Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 69, No. 2, 2007   

Free Abstract     Article (References)     Article (PDF 200 KB)     

Original Paper

Quality of Life following Total Laryngectomy: Assessment Using the UW-QOL Scale
R. Kazia, b, J. De Cordovaa, J. Kanagalingama, R. Venkitaramana, C.M. Nuttinga, P. Clarkea, P. Rhys-Evansa, K.J. Harringtona, b

aHead and Neck Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, and
bThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK

Address of Corresponding Author

ORL 2007;69:100-106 (DOI: 10.1159/000097792)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • Quality of life
  • Total laryngectomy
  • University of Washington Quality of Life Scale

 goto top of page Abstract

Objectives: To determine the quality of life (QOL) in patients using valved speech following total laryngectomy with a validated patient self-report scale. Study Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Patients: 63 patients following total laryngectomy using valved speech. Intervention: University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire. Main Outcome Measures: Patient perception of the QOL over the last 7 days following total laryngectomy in response to specific questions and correlated with sociodemographic and treatment factors. Results: Responses were received from 44 males and 11 females (response rate: 87.3%) with a median age of 66 years (range: 40-84). The mean (SD) composite score of the QOL in our series of patients with total laryngectomy was 81.3 (10.9). As regards the overall QOL, 80% of our patients cited it as very good (45.5%) to good (34.5%). Patients identified speech, appearance, and activity as the most important issues following total laryngectomy. Only age and pharyngo-oesophageal segment closure were significant predictors of QOL scores (Student t test, p < 0.05) and not other demographic and treatment variables. Conclusions: The composite score and overall QOL were high in our series of total laryngectomy patients and this possibly reflects adequate multidisciplinary management. We strongly urge the use of prospective longitudinal studies that will adequately identify any QOL changes over time. Although the UW-QOL questionnaire is a simple and brief scale, it has limitations that can curtail its effective use in laryngectomy patients and we advise supplementing it with the use of domain-specific questionnaires.

Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Dr. Rehan Kazi
Head and Neck Unit
Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road
London SW3 6JJ (UK)
Tel. +44 20 7808 2732, Fax +44 20 7808 2235, E-Mail rehan.kazi@rmh.nhs.uk


 goto top of page Article Information

Received: May 5, 2006
Accepted after revision: June 30, 2006
Published online: December 5, 2006
Number of Print Pages : 7
Number of Figures : 4, Number of Tables : 2, Number of References : 20

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 17148941)
Download Citation




For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their research paper editing service.



copyright  © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel