The purpose of the MFN clause in the International Investment Treaty is to promote the interests of the parties, not to derogate from their interests. From the perspective of the investor's home country, the MFN clause to expand the international arbitration practice applicable to the international investment dispute settlement procedure has the advantages and disadvantages of the investor's home country, and the overall situation is more harm than good. Which will seriously affects the investor's home country's own understanding of the obligations under the investment treaty, and thus inevitably affect the investor's home country on their own contract in the international law of the legitimacy of the judgments and expectations.
| Published in | International Journal of Law and Society (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12 |
| Page(s) | 10-15 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
MFN Clause, Investment Dispute Settlement, Investor Home Country
| [1] | Maffezini v. Spain, ICSID Case No. ABR/97/7. Decision on Objection to Jurisdiction of January 25, 2000. para. 58. |
| [2] | Zhu Mingxin: "The most-favored-nation treatment clause applies to the appearance and essence of the investment dispute settlement procedure - based on the perspective of treaty interpretation", "Law and business Studies", No. 3, 2015, p. 171. |
| [3] | Zheng Yubo: "Civil Law Debt Book", China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2004, pp. 358-359. |
| [4] | Shi Hui: "Criticism and Reconstruction of Investment Treaty Arbitration System", China Law Press, 2008, pp. 23-24. |
| [5] | Cai Congyan: "Commercialization of International Investment Arbitration and" Commercialization", "Modern Law Journal", No. 1, 2011, pp. 153-154. |
| [6] | Keohane, R. O. & A. Moravcsik & A. M. Slaughter, Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational, International Organization, 54 (3), 2000. p. 485. |
| [7] | UNCTAD, Latest Development in Investor-State dispute settlement, IIA Monitor, No 1, New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2009. pp. 45-48. |
| [8] | Huang Shixi: "Application of MFN Clauses in International Investment Arbitration and New Development of Jurisdiction", Journal of Legal Science, Vol. 2, 2013, p. 812. |
| [9] | Chen An, Cai Congyan: "New Development of International Investment Law and New Practice of China's Bilateral Investment Treaty", Fudan University Press, 2007, p. 209. |
| [10] | Mondev International Ltd. v. United States of America, Award, http://www.state.gov/s/l/c3758.htm, last visited May. 18, 2017. |
| [11] | Susan D. Franck, The Legitimacy Crisis in investment Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decision, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 73, 2005. p. 1525. |
| [12] | Liang Danni: A Study on the Application of the Most Interested Necessary Terms of the International Investment Treaty - An Analysis Based on Iraqi Lan Company v. China, "Journal of Legal Studies", Vol. 2, 2012, p. 101. |
| [13] | Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, Decision on Jurisdiction. para. 207. |
| [14] | Weng Xiantao: "China Investment Protection Agreement Model (Draft) on the draft (1)", "International Journal of Economic Law," No. 4, 2011, p. 195. |
| [15] | Chen Xin: "Legal Interpretation of WTO Dispute Settlement - Judicial Restraintism and Judicial Activism", Peking University Press, 2010, p. 1. |
| [16] | Denise Manning Cabral, The Imminent Death of the Calvo Clause and the Rebirth of the Calvo Principle: Equality of Foreign and national Investors, Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 26, 1995. p. 1198-1199. |
| [17] | Yannick Radi, the Application of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause to the Dispute Settlement Provisions of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Domesticating the “Trojan Horse”, The European Journal of International Law, 2007, Vol. 18 No. 4. p. 11. |
| [18] | Schneiderman, D, Globalisation, Governance, and Investment Rules, in J. Glarke & G. R. Edwards, Global Governance in the Twenty-first Century, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. p. 68. |
APA Style
Hai Tian. (2017). The Influence of MFN Clause on International Investment Dispute Settlement Procedure to Investor's Home Country. International Journal of Law and Society, 1(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12
ACS Style
Hai Tian. The Influence of MFN Clause on International Investment Dispute Settlement Procedure to Investor's Home Country. Int. J. Law Soc. 2017, 1(1), 10-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12
AMA Style
Hai Tian. The Influence of MFN Clause on International Investment Dispute Settlement Procedure to Investor's Home Country. Int J Law Soc. 2017;1(1):10-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12,
author = {Hai Tian},
title = {The Influence of MFN Clause on International Investment Dispute Settlement Procedure to Investor's Home Country},
journal = {International Journal of Law and Society},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {10-15},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijls.20180101.12},
abstract = {The purpose of the MFN clause in the International Investment Treaty is to promote the interests of the parties, not to derogate from their interests. From the perspective of the investor's home country, the MFN clause to expand the international arbitration practice applicable to the international investment dispute settlement procedure has the advantages and disadvantages of the investor's home country, and the overall situation is more harm than good. Which will seriously affects the investor's home country's own understanding of the obligations under the investment treaty, and thus inevitably affect the investor's home country on their own contract in the international law of the legitimacy of the judgments and expectations.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Influence of MFN Clause on International Investment Dispute Settlement Procedure to Investor's Home Country AU - Hai Tian Y1 - 2017/12/24 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12 T2 - International Journal of Law and Society JF - International Journal of Law and Society JO - International Journal of Law and Society SP - 10 EP - 15 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1908 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20180101.12 AB - The purpose of the MFN clause in the International Investment Treaty is to promote the interests of the parties, not to derogate from their interests. From the perspective of the investor's home country, the MFN clause to expand the international arbitration practice applicable to the international investment dispute settlement procedure has the advantages and disadvantages of the investor's home country, and the overall situation is more harm than good. Which will seriously affects the investor's home country's own understanding of the obligations under the investment treaty, and thus inevitably affect the investor's home country on their own contract in the international law of the legitimacy of the judgments and expectations. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: