Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 19, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2373041529
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2373041529v1
237/3/986    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Copel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Sheiman, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Copel, L.
Right arrow Articles by Sheiman, R. G.
(Radiology 2005;237:986-991.)
© RSNA, 2005


Genitourinary Imaging

Clinical and Duplex US Assessment of Effects of Sildenafil on Cavernosal Arteries of the Penis: Comparison with Intracavernosal Injection of Vasoactive Agents—Initial Experience1

Laurian Copel, MD, Ran Katz, MD, Arye Blachar, MD, Jacob Sosna, MD and Robert G. Sheiman, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Zerifin, Israel 70300 (L.C.); Departments of Urology (R.K.) and Radiology (J.S.), Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Radiology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (J.S., R.G.S.). Received September 4, 2004; revision requested November 10; revision received December 1; accepted January 12, 2005. Address correspondence to L.C. (e-mail: lcopel{at}gmail.com).

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the clinical response and hemodynamic changes in cavernosal arteries after oral administration of sildenafil without and with audiovisual sexual stimulation and to compare those responses with responses from intracavernosal injections of vasoactive agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Thirteen consecutive patients (age range, 22–77 years; mean, 60.4 years) with erectile dysfunction were evaluated with clinical assessment and cavernosal duplex ultrasonography (US). The patients were examined at two sessions 3 weeks apart. First, each patient received 100 mg of sildenafil citrate orally and was examined 60 minutes later without any sexual stimulation. Each patient then underwent repeat clinical and duplex US assessment after audiovisual sexual stimulation. Three weeks later, the patients underwent identical clinical evaluation and duplex US after intracavernosal injection of a commercially available combination of papaverine, prostaglandin E1, and phentolamine. Clinical and duplex US data (ie, peak systolic velocity [PSV]) were examined by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs.

RESULTS: At rest, the overall mean cavernosal artery PSV was 1.08 cm/sec and remained unchanged after intake of sildenafil without any audiovisual stimulation, with no clinical evidence of erection. With the addition of audiovisual sexual stimulation, eight (62%) of 13 patients had penile congestion or erection, and six (46%) had a PSV greater than 25 cm/sec. With intracavernosal injection of the combination of three drugs, all 13 patients achieved congestion or erection, and 10 (77%) had a PSV greater than 25 cm/sec. Both clinical and duplex US responses to intracavernosal injection were significantly greater than they were to sildenafil with audiovisual sexual stimulation (P = .04 and .003, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Oral sildenafil with audiovisual sexual stimulation led to a significant clinical response and increment in blood flow in the cavernosal arteries. However, more patients responded to intracavernosal injection of the combination of three drugs than to sildenafil, and the clinical response was significantly better.

© RSNA, 2005







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.