analyses—New Opportunities for Environmental Applications? Environments, 4(4): 1-17. [DOI: 10.3390/environments4020032http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/environments4020032]

Kleinberg J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S and Sunstein C R. 2019. Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms. Journal of Legal Analysis, 10: 113-74. [DOI: 10.1093/jla/laz001http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz001]

Leiserson C E, Thompson N C, Emer J S, Kuszmaul B C, Lampson B W, Sanchez D and Schardl T B. 2020. There's Plenty of Room at the Top: What Will Drive Computer Performance after Moore's Law? Science, 368(6495): eaam9744. [DOI: 10.1126/science.aam9744http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9744]

Li G Q, Zhang H Y, Zhang L C, Wang Y Y and Tian C Z. 2016. Development and Trend of Earth Observation Data Sharing. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 979-90

李国庆, 张红月, 张连翀, 王媛媛, 田传召. 2016. 地球观测数据共享的发展和趋势. 遥感学报, 20(5): 979-90 [DOI: 0.11834/jrs.20166173http://dx.doi.org/0.11834/jrs.20166173]

Little J D C. 2011. Reprint: Little's Law as Viewed on Its 50th Anniversary. Operations Research, 59(3): 536-549. [DOI: 10.1287/opre.1110.0940http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1110.0940]

Liu S, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Chen X, Zhou R, Zheng F, Li Z, Li J, Yang H, Li H, Yang J, Gao H and Gu X. 2022. QUantitative and Automatic Atmospheric Correction (QUAAC): Application and Validation. Sensors, 22(9): 3280. [DOI: doi.org/10.3390/s22093280http://dx.doi.org/doi.org/10.3390/s22093280]

Liu Z M and Wang J. 2020. Human-cyber-physical systems: concepts, challenges, and research opportunities. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng, 21(11): 1535-1553. [DOI: 10.1631/FITEE.2000537http://dx.doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2000537]

Masmoudi M, Karray M H, Abdallah S B, Lamine B, Zghal H B and Archimede B. 2020. MEMOn: Modular Environmental Monitoring Ontology to Link Heterogeneous Earth Observed Data. Environmental Modelling & Software, 124: 104581. [DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104581http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104581]

Mei H, Cao D G and Xie T. 2022. Ubiquitous Operating System: Toward the Blue Ocean of Human-cyber-physical Ternary Ubiquitous Computing. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 37(01): 30-7

梅宏, 曹东刚, 谢涛. 2022. 泛在操作系统:面向人机物融合泛在计算的新蓝海. 中国科学院院刊, 37(01): 30-7 [DOI: 1 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20211117009http://dx.doi.org/110.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20211117009]

Nativi S, Mazzetti P, Santoro M, Papeschi F, Craglia M and Ochiai O. 2015. Big Data Challenges in Building the Global Earth Observation System of Systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 68: 1-26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.017http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.017]

Owusu C, Snigdha N J, Martin M and Kalyanapu A. 2022. PyGEE-SWToolbox: A Python Jupyter Notebook Toolbox for Interactive SurfaceWater Mapping and Analysis Using Google Earth Engine. Sustainability, 14(5): 2557. [DOI: doi.org/10.3390/su14052557http://dx.doi.org/doi.org/10.3390/su14052557]

Pathirage C P, Amaratunga R D G and Haigh R P. 2006. Managing Construction Workers and Their Tacit Knowledge in A Knowledge Environment: A Conceptual Framework. In 6th International Postgraduate Research Conference in the Built and Human Environment. Delft University of Technology and TNO, Delft University, Netherlands.

Paulheim H. 2018. How much is a Triple? Estimating the Cost of Knowledge Graph Creation//17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2018), Monterey, USA: CEUR Workshop Proceedings: 2180

Pu Z Q, Yi J Q, Liu Z, Qiu T H, Sun J L and Li F M. 2022. Knowledge-based and Data-driven Integrating Methodologies for Collective Intelligence Decision Making: A Survey. Acta Automatica Sinica, 48(3): 1-17

蒲志强, 易建强, 刘振, 丘腾海, 孙金林, 李非墨. 2022. 知识和数据协同驱动的群体智能决策方法研究综述. 自动化学报, 48(3): 1-17 [DOI: 10.16383/j.aas.c210118http://dx.doi.org/10.16383/j.aas.c210118]

Rapiński J, Bednarczyk M and Zinkiewicz D. 2019. JupyTEP IDE as an Online Tool for Earth Observation Data Processing. Remote Sensing, 11(17): 1973. [DOI: doi.org/10.3390/rs11171973http://dx.doi.org/doi.org/10.3390/rs11171973]

Stacey P and Berry D. 2018. Towards a Digital Earth: Using Archetypes to Enable Knowledge Interoperability within Geo-observational Sensor Systems Design. Earth Science Informatics, 11(2): 307-23. [DOI: 10.1007/s12145-018-0340-zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12145-018-0340-z]

Su W J. 2021. You Are the Best Reviewer of Your Own Papers: An Owner-Assisted Scoring Mechanism. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34 ArXiv abs/2110.14802.

Sun K, Zhu Y Q, Pan P, Hou Z W, Wang D X, Li W R and Song J. 2019. Geospatial Data Ontology: the Semantic Foundation of Geospatial Data Integration and Sharing. Big Earth Data, 3(3): 269-96. [DOI: 10.1080/20964471.2019.1661662http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1661662]

The Earth Observation System and Data Center, CNSA. 2019. National Report of China High-resolution Earth Observation System Applications (business application volume). Beijing(国防科工局重大专项工程中心. 2019. 中国高分卫星应用国家报告（业务应用卷）. 北京) www.cheos.org.cn(访问日期：2022.03.01)

Wing J M. 2021. Trustworthy AI. Communications of the Acm, 64(10): 64-71. [DOI: 10.1145/3448248http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3448248]

Wulder M A and Coops N C. 2014. Satellites: Make Earth observations open access. Nature, 513: 30-31. [DOI: 10.1038/513030ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/513030a]

Xing L N and Chen Y W. 2011. Research Progress on Intelligent Optimization Guidance Approaches Using Knowledge. ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 37(11): 1285-1289

邢立宁, 陈英武. 2011. 基于知识的智能优化引导方法研究进展. 自动化学报, 37(11): 1285-1289 [DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2011.01285http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1004.2011.01285]

Xu H, Li S, Bai Y Q, Dong W H, Huang W Y, Xu S M, Lin Y L, Wang B, Wu F H, Xin X, Zhang L, Wang Z Z and Wu T W. 2019. A collaborative analysis framework for distributed gridded environmental data. Environmental Modelling & Software, 111: 324-39. [DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.007]

Xu Z W, Li G J and Sun N H. 2022. Information Superbahn: Towards New Type of Cyberinfrastructure. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 37(1): 46-52

徐志伟, 李国杰, 孙凝晖. 2022. 一种新型信息基础设施：高通量低熵算力网（信息高铁）. 中国科学院院刊, 37(1): 46-52 [DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20211117008http://dx.doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20211117008]

Yang Q Q, Jin C Y, Li T W, Yuan Q Q, Shen H F and Zhang L P. 2022. Research progress and challenges of data-driven quantitative remote sensing. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 26(2): 268-285

杨倩倩, 靳才溢, 李同文, 袁强强, 沈焕锋 ,张良培. 2022. 数据驱动的定量遥感研究进展与挑战. 遥感学报, 26(2): 268-285 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20211410http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20211410]

Zhang H Y, Zhou C H, Lv G N, Wu Z F, Lu F, Wang J F, Yue T X, Luo J C, Ge Y and Qin C Z. 2020. The connotation and inheritance of Geo-information Tupu. Journal of Geo-information Science, 22(4): 653-661

张洪岩, 周成虎, 闾国年, 陆峰, 王劲峰, 岳天祥, 骆剑承, 葛咏, 秦承志. 2020. 试论地学信息图谱思想的内涵与传承. 地球信息科学学报, 22(4): 653-661 [DOI: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.200167http://dx.doi.org/10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.200167]

Zhu C Q, Xu D J, Ren N and Cui H C. 2021. Geographical data transaction certificate and copyright protection model based on blockchain and digital watermarking. Journal of Surveying and Mapping, 50(12): 1694-704

朱长青, 徐鼎捷, 任娜, 崔瀚川, 赵亚宙. 2021. 区块链与数字水印相结合的地理数据交易存证及版权保护模型. 测绘学报, 50(12): 1694-704 [DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20200559http://dx.doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20200559]

Zhu Z, Wulder M A, Roy D P, Woodcock C E, Hansen M C, Radeloff V C, Healey S P, Schaaf C, Hostert P, Strobl P, Pekel J-F, Lymburner L, Pahlevan N and Scambos T A. 2019. Benefits of the free and open Landsat data policy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 224: 382-385. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.016http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.016]

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

暂无数据