This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 51/5/1300    most recent HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.106773v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Puato, M. Articles by Pauletto, P. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Puato, M. Articles by Pauletto, P. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information High Blood Pressure Related Collections Risk Factors Peripheral vascular disease Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc. Related Article

(Hypertension. 2008;51:1300.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Articles

Increase in Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Grade I Hypertensive Subjects

White-Coat Versus Sustained Hypertension

Massimo Puato; Paolo Palatini; Marco Zanardo; Francesca Dorigatti; Carmen Tirrito; Marcello Rattazzi; Paolo Pauletto

From the Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale (M.P., P. Palatini, M.Z., F.D., C.T., M.R., P. Pauletto), Università di Padova, Padova, Italy; and the Medicina Interna I (M.R., P. Pauletto), Treviso, Italy.

Correspondence to Paolo Pauletto, Medicina Interna I, Ospedale Cà Foncello, Piazza Ospedale, 1, 31100 Teviso, Italy. E-mail ppauletto{at}ulss.tv.it

We studied 74 never-treated grade I hypertensive subjects aged 18 to 45 years and 20 normotensive control subjects to define the rate of increase in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and the potential role played by the various risk factors. IMT was assessed as mean IMT and as maximum IMT in the right and left common carotid artery, carotid bulb, and internal carotid artery at baseline and at the 5-year follow-up. In grade I hypertensive subjects, both mean IMT and mean of maximum IMT were significantly higher compared with baseline values. Compared with normotensive subjects, both mean IMT and maximum IMT increased significantly (at least P<0.01) in each carotid artery segment. The increase in cumulative IMT was 3.4-fold for mean IMT and 3.2-fold for mean of maximum IMT. Levels of mean arterial pressure at 24-hour monitoring and total serum cholesterol were factors potentially linked to the increment in mean IMT and mean of maximum IMT. Age was also relevant for the increment in mean of maximum IMT, whereas body mass index played some role in the increment of mean IMT. During the follow-up, mean IMT and mean of maximum IMT increased to a greater degree in white-coat hypertensive subjects (n=35) and sustained hypertensive subjects (n=39) than in normotensive control subjects. No differences were found between white-coat hypertensive subjects and sustained hypertensive subjects for both mean IMT and maximum IMT. Levels of mean arterial pressure at 24-hour monitoring affected the increment in IMT in both white-coat hypertensive subjects and sustained hypertensive subjects. In conclusion, our findings indicate that carotid IMT is greater and grows faster in white-coat hypertensive subjects than in normotensive subjects without significant differences with sustained hypertensive patients.

Key Words: hypertension • carotid artery disease • ultrasound • carotid atherosclerosis

Related Article:

White-Coat Hypertension Is Hypertension

J. David Spence
Hypertension 2008 51: 1272. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Spence White-Coat Hypertension Is Hypertension Hypertension, May 1, 2008; 51(5): 1272 - 1272. [Full Text] [PDF]