Abstract
Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology
Vol. 51:
463-499
(Volume publication date June 2000)
(doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463)
PLANT CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR RESPONSES TO HIGH SALINITY Paul M. Hasegawa and Ray A. Bressan Center for Plant Environmental Stress Physiology, 1165 Horticulture Building, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1165; e-mail: paul.m.hasegawa.1@purdue.edu Jian-Kang Zhu1 and Hans J. Bohnert1,2 Departments of 1 Plant Sciences and 2Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721; e-mail: bonerth@u.arizona.edu ▪ Abstract Plant responses to salinity stress are reviewed with emphasis on molecular mechanisms of signal transduction and on the physiological consequences of altered gene expression that affect biochemical reactions downstream of stress sensing. We make extensive use of comparisons with model organisms, halophytic plants, and yeast, which provide a paradigm for many responses to salinity exhibited by stress-sensitive plants. Among biochemical responses, we emphasize osmolyte biosynthesis and function, water flux control, and membrane transport of ions for maintenance and re-establishment of homeostasis. The advances in understanding the effectiveness of stress responses, and distinctions between pathology and adaptive advantage, are increasingly based on transgenic plant and mutant analyses, in particular the analysis of Arabidopsis mutants defective in elements of stress signal transduction pathways. We summarize evidence for plant stress signaling systems, some of which have components analogous to those that regulate osmotic stress responses of yeast. There is evidence also of signaling cascades that are not known to exist in the unicellular eukaryote, some that presumably function in intercellular coordination or regulation of effector genes in a cell-/tissue-specific context required for tolerance of plants. A complex set of stress-responsive transcription factors is emerging. The imminent availability of genomic DNA sequences and global and cell-specific transcript expression data, combined with determinant identification based on gain- and loss-of-function molecular genetics, will provide the infrastructure for functional physiological dissection of salt tolerance determinants in an organismal context. Furthermore, protein interaction analysis and evaluation of allelism, additivity, and epistasis allow determination of ordered relationships between stress signaling components. Finally, genetic activation and suppression screens will lead inevitably to an understanding of the interrelationships of the multiple signaling systems that control stress-adaptive responses in plants. Most recent citing papers (via CrossRef)Improving salinity tolerance in crop plants: a biotechnological view In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant (2008) Physiological characterization and stress-induced metabolic responses of Dunaliella salina isolated from salt pan Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 35(10):1093-1101 (2008) Proline and betaine provide protection to antioxidant and methylglyoxal detoxification systems during cold stress in Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze Acta Physiologiae Plantarum (2008) Exploring the Role of Calcium to Improve Chilling Tolerance in Hybrid Maize Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 194(5):350-359 (2008)
Distinctive transcriptome responses to adverse environmental conditions in
Zea mays
L.
Plant Biotechnology Journal 6(8):782-798 (2008)
|
|
|
Users who read this review also read:
| Rana Munns, Mark Tester Annual Review of Plant Biology. Volume 59, Page 651-681, Jun 2008 Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (425 KB)
|
Add to Favorites
| Related | |
| Jian-Kang Zhu Annual Review of Plant Biology. Volume 53, Page 247-273, Jun 2002 Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (273 KB)
|
Add to Favorites
| Related | |
| Klaus Apel, Heribert Hirt Annual Review of Plant Biology. Volume 55, Page 373-399, Jun 2004 Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (396 KB)
|
Add to Favorites
| Related | |
| Kazuko Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, Kazuo Shinozaki Annual Review of Plant Biology. Volume 57, Page 781-803, Jun 2006 Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (261 KB)
|
Add to Favorites
| Related | |
|
|