This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roberts, J. K. Articles by Dmitrewski, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roberts, J. K. Articles by Dmitrewski, J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Macroscopic Findings at Appendicectomy Are Unreliable: Implications for Laparoscopy and Malignant Conditions of the Appendix

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dr_keith{at}hotmail.com.

	Abstract

Background: At laparoscopic appendicectomy, some surgeons leave a macroscopically normal appendix in situ. To assess if this is safe practice, the authors wanted to identify the correlation between macroscopic findings at appendicectomy and pathologists’ assessment with regard to the inflamed and the neoplastic. Method: Operative cases and histological findings over a 3-year period were identified. Results: The authors obtained 876/972 notes (90.1%). There was 100% congruity between surgeons and pathologists when perforation, abscess, or gangrene of the appendix was noted (n = 235). Where inflammation was the sole recorded finding, 8.3% of cases (37/445) were histologically normal; 33.1% (47/139) of appendices perceived to be normal at appendicectomy demonstrated histological signs of inflammation. Of 16 neoplastic lesions only 3 were identified at the time of surgery. Conclusions: Surgeons’ ability to diagnose a normal appendix is poor as is the ability to detect neoplastic lesions. At laparoscopy, to investigate acute abdominal pain a macroscopically normal appendix should be removed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?