<i>Poria cocos</i> Regulates Cell Migration and Actin Filament Aggregation in B35 and C6 Cells by Modulating the RhoA, CDC42, and Rho Signaling Pathways

Lee, Chia-Yu; Lee, Chang-Ti; Tzeng, I-Shiang; Kuo, Chan-Yen; Tsai, Fu-Ming; Chen, Mao-Liang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6854860

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Abbreviations Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Application of Natural Products in Experimental, and Cheminformatics-based Therapy for Neurological Disorders

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6854860 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6854860

Poria cocos Regulates Cell Migration and Actin Filament Aggregation in B35 and C6 Cells by Modulating the RhoA, CDC42, and Rho Signaling Pathways

Chia-Yu Lee,¹Chang-Ti Lee,¹I-Shiang Tzeng,²Chan-Yen Kuo,²Fu-Ming Tsai,²and Mao-Liang Chen²

Academic Editor: Ghulam Ashraf

Received16 Jun 2021

Revised13 Aug 2021

Accepted26 Aug 2021

Published01 Sept 2021

Abstract

Poria is used as a traditional Chinese herbal medicine with anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and mood-stabilizing properties. Poria contains triterpenoids and polysaccharides, which are reported to regulate the cytoplasmic free calcium associated with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and affect the cell function of neonatal rat nerve cells and hippocampal neurons. Although the modulatory effects of Poria on neuronal function have been widely reported, the molecular mechanism of these effects is unclear. Cell migration ability and the reorganization of actin filaments are important biological functions during neuronal development, and they can be regulated mainly by the Rho signaling pathway. We found that the cell migration ability and actin condensation in B35 cells enhanced by P. cocos (a water solution of P. cocos cum Radix Pini (PRP) or White Poria (WP)) might be caused by increased RhoA and CDC42 activity and increased expression of downstream ROCK1, p-MLC2, N-WASP, and ARP2/3 in B35 cells. Similar modulations of cell migration ability, actin condensation, and Rho signaling pathway were also observed in the C6 glial cell line, except for the PRP-induced regulation of RhoA and CDC42 activities. Ketamine-induced inhibition of cell migration and actin condensation can be restored by P. cocos. In addition, we observed that the increased expression of RhoA and ROCK1 or the decreased expression of CDC42 and N-WASP caused by ketamine in B35 cells could also be restored by P. cocos. The results of this study suggest that the regulatory effects of P. cocos on cell migration and actin filament aggregation are closely related to the regulation of RhoA, CDC42, and Rho signaling pathways in both B35 and C6 cells. PRP and WP have the potential to restore neuronal cell Rho signaling abnormalities involved in some mental diseases.

1. Introduction

Poria cocos (Schw.) is a parasitic fungus that exists in various species of Pinus. P. cocos cum Radix Pini (PRP; Sclerotium Pararadicis, also known as Fu Shen in traditional Chinese herbal medicine), and White Poria (WP; also known as Bai Fu Ling in traditional Chinese herbal medicine) are medicinal herbs from the dry sclerotium of Polyporaceae fungi that have diuretic, sedative, and tonic effects [1]. They both contain two major types of chemical substances, namely, triterpenoids and polysaccharides. Their other minor ingredients include histidine, amino acids, choline, steroids, and potassium salts [2, 3]. P. cocos mediates its pharmacological anti-inflammatory properties via two triterpenoids, namely, pachymic acid and dehydrotumulosic acid [4]. P. cocos also has immunomodulatory properties that can alter immune function through dynamically regulated cytokine expression [5, 6]. It has also been reported to possess anticancer properties [2, 7–9]. Moreover, P. cocos has been found to regulate the concentration of free calcium in the cytoplasm of brain neurons in neonatal rats [10]. Water extracts of P. cocos have been demonstrated to dose-dependently increase cytosolic free calcium [2] and inhibit glutamate-induced cytosolic free calcium [10] in cells. Similar results have been observed in the primary culture of hippocampal neurons from neonatal rats. Thus, P. cocos water extracts can regulate cytoplasmic free calcium in brain nerve cells by affecting a variety of glutamate receptors, such as N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) [10].

The integration of the hippocampus and posterior splenic cortex into a high-level cognitive circuit supports learning and memory in the form of relationships (space, context, and situation) [11]. Impairments in hippocampal neurons might cause abnormal cognitive function in animals [12]. Reduced hippocampal neuronal activities, caused by a reduction in hippocampal neurogenesis or an abnormality of the hippocampal neuronal structure, are always accompanied by cognitive impairments in NMDAR antagonist-treated rats [13, 14]. Schubert et al. [15] reported that active Ras homolog family member A (RhoA) interacts with NMDAR, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor, and metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 at the excitatory postsynapsis to maintain NMDAR stabilization and modulate spine actin remodeling [15]. They also mentioned that the activation of RhoA can induce dendritic spine morphology regulation in cultured hippocampal neurons [15]. Cell division cycle 42 (CDC42) levels and dendritic spine density have also been observed to decrease in patients with schizophrenia. A recent report revealed that ketamine can reduce the expression levels of RhoA and Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1) while simultaneously reducing the proportion of mushroom spines and increasing the proportion of stubby spines in rat hippocampal neurons, which could be involved in the cognitive impairments of schizophrenia [16].

The formation of actin filaments in neuronal cells can induce cytoskeletal rearrangement, which can lead to changes in cell shape and cell function [17]. Cytoskeletal rearrangement also induces synaptic spine elongation, cell migration [18–20], and neuronal plasticity [21, 22], which are important for neuron development and have the same molecular mechanism, namely, the Rho signaling pathway. Furthermore, various studies have mentioned that the calcium concentration in cells plays important roles in regulating Rho signaling regulation and further directional movement, mesodermal sheet migration, cytoskeletal reorganization, and cancer metastasis [18, 23–25]. Our previous study found that APDs might differentially regulate Rho protein expression and activation to further modulate cytoskeletal rearrangement by altering the expression of proteins that are involved in the Rho signaling pathway in B35 and C6 cells and APD-treated rat cortex [26]. We also found that APDs could reverse MK801-induced Rho protein regulation, migration, and actin filament (F-actin) condensation in B35 and C6 cells. In this study, we proposed that P. cocos might also provide potential regulatory and modulatory effects on neuronal cell activities by affecting the NMDAR-mediated calcium-related Rho signaling pathway. We aimed to determine whether PRP and WP can regulate the expression and activity of Rho family proteins in B35 and C6 cells. We also examined the effects of PRP and WP on proteins related to Rho signaling. We further investigated whether PRP and WP could enhance the migration ability and F-actin condensation of B35 and C6 cells. Additionally, ketamine-induced B35 cell migration inhibition, which was used to mimic the damaging effect on neuronal cells, was restored by PRP and WP. Ketamine-induced RhoA, CDC42, N-WASP, and ROCK1 expression regulation was also recovered by PRP and WP. We concluded that PRP and WP can modulate the Rho signaling pathway by regulating the expression level and activity of RhoA and CDC42 but not Rac1, thereby increasing cell migration and the F-actin concentration.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of PRP and WP

Herbal powder extracts of PRP and WP were obtained from Sun Ten Pharmaceutical Company (New Taipei City, Taiwan). To prepare the PRP and WP solutions, herbal powder extracts of PRP and WP were added to sterilized double-distilled H₂O and left at room temperature for 6 h at a final concentration of 10 mg/ml. The PRP and WP solutions were then centrifuged, and the corresponding supernatants were collected and stored at −20°C until use.

2.2. Cell Culture and PRP/WP Treatment

B35 and C6 cells were obtained from the Bioresource Collection and Research Center of the Food Industry Research and Development Institute (Hsinchu City, Taiwan). B35 cells are a rat neuroblastoma cell line used to observe drug effects on neuronal cells. Glial cells can provide nutritional and physiological support, such as neurotransmitter reuptake and recycling to neuronal cells. C6 cells are a glioblastoma cell line used for observing drug effects on glial cells. C6 cells were also used to compare the drug effects between B35 and C6 cells. B35 cells were cultured in modified Eagle’s medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies) with fetal bovine serum (10%) (Invitrogen Life Technologies). PRP or WP was added once a day to a final concentration of 10 μg/ml for seven days. To examine the effects of PRP or WP on ketamine-treated B35 cells, B35 cells were treated with ketamine (100 μg/ml) daily for seven days followed by the addition of ketamine (100 μg/ml) and ketamine in combination with PRP (10 μg/ml) or WP (10 μg/ml) daily for another seven days. C6 cells were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing L-glutamine (2 mm), fetal bovine serum (2%) (Invitrogen Life Technologies), and heat-inactivated horse serum (10%) (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The C6 cells were subcultured when the cell density reached 70% confluence to prevent abnormal S100 protein production. Both cell lines were cultured in a CO₂ incubator with 5% CO₂ at 37°C. The cells were harvested for examination after they had been treated with PRP or WP for seven days.

2.3. Total Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

B35 and C6 cells were lysed in mammalian protein extraction buffer (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden) to extract total proteins according to the manufacturer’s procedures. Protease inhibitor mix (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) and phosphatase inhibitors (2 mm NaF and 1 mm Na₃VO₄) were added to the lysis buffer to prevent protein degradation. In total, 10–50 μg of the total protein extracts was analyzed using 8%, 10%, or 12.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis according to the molecular weight of the target proteins. The separated proteins were then transferred from the gels to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and blocked with membrane blocking solution (Life Technology, Frederick, MD, USA). β-Actin was used as an internal calibration control for all of the target proteins. Specific primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies (cat. nos. 401215 and 401315; Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany) were used to detect the target protein bands. An Amersham ECL kit (Amersham, Bucks, UK) was then used to reveal the protein bands.

2.4. RhoA/Rac1/Cdc42 Activity Assay

Rho protein activity was analyzed using the RhoA/Rac1/Cdc42 activity assay kit (Cell Biolab, San Diego, CA, USA). In brief, cells cultured in a 10 cm dish were washed with PBS and lysed in 0.5 mL of lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor mix (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) and phosphatase inhibitors (2 mm NaF and 1 mm Na₃VO₄). After centrifugation at 14,000 × for 5 min, 300 μg of protein from each cellular lysate was adjusted to a total volume of 1 ml with 1 × assay lysis buffer. Then, each sample received 40 μl of resuspended Rhotekin RBD or PAK PBD agarose beads, and all assay mixtures were incubated for one hour at 4°C with gentle shaking. The beads were then collected by centrifugation at 14,000 × for 10 s followed by removing the supernatants and washing the bead pellets three times with 0.5 ml of 1 × assay lysis buffer. The beads were resuspended in 40 μl of 2 × SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiled for 5 min. The samples were then analyzed by western blot and detected with anti-RhoA, anti-CDC42, or anti-Rac1 antibodies.

2.5. Cell Migration Assay

To examine the migration ability of B35 and C6 cells, they were treated with PRP or WP for seven days followed by seeding 10⁴ PRP- or WP-treated B35 cells and 5 × 10³ PRP- or WP-treated C6 cells into a Transwell insert (pore size, 8 μm) (Costar; Corning Incorporation, Kennebunk, ME, USA) set in a 24-well tissue culture plate. The cells were cultured for another 24 h with PRP or WP for continuous stimulation. To examine the effects of PRP or WP on the migration ability of ketamine-treated B35 cells, B35 cells were treated with ketamine for seven days, followed by treatment with ketamine, ketamine with PRP, or ketamine with WP for another seven days. A total of 10⁴ drug-treated B35 cells were seeded into Transwell inserts and cultured for another 24 h with ketamine, PRP, or WP for continuous stimulation. The migrated B35 and C6 cells were washed with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with methanol and stained with 50 μg/ml propidium iodide solution (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min. The number of cells on the membrane was then counted under a microscope at 40 × magnification. The experiments were performed in triplicate for statistical analysis.

2.6. Phalloidin Staining of B35 and C6 Cell F-Actin

Fluorescently labeled phalloidin can stably and specifically bind to F-actin filaments in cells. To observe the F-actin condensation induced by PRP and WP, B35 and C6 cells (5 × 10³) treated with PRP or WP for seven days were seeded into a 6-well plate with poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and then cultured with PRP or WP for another two days accordingly. After the two-day incubation, the coverslips were collected and washed with 1 × PBS. Cells on the coverslips were then fixed in methanol. Subsequently, the cells were washed with 1 × PBS and stained with 1 × phalloidin solution (CytoPainter Phalloidin-iFluor 488 Reagent, ab176753; Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA) at room temperature for 90 min. Residual phalloidin was washed off two to three times with 1 × PBS. The coverslips were mounted and sealed on glass slides and then viewed under a fluorescence microscope.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Student’s t-tests were performed to analyze differences in the cell migration ability and normalized expression levels of the examined target proteins between the control cells and PRP- or WP-treated B35 and C6 cells. SPSS 20.0 was used for statistical analysis. values of <0.05 () and <0.01 () were defined as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. PRP and WP Induced Regulation of the Rho Family Proteins

RhoA, CDC42, and Rac1 are major Rho family proteins that can be regulated by RhoGDP-dissociation inhibitor 1 (RhoGDI1) and affect the modulation of Rho signaling. We found that PRP and WP increased the expression of RhoGDI1 ( for PRP and for WP) in B35 cells (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Moreover, PRP and WP increased the expression of RhoA ( for PRP and for WP) and CDC42 ( for PRP and for WP) in B35 cells (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Downregulation of RhoGDI1 () was observed in C6 cells treated with PRP (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). PRP also reduced the expression of RhoA () and CDC42 () in C6 cells (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). In contrast, WP increased the expression of RhoGDI1 (), RhoA (), and CDC42 () in C6 cells (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). Furthermore, neither PRP nor WP affected Rac1 expression in B35 and C6 cells (Figure 1). A pulldown assay was also performed to examine the activation of the Rho family proteins by measuring the expression of GTP form Rho family proteins. We observed that the GTP forms of RhoA (activated RhoA; RhoA-GTP) and CDC42 (activated CDC42; CDC42-GTP) were increased by either PRP () or WP () in B35 cells (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). In C6 cells, PRP increased RhoA-GTP () and decreased CDC42-GTP () levels, while WP decreased RhoA-GTP () and CDC42-GTP () levels (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). No GTP form of Rac1 (activated Rac1; Rac1-GTP) was detected in either the B35 or C6 cells in this study.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1

Poria cocos regulated RhoGDI1, RhoA, and CDC42 expression in B35 and C6 cells. The expression levels of RhoGDI1, RhoA, CDC42, and Rac1 were examined using western blotting in this experiment. B35 (a, b) and C6 (c, d) cells were treated with PRP (10 μg/ml) or WP (10 μg/ml). The bar charts were calculated based on triplicate western blot data from three batches of PRP- or WP-treated cells using Student’s t-test (; ). C/CTRL: control; PRP: Poria cocos cum Radix Pini; WP: White Poria.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2

Poria cocos induced activation of RhoA and CDC42 in B35 and C6 cells. The expression levels of activated RhoA, CDC42, and Rac1 were examined using western blotting in this experiment. B35 (a, b) and C6 (c, d) cells were treated with PRP (10 μg/ml) or WP (10 μg/ml). The GTP form of Rho protein was pulled down and analyzed. The bar charts were calculated based on triplicate western blot data from three batches of PRP- or WP-treated cells using Student’s t-test (; ). C/CTRL: control; PRP: Poria cocos cum Radix Pini; WP: White Poria.

3.2. PRP and WP Modulated F-Actin Condensation and RhoA-Related Rho Signaling

Rho proteins, including ROCK1, phosphorylated myosin light chain 2 (p-MLC2), and profilin 1 (PFN1), have been proposed to be able to regulate RhoA-related signaling to further modulate F-actin assembly and condensation. Usually, F-actin is evenly distributed in cells (indicated with a blue arrow in Figure 3) and will be condensed (indicated with a red arrow in Figure 3) when regulated. In this study, F-actin condensation in B35 cells was induced by PRP and WP (Figure 3). In addition, PRP and WP also induced F-actin condensation in C6 cells (Figure 3). The expression of ROCK1 was increased by PRP () and WP () in B35 cells (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). PFN1 expression was reduced by PRP (), but not by WP in B35 cells (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). An increase in the expression of p-MLC2 induced by PRP () and WP () was also observed in B35 cells (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Moreover, PRP-induced increased expression of ROCK1 (), PFN1 (), and p-MLC2 () in C6 cells (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)), whereas WP induced the expression of ROCK1 (), PFN1 (), and p-MLC2 () in C6 cells (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.3. PRP and WP Modulated CDC42 Migration-Related Rho Signaling

CDC42 signaling can modulate filopodia and the migration of cells by regulating CDC42 and CDC42 signaling-related proteins, including neuronal Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP), p21 (RAC1)-activated kinase 1 (PAK1), and RhoA protein–modulated actin-related protein 2/3 (ARP2/3). Activated CDC42 can modulate cell migration by regulating N-WASP or PAK1. N-WASP can modulate ARP2/3 to further manage actin polymerization and subsequent cell migration. PAK1 can regulate cofilin function to control actin polymerization and cell migration. PRP- or WP-treated B35 and C6 cells were seeded into a Transwell insert, incubated with PRP or WP for another 24 h, and then analyzed to confirm PRP- or WP-induced cell migration. As shown in Figure 5, PRP and WP increased the migration ability of B35 ( for both PRP and WP) and C6 ( for both PRP and WP) cells.

(a)

(b)

CDC42 signaling-related proteins were also analyzed with western blotting. N-WASP expression in B35 cells was enhanced by PRP () and WP () (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Interestingly, PRP and WP reduced N-WASP expression in C6 cells ( for PRP and for WP) (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). The expression of PAK1 was induced by PRP and WP in B35 ( for PRP and for WP) (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)) and C6 ( for PRP and for WP) cells (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). ARP2/3 expression was induced by PRP but inhibited by WP in B35 cells. Both PRP () and WP () increased the expression of ARP2/3 in C6 cells (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 6

Poria cocos induced CDC42/cell migration-related Rho signaling regulation and c-jun expression. The expression levels of N-WASP, PAK1, ARP2/3, and c-jun were examined using western blotting in this experiment. B35 (a, b) and C6 (c, d) cells were treated with PRP (10 μg/ml) or WP (10 μg/ml). The bar charts were calculated based on triplicate western blot data from three batches of PRP- or WP-treated cells using Student’s t-test (; ). C/CTRL: control; PRP: Poria cocos cum Radix Pini; WP: White Poria.

3.4. PRP and WP Modulated c-jun Expression in B35 and C6 Cells

Rho proteins have been reported to regulate c-jun expression and subsequently regulate apoptotic gene expression. As shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), increased expression of c-jun was induced by PRP () and WP () in B35 cells. c-jun expression in C6 cells was also increased by PRP () and WP () (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)).

3.5. PRP and WP Restored Cell Migration Inhibition and Rho Signaling Regulation in Ketamine-Treated B35 Cells

Ketamine has been reported to induce Rho family protein regulation in vitro and in vivo. We treated B35 cells with ketamine followed by PRP or WP treatment to further clarify the roles of PRP or WP in Rho signaling-related cytoskeletal regulation in neuronal cells. As Figure 7 shows, B35 cell migration was inhibited by ketamine and was restored by either PRP or WP treatment. We also examined the expression level of some of the Rho signaling proteins in B35 cells treated with ketamine or in combination with PRP/WP. We found that ketamine increased RhoA () and decreased CDC42 () expression in B35 cells, while both PRP and WP reversed ketamine-induced RhoA and CDC42 regulation (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)). Ketamine enhanced Rock1 expression, while PRP ()/WP () reversed ketamine-induced ROCK1 induction in B35 cells (Figures 8(c) and 8(d)). We also found that ketamine could induce a reduction in N-WASP expression, which could be restored by PRP or WP treatment (both ) in B35 cells (Figures 8(c) and 8(d)). Ketamine-reduced PAK1 expression () was further reduced by PRP () but not WP in B35 cells (Figures 8(e) and 8(f)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 8

Poria cocos reversed ketamine-induced Rho signaling regulation in B35 cells. B35 cells treated with ketamine for seven days were then treated with ketamine or ketamine in combination with PRP or WP for another seven days. The expression levels of RhoA, CDC42, ROCK1, N-WASP, and PAK1 were examined using western blotting in this experiment. The bar charts were calculated based on triplicate western blot data from three batches of drug-treated cells using Student’s t-test (; ). C/CTRL: control; PRP: Poria cocos cum Radix Pini; WP: White Poria.

Postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95) is a scaffold protein that can promote excitatory synapse maturation of neurons. The expression and accumulation of PSD-95 in postsynaptic dendrites is closely related to Rho protein-dependent cell cytoskeleton regulation [15, 27]. We observed that ketamine decreased PSD-95 expression, which was recovered by WP treatment in B35 cells (Figures 8(e) and 8(f)).

4. Discussion

P. cocos (Schw.) is a saprophytic fungus that parasitizes various species of Pinus, such as Pinus densiflora and Pinus massoniana [28]. Recent pharmacological research has revealed that P. cocos polysaccharides have antinephritic, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antitumor effects [29–31]. P. cocos has been proposed to treat insomnia through the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid or by stimulating the γ-aminobutyric acid AA receptor [32]. P. cocos water extracts have also been suggested as herbal medicines for treating depression [33]. A recent study reported that P. cocos polysaccharides exhibited neuroprotective effects by regulating various cell functions in an Alzheimer’s disease rat model [34]. P. cocos has also been found to exhibit antioxidant ability against oxidative stress and to prevent PC12 β-amyloid-induced cell death [35].

Rho protein signaling could modulate cell apoptotic gene expression, migration, morphological modulation, and cytoskeletal reorganization by regulating ROCK1 function and downstream MLC2 phosphorylation [16]. The phosphorylation of MLC2 will then induce myosin activation and stress fiber contraction in cells [36, 37]. In addition, the RhoA protein can regulate the expression of ARP2/3 to control cell filopodia and migration [38, 39]. CDC42-induced PAK1/N-WASP activation can also regulate ARP2/3-mediated cytoskeletal remodeling [40]. Recent studies also reported that, in addition to RAC1, PAK1 can be regulated by CDC42 signaling to affect cell migration [41–43]. These findings indicate that neuronal dysfunction caused by abnormal Rho protein expression/activation and downstream Rho protein-mediated pathway signaling may be corrected by reconstructing Rho protein signaling.

In this study, we found that PRP and WP could enhance RhoA, RhoA-GTP, ROCK1, and p-MLC2 expression in B35 neuronal cells. We also observed that PRP and WP could induce CDC42, CDC42-GTP, and N-WASP expression in B35 cells. In addition, PRP and WP enhanced the migration ability and induced F-actin condensation in B35 cells. These results indicate that PRP and WP can regulate cell migration and F-actin aggregation by regulating the Rho signaling pathway, especially by affecting RhoA and CDC42 instead of Rac1.

We also investigated whether ketamine inhibits the migration ability of B35 cells and modulates RhoA, CDC42, ROCK1, and N-WASP expression levels. Ketamine-induced Rho signaling regulation has been linked to various mental disorders. Our results show that PRP and WP can restore ketamine-induced cell migration inhibition and can reverse the ketamine-induced expression regulation of RhoA, CDC42, ROCK1, and N-WASP. These findings suggest that PRP and WP have the potential to correct dysfunction in impaired neurons by regulating abnormal Rho protein signaling.

ROCK1 and PAK1 act as regulators of cofilin activity by modulating LIM kinase activity. High expression levels of ROCK1 and PAK1 can inhibit cofilin activity, leading to further actin polymerization and F-actin stabilization [44, 45]. Our results showed that the expression of ROCK1 and N-WASP induced by PRP/WP enhanced the expression of p-MLC2 and ARP2/3, together with the expression of ROCK1 and PAK1 induced by PRP/WP, leading to cell migration, actin polymerization, and F-actin stabilization. In addition, we found unstable PAK1 expression levels among different control B35 samples and drug-treated B35 cells. We propose that the expression levels of PAK1 might be dynamically controlled by some unrevealed factors. Further studies should be performed to come to a reasonable conclusion about the unstable PAK1 expression.

We also found that WP exhibited effects on Rho protein signaling regulation in C6 cells similar to those observed in B35 cells. WP also induced ROCK1, PAK1, N-WASP, and p-MLC2 expression. These findings suggest that WP could enhance migration and F-actin aggregation in C6 cells by controlling Rho protein expression. Interestingly, the downregulation of RhoA and CDC42 expression induced by PRP could still increase the expression of ROCK1, PAK1, N-WASP, and p-MLC2 in C6 cells and induce cell migration and F-actin concentration.

There may be two reasons for these observations. First, the feedback inhibition of RhoGDI1, RhoA, and CDC42, as well as cross-talk between Rho protein signaling in C6 cells, may be the possible regulatory mechanisms by which cells maintain the signal balance between Rho proteins and related cell functions. Second, the lower expression levels of RhoA and CDC42 in C6 cells may be because there are components in PRP that are different from WP that can specifically reduce the expression levels of RhoA and CDC42 in C6 cells.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we found that PRP and WP could enhance migration and F-actin condensation in B35 and C6 cells. We also observed that PRP and WP regulated Rho protein signaling. Ketamine-induced cell migration inhibition and some Rho signaling regulation can be reversed by PRP and WP treatment. These findings suggest that PRP and WP regulate cell migration and F-actin condensation by differentially modulating Rho protein signaling in B35 and C6 cells. These results also show that PRP and WP can regulate Rho protein signaling in neurons and glial cells and, therefore, have the potential to further regulate abnormal cell functions related to mental disorders.

Abbreviations

APD:	Antipsychotic drug
ARP2/3:	Actin-related protein 2/3
CDC42:	Cell division cycle 42
F-actin:	Actin filament
NMDAR:	N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor
N-WASP:	Neuronal Wiskott–Aldrich Syndrome protein
p-MLC2:	Phosphorylated myosin light chain 2
PAK1:	p21 (RAC1) activated kinase 1
PFN1:	Profilin 1
PRP:	Poria cocos cum Radix Pini
PSD-95:	Postsynaptic density protein 95
RhoA:	Ras homolog family member A
RhoGDI1:	Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor 1
ROCK1:	Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1
WP:	White Poria.

Data Availability

The datasets used or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

CY Lee and CY Kuo designed and conducted the experiments. CT Lee and FM Tsai designed the experiments and analyzed the data. IS Tzeng performed statistical analysis. ML Chen conceived the study, designed, and conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant (TCRD–TPE–108–13) from the Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital through the Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan.

References

M. J. Cuella, R. M. Giner, M. C. Recio, M. J. Just, S. Manez, and J. L. Rios, “Two fungal lanostane derivatives as phospholipase A2 inhibitors,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 977–979, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
J. L. Rios, “Chemical constituents and pharmacological properties of Poria cocos,” Planta Medica, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 681–691, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. L. Feng, Y. Y. Zhao, F. Ding et al., “Chemical constituents of surface layer of Poria cocos and their pharmacological properties (I),” Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1098–1102, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. J. Cuellar, R. M. Giner, M. C. Recio, M. J. Just, S. Manez, and J. L. Rios, “Effect of the basidiomycete Poria cocos on experimental dermatitis and other inflammatory conditions,” Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 492–494, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Spelman, J. Burns, D. Nichols, N. Winters, S. Ottersberg, and M. Tenborg, “Modulation of cytokine expression by traditional medicines: a review of herbal immunomodulators,” Alternative Medicine Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 128–150, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
S. J. Yu and J. Tseng, “Fu-Ling, a Chinese herbal drug, modulates cytokine secretion by human peripheral blood monocytes,” International Journal of Immunopharmacology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Kaminaga, K. Yasukawa, H. Kanno, T. Tai, Y. Nunoura, and M. Takido, “Inhibitory effects of lanostane-type triterpene acids, the components of Poria cocos, on tumor promotion by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate in two-stage carcinogenesis in mouse skin,” Oncology, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 382–385, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
H. M. Kang, S. K. Lee, D. S. Shin et al., “Dehydrotrametenolic acid selectively inhibits the growth of H-ras transformed rat2 cells and induces apoptosis through caspase-3 pathway,” Life Sciences, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 607–613, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Ukiya, T. Akihisa, H. Tokuda et al., “Inhibition of tumor-promoting effects by poricoic acids G and H and other lanostane-type triterpenes and cytotoxic activity of poricoic acids A and G from Poria cocos,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 462–465, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Chen, W. An, and J. Chu, “Effect of water extract of Poria on cytosolic free calcium concentration in brain nerve cells of neonatal rats,” Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 293–295, 1956.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Buchtova, I. Fajnerova, A. Stuchlik, and S. Kubik, “Acute systemic MK-801 induced functional uncoupling between hippocampal areas CA3 and CA1 with distant effect in the retrosplenial cortex,” Hippocampus, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 134–144, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. Ivy, C. S. Rex, Y. Chen et al., “Hippocampal dysfunction and cognitive impairments provoked by chronic early-life stress involve excessive activation of CRH receptors,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 39, pp. 13005–13015, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Han, L. Xu, H. Xiao, G. C. Prado Schmidt, and S. Shi, “Dizocilpine reduces head diameter of dendritic spines in the hippocampus of adolescent rats,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 210, no. 1, pp. 351–356, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Juliandi, K. Tanemura, K. Igarashi et al., “Reduced adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive impairments following prenatal treatment of the antiepileptic drug valproic acid,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 996–1009, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Schubert, J. S. Da Silva, and C. G. Dotti, “Localized recruitment and activation of RhoA underlies dendritic spine morphology in a glutamate receptor-dependent manner,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 453–467, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Jiang, Z. Hao, X. Li et al., “Ketamine destabilizes growth of dendritic spines in developing hippocampal neurons in vitro via a Rhodependent mechanism,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 5037–5043, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
D. A. Fletcher and R. D. Mullins, “Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton,” Nature, vol. 463, no. 7280, pp. 485–492, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
F. C. Tsai, G. H. Kuo, S. W. Chang, and P. J. Tsai, “Ca2+ signaling in cytoskeletal reorganization, cell migration, and cancer metastasis,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 409245, 13 pages, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
D. D. Tang and B. D. Gerlach, “The roles and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, intermediate filaments and microtubules in smooth muscle cell migration,” Respiratory Research, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 54, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Yamazaki, S. Kurisu, and T. Takenawa, “Regulation of cancer cell motility through actin reorganization,” Cancer Science, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 379–386, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Nakahata and R. Yasuda, “Plasticity of spine structure: local signaling, translation and cytoskeletal reorganization,” Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 29, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Kuriu, A. Inoue, H. Bito, K. Sobue, and S. Okabe, “Differential control of postsynaptic density scaffolds via actin-dependent and -independent mechanisms,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 29, pp. 7693–7706, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Hayashi, T. S. Yamamoto, and N. Ueno, “Intracellular calcium signal at the leading edge regulates mesodermal sheet migration during Xenopus gastrulation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 2433, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Wei, X. Wang, M. Zheng, and H. Cheng, “Calcium gradients underlying cell migration,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 254–261, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Sakurada, N. Takuwa, N. Sugimoto et al., “Ca2+-dependent activation of Rho and Rho kinase in membrane depolarization-induced and receptor stimulation-induced vascular smooth muscle contraction,” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 548–556, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Chen, F. M. Tsai, M. C. Lee, and Y. Y. Lin, “Antipsychotic drugs induce cell cytoskeleton reorganization in glial and neuronal cells via Rho/Cdc42 signal pathway,” Progress In Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, vol. 71, pp. 14–26, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
M. J. Kim, K. Futai, J. Jo, Y. Hayashi, K. Cho, and M. Sheng, “Synaptic accumulation of PSD-95 and synaptic function regulated by phosphorylation of serine-295 of PSD-95,” Neuron, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 488–502, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
C. I. Esteban, “[Medicinal interest of Poria cocos (= Wolfiporia extensa)],” Revista Iberoamericana De Micologia, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 103–107, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Hattori, K. Hayashi, T. Nagao, K. Furuta, M. Ito, and Y. Suzuki, “Studies on antinephritic effects of plant components (3): effect of pachyman, a main component of Poria cocos Wolf on original-type anti-GBM nephritis in rats and its mechanisms,” The Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Tian, Z. Liu, Y. Pu, and Y. Bao, “Immunomodulatory effects exerted by Poria Cocos polysaccharides via TLR4/TRAF6/NF-kappaB signaling in vitro and in vivo,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 112, Article ID 108709, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Li, Y. He, P. Zeng et al., “Molecular basis for Poria cocos mushroom polysaccharide used as an antitumour drug in China,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 4–20, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Singh and K. Zhao, “Treatment of insomnia with traditional Chinese herbal medicine,” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 135, pp. 97–115, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. J. Huang, N. Y. Hsu, K. H. Lu et al., “Poria cocos water extract ameliorates the behavioral deficits induced by unpredictable chronic mild stress in rats by down-regulating inflammation,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 258, Article ID 112566, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Y. Jiang, C. Zhou, and Y. Ling, “Poria cocos polysaccharide attenuates damage of nervus in Alzheimer’s disease rat model induced by D-galactose and aluminum trichloride,” NeuroReport, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 727–737, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. H. Park, I. H. Son, B. Kim, Y. S. Lyu, H. I. Moon, and H. W. Kang, “Poria cocos water extract (PCW) protects PC12 neuronal cells from beta-amyloid-induced cell death through antioxidant and antiapoptotic functions,” Die Pharmazie, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 760–764, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Shi, X. Wu, M. Surma et al., “Distinct roles for ROCK1 and ROCK2 in the regulation of cell detachment,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 4, p. e483, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. S. Da Silva, M. Medina, C. Zuliani, A. Di Nardo, W. Witke, and C. G. Dotti, “RhoA/ROCK regulation of neuritogenesis via profilin IIa-mediated control of actin stability,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 162, no. 7, pp. 1267–1279, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. C. Bischoff, S. Lieb, R. Renkawitz-Pohl, and S. Bogdan, “Filopodia-based contact stimulation of cell migration drives tissue morphogenesis,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 791, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Huang, X. Yi, C. Kang, and C. Wu, “Arp2/3-Branched actin maintains an active pool of GTP-RhoA and controls RhoA abundance,” Cells, vol. 8, 10 pages, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Parsons, J. Monypenny, S. M. Ameer-Beg et al., “Spatially distinct binding of Cdc42 to PAK1 and N-WASP in breast carcinoma cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1680–1695, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Imamura, K. Takaishi, K. Nakano et al., “Rho and Rab small G proteins coordinately reorganize stress fibers and focal adhesions in MDCK cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 2561–2575, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Sells, J. T. Boyd, and J. Chernoff, “p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) regulates cell motility in mammalian fibroblasts,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 145, no. 4, pp. 837–849, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Del Pozo, W. B. Kiosses, N. B. Alderson, N. Meller, K. M. Hahn, and M. A. Schwartz, “Integrins regulate GTP-Rac localized effector interactions through dissociation of Rho-GDI,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 232–239, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Cook, B. J. Bolkan, and D. Kretzschmar, “Increased actin polymerization and stabilization interferes with neuronal function and survival in the AMPKgamma mutant Loechrig,” PloS One, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e89847, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Geneste, J. W. Copeland, and R. Treisman, “LIM kinase and Diaphanous cooperate to regulate serum response factor and actin dynamics,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 157, no. 5, pp. 831–838, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Chia-Yu Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

427

Downloads

705

Citations