
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Preclinical |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois and 2 Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Requests for reprints: David J. Frost, In Vivo Tumor Biology, Abbott Laboratories, R4N2 AP3, Abbott Park, IL 60064-6074. E-mail: david.frost{at}abbott.com.
Purpose: To evaluate the preclinical pharmacokinetics and antitumor efficacy of a novel orally bioavailable poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, ABT-888.
Experimental Design: In vitro potency was determined in a PARP-1 and PARP-2 enzyme assay. In vivo efficacy was evaluated in syngeneic and xenograft models in combination with temozolomide, platinums, cyclophosphamide, and ionizing radiation.
Results: ABT-888 is a potent inhibitor of both PARP-1 and PARP-2 with Kis of 5.2 and 2.9 nmol/L, respectively. The compound has good oral bioavailability and crosses the blood-brain barrier. ABT-888 strongly potentiated temozolomide in the B16F10 s.c. murine melanoma model. PARP inhibition dramatically increased the efficacy of temozolomide at ABT-888 doses as low as 3.1 mg/kg/d and a maximal efficacy achieved at 25 mg/kg/d. In the 9L orthotopic rat glioma model, temozolomide alone exhibited minimal efficacy, whereas ABT-888, when combined with temozolomide, significantly slowed tumor progression. In the MX-1 breast xenograft model (BRCA1 deletion and BRCA2 mutation), ABT-888 potentiated cisplatin, carboplatin, and cyclophosphamide, causing regression of established tumors, whereas with comparable doses of cytotoxic agents alone, only modest tumor inhibition was exhibited. Finally, ABT-888 potentiated radiation (2 Gy/d x 10) in an HCT-116 colon carcinoma model. In each model, ABT-888 did not display single-agent activity.
Conclusions: ABT-888 is a potent inhibitor of PARP, has good oral bioavailability, can cross the blood-brain barrier, and potentiates temozolomide, platinums, cyclophosphamide, and radiation in syngeneic and xenograft tumor models. This broad spectrum of chemopotentiation and radiopotentiation makes this compound an attractive candidate for clinical evaluation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Philip, S. Swaminathan, S. G. Kuznetsov, S. Kanugula, K. Biswas, S. Chang, N. A. Loktionova, D. C. Haines, P. Kaldis, A. E. Pegg, et al. Degradation of BRCA2 in Alkyltransferase-Mediated DNA Repair and Its Clinical Implications Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 68(23): 9973 - 9981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rottenberg, J. E. Jaspers, A. Kersbergen, E. van der Burg, A. O. H. Nygren, S. A. L. Zander, P. W. B. Derksen, M. de Bruin, J. Zevenhoven, A. Lau, et al. High sensitivity of BRCA1-deficient mammary tumors to the PARP inhibitor AZD2281 alone and in combination with platinum drugs PNAS, November 4, 2008; 105(44): 17079 - 17084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Kinders, M. Hollingshead, S. Khin, L. Rubinstein, J. E. Tomaszewski, J. H. Doroshow, R. E. Parchment, and the National Cancer Institute Phase 0 Clinical Tri Preclinical Modeling of a Phase 0 Clinical Trial: Qualification of a Pharmacodynamic Assay of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in Tumor Biopsies of Mouse Xenografts Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 6877 - 6885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Liu, Y. Shi, R. Guan, C. Donawho, Y. Luo, J. Palma, G.-d. Zhu, E. F. Johnson, L. E. Rodriguez, N. Ghoreishi-Haack, et al. Potentiation of Temozolomide Cytotoxicity by Poly(ADP)Ribose Polymerase Inhibitor ABT-888 Requires a Conversion of Single-Stranded DNA Damages to Double-Stranded DNA Breaks Mol. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 6(10): 1621 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. P. Vaughan and J. E. Karp The Long Road to a Cure for Acute Myelocytic Leukemia: From Intensity to Specificity J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2008; 26(21): 3475 - 3477. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Calvert and R. Plummer The Development of Phase I Cancer Trial Methodologies: the Use of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic End Points Sets the Scene for Phase 0 Cancer Clinical Trials Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3664 - 3669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Evers, R. Drost, E. Schut, M. de Bruin, E. van der Burg, P. W.B. Derksen, H. Holstege, X. Liu, E. van Drunen, H. B. Beverloo, et al. Selective Inhibition of BRCA2-Deficient Mammary Tumor Cell Growth by AZD2281 and Cisplatin Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3916 - 3925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kinders, R. E. Parchment, J. Ji, S. Kummar, A. J. Murgo, M. Gutierrez, J. Collins, L. Rubinstein, O. Pickeral, S. M. Steinberg, et al. Phase 0 Clinical Trials in Cancer Drug Development: From FDA Guidance to Clinical Practice Mol. Interv., December 1, 2007; 7(6): 325 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |