| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2006;48:711.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Departments of Physiology and ObstetricsGynecology and Center for Excellence in CardiovascularRenal Research, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss.
Correspondence to Joey P. Granger, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, 2500 North State St, Jackson, MS 39216-4505. E-mail jgranger{at}physiology.umsmed.edu
The purpose of this study was to determine the role of interleukin (IL) 6 in mediating the increase in arterial pressure (AP) in response to chronic reductions in uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP) in pregnant rats. AP was higher in RUPP rats (138±1 mm Hg) than in normal pregnant (NP) rats (104±1 mm Hg). Serum IL-6 levels in the RUPP rats were 104.5±28.6 pg/mL as compared with 36.6±7.4 pg/mL in NP rats. To determine the long-term effects of a 2- to 3-fold elevation in plasma IL-6 on renal function and AP in pregnant rats, we infused IL-6 for 5 days (2.5 ng/day) in NP rats starting at day 14 of gestation. Five days later, serum IL-6 levels were 55.5±6.5 pg/mL in the control NP rats and 157.0±36.1 pg/mL in the IL-6treated NP rats. AP was higher in the IL-6treated NP rats (115±3 mm Hg) as compared with NP controls (101±1 mm Hg) at day 19 of gestation. Renal plasma flow and GFR were lower in the IL-6treated NP rats than in the NP group. IL-6 increased plasma renin activity but did not affect endothelin in IL-6treated NP rats. In contrast to the NP rats, IL-6 had no effect on AP or renal hemodynamics in virgin rats. In summary, these data indicate that plasma IL-6 is elevated in response to chronic reductions in uterine perfusion in pregnant rats and that a comparable elevation in plasma IL-6 increases AP and reduces renal function in pregnant rats.
Key Words: kidney cytokines hypertension endothelin
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. D. LaMarca, J. Gilbert, and J. P. Granger Recent Progress Toward the Understanding of the Pathophysiology of Hypertension During Preeclampsia Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 982 - 988. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Gilbert, M. J. Ryan, B. B. LaMarca, M. Sedeek, S. R. Murphy, and J. P. Granger Pathophysiology of hypertension during preeclampsia: linking placental ischemia with endothelial dysfunction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H541 - H550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xia, C. C. Zhou, S. M. Ramin, and R. E. Kellems Angiotensin Receptors, Autoimmunity, and Preeclampsia J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 3391 - 3395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. I. Boesen and D. M. Pollock Effect of chronic IL-6 infusion on acute pressor responses to vasoconstrictors in mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1745 - H1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xia, S. M. Ramin, and R. E. Kellems Potential Roles of Angiotensin Receptor-Activating Autoantibody in the Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia Hypertension, August 1, 2007; 50(2): 269 - 275. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Granger Response to Modeling Preeclampsia: The True Model for the Uniquely Human Disease Preeclampsia Is the Human Female Not the Pregnant Rat Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): e22 - e22. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Nama, T. F. Antonios, and I. T. Manyonda Modeling Preeclampsia: The True Model for the Uniquely Human Disease Preeclampsia Is the Human Female Not the Pregnant Rat Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): e21 - e21. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |