
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Clinical |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, Australia; 2 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne; 3 Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; 4 Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; and 5 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd., North Ryde, New South Wales
Requests for reprints: Susan Branford, Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia. Phone: 61-8-8222-3899; Fax: 61-8-8222-3146; E-mail: susan.branford{at}imvs.sa.gov.au.
Purpose: In the first years of imatinib treatment, BCR-ABL remained detectable in all but a small minority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. We determined whether BCR-ABL continues to decline with longer imatinib exposure and the incidence and consequence of undetectable BCR-ABL.
Experimental Design: BCR-ABL levels were measured in a subset of 53 imatinib-treated IRIS trial patients for up to 7 years (29 first-line, 24 second-line). Levels were deemed undetectable using strict PCR sensitivity criteria.
Results: By 18 months, the majority achieved a 3-log reduction [major molecular response (MMR)]. BCR-ABL continued to decline but at a slower rate (median time to 4-log reduction and undetectable BCR-ABL of 45 and 66 months for first-line). The probability of undetectable BCR-ABL increased considerably from 36 to 81 months of first-line imatinib {7% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0-17%] versus 52% (95% CI, 32-72%)}. Undetectable BCR-ABL was achieved in 18 of 53 patients and none of these 18 lost MMR after a median follow-up of 33 months. Conversely, MMR was lost in 6 of 22 (27%) patients with sustained detectable BCR-ABL and was associated with BCR-ABL mutations in 3 of 6. Loss of MMR was recently defined as suboptimal imatinib response. There was no difference in the probability of achieving molecular responses between first- and second-line patients but first-line had a significantly higher probability of maintaining MMR [P = 0.03; 96% (95% CI, 88-100%) versus 71% (95% CI, 48-93%)].
Conclusions: With prolonged therapy, BCR-ABL continued to decline in most patients and undetectable BCR-ABL was no longer a rare event. Loss of MMR was only observed in patients with sustained detectable BCR-ABL.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Ross, D. B. Watkins, T. P. Hughes, and S. Branford Reverse Transcription with Random Pentadecamer Primers Improves the Detection Limit of a Quantitative PCR Assay for BCR-ABL Transcripts in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Implications for Defining Sensitivity in Minimal Residual Disease Clin. Chem., September 1, 2008; 54(9): 1568 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Cortes Imatinib Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Do We Go Now? J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2008; 26(20): 3308 - 3309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Hiwase, V. Saunders, D. Hewett, A. Frede, S. Zrim, P. Dang, L. Eadie, L. B. To, J. Melo, S. Kumar, et al. Dasatinib Cellular Uptake and Efflux in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Cells: Therapeutic Implications Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3881 - 3888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Saglio, F. Pane, and G. Martinelli State-of-the-art Monitoring for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 313 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |