skip to main content
10.1145/508791.508986acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Proxy Viewpoints Model-based Requirements engineering

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 March 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the problem of the "missing requirements" in software requirement specification (SRS) expressed in natural language. Due to rapid changes in technology and business frequently witnessed over time, the original SRS documents often experience the problems of missing, not available, and hard-to-locate requirements. One of the flaws in earlier solutions to this problem has no consideration for missing requirements from multiple viewpoints. Furthermore, since such SRS documents represent an incomplete domain model, manual discovery (identification and incorporation) of missing requirements is highly labor intensive and error-prone. Consequently, deriving and improving an efficient adaptation of SRS changes remain a complex problem. In this paper, we present a new methodology entitled "Proxy Viewpoints Model-based Requirements Discovery (PVRD)". Through the requirements discovery and analysis process, PVRD methodology provides ways to construct proxy viewpoints model from legacy status requirements. Requirements term expansion technique facilitates the retrieval process of requirements of interest based on the improved requirements representation space in proxy viewpoints model. The PVRD methodology provides an integrated environment that supports requirements discovery process as well as efficient management.

References

  1. Alderson, A. and Shah, H. Viewpoints on Legacy Systems. Communications of the ACM, Vol.42, No.3. pp. 115-116, March. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Buede, D. M. The Engineering Design of Systems : Models and Methods (Wiley Series in Systems Engineering), New York: Wiley, December. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cochran, W. G. Sampling Techniques, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons. New York. 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kirner, T. G. and Abib, J. C. Inspection of Software Requirements Specification Documents: A Pilot Study. In Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on Computer documentation. pp. 161-171. Snowbird, UT. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kotonya, G. and Sommerville, I. Requirements Engineering with Viewpoints, BCS/IEE Software Engineering Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.5-18. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kotonya, G. and Sommerville, I. Requirements Engineering: Processes and Techniques (Worldwide Series in Computer Science), J. Wiley, New York, September. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Merriman, M. FIERS: Categorization of missing requirements. Technical Report, School of Information Technology and Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nuseibeh, B., Kramer, J. and Finkelstein, A. A Framework for Expressing the Relationships Between Multiple Views in Requirements Specification, Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(10): 760-773, IEEE CS Press, October. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Porter, A. A., Votta, L. G., and Basili, V. R. Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspection: A Replicated Experiment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 6. pp.563-575. 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rayson, P., Garside, R. and Sawyer, P. Assisting Requirements Recovery from Legacy Documents. Technical Report CSEG/8/2000, Cooperative Systems Engineering Group. Computing Department, Lancaster University, United Kingdom. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Salton, G. The SMART Retrieval System --- Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 1971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sommerville, I. and Sawyer, P. Viewpoints: Principles, Problems and a Practical Approach to Requirements Engineering. Annual Software Engineering, Vol. 3. pp. 101-130. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Spanoudakis, G., Finkelstein, A. and Emmerich, W. (Editors). Joint proceedings of the second international software architecture workshop (ISAW-2) and international workshop on multiple perspectives in software development (Viewpoints '96) on SIGSOFT '96 workshops. ACM Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. October 14-15. San Francisco. ACM Press. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Xu, J. and Croft, B. Improving the Effectiveness of Information Retrieval with Local Context Analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 79-112. Jan. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Proxy Viewpoints Model-based Requirements engineering

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SAC '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Applied computing
              March 2002
              1200 pages
              ISBN:1581134452
              DOI:10.1145/508791

              Copyright © 2002 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 11 March 2002

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader