Phonetica was published by Karger Publishers up to and including 2020. If you or your institution subscribed to Phonetica during that period, you might still have access to the full text of this article on the Karger platform if you cannot access it here.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the contribution of higher frequencies to fricative consonant classification in Australian English. The spectral range above 10 kHz is analysed in an attempt to provide better classifications of the dental and the labiodental fricatives. A comparison is made between real-word data and data from a controlled-word context. Although results for the controlled-word context suggest that spectral information above 10 kHz may be of use in classifying [f] correctly, these results are not repeated for the real-word data. Moreover, classification of [f] and [q] using only the information above 10 kHz yields quite poor results. It is also shown that the results for the voiced dental and labiodental fricatives are not as promising as those for their voiceless counterparts.
verified
References
1 Behrens, S.; Blumstein, S.: Acoustic characteristics of English voiceless fricatives: a descriptive analysis. J. Phonet. 16: 295–298 (1988).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30504-2Search in Google Scholar
2 Broad, D.J.: Acoustic discrimination between [f] and [q] in a single speaker. Proc. ICASSP-76; pp. 162–165 (IEEE, Philadelphia, 1976).Search in Google Scholar
3 Cassidy, S.; Harrington, J.: EMU: an enhanced hierarchical speech data management system. Proc. 6th Aust. Int. Conf. Speech Sci. Technol., pp. 361–366 (ASSTA, Adelaide, 1996).Search in Google Scholar
4 Clermont, F.: Spectro-temporal description of diphthongs in F1-F2-F3 space. Speech Commun. 13: 377–390 (1993).10.1016/0167-6393(93)90036-KSearch in Google Scholar
5 Cox, F.: An acoustic study of vowel variation in Australian English; PhD thesis Macquarie University (1997).Search in Google Scholar
6 Fant, G.: Acoustic theory of speech production (Mouton, The Hague 1960).Search in Google Scholar
7 Flanagan, J.: Speech synthesis, analysis and perception (Springer, New York 1972).10.1007/978-3-662-01562-9Search in Google Scholar
8 Forrest, K.; Weismer, G.; Milenkovic, P.; Dougall, R.: Statistical analysis of word-initial obstruents: preliminary data. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 84: 115–123 (1988).10.1121/1.396977Search in Google Scholar
9 Gurlekian, J.A.: Recognition of the Spanish fricatives [s] and [f]. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 70: 1624–1627 (1981).10.1121/1.387228Search in Google Scholar
10 Harrington, J.; Cassidy, S.: Dynamic and target theories of vowel classification: evidence from monophthongs and diphthongs in Australian English. Lang. Speech 37: 357–373(1994).10.1177/002383099403700402Search in Google Scholar
11 Harrington, J.; Cassidy, S.: Techniques in speech acoustics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, in press).Search in Google Scholar
12 Harrington, J.; Cox, F.; Evans, Z.: An acoustic study of broad, general and cultivated Australian English vowels. Aust. J. Linguist. 17: 155–184 (1997).10.1080/07268609708599550Search in Google Scholar
13 Harris, K.S.: Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Lang. Speech 1: 1–7 (1958).10.1177/002383095800100101Search in Google Scholar
14 Heinz, J.M.; Stevens K.N.: On the properties of voiceless fricative consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 33: 589–598 (1961).10.1121/1.1908734Search in Google Scholar
15 Hughes, G.W.; Halle, M.: Spectral properties of fricative consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 28: 303–310 (1956).10.1121/1.1908271Search in Google Scholar
16 Jongman, A.; Sereno, J.A.: Acoustic properties of non-sibilant fricatives. Proc. ICPhS-95 4: 432–435 (1995).Search in Google Scholar
17 Ladefoged, P.; Maddieson, I.: The sounds of the world’s languages (Blackwell, Oxford, 1996).Search in Google Scholar
18 Maddieson, I.: Patterns of sounds (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984).10.1017/CBO9780511753459Search in Google Scholar
19 Miller, G.A.; Nicely, P.A.: An analysis of perceptual confusion among some English consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 27: 338–346 (1955).10.1121/1.1907526Search in Google Scholar
20 O’Shaughnessy, D.: Speech communication: human and machine (Addison-Wesley, Reading 1987).Search in Google Scholar
21 Palethorpe, S.; Wales, R.; Senserrick, T.: Vowel classification in children. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 100: 3843–3852 (1996).10.1121/1.417240Search in Google Scholar
22 Shadle, C.H.: The acoustics of fricative consonants; PhD thesis MIT (1985).Search in Google Scholar
23 Shadle, C.H.: Modelling the noise source in voiced fricatives. Proc. 15th Int. Congr. Acoustics, vol. 3, Trondheim, pp. 145–148 (1995).Search in Google Scholar
24 Shadle, C.H.; Mair, S.J.; Carter, J.N.: Acoustic characteristics of the front fricatives [f, v, q, #]. Proc. 1st ESCA Tut. Res. Workshop on Speech Production Modeling, ESCA, Autrans, pp. 193–196 (1996).Search in Google Scholar
25 Stevens, K.; Blumstein, S.; Glicksman, L.; Burton, M.; Kurowski, K.: Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 91: 2979–3000 (1992).10.1121/1.402933Search in Google Scholar
26 Strevens, P.: Spectra of fricative noise in human speech. Lang. Speech 3: 32–49 (1960).10.1177/002383096000300105Search in Google Scholar
27 Tabain, M.; Watson, C.: Classification of fricatives. Proc. 6th Aust. Int. Conf. Speech Sci. Technol., ASSTA, Adelaide, pp. 623–628 (1996).Search in Google Scholar
28 Watson, C.I.: Investigation and implementation of computer-based aids for the speech impaired; PhD thesis University of Canterbury, New Zealand (1994).Search in Google Scholar
29 Wilde, L.: Inferring articulatory movements from formant patterns at fricative-vowel boundaries. MIT Working Pap. Phonet. 9: 18–27 (1993).Search in Google Scholar
30 Zwicker, E.: Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 33: 248 (1961).10.1121/1.1908630Search in Google Scholar
© 1998 S. Karger AG, Basel
