This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shanks, R. H. Articles by Adams, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shanks, R. H. Articles by Adams, D. J.

Preclinical Evaluation of Gemcitabine Combination Regimens for Application in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ North Carolina Central University and ² Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Requests for reprints: David J. Adams, Department of Medicine DUMC 2638, Research Drive, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: 919-684-4383; Fax: 919-668-3925. E-mail: adams041{at}mc.duke.edu.

The DNA antimetabolite gemcitabine is an anticancer agent with shown preclinical and clinical utility and a low toxicity profile. In this study, we sought to identify and optimize drug partners for binary and tertiary combinations with gemcitabine for use in the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Drug interaction was assessed by growth inhibition assay with metabolic end points. The combination index method was used to evaluate combinations of gemcitabine with fludarabine, paclitaxel, chlorambucil, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and SN-38 in U937 human AML cells. A three-dimensional method was used to determine the effect of dose ratio and schedule on drug interaction. Mechanisms underlying interactions related to cell cycle effects and apoptosis were assessed by flow cytometric and caspase-3 and -7 assays, respectively. The most synergistic binary combination was gemcitabine + fludarabine. The most synergistic tertiary combination was gemcitabine + fludarabine + paclitaxel, where the interaction was sequence dependent with paclitaxel given before gemcitabine + fludarabine, producing a 2-fold increase in synergy. Cell cycle analysis did not reveal a significant G₂-M arrest, suggesting that the synergistic effect of paclitaxel in this combination, which produced the greatest caspase activation, might be independent of microtubule stabilization. In contrast, the gemcitabine + fludarabine + mitoxantrone combination was synergistic and schedule independent. Moreover, few ratios of gemcitabine + fludarabine to mitoxantrone were antagonistic, which could be important for clinical translation. In conclusion, synergistic interactions with gemcitabine occurred with several drugs, the most promising being gemcitabine + fludarabine, gemcitabine + fludarabine + paclitaxel, and gemcitabine + fludarabine + mitoxantrone. These findings provided a rationale for clinical trials of gemcitabine + fludarabine and gemcitabine + mitoxantrone where responses were observed in heavily pretreated AML patients.

Key Words: Combination chemotherapy • growth inhibition • caspase activation • cell cycle

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Galvez-Peralta, N. T. Dai, D. A. Loegering, K. S. Flatten, S. L. Safgren, J. M. Wagner, M. M. Ames, L. M. Karnitz, and S. H. Kaufmann Overcoming S-Phase Checkpoint-Mediated Resistance: Sequence-Dependent Synergy of Gemcitabine and 7-Ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) in Human Carcinoma Cell Lines Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 724 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. F. Cheok, A. Dey, and D. P. Lane Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors Sensitize Tumor Cells to Nutlin-Induced Apoptosis: a Potent Drug Combination Mol. Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 5(11): 1133 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.-C. Chou Theoretical Basis, Experimental Design, and Computerized Simulation of Synergism and Antagonism in Drug Combination Studies Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 621 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]