Moroccan Monofloral Bee Pollen: Botanical Origin, Physicochemical Characterization, and Antioxidant Activities

Asmae, El Ghouizi; Nawal, El Menyiy; Bakour, Meryem; Lyoussi, Badiaa

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8877266

Journal of Food Quality

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 8877266 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8877266

Moroccan Monofloral Bee Pollen: Botanical Origin, Physicochemical Characterization, and Antioxidant Activities

El Ghouizi Asmae,¹El Menyiy Nawal,¹Meryem Bakour,¹and Badiaa Lyoussi¹

Academic Editor: Vera Lavelli

Received30 Aug 2020

Revised31 Oct 2020

Accepted24 Dec 2020

Published07 Jan 2021

Abstract

In this study, eight monofloral bee pollen samples were collected from different apiaries in Morocco. Botanical origins of the bee pollen samples were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the physicochemical parameters (pH, moisture, ash, and the mineral contents) were determined. Total phenolic, flavones/flavonols contents were evaluated, and the antioxidant potential was assessed using total antioxidant capacity, DPPH, ABTS, and reducing power assays. Data showed that pH, moisture, and ash content values ranged between 4.19 ± 0.17 and 4.82 ± 0.36, 10.7 ± 0.04% and 26.8 ± 0.01%, and 1.81 ± 0.10% and 4.22 ± 0.08%, respectively. Potassium and magnesium were the most abundant minerals in bee pollen samples; heavy metals were not detected except for two samples (P5 and P6) where a very small amount of lead was found. The protein content in these samples varied between 19.86 ± 0.36 mg/100 g and 30.32 ± 0.12 mg/100 g of bee pollen. The phenolic content, flavones/flavonols content, and total antioxidant capacity were 21.87 ± 1.80 mgEAA/g, 2.37 ± 0.16 mgEAA/g, and 6.23 ± 0.21 mgEAA/g, respectively. High scavenging activity of DPPH and ABTS radicals was found in P2 with the lower IC₅₀ of 0.245 ± 0.009 mg/ml and 0.19 ± 0.005 mg/ml, respectively. The lower EC₅₀ was 0.133 ± 0.036 mg/ml found in P1 for the reducing power test. The current study is considered to be the first step to the standardization of Moroccan bee pollen.

1. Introduction

Bee pollen is considered as the final result of agglutination of pollen grains from flowers collected by worker honey bees, held together with nectar and/or honey and glandular secretions and collected at the entrance of the hive [1].

Bee pollen is an important bee product gaining attention as a functional food. It is renowned for its high content of biocompounds with health-promoting effects on human physical and mental well being, which make it the last trend of diet supplementation [2, 3]. It is commonly named the only perfectly complete food” because it is the most energetic, the richest hive product in nutrients, and contains the most active substances such as carbohydrate, crude fiber, and protein. It contains also all the essential amino acids, lipids, vitamins, and minerals that the human body needs. Additionally, bee pollen presents an excellent source of antioxidant compounds such as polyphenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, and vitamins A, C, and E, conferring to this bee product a great antioxidant potential [4, 5].

Thanks to the high load of natural antioxidants, bee pollen is the richest valued food in micronutrients. The literary data point out that bee pollen is responsible for a long list of pharmacological effects such as detoxifying action, hypolipidemic, hypoglycemic, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial activities [5, 6].

Morocco is a Mediterranean country ranked second in the world in terms of plants and floral biodiversity with almost 7000 plants [7]. Agricultural authorities focused on honey production; however, they neglected the other hive products such as royal jelly, propolis, and bee pollen. These facts turn into a lack of scientific studies concerning the national bee pollen. This emanates the aim of the current study: the characterization for the first time of Moroccan bee pollen, according to its floral origin, physicochemical properties, bioactive molecules, and their antioxidant activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bee Pollen Samples

Eight samples of bee pollen were collected by professional beekeepers from different regions of Morocco and were kept in the refrigerator until use (Table 1). All hives were free from pesticide use and any pathogens.

2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation was used for palynological analysis following the protocol described by Almeida et al. [8] Briefly, 2 g of the bee pollen sample was used for analysis, the pollen loads were grouped up into subsamples according to their coloring, and each subsample was placed onto the SEM stub and layered with carbon conductive adhesive tape. The percentage of each pollen grain was determined from a total of 350 pollen grains. According to Louveaux et al., the following terms are used to classify the percentages of pollen grains obtained: “predominant pollen grains” (>45% of total); “secondary pollen grains” (16–45% of total); “important minor pollen” (3–15% of total), and “minor pollen” (<3% of total) [9].

The observations are carried out at the SEM of the regional university interface center, of the University Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah, Fez.

2.3. Bee Pollen Extracts

The extraction was carried out by maceration of one gram of bee pollen in 10 mL of 70% ethanol for 1 week under agitation, and then, the solution was sonicated for 30 minutes by an ultrasonic vibrator and then filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The extract obtained was stored in −20°C until analysis [10].

2.4. pH

The pH value was determined with a pH meter from a solution of 10 g of bee pollen samples dissolved in 40 mL of distilled water. Tests were conducted three times, and the results were expressed as the mean average ± SD [11].

2.5. Moisture

Three g of sample was weighed and heated at 65°C for 24 h. Moisture content was obtained by the difference between the initial and final weight, and the results were expressed as the mean average ± SD [12].

2.6. Ash

Ash content was determined using the gravimetric method after incineration in an oven at 550°C, and until constant weight, the residue was weighed in an analytical balance. The determination of ash content was carried out in triplicate, and the mean was expressed as percentage ± SD [11].

2.7. Protein

The protein content was measured according to the method described by Lowry et al. [13]. The standard curve was prepared by the Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), and the concentration varied from 0.3 to 300 μg/ml. The absorbance was measured in 750 against the distilled water as the blank, and the equation of the calibration curve of BSA was as follows:

y = 3.6702x + 0.0927, R² = 0.9825. The experiment was performed in triplicates, and the results were expressed as mean ± SD g/100 g of bee pollen.

2.8. Mineral Content

Minerals were determined using the ash obtained after incineration and adding 5 mL of nitric acid 0.1 M. The mixture was heated to complete dryness. 10 mL of the same acid was added, and the mixture was made up to 25 mL with distilled water. The inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used for the determination of 11 elements (Ca, Na, Fe, K, Mg, Cu, Zn, Al, Ni, Cd, and Pb). The results were calculated as mg of each element per Kg of bee pollen [12].

2.9. Total Phenolic Content

Total phenolic content in the bee pollen samples was determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method according to singleton et al. [14]. 50 μL of ethanolic extract of bee pollen was mixed with 250 μL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (0.2 N) and 200 μL of (75 g/L) Na₂CO₃. The absorbance was measured at 760 nm after 2 h of incubation.

The experiment was performed in triplicates, and the results were expressed as mean ± SD mg equivalent of gallic acid/g of bee pollen.

2.10. Flavones and Flavonols Content

Flavones and flavonols content was quantified according to the method described by Miguel et al. [15]. Briefly, to 50 μl of the sample or standard, we added 200 μl of AlCl₃ (2%). After 1 hour, the absorbance was measured at 420 nm. Quercetin was used as standard, and flavones/flavonols content was expressed as mg quercetin equivalents per g of bee pollen (mg QE/g). Tests were performed in triplicate, and the results are given as mean ± SD.

2.11. Total Antioxidant Capacity

The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was determined according to the ammonium molybdate colorimetric method of Prieto et al. [16]. Briefly, 50 μl of ethanolic extract of bee pollen was added to 1 ml of reagent solution (0.6 M sulfuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate, and 4 mM ammonium molybdate). The mixture was capped and incubated in a thermal block at 95°C for 90 min. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 700 nm against a blank. Ascorbic acid was employed as the standard calibration, and the results were expressed as milligrams of ascorbic acid equivalent per gram of bee pollen.

2.12. Free-Radical Scavenging Activity (DPPH)

The radical scavenging activity of ethanolic extract of bee pollen against 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical was measured according to the method of Kumazawa et al. [17]. 50 μL of the ethanolic extract of bee pollen was added to 825 μL of ethanolic solution of DPPH. Absorbance measurements were read at 517 nm, after 1 h of incubation. The IC₅₀ was calculated based on the graph obtained by the percentage of inhibition, using the following formula:

Tests were conducted in triplicate, and the results are given as mean ± SD.

2.13. Reducing Power (RP)

The reducing power was determined according to the method described by Moreira et al. [18]. Ethanolic extract of bee pollen (50 μL) was mixed with 200 μL of 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.6), and 200 μL of 1% potassium ferricyanide. The mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 min, and 200 μL of 10% trichloroacetic acid, 200 μL of distilled water, and 120 μL of 0.1% of ferric chloride was added. The absorbance was measured at 700 nm. Extract concentration providing 0.5 of absorbance (EC₅₀) was calculated from the graph of absorbance against extract concentration in the solution. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. Tests were conducted in triplicate, and the results were given as mean ± SD.

2.14. Scavenging Activity of ABTS Radical Cation

The ABTS radical cation (ABTS⁺) scavenging activity was measured according to the method described by Miguel et al. [19]. Briefly, the ABTS⁺ radical was generated by the reaction of (7 mM) ABTS aqueous solution with K₂S₂O₈ (2.45 mM) in the dark for 16 h and adjusting the Abs 734 nm to 0.7 at room temperature. Ethanolic extract of bee pollen (50 μL) was added to (825 μL) ABTS⁺ solution, and the absorbance was measured at 734 nm, 5 min after the initial mixing, using water as the blank. The IC₅₀ was calculated using the percentage of inhibition of ABTS by the following formula:

Tests were conducted in triplicate, and the results are given as mean ± SD.

2.15. Statistical Analysis

Graphpad prism 5 was used for statistical analysis, comparisons of bee pollen samples were performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test, and the principal component analysis (PCA) was accomplished using Past 3.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Botanical Identification of Bee Pollen by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy analysis of bee pollen samples, presented in Figure 1 and Table 2, showed that the botanical origin of each bee pollen sample according to its predominant pollen grains was as follows: the botanical origin of bee pollen sample from LARACHE was Coriandrum sativum (Apiaceae) (70%), the botanical origin of bee pollen sample from KHENICHAT was Ulex europaeus (Fabaceae) (73%), the botanical origin of bee pollen sample from HED KOURT was Scorzonera cana (Asteraceae) (77%), the botanical origin of bee pollen sample from KENITRA was Trifolium pretense (Fabaceae) (76%), the botanical origin of bee pollen sample from FEZ was Ulex europaeus (Fabaceae) (64%), the botanical origin of bee pollen sample from SEFROU was Reseda luteola (Resedaceae) (60%), the botanical origin of bee pollen sample from ARFOUD was Spiraea salicifolia (Rosaceae) (68%), and the botanical origin of bee pollen sample from TAZA was Lamium galeobdolon (Lamiaceae) (59%). The bee pollen identification was carried out by comparing the morphology, sizes, and exine ornamentations of bee pollen studied to that described elsewhere [20–26]. Louveaux et al. reported that when the percentage of pollen grains is >45% of total, the sample is classified as monofloral [9]. Thus, all samples studied were classified as monofloral. Carpes et al. showed that the nutritional quality of pollen grains makes bees attractive to a single floral source [27].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

3.2. pH

The pH measurement is a simple and easy quality parameter to assess; a very low pH indicates bacterial deterioration of bee pollen because of its high moisture content [1]. Our results showed that there were no significant differences between all samples concerning pH, and the values ranged from 4.19 ± 0.17 in P4 to 4.82 ± 0.36 in P2 (Table 3); this value was similar to the one found in the Colombian bee pollen which showed pH values ranged between 3.8 and 5.4 [12]. Our bee pollens respond to the Argentinean regulation which fixed a pH range from 4 to 6 [28].

3.3. Moisture

The results of moisture are shown in Table 3. Moisture presented values between 10.7% for sample P8 and 26.8% for sample P4. Those values are comparable with the results presented in Romanian research [29]; our samples showed an average of moisture higher than that found by Radev and Bobis et al. [30, 31]. According to Campos et al. and Bogdanov [1, 32], fresh bee pollen should contain between 20% and 30% of water; this condition allowed us to classify our samples as follows: P1, P3, P4, P5, and P6 are fresh bee pollen, while P2, P7, and P8 are initiated to dry out.

The fresh bee pollen has a biological and nutritional value more important than dried bee pollen, while the high content of water in fresh bee pollen makes it an ideal culture medium for microorganisms, and to preserve the good quality of bee pollen, it should be harvested daily and stored under nitrogen until consumption [33]. On the other hand, for dry bee pollen, the percentage of humidity must be less than 6%, to be stored for 15 months. [32].

3.4. Ash Content

For the analyzed samples, ash amount showed a significant difference and ranged from 1.81 ± 0.10% in P6 to 4.02 ± 0.04% in P1 (Table 3). Our results were similar to the results shown in those of South African bee pollen [34]. These results fulfill with the Brazilian and Argentinean regulatory specifications which fixed a maximum of 4% [35, 36] and the Switzerland regulation reporting a range of 2 and 6% for this parameter. [37] The ash content is a quality parameter that can be impacted by the soil type, the botanical origin, and the plant’s ability to accumulate minerals [3, 38].

3.5. Protein Content

Bee pollen provides the required nutrients for the development of the bee’s organs. It is the only naturally available source of protein, which is the main source of honey bees’ nutrition. In this study, the total protein content of the analyzed samples was summarized in Table 3. Results showed values varied between 19.86 ± 0.36 g/100 g in P7 and 30.32 ± 0.12 g/100 g in P8. Our results agree with the standards described by Campos et al. and by Bogdanov which fixed the content of protein in 10 to 40 g/100 g of bee pollen dry weight [1, 32, 37].

3.6. Mineral Content

Regarding mineral composition, eleven elements were investigated, and the results are represented in Table 4. Potassium was the most abundant element in all samples with an average amount that ranged from 485.37 ± 9.30 mg/kg in P3 to 4594.25 ± 18.26 mg/kg in P5, followed by magnesium with an amount that ranged from 68.73 ± 5.30 in P3 mg/kg to 793.35 ± 13.64 mg/kg in P5, sodium with an amount that ranged from 91.85 ± .61 mg/kg in P8 to 397.22 ± 4.12 mg/kg in P1, iron with an amount that ranged from 17.07 ± 2.80 mg/kg to 68.86 ± 4.24 mg/kg in P1, aluminum with an amount that ranged from 16.43 ± 2.39 mg/kg in P6 to 126.3 ± 7.33 mg/kg in P1, zinc with an amount that ranged from 15.28 ± 0.94 mg/kg in P3 to 38.83 ± 4.36 mg/kg in P6, calcium with an amount that ranged from 2.24 ± 1.03 mg/kg in P3 to 22.73 ± 2.57 mg/kg in P5, and finally, copper with an amount that ranged from 2.09 ± 0.36 mg/kg to 7.18 ± 0.5 mg/kg in P8. These results follow the same order as the results found in Turkish, Colombian, and Argentinean studies [12, 28, 39]. The content in minerals depends on the botanical and geographical origin [6]. Concerning heavy metals, all samples are free except two (P5, P6) where we found 0.0049 ± 0.0002 mg/kg and 0.0033 ± 0.0003 mg/kg of lead, respectively; these values remain within the acceptable limits of bee pollen quality requiring that the lead content must not exceed 50 μg/100 g [1].

3.7. Phenolic and Flavones/Flavonols Contents

Polyphenols or phenolic compounds are plant secondary metabolites present in all parts of plants (roots, stems, leaves, flowers, pollen, fruits, seeds, and wood), while dietary phenols are involved in the potential health benefits for humans [40]. More than 8000 polyphenols are identified in plants; the most representative classes are flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, and lignans; these phytocompounds present a wide range of biological activities, and provide large protection against many chronic pathologies involving oxidative stress such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular affections, and aging [41]. The main common group of polyphenols in the human diet are flavonoids which are known for their antioxidant activities through scavenging or chelating mechanism [42]. Bee pollen exhibits a wide range of phenolic compounds such as quercetin, vanillic acids, protocatechuic acids, and many other phenolic compounds [43]. Its phenolic content varies according to its botanical and geographic origins, as well as soil type, climatic conditions, and beekeeper activities [44]. Total phenolic and flavones/flavonols amount of the eight analyzed bee pollen samples is presented in Table 5 which showed a significant variation between all samples. The total phenolic content varied between 8.070 ± 1.037 mgGAE/g in P7 and 32.387 ± 0.148 mgGAE/g in P6; these results were significantly higher than those found in the Romanian, Spanish, and Portuguese collected bee pollen with a mean value of 12.69 ± 0.21 mgGAE/g, 12.24 ± 2.0 mgGAE/g, and 16.4 ± 2.0 mgGAE/g, respectively [11, 45, 46]. The flavones/flavonols content ranged between 0.202 ± 0.044 mgQE/g in P6 and 6.30 ± 0.37 mgQE/g in P3; our results are higher than those obtained by Tavdidishvili et al. [47].

3.8. Total Antioxidant Capacity and Antioxidant Activities (DPPH, RP, and ABTS)

The total antioxidant capacity was evaluated by the phosphomolebdeneum test, while the antioxidant activity was assessed by three methods: DPPH, ABTS, and RP assays (Table 5), and the results of DPPH showed IC₅₀ values ranged between 0.245 ± 0.009 mg/ml in P2 and 0.832 ± 0.069 mg/ml in P7, which were lower than those obtained in a Spanish study (mean value = 3.0 ± 0.7 mg/mL) [11]. Antioxidant activity determined by the reducing power (RP) method showed the maximum inhibition in P1 (EC₅₀ = 0.133 ± 0.036 mg/ml) and the lowest inhibition in P6 (EC₅₀ = 0.790 ± 0.175 mg/ml); these values were much higher than that of ascorbic acid used as standard (0.031 ± 0.070 mg/ml). Results of ABTS assay showed a variation of IC₅₀ from 0.190 ± 0.005 mg/ml to 0.896 ± 0.051 mg/ml. Concerning the total antioxidant capacity (TAC), all samples showed a significant difference, and values ranged between 3.98 ± 0.16 mgEAA/g in P1 and 9.69 ± 0.34 mgEAA/g in P3. The results of the antioxidant activities of our samples seem to be stronger than Brazilian bee pollen [48].

3.9. ACP Analysis

The principal component analysis is mentioned in Figure 2. The results of the homogeneity of bee pollen samples based on palynological analysis, mineral, moisture, and ash content are represented in Figure 2(a): the first component explained (30.81%) and represented in its positive part: Fe, Na, Ca, Zn, Mg, K, and Cu and the results of palynological analyzes of Ulex europaeus, Spiraea salicifolia, Lamium galeobdolon, and Reseda luteola pollen grains, while ash, moisture, Al, and Coriandrum sativum, Trifolium pretense, and Scorzonera cana pollen grains percentages were in the negative part. The second principal component explained (22.884%) of the given results and represented in the positive parts: ash, Al, moisture, Fe, Na, Zn, Ca, Mg, and K and palynological analyzes results representing Trifolium pretense, Coriandrum sativum, Ulex europaeus, Spiraea salicifolia, and Reseda luteola pollen grains, whereas in the negative parts, we found Cu and Lamium galeobdolon and Scorzonera cana pollen grains percentages. The results represented in Figure 2(a) showed that K, Mg, Cu, and Zn correlated negatively with ash. The minerals Ca, Zn, Mg, K, and Cu correlated with each other positively, while Al correlated with all minerals studied negatively except Fe and Na. The monofloral bee pollen samples P2 (70% of Ulex europaeus pollen grains), P5 (64% of Ulex europaeus pollen grains), P6 (60% of Reseda luteola pollen grains), and P7 (68% of Spiraea salicifolia pollen grains) shared the features regarding Ca, Zn, Mg, K, and Cu, while the content of predominant pollen grains (70% of Coriandrum sativum) in bee pollen sample P1 correlated positively with Fe, Na, and Al, which suggests that, in addition to the soil type, the minerals content in bee pollen was affected by the botanical origin. Our findings go in hand with those found by Stanciu et al. and Kostić et al. [49, 50].

(a)

(b)

Figure 2

Principal component analysis: (a) biplots of monofloral bee pollen samples using palynological analysis (cor sat: Coriandrum sativum; ule eur: Ulex europaeus; sco can: Scorzonera cana; tri pre: Trifolium pretense; res lut: Reseda luteola; spi sal: Spiraea salicifolia; and lam gal: Lamium galeobdolon), mineral content, ash, and moisture; (b) biplots of monofloral bee pollen using total phenolic, flavones/flavonols, total antioxidant activity, and the antioxidant activities(ABTS, RP, and DPPH).

The results of the homogeneity of bee pollen samples based on total phenolic, flavones/flavonols, and antioxidant activities (TAC, DPPH, and RP) are represented in Figure 2(b); the first component explained (42.785%), represented in its positive parts reducing power (RP), total phenolic, flavones/flavonols, and total antioxidant capacity, while in the negative parts, we found DPPH and ABTS. The second component explained (21.866%), represented in its positive parts DPPH, RP, and total phenolic, while in the negative parts, it represents flavones/flavonols, total antioxidant capacity, and ABTS. The results of the PCA indicate that DPPH and ABTS correlated negatively with total antioxidant capacity, flavones/flavonols, and total phenolic, while antioxidant capacity, flavones/flavonols, and total phenolic correlated with each other positively. The variability of minerals and antioxidant contents could be attributed to the geographical location and botanical origin. [51].

The results also indicate variability in physicochemical analysis and antioxidant activity in P5 and P2, even if they have the same botanical origin (Ulex europaeus). The most likely explanation of these findings is the presence of secondary pollen (Table 2) that contribute to the antioxidant activity, and mineral content of the studied samples [52]. In addition, bee pollen sample P2 was from KHENICHAT, while bee pollen sample P5 was from FEZ (Table 1); therefore, they were produced in different geographic and climatic areas, which contributes to the variability of these two samples in the studied parameters [51].

4. Conclusions

In this work, palynological, physicochemical characterization, protein content, and antioxidant activities were assessed for the first time in Moroccan bee pollen. The results of the current study showed that all samples responded to the quality criteria and exhibited a strong antioxidant potential in vitro. This research is the first step towards the certification and the standardization of bee pollen produced in Morocco.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah for Laboratory Physiology-Pharmacology & Environmental Health (USMBA/L08FSDM).

References

M. G. R. Campos, S. Bogdanov, L. B. de Almeida-Muradian et al., “Pollen composition and standardisation of analytical methods,” Journal of Apicultural Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 154–161, 2008 Jan.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. G. Sattler, A. A. M. De-Melo, K. S. d. Nascimento et al., “Essential minerals and inorganic contaminants (barium, cadmium, lithium, lead and vanadium) in dried bee pollen produced in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil,” Food Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 505–509, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. O. Villanueva, A. D. Marquina, R. B. Serrano, and G. B. Abellán, “The importance of bee-collected pollen in the diet: a study of its composition,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 217–224, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kieliszek, K. Piwowarek, A. M. Kot, S. Błażejak, A. Chlebowska-Śmigiel, and I. Wolska, “Pollen and bee bread as new health-oriented products: a review,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 71, pp. 170–180, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kocot, M. Kiełczykowska, D. Luchowska-Kocot, J. Kurzepa, and I. Musik, “Antioxidant potential of propolis, bee pollen, and royal jelly: possible medical application,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 7074209, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Komosinska-Vassev, P. Olczyk, J. Kaźmierczak, L. Mencner, and K. Olczyk, “Bee pollen: chemical composition and therapeutic application,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 297425, 6 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Moujanni, A. K. Essamadi, and A. Terrab, “Beekeeping in Morocco: focus on honey production,” International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 52–78, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
J. de F. Almeida, D. Pereira, M Bianchin et al., “Lyophilized bee pollen extract: a natural antioxidant source to prevent lipid oxidation in refrigerated sausages,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 76, pp. 299–305, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Louveaux, A. Maurizio, and G. Vorwohl, “Methods of melissopalynology,” Bee World, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 139–157, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bakour, M. d. G. Campos, H. Imtara, and B. Lyoussi, “Antioxidant content and identification of phenolic/flavonoid compounds in the pollen of fourteen plants using HPLC-DAD,” Journal of Apicultural Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Feás, M. P. Vázquez-Tato, L. Estevinho, J. A. Seijas, and A. Iglesias, “Organic bee pollen: botanical origin, nutritional value, bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity and microbiological quality,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 8359–8377, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Fuenmayor B, C. Zuluaga D, C. Díaz M, M. Quicazán de C, M. Cosio, and S. Mannino, “Evaluation of the physicochemical and functional properties of Colombian bee pollen,” Revista MVZ Córdoba, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 4003–4014, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall, “Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 265–275, 1951.
View at: Google Scholar
V. L. Singleton and J. A. Rossi, “Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents,” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 144–158, 1965.
View at: Google Scholar
M. G. Miguel, S. Nunes, S. A. Dandlen, A. M. Cavaco, and M. D. Antunes, “Phenols and antioxidant activity of hydro-alcoholic extracts of propolis from algarve, south of portugal,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3418–3423, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Prieto, M. Pineda, and M. Aguilar, “Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 337–341, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kumazawa, T. Hamasaka, and T. Nakayama, “Antioxidant activity of propolis of various geographic origins,” Food Chemistry, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 329–339, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Moreira, L. G. Dias, J. A. Pereira, and L. Estevinho, “Antioxidant properties, total phenols and pollen analysis of propolis samples from Portugal,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 3482–3485, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. d. G. Miguel, O. Doughmi, S. Aazza, D. Antunes, and B. Lyoussi, “Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities of propolis from different regions of Morocco,” Food Science and Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 313–322, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Naggar, “Taxonomic significance of pollen morphology in some taxa of resedaceae,” Feddes Repertorium, vol. 113, pp. 518–527, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
V. D’Ávila, E. Menezes, V. Gonçalves-Esteves, C. Mendonça, R. Pereira, and T. Santos, “Morphological characterization of pollens from three apiaceae species and their ingestion by twelve-spotted lady beetle (coleoptera: coccinellidae),” Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 19, p. 76, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Atalay, F. Celep, B. Bilgili, and M. Doğan, “Pollen morphology of the genus lamium L. (Lamiaceae) and its systematic implications,” Flora, vol. 219, pp. 68–84, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Cubas and C. Pardo, “Pollen wall stratification trends inUlex (genisteae, papilionoideae: leguminosae) in the iberian peninsula,” Grana, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 177–185, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Polyakova and G. N. Gataulina, “Morphology and variability of pollen of the genus spiraea L. (rosaceae) in siberia and the far east,” Contemporary Problems of Ecology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 420–424, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hamzaoǧlu, A. Aksoy, E. Martin, M. Pinar, and H. Colgecen, “A new record for the flora of turkey: scorzonera ketzkhovelii grossh,” Asteraceae, vol. 34, pp. 57–61, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Koçyi̇ği̇t and D. Mahmut, “Pollen morphology of some trifolium species which are favorite plants of honey bees in istanbul,” İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 85–94, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. T. Carpes, I. S. R. Cabral, C. F. P. Luz, J. P. Capeletti, and S. M. Alencar, “Palynological and physicochemical characterization of apis mellifera L. bee pollen in the southern region of Brazil,” Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, vol. 7, 3 pages, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
B. B. Coronel, D. Grasso, S. C. Pereira, and G. Fernández, “Caracterización bromatológica del polen apícola,” Argentino, vol. 38, pp. 145–181, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Roxana, D. Muhsin, B. Narcisa, and P. Ovidiu, “Physicochemical characteristics of fresh bee pollen from different botanical origins,” Romanian Biotechnological Letters, vol. 23, pp. 13357–13365, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Radev, “Water content of honey bee collected pollen from 50 plants from bulgaria,” Modern Concepts & Developments in Agronomy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 314–316, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Bobis, L. A. Marghitas, D. Dezmirean, O. Morar, V. Bonta, and F. Chirila, “Quality parameters and nutritional value of different commercial bee products,” Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Animal Science and Biotechnologies, vol. 67, no. 1–2, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Bogdanov, “Quality and standards of pollen and beeswax,” Apiacta, vol. 38, pp. 334–341, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
M. G. R. Campos, C. Frigerio, J. Lopes, and S. Bogdanov, “What is the future of bee-pollen?” Journal of ApiProduct and ApiMedical Science, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 131–144, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Human and S. W. Nicolson, “Nutritional content of fresh, bee-collected and stored pollen of aloe greatheadii var. davyana (asphodelaceae),” Phytochemistry, vol. 67, no. 14, pp. 1486–1492, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. B. Almeida-Muradian, L. C. Pamplona, S. Coimbra, and O. M. Barth, “Chemical composition and botanical evaluation of dried bee pollen pellets,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2005 Feb.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Brasil, “Regulamentos técnicos de identidade e qualidade, de apitoxina, de cera de abelha, de geleia real,” 2001, de Geleia Real Liofilizada, de Polen Apicola, de Propolis, de Extrato de Propolis) from the World Wide. Instrucao Normativa n. 3 de 2001 http://www.agricultura.gov.br/sda/dipoa.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Bogdanov, Pollen: Collection, Harvest, Compostion, Quality in: Pollen Book, Stefan Bogdanov, Muehlethurnen, Switzerland, 2016.
S. T. Carpes, G. B. Mourão, S. M. de Alencar, and M. L. Masson, “Chemical composition and free radical scavenging activity of Apis mellifera bee pollen from southern Brazil,” Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, vol. 12, no. 1/4, pp. 220–229, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Kalaycıoğlu, H. Kaygusuz, S. Döker, S. Kolaylı, and F. B. Erim, “Characterization of Turkish honeybee pollens by principal component analysis based on their individual organic acids, sugars, minerals, and antioxidant activities,” LWT-Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft & Technologie, vol. 84, pp. 402–408, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Ganesan and B. Xu, “A critical review on polyphenols and health benefits of black soybeans,” Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 5, 455 pages, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
K. B. Pandey and S. I. Rizvi, “Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 270–278, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Cook and S. Samman, “Flavonoids?Chemistry, metabolism, cardioprotective effects, and dietary sources,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 66–76, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Ares, S. Valverde, J. L. Bernal, M. J. Nozal, and J. Bernal, “Extraction and determination of bioactive compounds from bee pollen,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 147, pp. 110–124, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Sun, Y. Guo, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhuang, “Antioxidant and anti-tyrosinase activities of phenolic extracts from rape bee pollen and inhibitory melanogenesis by cAMP/MITF/TYR pathway in B16 mouse melanoma cells,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 8, p. 104, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Mărghitaş, O. G. Stanciu, D. S. Dezmirean et al., “In vitro antioxidant capacity of honeybee-collected pollen of selected floral origin harvested from Romania,” Food Chemistry, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 878–883, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Serra Bonvehí, M. Soliva Torrentó, and E. Centelles Lorente, “Evaluation of polyphenolic and flavonoid compounds in honeybee-collected pollen produced in Spain,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1848–1853, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Tavdidishvili, T. Khutsidze, M. Pkhakadze, M. Vanidze, and A. Kalandia, “Flavonoids in Georgian bee bread and bee pollen,” Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 676–681, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
K. R. L. Freire, A. C. S. Lins, M. C. Dórea, F. A. R. Santos, C. A. Camara, and T. M. S. Silva, “Palynological origin, phenolic content, and antioxidant properties of honeybee-collected pollen from bahia, Brazil,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1652–1664, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. G. Stanciu, L. A. Marghitas, and D. Dezmirean, “Macro- and oligo-mineral elements from honeybee-collected pollen and beebread harvested from Transylvania (Romania),” Bulletin UASVM Animal Science and Biotechnology, vol. 66, 2 pages, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Ž Kostić, M. B. Pešić, M. D. Mosić, B. P. Dojčinović, M. M. Natić, and T. JĐ, “Mineral content of bee pollen from Serbia/Sadržaj minerala u uzorcima pčelinjega peluda iz Srbije,” Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 251–258, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Aličić, Š. Drago, M. Jašić, H. Pašalić, and Đ. Ačkar, “Antioxidant properties of pollen,” Hrana U Zdr Boles Znan-Stručni Časopis Za Nutr Dijetetiku., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Laaroussi, T. Bouddine, M. Bakour, D. Ousaaid, and B. Lyoussi, “Physicochemical properties, mineral content, antioxidant activities, and microbiological quality of bupleurum spinosum gouan honey from the middle atlas in Morocco,” Journal of Food Quality, vol. 2020, Article ID 7609454, 1 page, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 El Ghouizi Asmae et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1561

Downloads

1038

Citations