skip to main content
10.1145/948205.948218acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Best-path vs. multi-path overlay routing

Published:27 October 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Time-varying congestion on Internet paths and failures due to software, hardware, and configuration errors often disrupt packet delivery on the Internet.Many aproaches to avoiding these problems use multiple paths between two network locations. These approaches rely on a path-independence assumption in order to work well; i.e., they work best when the problems on different paths between two locations are uncorrelated in time.This paper examines the extent to which this assumption holds on the Internet by analyzing 14 days of data collected from 30 nodes in the RON testbed. We examine two problems that manifest themselves---congestion-triggered loss and path failures---and find that the chances of losing two packets between the same hosts is nearly as high when those packets are sent through an intermediate node (60%) as when they are sent back-to-back on the same path (70%). In so doing, we also compare two different ways of taking advantage of path redundancy proposed in the literature: mesh routing based on packet replication, and reactive routing based on adaptive path selection.

References

  1. Andersen, D. G., Balakrishnan, H., Kaashoek, M. F., and Morris, R. Resilient Overlay Networks. In Proc. 18th ACM SOSP (Banff, Canada, Oct. 2001), pp. 131--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Andersen, D. G., Feamster, N., Bauer, S., and Balakrishnan, H. Topology Inference from BGP Routing Dynamics. In Proc. Internet Measurement Workshop (Marseille, France, 2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Awduche, D. O., Chiu, A., Elwalid, A., Widjaja, I., and Xiao, X. Overview and Principles of Interent Traffic Engineering. Internet Engineering Task Force, May 2002. RFC 3272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Balakrishnan, H., Seshan, S., and Katz, R. Improving Reliable Transport and Handoff Performance in Cellular Wireless Networks. ACM Wireless Networks 1, 4 (Dec. 1995). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Banerjea, A. Simulation study of the capacity effects of dispersity routing for fault tolerant realtime channels. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (Aug. 1996), pp. 194--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bestavros, A. An adaptive information dispersal algorithm for time-critical reliable communication. In Network Management and Control, Volume II, I. Frish, M. Malek, and S. Panwar, Eds. Plenum Publishing Co., New York, New York, 1994, pp. 423--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bolot, J. End-to-End Packet Delay and Loss Behavior in the Internet. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (San Francisco, CA, Sept. 1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Braynard, R., Kostic, D., Rodriguez, A., Chase, J., and Vahdat, A. Opus: an overlay peer utility service. In Proc. 5th International Conference on Open Architectures and Network Programming (OPENARCH) (June 2002).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Byers, J. W., Luby, M., and Mitzenmacher, M. Accessing multiple mirror sites in parallel: Using tornado codes to speed up downloads. In Proc. IEEE Infocom (Mar. 1999), pp. 275--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Byers, J. W., Luby, M., Mitzenmacher, M., and Rege, A. A digital fountain approach to reliable distribution of bulk data. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (Aug. 1998), pp. 56--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chen, J. New Approaches to Routing for Large-Scale Data Networks. PhD thesis, Rice University, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cisco Security Advisory: Code Red Worm - Customer Impact. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-code-red-worm-pub.shtml, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Donelan, S. Update: CSX train derailment. http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2001-07/msg00351.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Feamster, N., Andersen, D., Balakrishnan, H., and Kaashoek, M. F. Measuring the effects of Internet path faults on reactive routing. In Proc. Sigmetrics (San Diego, CA, June 2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gallager, R. G. Low-Density Parity-Check Codes. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jannotti, J., Gifford, D. K., Johnson, K. L., Kaashoek, M. F., and O'Toole Jr., J. W. Overcast: Reliable multicasting with an overlay network. In Proc. 4th USENIX OSDI (San Diego, California, October 2000), pp. 197--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Khanna, A., and Zinky, J. The Revised ARPANET Routing Metric. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (Austin, TX, Sept. 1989), pp. 45--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Labovitz, C., Ahuja, A., Bose, A., and Jahanian, F. Delayed Internet Routing Convergence. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (Stockholm, Sweden, September 2000), pp. 175--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Labovitz, C., Malan, R., and Jahanian, F. Internet Routing Instability. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 6, 5 (1998), 515--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lewin, D. Systems issues in global Internet content delivery, 2000. Keynote Address at 4th USENIX OSDI Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Maxemchuk, N. F. Dispersity Routing in Store and Forward Networks. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, May 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. McAuley, A. J. Error Control for Messaging Applications in a Wireless Environment. In Proc. INFOCOM Conf. (Apr. 1995). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Miller, G. Overlay routing networks (Akarouting). http://www-math.mit.edu/~steng/18.996/lecture9.ps, Apr. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Opnix. Orbit: Routing Intelligence System. http://www.opnix.com/newsroom/OrbitWhitePaper_July_2001.pdf, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Paxson, V. End-to-End Routing Behavior in the Internet. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '96 (Stanford, CA, Aug. 1996), pp. 25--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Paxson, V. End-to-End Internet Packet Dynamics. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (Cannes, France, Sept. 1997), pp. 139--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rabin, M. O. Efficient dispersal of information for security, load balancing and fault tolerance. J. ACM 36, 2 (Apr. 1989), 335--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rizzo, L., and Vicisano, L. RMDP: An FEC-based reliable multicast protocol for wireless environments. Mobile Computing and Communications Review 2, 2 (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. RouteScience. Whitepaper available from http://www.routescience.com/technology/tec_whitepaper.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Savage, S., Collins, A., Hoffman, E., Snell, J., and Anderson, T. The End-to-End Effects of Internet Path Selection. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (Boston, MA, 1999), pp. 289--299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Snoeren, A. C., Conley, K., and Gifford, D. K. Mesh-based content routing using XML. In Proc. 18th ACM SOSP (Banff, Canada, Oct. 2001), pp. 160--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sockeye. http://www.sockeye.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Stonesoft. Multi-link technology white paper. http://www.stonesoft.com/files/products/StoneGate/SG_Multi-Link_Technology_Whitepaper.pdf, Oct. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Best-path vs. multi-path overlay routing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IMC '03: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
        October 2003
        328 pages
        ISBN:1581137737
        DOI:10.1145/948205

        Copyright © 2003 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 October 2003

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        IMC '03 Paper Acceptance Rate32of109submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        IMC '24
        ACM Internet Measurement Conference
        November 4 - 6, 2024
        Madrid , AA , Spain

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader