Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T06:56:35.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Living Standards in Britain 1900-2000: Women's Century?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Sara Horrell*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Abstract

Two composite measures are calculated to map improvements in living standards over the 20th century: the Dasgupta–Weale index and the Human Development Index. A gendered version of the latter is also considered. Indicators of income, leisure, inequality, wealth, health, education and political rights are included. The indices reveal a century of progress. But progress has been neither continuous nor uniformly shared. Downturns are evident in some of the indicators since 1980, demonstrating that the gains are not immutable and need to be protected. Women‘s position has improved if the end of the century is compared to its beginning, but there has been little change in women's position relative to men's over the last few decades on the dimensions considered here.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, A.B. (1970), ‘On the measurement of inequality’, Journal of Economic Theory, 2, pp. 244–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckerman, W. (1980), ‘Comparative growth rates of “measurable economic welfare”, some experimental calculations’, in Matthews, R.C.O. (ed.), Economic Growth and Resources, 2, London, Macmillan, pp. 3659.Google Scholar
Bienefeld, M.A. (1972), Working Hours in British Industry: An Economic History, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Bowden, S. and Offer, A. (1994), ‘Household appliances and the use of time: the United States and Britain since the 1920s’, Economic History Review, XLVII, pp. 725–48.Google Scholar
Cleary, E.J. (1965), The Building Society Movement, London, Elek Books.Google Scholar
Crafts, N.F.R. (1997a), ‘Some dimensions of the “Quality of Life” during the British industrial revolution’, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE, discussion paper no. 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997b), ‘The Human Development Index and changes in standards of living: some historical comparisons’, Department of Economic History, LSE, mimeo.Google Scholar
(1997c), ‘Economic growth in East Asia and western Europe since 1950: implications for living standards’, National Institute Economic Review, October, pp. 7584.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Weale, M. (1992), ‘On measuring the quality of life’, World Development, 20, pp. 119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Cruze, S. (1995), ‘Women and the family’, in Purvis, J. (ed.), Women's History: Britain 1850-1945, London, UCL Press, pp. 5184.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J. (1983), Social Innovation and the Division of Labour, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. (1994), ‘The welfare state’, in Floud, R. and McCloskey, D.N. (eds), The Economic History of Britain since 1700, vol. 3, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 284317.Google Scholar
Lindert, P.H. (1994), ‘Unequal living standards’, in Floud, R. and McCloskey, D.N. (eds), The Economic History of Britain since 1700, vol. I, Cambridge University Press, pp. 357–86.Google Scholar
Maclennan, D. (1982), Housing Economics, London, Longman.Google Scholar
Matthews, R.C.O., Feinstein, C.H. and Odling-Smee, J.C. (1982), British Economic Growth 1856-73, Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mckinnon, M. (1994), ‘Living standards 1879-1914’, in Floud, R. and McCloskey, D.N. (eds), The Economic History of Britain since 1700, vol. 2, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–90.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B.R. (1988), British Historical Statistics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1988), ‘Is there still life in the pessimist case? Consumption during the industrial revolution 1790-1850’, Journal of Economic History, pp. 6992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. and Tobin, J. (1972), Is Growth Obsolete?, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, S. (1989), Britain's Prime and Britain's Decline London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. (1901), Poverty: A Study of Town Life.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. and Lavers, G.R. (1951) Poverty and the Welfare State.Google Scholar
Sanderson, M. (ed.) (1975), The Universities in the Nineteenth Century, London, Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. (1973), On Economic Inequality, Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomou, S. and Weale, M. (1996), ‘Personal sector wealth in the United Kingdom 1920-1956’, NIESR discussion paper no. 99, September.Google Scholar
United Nations (1995), Human Development Report, Oxford, Oxford University Press. (1999), Human Development Report, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vanek, J. (1974), ‘Time spent in housework’, Scientific American, 231, pp. 116–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J.G. (1981), ‘Urban disamenities, dark satanic mills and the standard of living debate’, Journal of Economic History, pp. 7584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985), Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality? Boston, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar