Discovery of a Novel Microtubule Targeting Agent as an Adjuvant for Cancer Immunotherapy

Sato-Kaneko, Fumi; Wang, Xiaodong; Yao, Shiyin; Hosoya, Tadashi; Lao, Fitzgerald S.; Messer, Karen; Pu, Minya; Shukla, Nikunj M.; Cottam, Howard B.; Chan, Michael; Carson, Dennis A.; Corr, Maripat; Hayashi, Tomoko

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8091283

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 8091283 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8091283

Discovery of a Novel Microtubule Targeting Agent as an Adjuvant for Cancer Immunotherapy

Fumi Sato-Kaneko,¹Xiaodong Wang,^1,2Shiyin Yao,¹Tadashi Hosoya,¹Fitzgerald S. Lao,¹Karen Messer,³Minya Pu,³Nikunj M. Shukla,¹Howard B. Cottam,¹Michael Chan,¹Dennis A. Carson,¹and Maripat Corr⁴ et al.

Academic Editor: Lei Zheng

Received23 Jul 2018

Accepted17 Sept 2018

Published10 Oct 2018

Abstract

For an activating immunotherapy such as adjuvants, a compound that can prolong immune stimulation may enhance efficacy. We leveraged data from two prior high throughput screens with NF-B and interferon reporter cell lines to identify 4H-chromene-3-carbonitriles as a class of compounds that prolonged activation in both screens. We repurchased 23 of the most promising candidates. Out of these compounds we found #1 to be the most effective agent in stimulating the release of cytokines and chemokines from immune cells, including murine primary bone marrow derived dendritic cells. Mechanistically, #1 inhibited tubulin polymerization, and its effect on immune cell activation was abolished in cells mutated in the beta-tubulin gene (TUBB) encoding the site where colchicine binds. Treatment with #1 resulted in mitochondrial depolarization followed by mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. Because tubulin polymerization modulating agents have been used for chemotherapy to treat malignancy and #1 activated cytokine responses, we hypothesized that #1 could be effective for cancer immunotherapy. Intratumoral injection of #1 delayed tumor growth in a murine syngeneic model of head and neck cancer. When combined with PD-1 blockade, tumor growth slowed in the injected tumor nodule and there was an abscopal effect in an uninjected nodule on the contralateral flank, suggesting central antitumor immune activation. Thus, we identified a new class of tubulin depolymerizing agent that acts as both an innate and an adaptive immune activating agent and that limits solid tumor growth when used concurrently with a checkpoint inhibitor.

1. Introduction

Activation of dendritic cells (DCs) is one of the critical first steps in developing an antigen specific adaptive immune response. The NF-B pathway is upregulated after antigen presenting cell (APC) activation and inflammatory cytokines are produced [1, 2]. As a safeguard to prevent excessive inflammation which could be deleterious to the host, negative feedback molecules are subsequently induced, which then attenuate these processes [3, 4]. Therapies aimed at activating the immune system (vaccinations and tumor immunotherapy) require stimulation of APCs but could benefit from overcoming negative feedback loops to sustain signaling of NF-B and other pathways through the time required for the APCs to traffic to draining lymph nodes.

Hence, we aimed to identify small molecular weight compounds that enhanced and prolonged innate immune stimulation by using two high throughput screens (HTS) with THP-1 reporter cell lines for NF-B [5] and interferon activation [6]. The THP-1 NF-B-bla cell lines and the THP-1 ISRE-bla cell lines are equipped with a beta-lactamase reporter gene under the control of an NF-B response or an ISRE response element, respectively. We stimulated these reporter cell lines with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or human type I interferon (IFN) as primary stimulators and concurrently with 166,000 individual compounds to screen for extended reporter activity after 12 h or 16 h incubation [5, 6]. Analysis of the results revealed that compounds with a 4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile scaffold exhibited an immune phenotype of preventing deactivation or prolonging the activation of both NF-B by LPS at 12 h and ISRE at 16 h [5]. An agent with the ability to prolong the key signaling pathways critical to the function of APCs, NF-B or type I IFN would be advantageous as an immune stimulating adjuvant.

While most adjuvants target innate immune receptors, such as Toll-like receptors (TLR) and intracellular nucleotide receptors, recent studies have also indicated other potential targets, including microtubules. Microtubules interact with many intracellular proteins and regulate protein trafficking of multiple signaling pathways [7–13]. Clinically, microtubules have been a direct target for anticancer drugs because of their roles in mitosis and cellular dynamics [14–16]. Recent reports indicate that specific microtubule depolymerization agents induce immunogenic cell death of cancer cells and improve outcomes of cancer immunotherapy [17, 18]. Some of these agents can directly stimulate innate immune responses and activate murine DCs by upregulating maturation-markers and by induction of proinflammatory cytokines [7, 19].

Despite the potential of microtubules as a promising target, few chemically distinct compounds have been brought forward as immune adjuvants. In this study, we characterize a small molecule with a 4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile scaffold, which was confirmed to induce and sustain NF-B activation and to induce cytokine production by primary murine APCs and a human monocytic cell line (THP-1). This compound triggered mitochondrial stress via inhibition of microtubule polymerization and induced mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) activation. We further demonstrate that intratumoral administration of the lead compound both reduced tumor growth in a murine syngeneic head and neck cancer model and enhanced an immune response with concurrent use of anti-PD-1 antibodies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mice

Six- to eight-week-old C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, MA). All animal experiments received prior approval by the UCSD Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

2.2. Cells and Reagents

THP-1 NF-B-bla cell lines were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). THP-1 ISRE-bla cell lines were developed by Thermo Fisher Scientific [6]. THP-1 cells were purchased from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). Cells were cultured in RPMI medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Omega Scientific Inc., Tarzana, CA), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 55 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Mouse primary bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were generated from bone marrow cells harvested from the femurs of C57BL/6 mice as previously described [20, 21].

The human T cell lymphoblast cell line, CEM, was obtained from ATCC. The CEM-178 cell line has a point mutation in the TUBB gene. The mutation caused a lysine to arginine substitution at amino acid 350 in the β-tubulin molecule making it resistant to microtubule-depolymerizing agents [22]. B16-OVA cells are a melanoma line transfected to express ovalbumin (OVA) [23]. Wild type mouse tonsil epithelial cells (MTECs) that are human papillomavirus- (HPV-) negative [24, 25] were a gift from Dr. John Lee (Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA) and were cultured in E-media, which consisted of 68% DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 23% Ham F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10% FBS and supplemented with 500 μg/L hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich), 8.4 μg/L cholera toxin (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 μg/L transferrin (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 μg/L insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), 1.36 μg/L tri-iodo-thyronine (Sigma-Aldrich), and 5 μg/L epidermal growth factor (EGF) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). HPV-negative MTECs were tested for mouse pathogen contamination (IMPACT II mouse test, IDEXX BioResearch, Columbia MO) prior to being introduced into mice. LPS-EB Ultrapure (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA), JNK inhibitor S600125 (Selleckchem, Houston, TX), and DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) were used for in vitro experiments. Rat anti-mouse PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (clone, RMP1-14, BioXcell, West Lebanon, NH) and rat IgG2a isotype control (clone 2A3, BioXcell) were used for in vivo experiments. Colchicine was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Other compounds were purchased from ChemBridge Corporation and ChemDiv and were verified for purity (>98%) by LC-MS. Endotoxin levels of all compounds were determined by Endosafe (Charles River Laboratory, Wilmington, MA) and were less than 10 EU/μmol.

2.3. Assay Using THP-1-Blue™ NF-B Cells

The THP-1-Blue™ NF-B cell line has a stable integration of an NF-B-inducible secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) reporter construct and was purchased from InvivoGen (#thp-nfkb). The levels of NF-B-induced SEAP in the cell culture supernatant were measured using QUANTI-Blue, a SEAP detection reagent (#rep-qbl, InvivoGen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.4. Immunoblot

THP-1 cells were rested overnight and then treated with 5 μM #1 in the presence or absence of 4 ng/mL LPS for indicated time periods. Cells were lysed with PhosphoSafe Extraction Reagent (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Manheim, Germany) and 0.1% SDS (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein concentrations were measured using Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Ten μg of reduced and denatured protein per sample was then separated by gel electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in 0.1% Tween-20 Tris-buffered saline (TBST) and subsequent washes were done in TBST. Primary antibody and secondary antibody were diluted in 5% bovine serum albumin- (BSA-) TBST and 5% nonfat milk-TBST. Anti-phospho NF-B p65 (#3033), anti-NF-B p65 (#8242), anti-IBα (#4814), anti-phospho JNK (#9251), anti-JNK (#9252) anti-β-actin (#3700), anti-rabbit (#7074), and anti-mouse IgG HRP-linked antibodies (#7067) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA).

2.5. Immunofluorescent Staining

THP-1 cells were treated with 5 μM #1 in the presence or absence of 4 ng/mL LPS for 2 and 8 h. After treatment, cells were fixed for 20 min at room temperature with 3.7% formaldehyde and then incubated in 0.1% Triton X-100-PBS for 20 min and incubated in 3% BSA-PBS for 30 min at room temperature. After rinsing with PBS, cells were stained with anti-NF-B p65 rabbit monoclonal antibody overnight at 4°C (1:800, #8482, Cell Signaling Technology). After rinsing with PBS, cells were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 for 1 h at room temperature (1:600, #111-545-144, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). After washing in PBS, cells were mounted in anti-fade reagent with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (#P36931, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and images were captured using an Axio Imager (Zeiss, Germany).

2.6. Gene Expression Analyses

QuantiGene Plex Assay kits for IL8, IL1B, CCL2, and IL23A were provided by Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA). 10⁶ cell/mL of THP-1 cells were treated with 5 μM #1 with 10 ng/mL LPS. After 4 and 16 h treatment, the culture supernatants were removed, and cells were lysed in lysis buffer. Assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols. For quantitative RT-PCR, RNA was extracted from THP-1 cells using RNA extract kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) and was reverse-transcribed using iScript (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA). TaqMan Gene Expression assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were performed using CFX-Connect Real-Time System using primers for HPRT (Hs02800695_m1), IL1B (Hs01555410_m1), IL8 (Hs00174103_m1) CCL2 (Hs00234140_m1), and IL23A (Hs00372324_m1) as previously described [26].

2.7. ELISA and Cell Viability Assay

Mouse BMDCs, THP-1 cells, CEM cells, or TUBB mutant CEM-178 cells [22] were treated with compound (0.1 or 5 μM) or vehicle in the presence or absence of LPS overnight. A portion of the supernatant was transferred and secreted levels of KC, IL-6, IL-12, and IL-1β were assessed by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s protocol (R&D systems). 0.5 mg/mL 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-dipheyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Thermo Fisher Scientific) solution was added to each well and incubated 6 h and formazan crystals were then lysed with lysis buffer (15% SDS and 0.12% 12 N HCl). The absorbance was measured at 570 nm using 650 nm as a reference with a plate reader (Tecan, Switzerland).

2.8. Tubulin Polymerization Assay

Tubulin polymerization was tested by a tubulin polymerization assay kit (#BK011P, Cytoskeleton Inc., Denver, CO) in the presence of vehicle (DMSO), 3 μM compound, or colchicine according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.9. RNA Sequencing

THP-1 cells were incubated for 5 h with vehicle control or 5 μM #1 alone and then RNA was isolated. High throughput RNAseq was performed by the sequencing core at La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology (San Diego, CA). Briefly each experimental group had 3 replicates. RNAseq was used to obtain gene expression values. Reads were mapped using TopHat with hg19 annotation; reads mapped to tRNA/rRNA, adapters, and intergenic regions were filtered; HTseq was used for read count quantification. Genes were filtered if more than 2/3 of the samples had counts <10. About 13,500 genes were included in final analyses. Raw counts were then upper-quantile normalized and used as expression values in the following analysis. Linear models for microarray (Limma, using R-limma package) were used to compare groups regarding log2 expression values. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was applied to control the false discovery rate (FDR). A gene was considered significantly changed if FDR <0.05. If log₂ fold change in expression for a test compound versus control was greater than 0, it was said to be upregulated; otherwise, it was downregulated. In addition, log₂ fold changes between two groups of interest (e.g., #1 versus vehicle) for all the genes included in the analysis set were extracted and preranked for gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA, using GSEA v3.0 from the Broad Institute). Enrichment in KEGG pathways (c2.cp.kegg.v6 from Broad Institute) was examined. For each gene set, the number of expressed genes in the analysis dataset was calculated along with enrichment score, the p value and q value for testing enrichment significance, and the number of core enrichment genes.

2.10. Cell Cycle Analysis

2.5 × 10⁵ cells/mL THP-1 cells were cultured with 5 μM #1 overnight. Cells were fixed in 70 % ethanol for 5 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, cells were stained with 10 μg/mL of DAPI for 15 min at room temperature and analyzed by flow cytometry (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). Data was analyzed with FlowJo software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).

2.11. Mitochondria Stress Assay

THP-1 cells, WT CEM cells, and CEM-178 cells were treated with 0.1 or 5 μM #1, colchicine, and vinblastine for 72 h. MitoTracker Red FM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol to examine depolarized mitochondria by flow cytometry.

2.12. Control of Established Tumor Growth and Conditional Survival

2 x 10⁶ HPV-negative MTECs in 50 μL were implanted in both flanks of C57BL/6 male mice. When the diameter of the tumors reached 2-4 mm (approximately day 7), treatment was initiated. 20-200 nmol #1 or vehicle (10% DMSO) was injected intratumorally in a total volume of 50 μL and anti-PD-1mAb (250 μg/injection) or rat IgG2a isotype control was intraperitoneally injected in a volume of 100 μL. Tumors were measured on two perpendicular axes using a caliper. Estimates of tumor volume (mm³) were calculated using ([width]² x [length]/2). Mice were euthanized if the tumor diameter reached 15 mm or the tumor ulcerated in accordance with UCSD IACUC guidelines.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means with standard error of mean (SEM) or standard deviation (SD). For analysis of in vitro data, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test was used to compare multiple groups and a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare two groups. Two-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni corrected post hoc test was used for the in vivo data. The log rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to test for a significant difference between Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) was used; all comparisons are two-sided at 5% significance level.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure-Activity Relationship Studies in 4H-Chromene-3-Carbonitriles

We had previously identified 4H-chromene-3-carbonitriles as a class of compounds that prolonged NF-B activation by LPS [5] in a high throughput screen (HTS) with 166,304 compounds. In a separate HTS we noted that this scaffold was also active in prolongation of an ISRE signal induced by IFNα [6]. By reanalyzing the two studies we identified 1,778 compounds with the 4H-chromene substructure that were screened in both HTS. We plotted the “% activation” values relative to their respective controls for these compounds from the NF-B versus the ISRE HTS (Figure 1(a)). We then examined the structural features that are necessary for these potencies in two different immune activating assays. The 4H-chromene-3-carbonitriles have two sites of variability (Figure 1(a) inset): first, the site fused to the chromene ring, as shown by wiggly lines and, second, the R group at position 4. Substructural classification by the scaffold fused to the chromene ring yielded 13 major groups (Supplementary Table 1).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1

Structure-activity relationship studies in 4H-chromene-3-carbonitriles. (a) HTS identification of the 4H-chromene-3-carbonitriles (insert) as a hit scaffold. We reanalyzed the data from two prior HTS for prolongation of NF-B activation 12 h after LPS versus ISRE activation 16 h after IFNα administration with a chemical library containing 1,778 compounds within this scaffold. The %activation values of each compound relative to the LPS and IFNα controls in the original HTS, respectively, are shown. (b) Structures for fused naphthalene, fused pyrazole, fused benzodioxolane, and fused dimethylaminobenzene scaffolds. (c) SEAP production by the THP-1-Blue NF-B reporter cell line stimulated with 5 μM of each compound in the absence versus the presence of 10 ng/mL LPS. Each symbol indicates the means ± SEM for triplicates of individual compounds. (d) IL-12 secretion by BMDCs stimulated with compounds in the presence of 0.5 ng/mL LPS significantly correlated with SEAP production measured by THP-1-Blue NF-B reporter cells measured in triplicate. The dotted line indicates the regression line (Spearman r=0.81, P<0.0001, n=23). Each symbol indicates the means ± SEM for triplicates of individual compounds.

Most of the potent compounds belonged to four major groups: fused naphthalene, fused pyrazole, fused benzodioxolane, and fused dimethylaminobenzene, with each group having more than 2 compounds with “% activation” values greater than 90% full activation in either of the HTS screens (Figure 1(a)). The structures for these scaffolds are shown in Figure 1(b), with variable sites marked by R and R’. While the 4H-chromene-3-carbitrile scaffolds have been associated with pan-assay interference (PAINS) compounds due to presence of α-β unsaturated nitriles, it is important to note that the activity here was not related to this functional group as the vast majority of compounds in this series were inactive and only a specific subset of compounds was potent in both screens.

Within each group identified above, the compounds that had a 3-substitution (meta) on the phenyl ring and at the 4-position of the chromene were more active compared to the 2-position (ortho), while 4-monosubstituted (para) phenyls were inactive. Also, within the fused naphthalene group, compounds that were derived from 1-naphthol (solid bonds in black Figure 1(b)) were more active than compounds derived from 2-naphthol (dotted bonds in black Figure 1(b)), which were completely inactive, clearly indicating the structural requirements for activity. Thus, both the angle of the fused group and substitution at the 4-position of the chromene play key roles for activity in prolonging NF-B activation.

To further evaluate these four chemical groups, we purchased 23 compounds from commercial vendors and confirmed their purity by LC-MS. Among the fused naphthalene derivatives, 10 compounds were purchased including active hits (#1- #8) and inactive compounds such as 4-isopropyl substituted phenyl (#9) and a 2-naphthol derived compound #10. In the fused pyrazolo series, derivatives #11 - #14 were purchased. Similarly, in the fused dimethylaminobenzene scaffold, #15 - #18, and in the fused benzodioxolane series, #19 - #23, were purchased. The structures for these compounds are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.

3.2. 4H-Chromene-3-Carbonitriles Activate NF-B Signaling in the Presence and Absence of TLR4 Stimulation

Immune activities of these 23 compounds were first evaluated using the THP-1-Blue™ NF-B reporter cell line, which allows quantification of NF-B activation by SEAP levels in the culture supernatant. Compounds were tested in both the absence and presence of LPS (10 ng/mL). Most of the compounds except the fused pyrazole analogs showed innate stimulatory activity as a single agent as well as enhancement of NF-B activity with LPS co-stimulation (Figure 1(c) and Supplementary Table 2). Two inactive analogs in the fused naphthalene series were consistent with very low to no activity in this assay. Most of the fused benzodioxolane analogs were highly active, while some of the fused dimethylaminobenzene analogs were only weakly active.

Next, we assayed these compounds in the presence of LPS for NF-B dependent IL-12 production in primary murine BMDCs, as this is a key cytokine for an APC priming environment (Figure 1(d) and Supplementary Table 2). IL-12 release from BMDCs stimulated by these compounds in the presence of LPS was significantly correlated with NF-B activation (Figure 1(d), Spearman r=0.81, P<0.0001). Most of the compounds in the fused benzodioxolane series were active except the bis-substituted #23. In the fused naphthalene series, besides the inactive analogs, the 2-substituted compound #2 and naphthyl substituted #6 did not enhance induction of IL-12, suggesting that 3-substitution (meta) on the C4-phenyl of the chromene plays a key role for potency.

3.3. Lead Compound Impacts Mitochondrial Function and Cytokine Gene Expression

To examine potential intracellular mechanisms that are targeted by the 4H-chromene-3-carbonitriles we selected a candidate for a lead compound from the fused napthalene series that potently increased IL-12 and SEAP production in the presence of LPS, compound #1 (Figure 1(d)). This compound was the most potent at stimulating innate immune cells (BMDC) to produce IL-12 (EC₅₀=0.23 μM) and IL-6 (EC₅₀=0.15 μM) in the presence of LPS (Figure 2(a) and Supplementary Table 3). We confirmed the effect of compound #1 on phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of NF-B in THP-1 cells (Figures 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d)). The phosphorylation of the p65 subunit of NF-B induced by compound #1 was sustained for at least 24 h (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)). In THP-1 cells, compound #1 stimulated NF-B nuclear translocation at 2 h and 8 h with and without LPS (Figure 2(d)). Gene expression analysis by QuantiGene plex assay showed that NF-B downstream cytokine genes (IL8, IL1B, CCL2, and IL23A) were significantly upregulated in THP-1 cells treated with #1 in the presence of LPS after 16 h treatment (Figure 2(e)). These results were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (Supplementary Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2

Lead compound #1, a fused naphthalene, enhances LPS induced cytokine production and sustains NF-B signaling. (a) EC₅₀ for IL-12 and IL-6 production. BMDCs were treated for 18 h with graded concentrations of #1 (from 10 μM) in the presence of 0.5 ng/mL LPS. 0.5 % DMSO was used as a negative control. IL-12 and IL-6 secretion levels were measured by ELISA. EC₅₀ for IL-12 and IL-6 were 0.23 μM and 0.15 μM, respectively. (b) Immunoblot analysis for NF-B signaling pathway in THP-1 cells. THP-1 cells were treated with compound #1 (5 μM) in the presence or absence of 4 ng/mL LPS at indicated time periods; p-NF-B and t-NF-B indicate phospho-NF-B and total-NF-B, respectively. (c) Relative intensity of bands was calculated using ImageJ software. Band intensities were normalized to vehicle 4 h. (d) Nuclear translocation of NF-B by #1. After 2 h and 8 h treatment with 5 μM #1, THP-1 cells were fixed and stained for NF-B (green) and nuclear DNA (blue). The overlap in the merged images appears pale green. Arrowheads indicate nuclear translocation. Bars indicate 10 μm. (e) NF-B targeted gene expression analysis. THP-1 cells were treated with 5 μM #1 plus 4 ng/mL LPS for 4 h and 16 h. Expressions of IL8, IL1B, CCL2, and IL23A were examined by QuantiGene plex assay and the expression was normalized to HPRT mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) (=100). P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Data are presented as mean ± SD of triplicate and are representative of two independent experiments showing similar results.

After confirming the effects of the lead compound we then explored its impact on the mRNA transcription signature in THP-1 cells by RNAseq analysis. The genes involved in innate immune signaling (“cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction”, “complement and coagulation cascade” and “NOD-like receptor”), NF-B signaling (“MAPK signaling”), and interferon signaling (“JAK-STAT”) pathways in the KEGG analysis were upregulated by compound #1 treatment compared to vehicle (Supplementary Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 3). These pathways were all consistent with the original HTS discoveries that compound #1 is active in regulating NF-B signaling with TLR4 stimulation and ISRE signaling with type I interferon (Figure 1(a)). We also noted that genes involved in “oxidative phosphorylation” and” DNA replication” pathways were significantly downregulated following #1 treatment.

3.4. 4H-Chromene-3-Carbonitriles Inhibit Tubulin Polymerization

The downmodulated KEGG pathways indicated dysregulation of cell division and mitochondrial function. The antiproliferative effects of #1 were confirmed in THP-1 cells; however, cell cycle analysis indicated an accumulation at the G2/M phase rather than an S phase arrest, suggesting that this compound might target the mitotic spindle (Supplementary Figure 4A and 4B). We searched the literature for prior reports of similar molecules that affected cellular replication. One compound, LY290181, with a 4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile scaffold [2-amino-4-(3-pyridyl)-4H-naphtho(1,2-b) pyran-3-carbonitrile] was described as inhibiting vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation after balloon angioplasty for coronary artery disease [27]. LY290181 was reported to inhibit cell proliferation by binding to tubulin with high affinity and inhibiting microtubule polymerization [28–30]

Based on this report and our functional RNAseq data, we examined all 23 4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile compounds for their ability to inhibit microtubule polymerization using a cell free fluorescence-based assay (Figures 3(a)–3(d)). Some of the compounds belonging to fused naphthalene and fused dimethylaminobenzene groups showed modest inhibition compared to the colchicine control, while compounds in the fused benzodioxolane and fused pyrazole groups showed minimal if any inhibition. These data suggested that compounds in two classes of derivatives attenuated microtubule polymerization.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.5. Inhibition of Tubulin polymerization Leads to Mitochondrial Stress and Immune Activation

Intracellular assembly of microtubules is crucial for signal transduction and mitosis of cells [12, 13, 31]. In addition, modulation of intracellular microtubule assembly is a well-known cause of mitochondrial stress [32–34]. Hence, we examined mitochondrial membrane potential following addition of compound #1 to THP-1 cells using MitoTracker Red, a dye that differentially stains mitochondria depending on the membrane potential. Compound #1 treatment increased mitochondrial depolarization similar to the that of the positive control, colchicine (Supplemental Figure 4C). Subsequently, we assessed the effects of #1 on mitochondria using a human T cell lymphoblast cell line (CEM) and a TUBB mutant CEM cell line (CEM-178), which is mutated in the beta-tubulin gene (TUBB) where the colchicine binding site is encoded [22]. The mutant cells were refractory to changes in mitochondrial depolarization induced by #1 treatment (Figure 4(a)). These data indicated that compound #1 induced mitochondrial stress associated with inhibition of microtubule polymerization.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4

Tubulin polymerization inhibiting compounds induce mitochondrial stress and show cytotoxicity in WT CEM cells. (a) Analysis of mitochondrial depolarization. WT CEM cells and TUBB mutant CEM-178 cells were treated with 0.1 μM #1 or colchicine for 72 h and stained with MitoTracker Red, which stains mitochondria in a membrane potential dependent manner. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and representative histograms are shown. (b) Cell numbers of WT CEM cells and TUBB mutant CEM-178 cells were measured by MTT assay. Cells were cultured with 0.1 μM compounds or 0.01 μM colchicine for 72 h. Each dot indicates an individual compound. Compounds were categorized into two clusters, cluster 1 (< 50% viability; n=13; closed circles) and cluster 2 (> 50% viability; n=10; open circles). #1 is the closed circle in black. Individual compound IDs are shown in Supplemental Figure 5. (b) NF-B activation shown in Figure 1(c) was reanalyzed according to the viability clusters. (c) ELISA for KC, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12 in BMDCs. BMDCs were cultured with 5 μM compounds overnight. P<0.0001 by Mann-Whitney U test for comparison of cluster 1 versus cluster 2. Data presented are representative of two independent experiments showing similar results.

To examine the relationship between tubulin polymerization inhibition and immune activation, we treated WT CEM and TUBB mutant CEM-178 cells with each compound and assessed cell proliferation after 72 h. We categorized the compounds into two clusters according to reduced cell proliferation seen in WT CEM but not in the TUBB mutant CEM (CEM-178): 13 compounds showed less than 50% cell growth in WT CEMs (cluster 1, filled circles) and 10 compounds showed more than 50% (cluster 2, open circles; Figure 4(b) and Supplementary Figure 5). The compounds in cluster 1 induced significantly higher levels of NF-B activation (Figure 4(c)) and higher levels of IL-1β, KC, IL-6 and IL-12 in the culture supernatants of BMDCs compared to compounds in cluster 2 (P< 0.01, Figure 4(d)). These data suggested that compounds in cluster 1 may stimulate DCs through cellular stress.

Mitochondrial stress induced by various environmental stimuli can activate mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) including extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2), p38, or c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) [35, 36]. Because MAPK signaling participates in the regulation of NF-B transcriptional activity [37–40], we evaluated phosphorylation of MAPKs in THP-1 cells following #1 treatment. ERK1/2, p38, and JNK, were phosphorylated in response to treatment with #1 (Figure 5(a)). Further, to validate the involvement of MAPK in the immunostimulatory effects of #1, we evaluated the effect of a JNK inhibitor, S600125, on #1 stimulated release of IL-8 and IL-1β. The levels of IL-8 and IL-1β stimulated by compound #1 were markedly reduced in the presence of S600125 (Figure 5(b)) indicating that MAPK activation and phosphorylation is involved in the innate immune stimulatory effects of this compound. Collectively, the results suggest that #1 inhibits tubulin, induces mitochondria stress, and leads to MAPK phosphorylation. The combined activation of MAPK and NF-B can subsequently lead to the cytokine production by APCs that we detected in the BMDC cultures.

(a)

(b)

Figure 5

Compound #1 induces immune activation through MAPK activation. (a) Immunoblot for activation of MAPK signaling pathways. THP-1 cells were cultured for indicated time periods with 5 μM #1. Phospho-JNK (p-JNK), total JNK (t-JNK), phospho-ERK (p-ERK), total ERK (t-ERK), phospho-p38 (p-p38), total p38 (t-p38), and b-actin are shown. (b) Effect of JNK inhibitor on cytokine release in THP-1 cells. Cells were stimulated for 18 h with 5 μM #1 and 20 μM JNK inhibitor, SP600125. IL-8 and IL-1β secretions from THP-1 cells were measured by ELISA. P<0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test). Data presented are representative of two independent experiments showing similar results.

3.6. Control of Established Tumor Growth and Conditional Survival Using #1 as Immunotherapy

There are conflicting reports on the effect of microtubular depolymerizing agents on the immune system. Because intracellular microtubules are required for the translocation of intracellular signaling molecules, high concentrations of microtubule depolymerizing agents, such as colchicine, downregulate innate immune responses [15, 41, 42]. In other studies, microtubule depolymerizing drugs used as chemotherapeutic agents, such as vinblastine, have potentiated immune responses [15, 43]. Recently, specific microtubule-depolymerizing agents such as colchicine have gained attention because they have promoted innate and adaptive immune responses during cancer immunotherapy [18, 19, 44]. Therefore, compound #1 might be useful both to slow the growth of a solid tumor and to stimulate an antitumor immune response. Prior to evaluating the antitumor efficacy, the direct toxicity of #1 for tumor cells was evaluated in vitro at three dosing schedules. MTECs, an epithelial cell line derived as a model of oropharyngeal malignancy [24], were more sensitive to #1 than B16-OVA cells (a murine melanoma line engineered to express OVA) [23]. In both cell lines the toxicity was increased in a dose and time-dependent manner (Supplemental Figure 6A).

To test the antitumor effect of #1, we selected the murine head and neck cancer MTECs to implant into mice, as MTECs were shown to be more sensitive to compound #1 than the B16-OVA cells (Supplementary Figure 6A). To avoid systemic toxicity and to use the tumor as a potential antigenic reservoir for activated APCs, compound #1 was injected directly into the established tumor nodules. Two doses were used with daily injections of engrafted tumor nodules. The dose of 200 nmol/ injection significantly suppressed growth of the injected nodule compared to 20 nmol/injection (P<0.05, Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). We then determined an optimal treatment schedule using 200 nmol/ injection and different dosing intervals (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). The mice were treated with #1 daily for 5 injections or 3 times a week for two weeks (6 injections) and tumor growth at the injected site was monitored. The schedule of 200 nmol injections given three times a week was significantly more effective compared to vehicle treatment in slowing growth of the injected tumor nodule (P<0.05, Figure 6(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 6

Combination treatment with #1 and anti-PD-1 mAb suppressed tumor progression at both injected and distal sites. (a-d) HPV-negative MTECs (2 × 10⁶) were subcutaneously implanted in both flanks of C57BL/6 mice (n=5-7/group). The optimal doses (20 or 200 nmol/injection) and schedules (daily or 3 times/week) of intratumor treatment of compound #1 were evaluated. Experimental protocols ((a) and (c)) and growth curves of injected and uninjected tumor ((b) and (d)) are shown. ((e) and (f)) Combination treatment with #1 and anti-PD-1 mAb (n=10-11/group). Tumor bearing mice received intratumoral injection of compound #1 (200 nmol/injection, 3 times/week) and intraperitoneal administration of anti-PD-1 mAb (250 μg/injection) (e). Average calculated tumor volumes are shown ± SEM (f). P<0.05, P < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test.

Since #1 activates innate immune cells, we hypothesized that combination therapy with an anti-PD-1 mAb would increase treatment efficacy by releasing T cells from immunosuppression by tumor cells [45]. Compound #1 was administered for 2 weeks (total 6 injections) (Figure 6(e)) and anti-PD-1 mAb was administered on day -1 followed by injecting twice a week, per an established protocol [45]. At the injected sites, compound #1 as a single agent significantly suppressed tumor growth on day 18 (P<0.05, Figure 6(f)) and its effect was potentiated by anti-PD-1 therapy (P<0.001, Figure 6(f) and Supplemental Figure 6B). The suppression of tumor growth was also observed at the uninjected site (an abscopal effect), suggesting that the combination treatment induced tumor specific adaptive immune responses. Mice that received combination treatment survived longer than vehicle treated mice (P<0.05, Supplementary Figure 6C). These data suggested that compound #1 might activate immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and simultaneously induce tumor cell death thereby releasing new tumor antigens and danger signals (Supplementary Figure 7).

4. Conclusion

In this study we have demonstrated that compounds of the 4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile scaffold containing a fused naphthalene, benzodioxolane, or dimethylaminobenzene group fused to the chromene ring are capable of activating innate immune cells through sustained NF-B activation to produce inflammatory cytokines. Among active compounds, fused naphthalene, and fused dimethylaminobenzene, substituted compounds showed modest inhibition of microtubule polymerization. The compounds that were the most cytostatic to cells were also the most immunostimulatory. A lead fused naphthalene compound #1 induced mitochondrial stress, MAPK and JNK activation. Its ability to produce cytokines was blocked by JNK inhibition. Intratumoral administration of #1 potentiated the anti-tumor activity of anti-PD-1 antibody at an uninjected tumor site indicative of an abscopal effect.

Data Availability

The RNA-seq data that support the findings of this study was deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI under accession number E-MTAB-7267.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to be reported for this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the NIH Adjuvant Discovery Program (HHSN272200900034C and HHSN272201400051C, Principal Investigator-Dennis A. Carson) and Vivace Therapeutics for funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1. Structures of select purchased 4-chromene-3-carbonitriles. Supplementary Figure 2. Quantitative RT-PCR of gene expression of IL8, IL1B, CCL2, and IL23A in THP-1 cells. THP-1 cells were treated with 5 μM #1 in the presence and absence of LPS for 4 and 16 h. Expressions of IL8, IL1B, CCL2, and IL23A were measured by quantitative RT-PCR and the levels were normalized to HPRT. P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Supplementary Figure 3. RNA-seq data was analyzed by enrichment method using KEGG pathway database. THP-1 cells were incubated with compound #1 for 5 h and RNA was isolated. RNA-seq was performed by La Jolla Institute Next Generation Sequencing Facility. The most significantly upregulated (upper panels) and downregulated pathways (lower panels) are shown (FDR q<0.05). Supplementary Figure 4. Compound #1 induces cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and mitochondrial depolarization in THP-1 cells. (A) Representative histograms of cell cycle analysis. 5×10⁴ THP-1 cells cultured with 5 μM #1 or colchicine overnight. After fixation with 70% ethanol, cells were washed with PBS and stained with 10 μg/ml of DAPI for 15 min at room temperature and flow cytometry analysis was performed. (B) Distribution (%) of cells in G1, G2/M and S phases. Data presented are representative of two independent experiments showing similar results. (C) THP-1 cells were treated with 0.1 or 5 μM #1 or colchicine for 72 h and stained with MitoTracker Red, which stains mitochondria in a membrane potential dependent manner. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and representative histograms are shown. Supplementary Figure 5. Detailed compound distribution of Figure 4(b). The individual compound IDs are labeled next to their respective symbols from the plot in Figure 4(b). Supplemental Figure 6. Antitumor effects of compound #1. (A) Cytotoxicity of #1 increased in a time-dependent manner. 10⁵ cells/mL HPV negative MTECs or B16-OVA cells were cultured for 24 h (black), 48 h (green), and 72 h (blue) with serially diluted compound #1 from 15 μM. At the indicated times cell viability was tested by MTT assay as described in the methods. Comparisons among 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h at each concentration were examined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (P<0.0001, NS: not significant). (B) Tumor growth curves from individual mice in Figure 6(f) are shown. (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of each treatment group are shown. Mice that received combination treatment survived longer compared to vehicle treated mice [P<0.05 by Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test]. Supplemental Figure 7. Model of functional activity for compound #1. Compound #1 inhibits intracellular beta-tubulin polymerization, which is associated with mitochondrial depolarization and cell cycle arrest. Mitochondrial distress initiates a cascade of MAPK and NF-B activation which results in cytokine/chemokine release. Intratumor injection of compound #1 activates APCs in the tumor microenvironment and concurrently induces the release of tumor-antigens, which provides the stimulus of tumor-specific cellular responses. (Supplementary Materials)

References

S. G. Reed, M. T. Orr, and C. B. Fox, “Key roles of adjuvants in modern vaccines,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1597–1608, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Liu, “NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, p. 2, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Sun, J. Chang, and J. Jin, “Regulation of nuclear factor-κB in autoimmunity,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 282–289, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Baratin, C. Foray, O. Demaria et al., “Homeostatic NF-κB signaling in steady-state migratory dendritic cells regulates immune homeostasis and tolerance,” Immunity, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 627–639, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chan, A. Ahmadi, S. Yao et al., “Identification of biologically active pyrimido[5,4-b]indoles that prolong NF-kappaB Activation without intrinsic activity,” ACS Combinatorial Science, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 533–543, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Shukla, K. Arimoto, S. Yao et al., “Identification of compounds that prolong type i interferon signaling as potential vaccine adjuvants,” SLAS DISCOVERY: Advancing Life Sciences R&D, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 960–973, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Martin, P. Müller, J. Schreiner et al., “The microtubule-depolymerizing agent ansamitocin P3 programs dendritic cells toward enhanced anti-tumor immunity,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 925–938, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. G. Mackenzie, C. L. Keen, and P. I. Oteiza, “Microtubules are required for NF-B nuclear translocation in neuroblastoma IMR-32 cells: modulation by zinc,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 402–415, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Jung et al., “Microtubule disruption utilizes an NFkappa B-dependent pathway to stabilize HIF-1alpha protein,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 9, pp. 744–7452, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Rosette, “Cytoskeletal control of gene expression: depolymerization of microtubules activates NF-kappa B,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 1111–1119, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Papatriantafyllou, “Inflammasomes: Microtubules pull mitochondria to NLRP3,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 306, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Stolz, A. Ernst, and I. Dikic, “Cargo recognition and trafficking in selective autophagy,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 495–501, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mostowy and A. R. Shenoy, “The cytoskeleton in cell-autonomous immunity: Structural determinants of host defence,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 559–573, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Jordan and L. Wilson, “Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 253–265, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Mukhtar, V. M. Adhami, and H. Mukhtar, “Targeting microtubules by natural agents for cancer therapy,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 275–284, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Dumontet and M. A. Jordan, “Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 790–803, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Rufo, A. D. Garg, and P. Agostinis, “The Unfolded Protein Response in Immunogenic Cell Death and Cancer Immunotherapy,” Trends in Cancer, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 643–658, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-C. Wen, H.-M. Chen, S.-S. Chen et al., “Specific microtubule-depolymerizing agents augment efficacy of dendritic cell-based cancer vaccines,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 18, p. 44, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Müller, K. Martin, S. Theurich et al., “Microtubule-depolymerizing agents used in antibody-drug conjugates induce antitumor immunity by stimulation of dendritic cells,” Cancer Immunology Research, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 741–755, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Datta, V. Redecke, K. R. Prilliman et al., “A subset of toll-like receptor ligands induces cross-presentation by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 8, pp. 4102–4110, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Lutz, N. Kukutsch, A. L. J. Ogilvie et al., “An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 77–92, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. H. Hua et al., “Biochemical genetic analysis of indanocine resistance in human leukemia,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 19, pp. 7248–7254, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
A. B. Sharabi, C. J. Nirschl, C. M. Kochel et al., “Stereotactic radiation therapy augments antigen-specific PD-1-mediated antitumor immune responses via cross-presentation of tumor antigen,” Cancer Immunology Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 345–355, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Williams, D. W. Lee, B. D. Elzey, M. E. Anderson, B. S. Hostager, and J. H. Lee, “Preclinical models of HPV+ and HPV- HNSCC in mice: An immune clearance of HPV+ HNSCC,” Head & Neck, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 911–918, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Hoover, W. C. Spanos, G. F. Harris, M. E. Anderson, A. J. Klingelhutz, and J. H. Lee, “The role of human papillomavirus 16 E6 in anchorage-independent and invasive growth of mouse tonsil epithelium,” Archives of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 495–502, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hayashi, S. Yao, B. Crain et al., “Induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells by a PEGylated TLR7 ligand for treatment of type 1 diabetes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 6, Article ID e0129867, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. R. Wiernicki, “Inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and arterial intimal thickening by a novel antiproliferative naphthopyran,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 1452–1459, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
C. P. Dell, “Antiproliferative naphthopyrans: biological activity, mechanistic studies and therapeutic potential,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 179–194, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Panda, J. P. Singh, and L. Wilson, “Suppression of microtubule dynamics by LY290181: A potential mechanism for its antiproliferative action,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 12, pp. 7681–7687, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Wood, D. Panda, T. R. Wiernicki, L. Wilson, M. A. Jordan, and J. P. Singh, “Inhibition of mitosis and microtubule function through direct tubulin binding by a novel antiproliferative naphthopyran LY290181,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 437–444, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Fletcher and R. D. Mullins, “Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton,” Nature, vol. 463, pp. 485–492, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rovini, A. Savry, D. Braguer, and M. Carré, “Microtubule-targeted agents: When mitochondria become essential to chemotherapy,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, vol. 1807, no. 6, pp. 679–688, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. A. Saks, A. V. Kuznetsov, Z. A. Khuchua et al., “Control of cellular respiration in vivo by mitochondrial outer membrane and by Creatine Kinase. A new speculative hypothesis: possible involvement of mitochondrial-cytoskeleton interactions,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 625–645, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Parker, M. Kavallaris, and J. A. McCarroll, “Microtubules and their role in cellular stress in cancer,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 4, p. 153, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Chambers and P. V. LoGrasso, “Mitochondrial c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) signaling initiates physiological changes resulting in amplification of reactive oxygen species generation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 18, pp. 16052–16062, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. L. Gabai, J. A. Yaglom, V. Volloch et al., “Hsp72-mediated suppression of c-Jun N-terminal kinase is implicated in development of tolerance to caspase-independent cell death,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 6826–6836, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Neff, M. Zeisel, J. Sibilia, M. Schöller-Guinard, J.-P. Klein, and D. Wachsmann, “NF-κB and the MAP kinases/AP-1 pathways are both involved in interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 expression in fibroblast-like synoviocytes stimulated by protein I/II, a modulin from oral streptococci,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 703–712, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Schulze-Osthoff, D. Ferrari, K. Riehemann, and S. Wesselborg, “Regulation of NF-κB activation by MAP kinase cascades,” Immunobiology, vol. 198, no. 1-3, pp. 35–49, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. W. Pan, J. Li, S. Huang, T. J. Papadimos, Z. K. Pan, and L. Chen, “Synergistic Activation of NF-κB by Bacterial Chemoattractant and TNFα Is Mediated by p38 MAPK-dependent RelA Acetylation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 45, pp. 34348–34354, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. N. Lee, H. J. Cho, D. Y. Lim, Y.-H. Kang, K. W. Lee, and J. H. Y. Park, “Mechanisms by which licochalcone e exhibits potent anti-inflammatory properties: studies with phorbol ester-treated mouse skin and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated murine macrophages,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 10926–10943, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Liantinioti, A. A. Argyris, A. D. Protogerou, and P. Vlachoyiannopoulos, “The role of colchicine in the treatment of autoinflammatory diseases,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 690–694, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Y. Leung, L. L. Yao Hui, and V. B. Kraus, “Colchicine-Update on mechanisms of action and therapeutic uses,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 341–350, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. L. Ceresoli and P. A. Zucali, “Vinca alkaloids in the therapeutic management of malignant pleural mesothelioma,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 853–858, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chopra, A. Anderson, and C. Giardina, “Novel piperazine-based compounds inhibit microtubule dynamics and sensitize colon cancer cells to tumor necrosis factor-induced apoptosis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 5, pp. 2978–2991, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sato-Kaneko, S. Yao, A. Ahmadi et al., “Combination immunotherapy with TLR agonists and checkpoint inhibitors suppresses head and neck cancer,” JCI Insight, vol. 2, no. 18, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Fumi Sato-Kaneko et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1871

Downloads

1571

Citations