Activate Activate Activate
contact  
Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  

In
By author
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Monthly
160 pp. per issue
8 1/2 x 11, illustrated
Founded: 1989
ISSN 0898-929X
E-ISSN 1530-8898
2007 ISI Impact Factor: 4.997

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

June 2006, Vol. 18, No. 6, Pages 1029-1043
Posted Online July 13, 2006.
(doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.1029)
Performance Feedback Drives Caudate Activation in a Phonological Learning Task

Elizabeth Tricomi 1, 2, ­ Mauricio R. Delgado 3, ­ Bruce D. McCandliss 4, ­ James L. McClelland 2, 5, and ­ Julie A. Fiez, 1, 2­

1University of Pittsburgh

2Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh

3Rutgers-Newark

4Weill Medical College of Cornell University

5Carnegie Mellon University

PDF (633.509 KB) PDF Plus (264.292 KB)

Abstract

Adults have difficulty discriminating nonnative phonetic contrasts, but under certain circumstances training can lead to improvement in this ability. Despite the ubiquitous use of performance feedback in training paradigms in this and many other domains, the mechanisms by which feedback affects learning are not well understood. In this event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we examined how performance feedback is processed during perceptual learning. Thirteen Japanese speakers for whom the English phonemes [r] and [l] were nondistinct performed an identification task of the words “road” and “load” that has been shown to be effective in inducing learning only when performance feedback is present. Each subject performed alternating runs of training with and without feedback, followed by performance of a card-guessing task with monetary reward and punishment outcomes. We found that the caudate nucleus was more robustly activated bilaterally when performing the perceptual identification task with feedback than without feedback, and the right caudate nucleus also showed a differential response to positive and negative feedback. Moreover, using a within-subjects design, we found that the caudate nucleus also showed a similar activation pattern to monetary reward and punishment outcomes in the card-guessing task. These results demonstrate that the caudate responds to positive and negative feedback during learning in a manner analogous to its processing of extrinsic affective reinforcers and indicate that this region may be a critical moderator of the influence of feedback on learning. These findings impact our broader understanding of the mechanisms underlying nondeclarative learning and language acquisition.

Cited by

John T. Cacioppo, Catherine J. Norris, Jean Decety, George Monteleone, Howard Nusbaum. In the Eye of the Beholder: Individual Differences in Perceived Social Isolation Predict Regional Brain Activation to Social Stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 0:0, 1-10
Abstract | PDF (371 KB) | PDF Plus (389 KB) 
Corinna M. Cincotta, Carol A. Seger. (2007) Dissociation between Striatal Regions while Learning to Categorize via Feedback and via Observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19:2, 249-265
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2007.
Abstract | PDF (440 KB) | PDF Plus (456 KB) 
Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.
  CrossRef member COUNTER member