
Vol. 139, No. 3, 2006
Free Abstract
Article (Fulltext)
Article (PDF 314 KB)
Original Paper
Study of IgE Antigenic Relationships in Hypersensitivity to Hydrolyzed Wheat Proteins and Wheat-Dependent Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis
Jacques Snégaroffa, Isabelle Bouchez-Mahiouta, Catherine Pecquetb, Gérard Branlardc, Michel Laurièrea
aUMR INRA/INA-PG de Chimie-Biologique, Centre de Recherche de Grignon, Thiverval-Grignon; bCentre d'Allergologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, and cUMR INRA-Université Clermont II, Amélioration et Santé des Plantes, Clermont-Ferrand, France
Address of Corresponding Author
Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2006;139:201-208 (DOI: 10.1159/000091165)
Key Words
- Barley hordeins
- IgE binding
-5 gliadin- Rye secalins
- Wheat allergy
Abstract
Background: Wheat is involved in different forms of respiratory, food and contact allergy. The IgE of patients generally reacts with various flour proteins. It is not known if antigenic relationships could explain some of these reactions and if proteins could be involved in different pathologies. Methods: Two sera were selected as representative of patients with either wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA) or hypersensitivity to hydrolyzed wheat proteins (HHWP). Their IgE specificity was studied with wheat, barley and rye proteins, using immunoblot, and immunoblot inhibition with recombinant -3 hordein. This protein was chosen for its cross-reactivity with -5 gliadin, a major allergen in WDEIA. Results: The IgE from both sera strongly reacted with natural and recombinant -3 hordein but displayed different patterns of reactivity with wheat, barley and rye proteins. Those from the WDEIA patient showed expected reactions with -5 gliadin, -35 and -75 secalins, but also with wheat low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GS), and not with C hordeins. On the contrary, IgE from a HHWP patient reacted with C hordeins, various gliadins, and -75 secalin, but very weakly with -35 secalin and LMW-GS. Recombinant -3 hordein inhibited strongly but not totally the WDEIA patient's IgE binding to prolamins. No such inhibition could be observed for the HHWP patient's IgE. Conclusions: At least part of the reactions of prolamins with the IgE from the WDEIA patient was due to antigenic homologies. The occurrence of cross-reacting carbohydrates was unlikely. These common IgE epitopes were not involved in the pathology of the HHWP patient. Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
Author Contacts
Correspondence to: Dr. Jacques Snégaroff UMR INRA/INA-PG de Chimie-Biologique Centre de Recherche de Grignon, Avenue Bretignières FR-78850 Thiverval-Grignon (France) Tel. +33 1 30 81 54 71, Fax +33 1 30 81 53 73, E-Mail snegarof@grignon.inra.fr
Article Information
Received: May 3, 2005
Accepted after revision: October 17, 2005
Published online: January 26, 2006
Number of Print Pages : 8
Number of Figures : 5, Number of Tables : 1, Number of References : 25 |
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their research paper editing service. |
|
|