HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2352040448v1 235/2/530    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Memarsadeghi, M. Articles by Prokop, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Memarsadeghi, M. Articles by Prokop, M.

Unenhanced Multi–Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Stone Disease: Effect of Section Width on Diagnosis¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (M.M., G.H.P., T.H.H., C.S.P., M.S., M.P.) and Urology (G.K.), University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Received March 10, 2004; revision requested May 2; revision received June 28; accepted July 27. Address correspondence to M.M. (e-mail: mazda.memarsadeghi@meduniwien.ac.at).

PURPOSE: To assess prospectively the effect of section width in multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) evaluation of patients with acute flank pain who are suspected of having or known to have urinary stone disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the ethics committee of the authors’ university, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. One hundred forty-seven patients (age range, 11–101 years; mean, 51.4 years ± 18.7 [standard deviation]) suspected of having urinary stone disease underwent unenhanced multi–detector row CT. CT was performed with four detector rows, a section thickness of 1.0 mm, an effective tube current–time product of 100 mAs, and a tube voltage of 120 kVp (CT dose index, 11.4 mGy). From these data, three sets of transverse images were reconstructed with section widths of 1.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm and approximately 50% of overlap each. Scans were evaluated in varying random orders by two radiologists for the number, size, and location of uroliths and nephroliths and for the presence of phleboliths, renal cysts, and secondary signs of obstruction. The significance of differences between the numbers of detected calcifications and the numbers of associated abnormalities on the scans obtained with varying section widths was tested with the McNemar test at a P level of less than .05. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the correlation between the presence of uroliths and the presence of secondary signs.

RESULTS: Uroliths were found in 72 of 147 (49.0%) patients, and nephroliths were found in 16 patients (10.9%). There was no significant difference between section widths of 1.5 and 3.0 mm with regard to the number of detected stones (264 uroliths and 61 nephroliths for both protocols). Transverse sections 5.0-mm wide revealed significantly fewer uroliths (n = 231; P < .001) and nephroliths (n = 47; P < .016). The final diagnosis was changed in four of 72 patients. All missed renal and ureteral stones measured less than 3 mm in diameter.

CONCLUSION: Overlapping 3-mm sections are sufficient for the detection of urinary stone disease. Small calculi (<3 mm) may be missed on 5.0-mm-thick sections.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K Xafis, G Thalmann, L M Benneker, C Stoupis, D J Buggy, H Zimmermann, and A K Exadaktylos Forget the blood, not the stone! Microhaematuria in acute urolithiasis and the role of early CT scanning Emerg. Med. J., October 1, 2008; 25(10): 640 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Minami, H. Chung, M. Kudo, S. Kitai, S. Takahashi, T. Inoue, K. Ueshima, and H. Shiozaki Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Virtual CT Sonography with Magnetic Navigation Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W335 - W341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. T. Hsu, Z. J. Wang, A. S. L. Yu, R. G. Gould, Y. Fu, B. N. Joe, A. Qayyum, R. S. Breiman, F. V. Coakley, and B. M. Yeh Physiology of Renal Medullary Tip Hyperattenuation at Unenhanced CT: Urinary Specific Gravity and the NaCl Concentration Gradient Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 147 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Memarsadeghi, C. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Prokop, T. H. Helbich, C. C. Seitz, I. M. Noebauer-Huhmann, and G. Heinz-Peer Unenhanced MDCT in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Do Coronal Reformations Improve Diagnostic Performance? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W60 - W64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Mulkens, S. Daineffe, R. De Wijngaert, P. Bellinck, A. Leonard, G. Smet, and J.-L. Termote Urinary Stone Disease: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Low-Dose with 4D MDCT Tube Current Modulation Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 553 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]