IOVS Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2007;48:2510-2519.)
© 2007 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.06-0562

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mutti, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mutti, D. O.

Refractive Error, Axial Length, and Relative Peripheral Refractive Error before and after the Onset of Myopia

Donald O. Mutti,1 John R. Hayes,1 G. Lynn Mitchell,1 Lisa A. Jones,1 Melvin L. Moeschberger,2 Susan A. Cotter,3 Robert N. Kleinstein,4 Ruth E. Manny,5 J. Daniel Twelker,6 Karla Zadnik6 for the CLEERE Study Group

1From The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio; 2The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biometrics, Columbus, Ohio; the 3Southern California College of Optometry, Fullerton, California; the 4School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; the 5University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas; and the 6University of Arizona Department of Ophthalmology, Tucson, Arizona.

PURPOSE. To evaluate refractive error, axial length, and relative peripheral refractive error before, during the year of, and after the onset of myopia in children who became myopic compared with emmetropes.

METHODS. Subjects were 605 children 6 to 14 years of age who became myopic (at least –0.75 D in each meridian) and 374 emmetropic (between –0.25 D and +1.00 D in each meridian at all visits) children participating between 1995 and 2003 in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study. Axial length was measured annually by A-scan ultrasonography. Relative peripheral refractive error (the difference between the spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction 30° in the nasal visual field and in primary gaze) was measured using either of two autorefractors (R-1; Canon, Lake Success, NY [no longer manufactured] or WR 5100-K; Grand Seiko, Hiroshima, Japan). Refractive error was measured with the same autorefractor with the subjects under cycloplegia. Each variable in children who became myopic was compared to age-, gender-, and ethnicity-matched model estimates of emmetrope values for each annual visit from 5 years before through 5 years after the onset of myopia.

RESULTS. In the sample as a whole, children who became myopic had less hyperopia and longer axial lengths than did emmetropes before and after the onset of myopia (4 years before through 5 years after for refractive error and 3 years before through 5 years after for axial length; P < 0.0001 for each year). Children who became myopic had more hyperopic relative peripheral refractive errors than did emmetropes from 2 years before onset through 5 years after onset of myopia (P < 0.002 for each year). The fastest rate of change in refractive error, axial length, and relative peripheral refractive error occurred during the year before onset rather than in any year after onset. Relative peripheral refractive error remained at a consistent level of hyperopia each year after onset, whereas axial length and myopic refractive error continued to elongate and to progress, respectively, although at slower rates compared with the rate at onset.

CONCLUSIONS. A more negative refractive error, longer axial length, and more hyperopic relative peripheral refractive error in addition to faster rates of change in these variables may be useful for predicting the onset of myopia, but only within a span of 2 to 4 years before onset. Becoming myopic does not appear to be characterized by a consistent rate of increase in refractive error and expansion of the globe. Acceleration in myopia progression, axial elongation, and peripheral hyperopia in the year prior to onset followed by relatively slower, more stable rates of change after onset suggests that more than one factor may influence ocular expansion during myopia onset and progression.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. D. Bailey, L. T. Sinnott, and D. O. Mutti
Ciliary Body Thickness and Refractive Error in Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 4353 - 4360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
L.-F. Hung, R. Ramamirtham, J. Huang, Y. Qiao-Grider, and E. L. Smith III
Peripheral Refraction in Normal Infant Rhesus Monkeys
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3747 - 3757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology