IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006;47:5322-5330.)
© 2006 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.06-0096

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owen, V. M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Crabb, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Owen, V. M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Crabb, D. P.

Measurement Variability in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Imaging of Neuroretinal Rim Area

Victoria M. F. Owen,1 Nicholas G. Strouthidis,2 David F. Garway-Heath,2 and David P. Crabb1

1From the Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London, United Kingdom; and the 2Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To investigate the optimal frequency of imaging during follow-up to detect glaucoma progression by characterizing variability (noise) in neuroretinal rim area (RA) measured by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany).

METHODS. RA noise was estimated from patient data and characterized by fitting theoretical distributions to the observed data. Multilevel regression was used to determine factors that significantly affect noise. Computer simulations of disease progression were performed by adding noise generated from the distribution derived from the observed data to the average rate of loss in RA estimated from longitudinal data. Rates of detection of disease progression were investigated for various progression rates, follow-up periods, and rates of imaging.

RESULTS. Noise was not normally distributed and was best characterized by the hyperbolic distribution, which fit averages well while allowing for extreme values. Noise was greatly influenced by image quality, but age did not have a significant effect. Rates of detection improved for more frequent imaging, better quality images, and faster rates of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS. Noise in HRT measurement of RA is well characterized by the hyperbolic distribution. Sensitivity of detection improves with more frequent testing, but if consistently poor-quality images are yielded for a patient, the probability of detection is low. Results from this work could be used to tailor individual follow-up patterns for patients with different rates of RA loss and image quality, especially in a clinical trial setting.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. Breusegem, S. Fieuws, I. Stalmans, and T. Zeyen
Variability of the Standard Reference Height and Its Influence on the Stereometric Parameters of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 4881 - 4885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Poli, N. G. Strouthidis, T. A. Ho, and D. F. Garway-Heath
Analysis of HRT Images: Comparison of Reference Planes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3970 - 3975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
B C Chauhan, D F Garway-Heath, F J Goni, L Rossetti, B Bengtsson, A C Viswanathan, and A Heijl
Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2008; 92(4): 569 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology