This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Loo, L. W. M. Articles by Porter, P. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Loo, L. W. M. Articles by Porter, P. L.

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Genomic Alterations in Breast Cancer Subtypes

¹ Division of Human Biology, ² Division of Public Health Sciences, and ³ Genomics Shared Resource, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington

In this study, we performed high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization with an array of 4153 bacterial artificial chromosome clones to assess copy number changes in 44 archival breast cancers. The tumors were flow sorted to exclude non-tumor DNA and increase our ability to detect gene copy number changes. In these tumors, losses were more frequent than gains, and gains in 1q and loss in 16q were the most frequent alterations. We compared gene copy number changes in the tumors based on histologic subtype and estrogen receptor (ER) status, i.e., ER-negative infiltrating ductal carcinoma, ER-positive infiltrating ductal carcinoma, and ER-positive infiltrating lobular carcinoma. We observed a consistent association between loss in regions of 5q and ER-negative infiltrating ductal carcinoma, as well as more frequent loss in 4p16, 8p23, 8p21, 10q25, and 17p11.2 in ER-negative infiltrating ductal carcinoma compared with ER-positive infiltrating ductal carcinoma (adjusted P values 0.05). We also observed high-level amplifications in ER-negative infiltrating ductal carcinoma in regions of 8q24 and 17q12 encompassing the c-myc and c-erbB-2 genes and apparent homozygous deletions in 3p21, 5q33, 8p23, 8p21, 9q34, 16q24, and 19q13. ER-positive infiltrating ductal carcinoma showed a higher frequency of gain in 16p13 and loss in 16q21 than ER-negative infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Correlation analysis highlighted regions of change commonly seen together in ER-negative infiltrating ductal carcinoma. ER-positive infiltrating lobular carcinoma differed from ER-positive infiltrating ductal carcinoma in the frequency of gain in 1q and loss in 11q and showed high-level amplifications in 1q32, 8p23, 11q13, and 11q14. These results indicate that array comparative genomic hybridization can identify significant differences in the genomic alterations between subtypes of breast cancer.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Melchor and J. Benitez An integrative hypothesis about the origin and development of sporadic and familial breast cancer subtypes Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2008; 29(8): 1475 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. N. Holcomb, D. I. Grove, M. Kinnunen, C. L. Friedman, I. S. Gallaher, T. M. Morgan, C. L. Sather, J. J. Delrow, P. S. Nelson, P. H. Lange, et al. Genomic Alterations Indicate Tumor Origin and Varied Metastatic Potential of Disseminated Cells from Prostate Cancer Patients Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5599 - 5608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. V. Iakovlev, N. C.R. Arneson, V. Wong, C. Wang, S. Leung, G. Iakovleva, K. Warren, M. Pintilie, and S. J. Done Genomic Differences Between Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast and that Associated with Invasive Disease: a Calibrated aCGH Study Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4446 - 4454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Rakha, J. S. Reis-Filho, and I. O. Ellis Basal-Like Breast Cancer: A Critical Review J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2008; 26(15): 2568 - 2581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Klijn, H. Holstege, J. de Ridder, X. Liu, M. Reinders, J. Jonkers, and L. Wessels Identification of cancer genes using a statistical framework for multiexperiment analysis of nondiscretized array CGH data Nucleic Acids Res., February 2, 2008; 36(2): e13 - e13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Melchor, E. Honrado, J. Huang, S. Alvarez, T. L. Naylor, M. J. Garcia, A. Osorio, D. Blesa, M. R. Stratton, B. L. Weber, et al. Estrogen Receptor Status Could Modulate the Genomic Pattern in Familial and Sporadic Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7305 - 7313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Huang, S. V. Fernandez, S. Goodwin, P. A. Russo, I. H. Russo, T. R. Sutter, and J. Russo Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Human Breast Epithelial Cells Transformed by 17 -Estradiol Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 67(23): 11147 - 11157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. P. Gomez, R. B. Riggins, A. N. Shajahan, U. Klimach, A. Wang, A. C. Crawford, Y. Zhu, A. Zwart, M. Wang, and R. Clarke Human X-Box binding protein-1 confers both estrogen independence and antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer cell lines FASEB J, December 1, 2007; 21(14): 4013 - 4027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S Reis-Filho and S. E Pinder Non-operative breast pathology: lobular neoplasia J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1321 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Miremadi, M. Z. Oestergaard, P. D.P. Pharoah, and C. Caldas Cancer genetics of epigenetic genes Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2007; 16(R1): R28 - R49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Y. Hehir-Kwa, M. Egmont-Petersen, I. M. Janssen, D. Smeets, A. G. van Kessel, and J. A. Veltman Genome-wide Copy Number Profiling on High-density Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes, Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms, and Oligonucleotide Microarrays: A Platform Comparison based on Statistical Power Analysis DNA Res, March 15, 2007; (2007) dsm002v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Climent, P. Dimitrow, J. Fridlyand, J. Palacios, R. Siebert, D. G. Albertson, J. W. Gray, D. Pinkel, A. Lluch, and J. A. Martinez-Climent Deletion of Chromosome 11q Predicts Response to Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 818 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lacroix Significance, detection and markers of disseminated breast cancer cells Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 1033 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hicks, A. Krasnitz, B. Lakshmi, N. E. Navin, M. Riggs, E. Leibu, D. Esposito, J. Alexander, J. Troge, V. Grubor, et al. Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer Genome Res., December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1465 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Reis-Filho, P. T. Simpson, N. C. Turner, M. B. Lambros, C. Jones, A. Mackay, A. Grigoriadis, D. Sarrio, K. Savage, T. Dexter, et al. FGFR1 Emerges as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Lobular Breast Carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 12(22): 6652 - 6662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Stange, B. Radlwimmer, F. Schubert, F. Traub, A. Pich, G. Toedt, F. Mendrzyk, U. Lehmann, R. Eils, H. Kreipe, et al. High-Resolution Genomic Profiling Reveals Association of Chromosomal Aberrations on 1q and 16p with Histologic and Genetic Subgroups of Invasive Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 12(2): 345 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Hodgson, T. Malek, S. Bornstein, S. Hariono, D. G. Ginzinger, W. J. Muller, and J. W. Gray Copy Number Aberrations in Mouse Breast Tumors Reveal Loci and Genes Important in Tumorigenic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 9695 - 9704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]