Abstract

In this paper, we introduce new sequential fractional differential equations with mixed-type boundary conditions where is a real number, is the Caputo fractional derivative, and the boundary conditions include antiperiodic and Riemann-Liouville fractional integral boundary value cases. Our approach to treat the above problem is based upon standard tools of fixed point theory and some new inequalities of norm form. Some existence results are obtained and well illustrated through the aid of examples.

1. Introduction

In this paper, we focus on sequential fractional differential equations with mixed-type boundary conditions. where is a real number and , is the Caputo fractional derivative of order . The nonlinearity term contains the unknown function and its lower order fractional derivatives. The new boundary conditions include antiperiodic and Riemann-Liouville fractional integral boundary value cases which can be regarded as the linear combination of the values of the unknown function and its first derivatives at the end points of interval, and the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral value of the unknown function and its first derivatives at an interior point of interval.

Fractional differential equations have attracted significant attention for their wide application in many fields of engineering and applied sciences (see [110]). Sequential fractional differential equations as an importance branch have also received wide attention; for instance, see [1116]. Motivated by the HIV infection model and its application background in [12], the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the following sequential fractional differential system are obtained by means of Leray-Schauder’s alternative and Banach’s contraction principle where () is a parameter; , , , and are the Caputo fractional derivatives; and the nonlinearity terms are the given continuous function.

Antiperiodic boundary conditions arise in the mathematical problems of certain physical phenomena and processes. Recently, many scholars paid attention to solvability for fractional differential equations involving antiperiodic boundary conditions (see [1721]). For example, in [21], the authors considered the nonlinear antiperiodic boundary value problems where is the Caputo fractional derivatives of order , , (), , , is a continuous function.

Integral boundary conditions are believed to be more reasonable than the local boundary conditions, which can describe modeling of blood flow, cellular systems, population dynamics, heat transmission, etc. There are a number of results about fractional differential equations and partial differential equations with integral boundary condition; we refer the reader to see [17, 20, 2243] and the references cited therein. In [20], the authors discussed the following fractional differential equation with integral boundary conditions given by where and are the Caputo fractional derivatives; , , , and are real numbers; and is a given continuous function.

Observing the results of the above literature, an interesting and important question is whether antiperiodic and integral boundary conditions can be unified in a system. If we have unified the conditions, how can we obtain the existence of the solutions? Through a literature search, the sequential fractional differential equation (1) has not been given up to now.

Now in this paper, we shall discuss the problem (1) by using the standard tools of fixed point theory and some new inequalities of norm from.

2. Preliminary and Lemmas

In this paper, we provide some necessary definitions and lemmas of the Caputo fractional calculus; for more information, see the books [13].

Definition 1. The Caputo derivative of fractional order for a -times continuously differentiable function is defined as where and denotes the integer part of number .

Definition 2. The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order for a function is defined as where .

Lemma 3. The Caputo fractional differential equation has the general solution for where , , and is given as in Definition 1.

Lemma 4. Let and . Then, the following sequential fractional differential equations have a unique solution where

Proof. Using Lemma 3, the general solution of the fractional differential equations can be written as where . Differentiating (11) with respect to , we get Applying the boundary condition (8) in (11) and (12), we obtain A simultaneous solution of equation (13) leads to Substituting and to (11), we obtain the desired solution in (9). The converse of the lemma follows by direct computation. The proof is completed.

Remark 5. Caputo fractional differentiating (11) with respect to , we obtain where is defined as (14).
Set is all the continuous functions on , . Let denotes the Banach space endowed with the norm defined by . For the convenience of the proofs in the next main results, we first give the bounds for integrals arising from the sequel, which are very important for us to establish the existence of solutions for problem (1).

Lemma 6. Suppose that . Then, we have (i)(ii)

Proof. (i)Obviously, we have Furthermore, Hence, When the proof of (ii) is similar to (i), we omit it.
In view of Lemma 4 and Remark 5, replacing by in (9) and (15), we transform the solution of problem (1) into the fixed point of operator equation , where operator is defined as

Lemma 7 (see [44]). Let be completely continuous (i.e., a map restricted to any bounded set in is compact). Let Then, either set is unbounded or has at least one fixed point.

Lemma 8 (see [45]). Let be a Banach space, be closed and a strict contraction, i.e., for some and all . Then, has a unique fixed point.

3. Main Results

Before starting and introducing the main results, we list our assumption for : (i)H0: is continuous(ii)H1: there exist positive constants such that (iii)H2: there exist positive constants such that (iv)H3: there exist positive constants such that (v)H4: there exist positive constants such that (vi)H5: there exist positive constants such that

For convenience, we introduce the following symbols:

Theorem 9. Suppose that (H0) and (H1) hold. Then, problem (1) has at least one solution.

Proof. We first define a ball in E as , where Then, we show that . For , using Lemma 6 and the condition (H1), we have From (29) and (30), we obtain This means .
From the formula (19), it is easy to know that operators are continuous on . Now, we show that operator is equicontinuous. Set Let , we have In (33) and (34), letting t1 ⟶ t2, then, That is, as t1 ⟶ t2, Therefore, is an equicontinuous set. Furthermore, it is uniformly bounded because of . Applying the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem, we can infer that is a completely continuous operator.
Consider and show that is bounded. For , we know . By Lemma 7, problem (1) has at least one solution in .

Theorem 10. Suppose that (H0) and (H2) hold. If , then problem (1) has at least one solution.

Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 9. We just need to make sure that satisfies in .

Theorem 11. Suppose that (H0) and (H3) hold. If , then problem (1) has at least one solution.

Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 9, we omit it.

Theorem 12. Suppose that (H0) and (H4) hold. If , then problem (1) has at least one solution.

Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 10, we omit it.

Theorem 13. Suppose that (H0) and (H5) hold. If , then problem (1) has a unique solution.

Proof. Define , such that .
First, we show that , where . For , by direct calculation, we have Combining (37) and (38), we obtain Now, for any , we have Similar to (40), one has Therefore, Since , is a contraction operator. Using Lemma 8, operator has a unique fixed point which is the unique solution of problem (1).
In order to illustrate our main results, we consider the following sequential fractional differential equations: where and .

Example 1. Let . So we have where , , , , and . Theorem 9 implies that problem (43) has at least one solution.

Example 2. Let . By direct calculation, we obtain that In the meantime, we have where and . So we obtain . Theorem 10 implies that problem (43) has at least one solution.

Example 3. Let . So we have where and . Combining with the calculation result of Example 2, we can obtain that . Hence, Theorem 13 implies that problem (43) has a unique solution.

4. Conclusions

We have obtained some existence results for new sequential fractional differential equations by using some nonlinear growth conditions which is different from the existing linear condition. Obviously, these results are easy to verify and apply (see Example 1 and Example 3).

On the other hand, we note that our results contain some special types of results by fixing the parameters in the given problem (1). For instance, let , , , , , and , then the results of this paper are the following sequential fractional differential equations with the boundary value conditions of the form and . Further, letting α1 = 0, β1 = 1, γ1 = − 1, ϵ1 = 0, α2 = 0, β2 = 1, γ2 = − 1, and ϵ2 = 0, we obtain the results for the boundary conditions and .

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Nature Science Foundation of Anhui Education Department (Grant No. KJ2017A422, Grant No. KJ2017A702, Grant No. KJ2018A0452, and Grant No. KJ2019A0666), Teaching Team Foundation of Suzhou University (Grant No. 2019XJSN03 and Grant No. szxy2018jxtd02), and Professional Leader Program of Suzhou University (Grant No. 2019XJZY02).