Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating industry context effects in consumer-firm relationships: Preliminary results from a dispositional approach

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few, if any, past studies have attempted to develop a model to capture and explain industry context variability and hypothesize its effects on consumer-firm relationships. Generally, industry effects are ignored, described, or explained post hoc. Using the notion of consumers' dispositions toward a market, a framework is proposed for understanding the influence of industry context on consumer satisfaction, trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. The empirical results of a survey in two service industries show that industry contexts matter and yield significant direct and moderating effects on consumer-firm relationships. The study underscores the promise of a dispositional approach for providing insights for the theory and practice of relationship marketing, resolvin goutstanding questions, and proposing fruitful areas for further examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S. and S. G. West. 1991.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Neil K. 1978. “A Psychometric Development Test for Consumer Alienation From the Marketplace.”Journal of Marketing Research 15 (November): 566–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Eugene W. 1994. “Cross Category Variation in Customer Satisfaction and Retention.”Marketing Letters 5 (1): 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. Scott and Terry S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Researh 14 (August): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barksdale, Hiram C., and William R. Darden. 1972. “Consumer Attitudes Toward Marketing and Consumerism.”Journal of Marketing 36 (October): 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Blake, A. and Jerry Pfeffer. 1989. “Just a Ratrace: The Search for Dispositional Effects in Organizational Research.”Academy of Management Review 14: 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, Patricia M. and Joseph P. Cannon. 1978. “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 61 (April): 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, Russell H. and Mark P. Zanna. 1978. “On the Predictive Validity of Attitudes: The Roles of Direct Experience and Confidence.”Journal of Personality 46: 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, Steven. 1996. “Effects of Suspicion on Attributional Thinking and the Correspondence Bias.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (6): 1164–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes, Michael D. Johnson, Eugene W. Anderson, Jaesung Cha, and Barbera Everitt Bryant. 1996. “The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose and Findings.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and David V. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structure Equations Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (February): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, Marian and Peter Wright. 1995. “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope With Persuasion Attempts.”Journal of Consumer Research 21 (June): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, Ellen and Mark Johnson. 1999. “The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust and Commitment for Relational and Transactional Consumers.”Journal of Marketing 63 (April): 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, John and Michael Etzel. 1986. “The Index of Consumer Sentiment Toward Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 50 (July): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisaffe, Douglas P. and Anand Kumar. 1998. “Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Value: Testing an Expanded Framework.” Working Paper 98-107. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. 1970.Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, Michael K. and John N. Bateson. 1991. “Perceived Control and the Effects of Crowding and Consumer Choice in the Service Environment.”Journal of Consumer Research 18 (September): 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, Dawn, and Amy Oström. 1996. “Commercial and Interpersonal Relationships: Using the Structure of Interpersonal Relationships to Understand Individual-to-Individual, Individual-to-Firm, and Firm-to-Firm Relationships in Commerce.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 13: 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Michael D. and Seigyoung Auh. 1998. “Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, and the Trust Environment.”Advances in Consumer Research 25: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Thomas O. and W. Earl Sasser Jr. 1995. “Why Satisfied Customers Defect.”Harvard Business Review 73 (6): 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Zarrel V. 1980. “Consumer Alienation, General Dissatisfaction and Consumerism Issues.”Journal of Retailing 56 (Summer): 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. Allen and Tom R. Tyler. 1988.The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundstrom, W. J. and Lawrence M. Lamont. 1976. “The Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Discontent.”Journal of Marketing Research 13 (November): 373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, Walter and Yuichi Shoda. 1999. “Integrating Dispositions and Processing Dynamics Within a Unified Theory of Personality: The Cognitive-Affective Personality System.” InHandbook of Personality, Theory and Research, 2nd ed. Eds. Lawerence A. Pervin and Oliver P. John. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, Vikas and Wagner A. Kamakura. 2001. “Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics.”Journal of Marketing Research 38 (February): 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers-Levy, Joan and Alice M. Tybout. 1989. “Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (June): 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, William D. 1999. “Satisfaction Is Nice, but Value Drives Loyalty.”Marketing Research 11 (Spring): 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard. 1997.Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. “Whence Consumer Loyalty.”Journal of Marketing 63 (Special Issue): 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oström, Amy and Dawn Iacobucci. 1995. “Consumer Trade-Offs and the Evaluation of Services.”Journal of Marketing 59 (January): 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otnes, Cele, Tina M. Lowrey, and L. J. Shrum. 1997. “Toward an Understanding of Consumer Ambivalence.”Journal of Consumer Research 24 (June): 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, José Antonio, Joseph F. Porac, Jelena Runser-Spanjol, and Michael S. Saxon. 1999. “Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market.”Journal of Marketing 63 (Special Issue): 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor and Carolyn B. Mervis. 1975. “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories.”Cognitive Psychology 7 (October): 573–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Jagdip. 1991. “Industry Characteristics and Consumer Dissatisfaction.”Journal of Consumer Affairs 25 (1): 19–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Deepak Sirdeshmukh. 2000. “Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgements.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (Winter): 150–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirdeshmukh Deepak, Jagdip Singh, and Barry Sabol. 2002. “Impact of Frontline Employee Behaviors and Management Practices on Consumer Trust, Value and Loyalty in Relational Service Exchanges.”Journal of Marketing 66 (January): 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Brock J. and Donald W. Barclay. 1997. “The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, Narasimhan and Brian T. Ratchford. 1991. “An Empirical Test of a Model of External Search for Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 18 (September): 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M., Frenkel ter Hofstede, and Michel Wedel. 1999. “A Cross-National Investigation Into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness.”Journal of Marketing 63 (April): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tax, Stephen S., Stephen W. Brown, and Murali Chandrashekaran. 1998. “Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 62 (April): 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wish, Myron, Morton Deutsch, and Susan J. Kaplan. 1976. “Perceived Dimensions of Interpersonal Relations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33 (4): 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., L. L. Berry, and A. Parasuraman. 1996. “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality.”Journal of Marketing 60 (April): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Edwin Nijssen

  2. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA

    Jagdip Singh

  3. Dortmund University, Germany

    Hartmut Holzmüeller

Authors
  1. Edwin Nijssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jagdip Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deepak Sirdeshmukh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hartmut Holzmüeller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Edwin Nijssen, Ph.D., is a professor of marketing at the Nijmegen School of Management at the University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands. His research interest focuses on strategic and international marketing issues, relationship marketing, brand management, and new-product development. He has published inLong Range Planning, theJournal of Product Innovation Management, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, R&D Management, Industrial Marketing Management, and theJournal of International Marketing and has written several books on marketing strategy.

Jagdip Singh, Ph.D., is a professor of marketing at the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University. His primary areas of research include consumer dissatisfaction and trust, measurement issues—including relationships between theoretical concepts and empirical observations— and the effectiveness of boundary role personnel. He has published in theJournal of Marketing, theAcademy of Management Journal, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Behavioral Research in Accounting, andManagement Science, among others.

Deepak Sirdeshmukh, Ph.D., is a visiting assistant professor of marketing at the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University. His primary areas of research include consumer trust and consumer processing of brand information. He has published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, and theJournal of Consumer Psychology, among others.

Hartmut H. Holzmüeller, Ph.D., is a professor of marketing at the School of Business at Dortmund University, Germany. His research interests include cross-national consumer research and customer relationship marketing. Most of his work has been published in German. His articles also appeared in theJournal of International Marketing, Management International Review, andInternational Business Review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nijssen, E., Singh, J., Sirdeshmukh, D. et al. Investigating industry context effects in consumer-firm relationships: Preliminary results from a dispositional approach. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 31, 46–60 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302238604

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302238604

Keywords

Search

Navigation