| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Minireview |
1 Cancer Control Research Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency; 2 Department of Health Care and Epidemiology and 3 Division of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; and 4 School of Computing Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
Requests for reprints: Richard P. Gallagher, Cancer Control Research Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4E6. Phone: 604-877-6000; Fax: 604-877-1868. E-mail: richardg{at}bccancer.bc.ca
Background: A number of studies have been conducted evaluating the risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma after exposure to sunlamps and/or sunbeds. The proportion of subjects in the individual studies who have reported exposure has, in general, been modest, and the resulting risk estimates for melanoma have been unstable with wide 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The inconclusive results seen in individual studies have resulted in confusion as to the carcinogenicity of these devices.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of these studies. A review of the literature from Jan 1, 1984 to April 2004 using MEDLINE identified 12 case-control studies and 1 cohort study which quantitatively evaluated the use of sunlamps and/or sunbeds and subsequent melanoma. After applying exclusion/inclusion criteria, 9 case-control and 1 cohort study provided data for the analysis. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs for sunlamp/sunbed use and subsequent melanoma were calculated using a random-effect model.
Results: Ten studies provided data for assessment of melanoma risk among subjects who reported "ever" being exposed compared with those "never" exposed. A positive association was found between exposure and risk (summary OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49). Significant heterogeneity between studies was present. Evaluation of the metrics "first exposure as a young adult" (5 studies) and "longest duration or highest frequency of exposure" (6 studies) also yielded significantly elevated risk estimates (summary OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.32-2.18, and 1.61; 95% CI, 1.21-2.12, respectively, with no heterogeneity in either analysis).
Conclusions: Results indicate a significantly increased risk of cutaneous melanoma subsequent to sunbed/sunlamp exposure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Turrisi, N. R. Mastroleo, J. Stapleton, and K. Mallett A Comparison of 2 Brief Intervention Approaches to Reduce Indoor Tanning Behavior in Young Women Who Indoor Tan Very Frequently Arch Dermatol, November 1, 2008; 144(11): 1521 - 1524. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stapleton, R. Turrisi, and J. Hillhouse Peer Crowd Identification and Indoor Artificial UV Tanning Behavioral Tendencies J Health Psychol, October 1, 2008; 13(7): 940 - 945. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Tucker Is Sunlight Important to Melanoma Causation? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 467 - 468. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hillhouse, R. Turrisi, and A. L. Shields Patterns of Indoor Tanning Use: Implications for Clinical Interventions Arch Dermatol, December 1, 2007; 143(12): 1530 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Han, G. A Colditz, and D. J Hunter Risk factors for skin cancers: a nested case-control study within the Nurses' Health Study Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2006; 35(6): 1514 - 1521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Freeman, S. Francis, K. Lundahl, T. Bowland, and R. P. Dellavalle UV tanning advertisements in high school newspapers. Arch Dermatol, April 1, 2006; 142(4): 460 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Johnson, L. F. Heilig, E. J. Hester, S. O. Francis, S. J. Deakyne, and R. P. Dellavalle Indoor tanning attitudes and practices of US dermatologists compared with other medical specialists. Arch Dermatol, April 1, 2006; 142(4): 465 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. H. Buckel, A. M. Goldstein, M. C. Fraser, B. Rogers, and M. A. Tucker Recent tanning bed use: a risk factor for melanoma. Arch Dermatol, April 1, 2006; 142(4): 485 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Weinstock Progress and prospects on melanoma: the way forward for early detection and reduced mortality. Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 2297s - 2300s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |