<sup>18</sup>F-Labeling Using Click Cycloadditions

Kettenbach, Kathrin; Schieferstein, Hanno; Ross, Tobias L.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/361329

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Recent Trends in Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry for Molecular PET Imaging

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 361329 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/361329

¹⁸F-Labeling Using Click Cycloadditions

Kathrin Kettenbach,¹Hanno Schieferstein,¹and Tobias L. Ross^1,2

Academic Editor: Olaf Prante

Received15 Mar 2014

Revised29 Apr 2014

Accepted01 May 2014

Published27 May 2014

Abstract

Due to expanding applications of positron emission tomography (PET) there is a demand for developing new techniques to introduce fluorine-18 ( min). Considering that most novel PET tracers are sensitive biomolecules and that direct introduction of fluorine-18 often needs harsh conditions, the insertion of ¹⁸F in those molecules poses an exceeding challenge. Two major challenges during ¹⁸F-labeling are a regioselective introduction and a fast and high yielding way under mild conditions. Furthermore, attention has to be paid to functionalities, which are usually present in complex structures of the target molecule. The Cu-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) and several copper-free click reactions represent such methods for radiolabeling of sensitive molecules under the above-mentioned criteria. This minireview will provide a quick overview about the development of novel ¹⁸F-labeled prosthetic groups for click cycloadditions and will summarize recent trends in copper-catalyzed and copper-free click ¹⁸F-cycloadditions.

1. Introduction

For the application in positron emission tomography (PET) [1], fluorine-18 provides ideal nuclear physical characteristics for in vivo imaging. Fluorine-18 offers a half-life of 110 min, a β⁺-branch of 97%, and especially a low β⁺-energy of 635 keV, which is responsible for a very high spatial resolution [2]. The challenges for researchers are to develop convenient ¹⁸F-labeling strategies, which include short reaction times and applicability for sensitive biomolecules. Especially the harsh conditions during direct ¹⁸F-labeling pose an exceeding challenge [3, 4]. Therefore, most of the radiolabeling strategies focus on ¹⁸F-containing prosthetic groups, which allow a sensitive and bioorthogonal ¹⁸F-labeling to treat the multitude of functional groups in those bioactive compounds with respect.

The most established method, which fulfills all mentioned criteria, is given by click reactions. Especially the Cu(I)-catalyzed variant of the Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of terminal alkynes and azides offers a very powerful reaction with high specificity and excellent yields under mild conditions [5]. As a result, numerous PET tracers have been synthesized using CuAAC in a widespread spectrum of structural varieties of the prosthetic group within the last decade. One of the latest investigations deals with a polar clickable amino acid-based prosthetic group to further improve the pharmacokinetic properties of radiotracers, particularly suitable for peptides and proteins [6].

However, the need of cytotoxic copper during CuAAC has led to the necessity of alternative fast and copper-free click reaction strategies for radiofluorination and additionally enabling pretargeting approaches in living systems. Those so-called strain-promoted click reactions can be carried out between cyclooctyne derivatives and azides (strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition, SPAAC) [7–13] or tetrazines (tetrazine-trans-cyclooctyne (TTCO) ligation) [14–17] as well as between norbornene derivatives and tetrazines [18]. Especially, the TTCO ligation showed promising reaction rates, which makes this click reaction concept very suitable for ¹⁸F-labeling and also for in vivo application in living systems. Very recently, new versions of ¹⁸F-click cycloadditions are added to the range of reactions [19–25]. In this line, the first ¹⁸F-labeled β-lactame became available via a new radio-Kinugasa reaction [21].

As a consequence, click cycloaddition is one of the most frequently applied methods for ¹⁸F-labeling of new bioactive compounds, with or without a catalytic system. This can be impressively illustrated by the fact that over 50 original papers have been published in this research area within the last eight years.

Tables 1–3 give an overview of the ¹⁸F-prosthetic groups, the reaction conditions and reaction partners applied for copper-catalyzed, copper-free and other kinds of ¹⁸F-click cycloadditions, respectively. The most important structures of those prosthetic groups are shown in Figures 1, 3, and 5.

2. Copper-Catalyzed ¹⁸F-Click Cycloadditions

In the last decade, the copper-catalyzed azide alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), which has first been reported independently by Rostovtsev et al. [81] and Tornøe et al. [82] in 2002, has spread over almost all fields of chemistry [83–87], biology [88–90], and material science [91, 92]. The great advantage of this method is given by its outstanding efficiency, its regiospecificity, and fast formation of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles at ambient temperatures, which is particularly suitable for ¹⁸F-labeling of sensitive biomolecules. In particular, the CuAAC enables incorporation of fluorine-18 via a prosthetic group under mild and bioorthogonal conditions [22–25]. 1,2,3-triazoles were first introduced by Michael, who described the formation of a 1,2,3-triazole from a phenylazide in 1893 [93]. Following this pioneering work, Dimroth, Fester, and Huisgen described this type of reaction as a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition for the first time in 1963 [5].

In 2006, Marik and Sutcliffe published the application of the CuAAC as an ¹⁸F-labeling strategy for the first time [26]. They radiolabeled three different alkyne precursors in radiochemical yields (RCY) of 36–81%. Afterwards they were reacted them with azido-functionalized peptides in RCY of 54–99% and an overall reaction time of 30 min. Thus, they could show a new, very fast, efficient, and mild ¹⁸F-labeling strategy for complex compounds, especially appropriate for sensitive biomolecules. Only two years later, the suitability of this approach was demonstrated for the ¹⁸F-labeling of a folate derivative for in vivo tumor imaging with the same prosthetic group, 6-[¹⁸F]fluoro-1-hexyne [30]. The radiofolate was obtained in RCY of 25–35% and was applied to KB-tumor bearing mice. A specific tumor accumulation could be observed by using the folate receptor (FR) targeting concept. Furthermore, Kim et al. used ¹⁸F-labeled alkynes as prosthetic groups for the ¹⁸F-labeling of 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl azide [27], which in turn was employed to label the β₆ specific peptide A20FMDV2 [28].

Considering all known clickable prosthetic groups for ¹⁸F-labeling, [¹⁸F]fluoroethyl azide ([¹⁸F]FEA) is certainly one of the most investigated clickable ¹⁸F-prosthetic groups. Until today, about twenty different manuscripts deal with [¹⁸F]FEA to radiolabel a broad variety of biomolecules and compounds. In 2007, Glaser and Årstad [31] mentioned for the first time the preparation of [¹⁸F]FEA with a RCY of 55% using 2-azidoethyl-4-toluenesulfonate as precursor. As a proof of concept, they reacted [¹⁸F]FEA with different terminal alkynes in very good to excellent RCY of 61–98%. With respect to the catalytic system copper sulfate in combination with ascorbic acid or sodium ascorbate has mainly been used, whereas only in a few approaches copper(I) iodide was used [37, 42]. It has been shown that addition of bathophenanthroline disulfonate ( stabilizing agent) accelerates the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition [36, 38, 45]. The very good access to [¹⁸F]FEA led to the development of a variety of radiotracers labeled with this prosthetic group, like ¹⁸F-deoxyuridine [37], ¹⁸F-fluoro-oxothymidine (¹⁸F-FOT), or ¹⁸F-fluoro-thiothymidine (¹⁸F-FTT) [40] as well as apoptosis markers [36] and several peptide systems [34, 44, 49]. In 2012, Smith et al. [40] described the reduction of [¹⁸F]FEA using copper wire under acidic conditions, which is a possible explanation of the poor yields during some click reactions.

In 2007, Sirion et al. [50] reported for the first time [¹⁸F]fluoro-PEG_x-derivatives ( = various polyethylene glycol (PEG) ratios) as new ¹⁸F-labeled prosthetic click groups. These compounds showed a reduced volatility and increased polarity compared with other ¹⁸F-labeled prosthetic groups like [¹⁸F]FEA or [¹⁸F]fluoroalkynes. These properties ease their handling as well as improving the in vivo behavior of the labeled compounds. The compounds showed a longer circulation time and a reduced renal clearance making them very suitable for in vivo application. Sirion et al. described the preparation of different aliphatic and aromatic ¹⁸F-PEG-azides and ¹⁸F-labeled alkynes in RCY of 85–94%. As a proof of concept, they carried out cycloadditions with the ¹⁸F-labeled prosthetic groups and the corresponding alkynes, respectively, azides in high RCY of 71–99%. Several other groups continued this work by using the ¹⁸F-labeled PEGylated prosthetic groups for labeling cRGD derivatives [51] and other peptides [53], nanoparticles [52, 54], or folates [55].

To increase the lipophilicity and metabolic stability of radiotracers, [¹⁸F]fluoro-aryl-based prosthetic groups have been developed and investigated. In 2007, Ramenda et al. [56] published for the first time a 4-[¹⁸F]fluoro-N-methyl-N-(prop-2-ynyl)-benzenesulfonamide (p-[¹⁸F]F-SA), which was obtained in RCY of 32 ± 5%. Subsequently, this prosthetic group was used for radiolabeling an azido-functionalized neurotensin giving a RCY of 66%. Furthermore, the same group used the ¹⁸F-aryl prosthetic group for the labeling of human serum albumin (HSA) [57] and other proteins, phosphopeptides, and L-RNA [58] in good RCY. A pyridine-based ¹⁸F-prosthetic group was first introduced by Inkster et al. [59] in 2008 by reacting [¹⁸F]FPy5yne with a model peptide in RCY of 18.7% and an overall reaction time of 160 min. They started from either 2-nitro- or 2-trimethylammonium pyridine to synthesize [¹⁸F]FPy5yne with a RCY of 42%. Furthermore, [¹⁸F]pyridine derivatives have been used to radiolabel cRGDs [60] and the D-amino acid analog of WT-pHLIP [61].

In 2009, Vaidyanathan et al. [62] presented a prosthetic group based on a 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzoate. Propargyl-4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzoate ([¹⁸F]PFB), which could be obtained in RCY of % within 15 min. To investigate the labeling properties of this new prosthetic group, numerous compounds have been ¹⁸F-labeled using [¹⁸F]PFB with RCY from 37% to 88% and overall reaction times of about 1 h. Another approach was published by Li et al. in 2012 [63], who synthesized 4-[¹⁸F]fluoro-3-nitro-N-2-propyn-1-yl-benzamide ([¹⁸F]FNPB) for ¹⁸F-labeling of cRGDfK and a D4 peptide, which was identified as an EGFR targeting ligand. This approach was followed by the synthesis of 1-(azidomethyl)-4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzene by Thonon et al. [64]. They did a multistep radiosynthesis (4 steps), where the fluorine-18 was introduced in the first step. The desired radiolabeled product could be obtained in a RCY of 34% within 75 min and was used itself to label a 4-ethynyl-L-phenylalanine-containing peptide. The same prosthetic group was also employed by Mercier et al. [65] and Flagothier et al. [66] for ¹⁸F-labeling of siRNA. Other structural analog prosthetic groups have also been developed by Mercier et al. [65] and Chun and Pike [67].

To improve the in vivo behavior of peptides with respect to blood clearance and stability, Maschauer and Prante developed ¹⁸F-gluco-derivatives for CuAAC-radiolabeling of Fmoc-L-propargylglycine with a RCY of 60% [68]. They showed that the ¹⁸F-click labeling reaction was more convenient by using the β-anomeric derivative of the azides, respectively, alkynes, giving very high RCY of %. One year later, they published the first in vivo evaluation of an ¹⁸F-labeled RGD peptide labeled with [¹⁸F]FDG-β-Az in U87MG-tumor bearing mice showing an improved blood clearance and stability [65, 66]. Likewise, Fischer et al. demonstrated in 2012 that a [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglycosyl folate could be obtained in RCY of 5–25% and subsequent biodistribution and PET-imaging studies showed a high and specific uptake of the radiotracer in FR-positive tumors [70]. The variety of new ¹⁸F-labeling strategies using ¹⁸F-Fluoroglycosylation is the focus of a review article as a part of this special issue provided by Maschauer and Prante [94].

As another promising approach, Li et al. presented in 2013 an alkyne-functionalized aryltri-[¹⁸F]fluoroborate for radiolabeling azido-bombesin and azido-RGD. The major advantage of this method is the two-step, one-pot procedure providing a water-soluble and noncoordinating aryltri-[¹⁸F]fluoroborate anion, which provided specific activities up to 555 GBq/μmol [75, 76, 95].

Two new piperazine-based prosthetic groups, 1-(but-3-ynyl)-4-(3-[¹⁸F]fluoropropyl)piperazine ([¹⁸F]BFP) and 1-(3-azidopropyl)-4-(3-[¹⁸F]fluoropropyl)piperazine ([¹⁸F]AFP), have recently been developed by Pretze and Mamat [78]. Spiro salts were used as precursors, facilitating purification by using solid phase extractions (RP-18 or SiO₂-cartridges). Both prosthetic groups could be obtained in RCY of about 30% using an automated synthesis module. To avoid Glaser coupling, which has been observed by using [¹⁸F]BFP for radiolabeling of peptides, [¹⁸F]AFP was used instead. An important observation was the fact that the applied peptide formed very strong complexes with the copper catalyst, which required the use of bispidine as a strong chelating agent to remove cytotoxic copper species.

One of the latest developments describes the synthesis of an ¹⁸F-labeled alanine derivative as a new prosthetic click group, reported by Schieferstein and Ross [6]. In this case, an amino acid-based prosthetic group has been developed to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of ¹⁸F-click-labeled biomolecules. The prosthetic group was obtained in good RCY of % from a two-step reaction as described in Figure 2. The final ¹⁸F-labeled prosthetic group was subsequently reacted with an azido-RGD as model system in RCY of 75% within 20 min.

Considering the above-mentioned prosthetic groups for radiolabeling with fluorine-18, Table 1 summarizes important properties of those components. It has been shown that the integration of an ¹⁸F-propyl, ¹⁸F-ethyl, or ¹⁸F-aryl moiety can provide an improved metabolic profile and that the glycosylation or PEGylation can further improve the in vivo behavior. Furthermore, for in vivo application a total removal of the copper catalyst is essential. This could be very challenging in the case where peptides or proteins are able to complex copper species from the catalytic system.

3. Copper-Free ¹⁸F-Click Cycloadditions

Even though a large number of novel radiotracers using click chemistry have been developed, none of them has entered clinical routine to date, apart from ¹⁸F-RGD-K5, which is already used in clinical trials in US. This can be explained by the need of cytotoxic copper during radiotracer syntheses by using copper-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar Huisgen cycloadditions [96]. Thus, there is still a demand for facile (metal-free) and robust ¹⁸F-labeling reactions for the syntheses of radiotracers for imaging of malignancies in vivo. This leads to the development of catalyst-free click-labeling approaches, which spare copper species during labeling steps and even enable in vivo pretargeting concept. Recent developments deal with biocompatible strain-promoted copper-free versions of the alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC), where the focus has been set on derivatives of cyclooctynes and dibenzocyclooctynes. First approaches focus on the reaction of ¹⁸F-labeled cyclooctynes with azide-bearing biomolecules. On the other hand, in further approaches cyclooctyne-carrying bioactive compounds are used, which can be labeled with different ¹⁸F-labeled azides. In the beginning, only a few studies have been reported due to the complex and low yielding syntheses of strained cyclooctynes [10, 12, 14]. However, nowadays lots of cyclooctyne derivatives are commercially available, which facilitates the precursor syntheses and opens a wide range of applications.

In 2011 Bouvet et al. [7] published the first example of a SPAAC with ¹⁸F-labeled aza-dibenzocyclooctyne, [¹⁸F]FB-DBCO, and a plethora of azides. The ¹⁸F-labeled building block was synthesized via acylation of commercially available N-(3-aminopropionyl)-5,6-dihydro-11,12-didehydrodibenzo[b,f]azocine with N-succinimidyl-4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzoate ([¹⁸F]SFB), which can be easily prepared in an automated synthesis module [97]. The ¹⁸F-labeled cyclooctyne could be obtained in a RCY of 85% and a purity >95% within 60 min. The evaluation of this building block in healthy Balb/C mice showed 60% of intact compound at 60 min p.i. and had a blood clearance half-life of 53 s. Besides, the compound was stable in methanol and phosphate buffer over 60 min. Subsequently, [¹⁸F]FB-DBCO was reacted with various azides as proof of principle showing different structural complexities. In all reactions, the formation of two regioisomers (1,4- and 1,5-triazole) has been observed and in some cases a separation of the regioisomers by HPLC was impossible. All ¹⁸F-labeled radiotracers were obtained in good to excellent RCY of 69–98% within an overall reaction time of about 2 h. However, the reaction rates in these cases were much slower compared to other examples of bioorthogonal reactions, limiting this new approach for in vivo pretargeting applications.

A cyclooctyne derivative has been conjugated to bombesin (aza-DBCO-BN, 9 steps) with an overall yield of 17% by Campbell-Verduyn et al. [8]. The aza-DBCO-BN was reacted with various ¹⁸F-azides giving RCY of 19–37% within 30 min. In 2011, Arumugam et al. [9] investigated the direct ¹⁸F-labeling of azadibenzocyclooctyne (DBCO) yielding the ¹⁸F-labeled prosthetic group (RCY = 36%). The radiolabeling was followed by a click reaction with an azido-octreotide leading to the ¹⁸F-labeled octreotide in a RCY of 95% within a total reaction time of 1.5 h. In contrast, other working groups used ¹⁸F-cyclooctynes for labeling RDG-derivatives [11] as well as further integrin-specific peptides [10, 13].

Another possibility to perform copper-free click reactions is given by the inverse electron demand of the Diels Alder cycloaddition between a cyclooctene and a tetrazine under the release of nitrogen. The so-called tetrazine-trans-cyclooctene ligation (TTCO ligation) was first published by Li et al. in 2010 [14]. Concerning the instability of the tetrazines, it is more practical to functionalize the biomolecule with a tetrazine followed by the reaction with an ¹⁸F-labeled cyclooctene. The latter are much more suitable for direct ¹⁸F-labeling than tetrazines. For this purpose a nosylate precursor was used for ¹⁸F-labeling of the cyclooctene providing RCY of 71% within 15 min. To investigate the suitability of the ¹⁸F-prosthetic group in click reactions, the ¹⁸F-cyclooctene was reacted with a 3,6-di(2-pyridyl)-S-tetrazine in an excellent RCY of 98% within 10 s, showing its outstanding feasibility for in vivo pretargeting approaches. These fast reaction rates made this approach very attractive that even ¹¹C-labeling reaction was explored using the inverse electron demand Diels Alder cycloaddition between a cyclooctene and a tetrazine [98]. In 2011, ¹⁸F-labeled cyclooctene was linked to a tetrazine-RGD derivative by Selvaraj et al. [15] with a RCY of 90% within 5 min at room temperature. The resulting ¹⁸F-labeled tracer was tested in in vivo experiments showing a high tumor accumulation, which could selectively be blocked. In 2012, the group of Devaraj et al. [80] published for the first time the in vivo click reaction of [¹⁸F]trans-cyclooctene and a polymer-modified tetrazine (PMT). The radiolabeled peptide ¹⁸F-PMT10 could be obtained in a RCY of 89.2%. Whole body animal PET scans were carried out 3 h p.i., showing renal clearance and a widespread tissue distribution as can be seen in Figure 4. Previously, the same group described the synthesis of an ¹⁸F-labeled cyclooctene with a RCY of %. Subsequently, this prosthetic group was clicked with a tetrazine-modified exendin-4 in RCY of % [16].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4

PET and autoradiography using ¹⁸F-tetrazine agents. (a) PET/CT fusion of LS174T tumor xenograft labeled using either trans-cyclooctene (TCO) monoclonal antibodies (mAb TCO) or control unlabeled antibodies (mAb) followed by ¹⁸F-PMT10 (polymer-modified tetrazine). Arrows indicate location of the tumor xenograft. The bladder was omitted for clarity. (b) Imaging using autoradiography (left side) and fluorescence slices after targeting with fluorescence TCO monoclonal antibody and ¹⁸F-PMT10. (c) PET/CT fusion of mouse bearing A431 and LS174T tumors after targeting with anti-A33 TCO monoclonal antibodies followed by ¹⁸F-PMT10. Arrows indicate location of tumors and the liver was omitted for clarity. (d) Autoradiography of representative 1 mm LS174T and A431 tumor slices after multistep targeting (reprinted with permission from [80]; Copyright 2012 National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America).

A similar strategy was published by Knight et al. in 2013, where an ¹⁸F-labeled amino-functionalized norbornene was reacted with a tetrazine-modified peptide [18]. The ¹⁸F-labeled norbornene was obtained using N-succinimicyl-4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzoate ([¹⁸F]SFB) in RCY of % within 52 min. As a proof of concept, two different tetrazines, an asymmetric dipyridyl tetrazine, and a tetrazine-modified bombesin peptide were labeled with ¹⁸F-labeled norbornene derivative ([¹⁸F]NFB) in 46–97% RCY within 82 min.

Considering the copper-free click labeling of bioactive compounds with fluorine-18, both the strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC) and the tetrazine-trans-cyclooctyne ligation (TTCO ligation) show promising results. Regarding in vivo pretargeting approaches, only the TTCO ligation showed favorable results and reaction rates, which are suitable for this application [80]. Table 2 summarizes reaction conditions, radiochemical yields, and reaction partners of those components.

4. New Developments in ¹⁸F-Click Cycloadditions

The latest developments in metal-free ¹⁸F-click cycloadditions have been reported by Zlatopolskiy et al. [19–21] (Table 3). In a first approach, the ¹⁸F-labeled building block C-(4-[¹⁸F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone was developed to form ¹⁸F-isoxazolidines via high-yielding [3+2]cycloadditions with various maleimides [19]. C-(4-[¹⁸F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone was obtained from the reaction of 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzaldehyde and N-phenylhydroxylamine in high RCY of 74% with 10 min. In the subsequent click cycloaddition step, differently substituted maleimides as model dipolarophiles were used to form the corresponding isoxazolidines as endo-/exoisomers in high yields of up to >90% within 10 min. A one-pot strategy with in situ generation of C-(4-[¹⁸F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone provided the desired ¹⁸F-isoxazolidines only in moderate yields of 25% and only after heating to 110°C. Under optimized conditions, ¹⁸F-isoxazolidines were obtained from fast ¹⁸F-click [3+2]cycloadditions.

In further studies, the same group used 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzonitrile oxide instead of C-(4-[¹⁸F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone as 1,3-dipol for milder reaction conditions [20] (Table 3). 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzonitrile oxide was obtained in 92% RCY within 10 min from the reaction of 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzaldehyde (RCY: 30–50%, 50 min [99]) with hydroxylamine and subsequent treatment with phenyl iodine bis(trifluoroacetate).

After the click [3+2]cycloaddition to various ¹⁸F-labeled model 2-isoxazolines and isoxazoles was successfully tested, the novel method was applied to three different COX-2 inhibitors (indomethacin conjugates) carrying dipolarophilic moieties of cyclononyne, maleimide, and propyne. The resulting products were obtained in moderate to excellent RCY of 81%, 55%, and 35%, respectively. It is noteworthy that, for the propyne derivative, the milder oxidant [bis(acetoxy)iodo]benzene was used to avoid decomposition. Finally, the method was successfully adapted for ¹⁸F-labeling of two model dipeptide conjugates, cyclononyne- and norbornene-β-Ala-Phe-OMe. However, the original cycloaddition using 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzonitrile oxide did only provide traces of the desired products. Consequently, 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzonitrile oxide was further treated with chloramine T (CAT) in situ forming the more stable building block N-hydroxy-4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzimidoyl chloride. With the use of high precursor (peptides) amounts, the latter enabled excellent RCY of the ¹⁸F-labeled dipeptides of up to 88% within 10 min at room temperature [20]. Under optimized conditions low precursor amounts of 5 nmol (cyclononyne) and 50 nmol (norbornene-β-Ala-Phe-OMe) still allowed RCY of 56% and 47%, respectively.

In a very recent report, Zlatopolskiy and coworkers applied their ¹⁸F-labeled nitrone, C-(4-[¹⁸F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone, for the first formation of ¹⁸F-labeled β-lactames via the CuI-catalyzed Kinugasa reaction [21] (Table 3). The optimized reactions went smooth under very mild conditions to give the ¹⁸F-labeled model β-lactames in high RCY and various isomeric mixtures of the trans- and cis-product. In dependency on the reactivity of the terminal alkynes, the reaction parameters needed (individual) optimization regarding catalyst system, solvent, temperature, and CuI-stabilizing ligands. As a biologically relevant molecule the ¹⁸Flabeled nucleobase chimera was synthesized as potential PET-imaging agent for bacterial infections.

Moreover, the dipeptide β-Ala-Phe-OMe was propiolated and used in this radio-Kinugasa reaction to give excellent RCY of 85% of the ¹⁸F-labeled dipeptide under very mild conditions (aqueous solution, room temperature) [21]. Similarly, this new method was successfully transferred to the ¹⁸F-labeling of proteins. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was conjugated with 3-propiolamidopropyl chloroformate. This propiolated BSA was successfully radiolabeled with fluorine-18 in the radio-Kinugasa reaction.

5. Conclusions

The field of click cycloadditions had and still has a major impact in ¹⁸F-labeling chemistry. The very mild reaction conditions mostly applicable and the excellent efficiency of all types of these reactions are particularly suitable for ¹⁸F-labeling. Especially, complex and sensitive biomolecules benefit from this methodology. No protection group chemistry is needed and the ¹⁸F-click cycloaddition step provides the final radiotracer.

Besides several new ¹⁸F-labeled radiotracers are available via click cycloadditions, and the metal-free versions even enabled pretargeting concepts by in vivo click. The latest development of a radio-Kinugasa reaction towards the first ¹⁸F-β-lactames demonstrates the highly active field and the broad applicability of ¹⁸F-click cycloadditions.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

M. E. Phelps, “Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 16, pp. 9226–9233, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Fowler and A. P. Wolf, “The synthesis of carbon-11, fluorine-18 and nitrogen-13 labeled radiotracers for biomedical applications,” Bnl-31222 de82 013799.
View at: Google Scholar
H. H. Coenen, K. Franken, P. Kling, and G. Stocklin, “Direct electrophilic radiofluorination of phenylalanine, tyrosine and dopa,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1243–1250, 1988.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Lang and W. C. Eckelman, “One-step synthesis of ¹⁸F labeled [¹⁸F]-N-succinimidyl 4-(fluoromethyl)benzoate for protein labeling,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1155–1163, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Huisgen, “1.3-dipolare cycloadditionen,” Angewandte Chemie, no. 13, pp. 604–637, 1963.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Schieferstein and T. L. Ross, “A Polar ¹⁸F-labeled amino acid derivative for click-labeling of biomolecules,” European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Bouvet, M. Wuest, and F. Wuest, “Copper-free click chemistry with the short-lived positron emitter fluorine-18,” Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 21, pp. 7393–7399, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. S. Campbell-Verduyn, L. Mirfeizi, A. K. Schoonen, R. A. Dierckx, P. H. Elsinga, and B. L. Feringa, “Strain-promoted copper-free “click” chemistry for ¹⁸F radiolabeling of bombesin,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 50, no. 47, pp. 11117–11120, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Arumugam, J. Chin, R. Schirrmacher, V. V. Popik, and A. P. Kostikov, “[¹⁸F]azadibenzocyclooctyne ([¹⁸F]ADIBO): a biocompatible radioactive labeling synthon for peptides using catalyst free [3+2] cycloaddition,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 6987–6991, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. D. Carpenter, S. H. Hausner, and J. L. Sutcliffe, “Copper-free click for PET: rapid 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions with a fluorine-18 cyclooctyne,” ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 885–889, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sachin, V. H. Jadhav, E.-M. Kim et al., “F-18-labeling protocol of peptides based on chemically orthogonal strain-promoted cycloaddition under physiologically friendly reaction conditions,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1680–1686, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
H. L. Evans, R. L. Slade, L. Carroll et al., “Copper-free click—a promising tool for pre-targeted PET imaging,” Chemical Communications, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 991–993, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Hausner, R. D. Carpenter, N. Bauer, and J. L. Sutcliffe, “Evaluation of an integrin α_vβ₆-specific peptide labeled with [¹⁸F]fluorine by copper-free, strain-promoted click chemistry,” Nuclear Medicine and Biolology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 233–239, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Li, H. Cai, M. Hassink et al., “Tetrazine-trans-cyclooctene ligation for the rapid construction of ¹⁸F labeled probes,” Chemical Communications, vol. 46, no. 42, pp. 8043–8045, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Selvaraj, S. Liu, M. Hassink et al., “Tetrazine-trans-cyclooctene ligation for the rapid construction of integrin α_vβ₃ targeted PET tracer based on a cyclic RGD peptide,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 5011–5014, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Keliher, T. Reiner, G. M. Thurber, R. Upadhyay, and R. Weissleder, “Efficient ¹⁸F-labeling of synthetic exendin-4 analogues for imaging beta cells,” ChemistryOpen, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 177–183, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Devaraj, “Advancing tetrazine bioorthogonal reactions through the development of new synthetic tools,” Synlett, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 2147–2152, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. C. Knight, S. Richter, M. Wuest, J. D. Way, F. Wuest, and “Synthesis a, “nd evaluation of an ¹⁸F-labelled norbornene derivative for copper-free click chemistry reactions,” Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 3817–3825, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
B. D. Zlatopolskiy, R. Kandler, F. M. Mottaghy, and B. Neumaier, “C-(4-[¹⁸F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone: a novel ¹⁸F-labeled building block for metal free [3+2]cycloaddition,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 184–192, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. D. Zlatopolskiy, R. Kandler, D. Kobus, F. M. Mottaghy, and B. Neumaier, “Beyond azide-alkyne click reaction: easy access to ¹⁸F-labelled compounds via nitrile oxide cycloadditions,” Chemical Communications, vol. 48, no. 57, pp. 7134–7136, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
B. D. Zlatopolskiy, P. Krapf, R. Richarz, H. Frauendorf, F. M. Mottaghy, and B. Neumaier, “Synthesis of ¹⁸F-labelled β-lactams by using the kinugasa reaction,” Chemistry: A European Journal, vol. 20, pp. 4697–4703, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Schirrmacher, C. Wängler, and E. Schirrmacher, “Recent developments and trends in ¹⁸F-radiochemistry: syntheses and applications,” Mini-Reviews in Organic Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 317–329, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Glaser and E. G. Robins, ““Click labelling” in PET radiochemistry,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 407–414, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Ross, “The click chemistry approach applied to fluorine-18,” Current Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 202–223, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pretze, D. Pietzsch, and C. Mamat, “Recent trends in bioorthogonal click-radiolabeling reactions using fluorine-18,” Molecules, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 8618–8665, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Marik and J. L. Sutcliffe, “Click for PET: rapid preparation of [¹⁸F]fluoropeptides using CuI catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 47, no. 37, pp. 6681–6684, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Kim, Y. S. Choe, K.-H. Jung et al., “A ¹⁸F-labeled glucose analog: synthesis using a click labeling method and in vitro evaluation,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 587–593, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Kim, Y. S. Choe, and B.-T. Kim, “Evaluation of 4-[¹⁸F]fluoro-1-butyne as a radiolabeled synthon for click chemistry with azido compounds,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 329–333, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Hausner, J. Marik, M. K. J. Gagnon, and J. L. Sutcliffe, “In vivo positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with an α_vβ₆ specific peptide radiolabeled using ¹⁸F-“click” chemistry: evaluation and comparison with the corresponding 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzoyl- and 2-[¹⁸F] fluoropropionyl-peptides,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 19, pp. 5901–5904, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Ross, M. Honer, P. Y. H. Lam et al., “Fluorine-18 click radiosynthesis and preclinical evaluation of a new ¹⁸F-labeled folic acid derivative,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2462–2470, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Glaser and E. Årstad, ““Click labeling” with 2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethylazide for positron emission tomography,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 989–993, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kobus, Y. Giesen, R. Ullrich, H. Backes, and B. Neumaier, “A fully automated two-step synthesis of an ¹⁸F-labelled tyrosine kinase inhibitor for EGFR kinase activity imaging in tumors,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 1977–1984, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Smith, M. Glaser, M. Perumal et al., “Design, synthesis, and biological characterization of a caspase 3/7 selective isatin labeled with 2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethylazide,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 24, pp. 8057–8067, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Glaser, M. Solbakken, D. R. Turton et al., “Methods for ¹⁸F-labeling of RGD peptides: comparison of aminooxy [¹⁸F] fluorobenzaldehyde condensation with “click labeling” using 2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethylazide, and S-alkylation with [¹⁸F] fluoropropanethiol,” Amino Acids, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 717–724, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Pisaneschi, Q.-D. Nguyen, E. Shamsaei et al., “Development of a new epidermal growth factor receptor positron emission tomography imaging agent based on the 3-cyanoquinoline core: synthesis and biological evaluation,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 6634–6645, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Glaser, J. Goggi, G. Smith et al., “Improved radiosynthesis of the apoptosis marker ¹⁸F-ICMT11 including biological evaluation,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 6945–6949, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Ackermann, G. O'Keefe, S.-T. Lee et al., “Synthesis of a [¹⁸F]fluoroethyltriazolylthymidine radiotracer from [¹⁸F]2-fluoroethyl azide and 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 260–266, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Iddon, J. Leyton, B. Indrevoll et al., “Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of [¹⁸F]fluoroethyl triazole labelled [Tyr3]octreotate analogues using click chemistry,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 3122–3127, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Fortt, G. Smith, R. O. Awais, S. K. Luthra, and E. O. Aboagye, “Automated GMP synthesis of [¹⁸F]ICMT-11 for in vivo imaging of caspase-3 activity,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1000–1005, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Smith, R. Sala, L. Carroll et al., “Synthesis and evaluation of nucleoside radiotracers for imaging proliferation,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 652–665, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Zhou, W. Chu, C. S. Dence, R. H. Mach, and M. J. Welch, “Highly efficient click labeling using 2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl azide and synthesis of an ¹⁸F-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester as conjugation agent,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1175–1181, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Laurens, S. D. Yeoh, A. Rigopoulos et al., “Radiolabelling and evaluation of novel haloethylsulfoxides as PET imaging agents for tumor hypoxia,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 871–882, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Bejot, L. Carroll, K. Bhakoo, J. Declerck, and V. Gouverneur, “A fluorous and click approach for screening potential PET probes: evaluation of potential hypoxia biomarkers,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 324–329, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, L. Shi, L. Jia et al., “Radiolabeling of RGD peptide and preliminary biological evaluation in mice bearing U87MG tumors,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 3850–3855, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Galante, B. W. Schoultz, M. Koepp, and E. Arstad, “Chelator-accelerated one-pot “click” labeling of small molecule tracers with 2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl azide,” Molecules, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 5335–5347, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
K. K. S. Sai, C. Huang, L. Yuan et al., “¹⁸F-AFETP,¹⁸F-FET, and ¹⁸F-FDG imaging of mouse DBT gliomas,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1120–1126, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Haslop, A. Gee, C. Plisson, and N. Long, “Fully automated radiosynthesis of [1-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl),1H[1,2,3]triazole 4-ethylene] triphenylphosphonium bromide as a potential positron emission tomography tracer for imaging apoptosis,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 313–316, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Jia, Z. Cheng, L. Shi et al., “Fluorine-18 labeling by click chemistry: multiple probes in one pot,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 75, pp. 64–70, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Bejot, J. Goggi, S. S. Moonshi, and E. G. Robins, “A practical synthesis of [¹⁸F]FtRGD: an angiogenesis biomarker for PET,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 42–49, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
U. Sirion, H. J. Kim, J. H. Lee et al., “An efficient F-18 labeling method for PET study: huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of bioactive substances and F-18-labeled compounds,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 48, no. 23, pp. 3953–3957, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-B. Li, Z. Wu, K. Chen, F. T. Chin, and X. Chen, “Click chemistry for ¹⁸F-labeling of RGD peptides and microPET imaging of tumor integrin α_vβ₃ expression,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1987–1994, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. K. Devaraj, E. J. Keliher, G. M. Thurber, M. Nahrendorf, and R. Weissleder, “¹⁸F labeled nanoparticles for in Vivo PET-CT imaging,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 397–401, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Gill and J. Marik, “Preparation of ¹⁸F-labeled peptides using the copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition,” Nature Protocols, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1718–1725, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-M. Lee, H.-J. Jeong, D. W. Kim, M.-H. Sohn, and S. T. Lim, “The effect of fluorination of zinc oxide nanoparticles on evaluation of their biodistribution after oral administration,” Nanotechnology, vol. 23, no. 20, Article ID 205102, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Schieferstein, T. Betzel, C. R. Fischer, and T. L. Ross, “¹⁸F-click labeling and preclinical evaluation of a new ¹⁸F-folate for PET imaging,” EJNMMI Research, vol. 3, article 68, pp. 1–10, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ramenda, R. Bergmann, and F. Wuest, “Synthesis of ¹⁸F-labeled neurotensin(8-13) via copper-mediated 1,3-dipolar [3+2]cycloaddition reaction,” Letters in Drug Design and Discovery, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 279–285, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ramenda, T. Kniess, R. Bergmann, J. Steinbach, and F. Wuest, “Radiolabelling of proteins with fluorine-18 via click chemistry,” Chemical Communications, no. 48, pp. 7521–7523, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ramenda, J. Steinbach, and F. Wuest, “4-[¹⁸F]Fluoro-N-methyl-N-(propyl-2-yn-1-yl)benzenesulfonamide ([¹⁸F]F-SA): a versatile building block for labeling of peptides, proteins and oligonucleotides with fluorine-18 via Cu(I)-mediated click chemistry,” Amino Acids, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1167–1180, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. H. Inkster, B. Guérin, T. J. Ruth, and M. J. Adam, “Radiosynthesis and bioconjugation of [¹⁸F]FPy5yne, a prosthetic group for the ¹⁸F labeling of bioactive peptides,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 51, no. 14, pp. 444–452, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Valdivia, M. Estrada, T. Hadizad, D. J. Stewart, R. S. Beanlands, and J. N. Dasilva, “A fast, simple, and reproducible automated synthesis of [¹⁸F]FPyKYNE-c(RGDyK) for α_vβ₃ receptor positron emission tomography imaging,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 57–60, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Daumar, C. A. Wanger-Baumann, N. Pillarsetty et al., “Efficient ¹⁸F-labeling of large 37-amino-acid pHLIP peptide analogues and their biological evaluation,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1557–1566, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Vaidyanathan, B. J. White, and M. R. Zalutsky, “Propargyl 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzoate: a putatively more stable prosthetic group for the fluorine-18 labeling of biomolecules via click chemistry,” Current Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, Y. Liu, L. Zhang, and Y. Xu, “One-step radiosynthesis of 4-[¹⁸F]flouro-3-nitro-N-2-propyn-1-yl-benzamide ([¹⁸F]FNPB): a new stable aromatic porosthetic group for efficient labeling of peptides with fluorine-18,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 229–234, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Thonon, C. Kech, J. Paris, C. Lemaire, and A. Luxen, “New strategy for the preparation of clickable peptides and labeling with 1-(azidomethyl)-4-[¹⁸F]-fluorobenzene for PET,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 817–823, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Mercier, J. Paris, G. Kaisin et al., “General method for labeling siRNA by click chemistry with fluorine-18 for the purpose of PET maging,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 108–114, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Flagothier, G. Kaisin, F. Mercier et al., “Synthesis of two new alkyne-bearing linkers used for the preparation of siRNA for labeling by click chemistry with fluorine-18,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1549–1557, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J.-H. Chun and V. W. Pike, “Single-step radiosynthesis of “¹⁸F-labeled click synthons” from azide-functionalized diaryliodonium salts,” European Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 2012, no. 24, pp. 4541–4547, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Maschauer and O. Prante, “A series of 2-O-trifluoromethylsulfonyl-d-mannopyranosides as precursors for concomitant ¹⁸F-labeling and glycosylation by click chemistry,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 344, no. 6, pp. 753–761, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Maschauer, J. Einsiedel, R. Haubner et al., “Labeling and glycosylate of peptides using click chemistry: a general approach to ¹⁸F-glycopeptides as effective imaging probes for positron emission tomography,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 976–979, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Fischer, C. Müller, J. Reber et al., “[¹⁸F]fluoro-deoxy-glucose folate: a novel PET radiotracer with improved in vivo properties for folate receptor targeting,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 805–813, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Maschauer, R. Haubner, T. Kuwert, and O. Prante, “¹⁸F-Glyco-RGD peptides for PET imaging of integrin expression: efficient radiosynthesis by click chemistry and modulation of biodistribution by glycosylation,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 505–515, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Boutureira, F. D'Hooge, M. Fernández-González et al., “Fluoroglycoproteins: ready chemical site-selective incorporation of fluorosugars into proteins,” Chemical Communications, vol. 46, no. 43, pp. 8142–8144, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Maschauer, K. Michel, P. Tripal et al., “Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of an ¹⁸F-labeled glycoconjugate of PD156707 for imaging ETA receptor expression in thyroid carcinoma by positron emission tomography,” Americam Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 425–436, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Pisaneschi, R. L. Slade, L. Iddon et al., “Synthesis of a new fluorine-18 glycosylated “click” cyanoquinoline for the imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 92–96, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. Guo, S. Tang, L. Lang, X. Chen, and D. M. Perrin, “One-step and one-pot-two-step radiosynthesis of functional imaging,” American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Li, Z. Liu, C. W. Harwig et al., “¹⁸F-click labeling of a bombesin antagonist with an alkyne-¹⁸F-ArBF3-: in vivo PET imaging of tumors expressing the GRP-receptor,” American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Liu, Y. Li, J. Lozada et al., “Stoichiometric Leverage: rapid ¹⁸F-aryltrifluoroborate radiosynthesis at high specific activity for click conjugation,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 125, no. 8, pp. 2359–2363, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Pretze and C. Mamat, “Automated preparation of [¹⁸F]AFP and [¹⁸F]BFP: two novel bifunctional ¹⁸F-labeling building blocks for Huisgen-click,” Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, vol. 150, pp. 25–35, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Fani, X. Wang, G. Nicolas et al., “Development of new folate-based PET radiotracers: preclinical evaluation of 68Ga-DOTA-folate conjugates,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 108–119, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. K. Devaraj, G. M. Thurber, E. J. Keliher, B. Marinelli, and R. Weissleder, “Reactive polymer enables efficient in vivo bioorthogonal chemistry,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 13, pp. 4762–4767, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin, and K. B. Sharpless, “A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “Ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 114, no. 14, pp. 2708–2711, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
C. W. Tornøe, C. Christensen, and M. Meldal, “Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: [1,2,3]-triazoles by regiospecific copper(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 3057–3064, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. V. Gil, M. J. Arévalo, and Ó. López, “Click chemistry—what's in a name? Triazole synthesis and beyond,” Synthesis, no. 11, pp. 1589–1620, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Hänni and D. A. Leigh, “The application of CuAAC “click” chemistry to catenane and rotaxane synthesis,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1240–1251, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Hua and A. H. Flood, “Click chemistry generates privileged CH hydrogen-bonding triazoles: the latest addition to anion supramolecular chemistry,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1262–1271, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. O. Kappe and E. Van Der Eycken, “Click chemistry under non-classical reaction conditions,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1280–1290, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Hein and V. V. Fokin, “Copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) and beyond: new reactivity of copper(i) acetylides,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1302–1315, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Mamidyala and M. G. Finn, “In situ click chemistry: probing the binding landscapes of biological molecules,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1252–1261, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Decréau, J. P. Collman, and A. Hosseini, “Electrochemical applications. How click chemistry brought biomimetic models to the next level: electrocatalysis under controlled rate of electron transfer,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1291–1301, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. El-Sagheer and T. Brown, “Click chemistry with DNA,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1388–1405, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. H. Binder and R. Sachsenhofer, ““Click” chemistry in polymer and materials science,” Macromolecular Rapid Communications, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 15–54, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. L. Golas and K. Matyjaszewski, “Marrying click chemistry with polymerization: expanding the scope of polymeric materials,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1338–1354, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Michael, “Über die Einwirkung von Diazobenzolimid auf Acetylendicarbonsäure-methylester,” Journal für Praktische Chemie, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 94–95, 1893.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Maschauer and O. Prante, “Sweetening pharmaceutical radiochemistry by ¹⁸F-fluoro-glycosylation: a short review,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 214748, 30 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Liu, Y. Li, J. Lozada et al., “Stoichiometric leverage: rapid ¹⁸F-aryltrifluoroborate radiosynthesis at high specific activity for click conjugation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition English, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 2303–2307, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
G. J. Brewer, “Copper toxicity in the general population,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 459–460, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Mäding, F. Füchtner, and F. Wüst, “Module-assisted synthesis of the bifunctional labelling agent N-succinimidyl 4-[¹⁸F]fluorobenzoate ([¹⁸F]SFB),” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 329–332, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Herth, V. L. Andersen, S. Lehel, J. Madsen, G. M. Knudsen, and J. L. Kristensen, “Development of a 11C-labeled tetrazine for rapid tetrazine-trans-cyclooctene ligation,” Chemical Communications, vol. 49, no. 36, pp. 3805–3807, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. S. Haka, M. R. Kilbourn, G. L. Watkins, and S. A. Toorongian, “Aryltrimethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonates as precursors to aryl [¹⁸F]fluorides: improved synthesis of [¹⁸F]GBR-13119,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 823–833, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Kathrin Kettenbach et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3797

Downloads

1788

Citations