skip to main content
survey

Interactive Question Answering Systems: Literature Review

Published:08 May 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Question-answering systems are recognized as popular and frequently effective means of information seeking on the web. In such systems, information seekers can receive a concise response to their queries by presenting their questions in natural language. Interactive question answering is a recently proposed and increasingly popular solution that resides at the intersection of question answering and dialogue systems. On the one hand, the user can ask questions in normal language and locate the actual response to her inquiry; on the other hand, the system can prolong the question-answering session into a dialogue if there are multiple probable replies, very few, or ambiguities in the initial request. By permitting the user to ask more questions, interactive question answering enables users to interact with the system and receive more precise results dynamically.

This survey offers a detailed overview of the interactive question-answering methods that are prevalent in current literature. It begins by explaining the foundational principles of question-answering systems, hence defining new notations and taxonomies to combine all identified works inside a unified framework. The reviewed published work on interactive question-answering systems is then presented and examined in terms of its proposed methodology, evaluation approaches, and dataset/application domain. We also describe trends surrounding specific tasks and issues raised by the community, so shedding light on the future interests of scholars. Our work is further supported by a GitHub page synthesizing all the major topics covered in this literature study. https://sisinflab.github.io/interactive-question-answering-systems-survey/

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Huda Alamri, Vincent Cartillier, Abhishek Das, Jue Wang, Anoop Cherian, Irfan Essa, Dhruv Batra, Tim K. Marks, Chiori Hori, Peter Anderson, and Stefan Lee, Devi Parikh. 2019. Audio visual scene-aware dialog. In CVPR. 75587567.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Alipour Kamran, Schulze Jürgen P., Yao Yi, Ziskind Avi, and Burachas Giedrius. 2020. A study on multimodal and interactive explanations for visual question answering. In SafeAI@AAAI(CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2560). CEUR-WS.org, 5462.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Alloatti Francesca, Caro Luigi Di, and Sportelli Gianpiero. 2019. Real life application of a question answering system using BERT language model. In SIGdial. Association for Computational Linguistics, 250253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Anderson Ashton, Huttenlocher Daniel, Kleinberg Jon, and Leskovec Jure. 2012. Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: A case study of stack overflow. In KDD. 850858.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. [5] Antol Stanislaw, Agrawal Aishwarya, Lu Jiasen, Mitchell Margaret, Batra Dhruv, Zitnick C. Lawrence, and Parikh Devi. 2015. VQA: Visual question answering. In ICCV. 24252433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Baheti Ashutosh, Ritter Alan, and Small Kevin. 2020. Fluent response generation for conversational question answering. In ACL. Association for Computational Linguistics, 191207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Basu Kinjal. 2019. Conversational AI : Open domain question answering and commonsense reasoning. In ICLP Technical Communications(EPTCS, Vol. 306). 396402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Berant Jonathan, Chou Andrew, Frostig Roy, and Liang Percy. 2013. Semantic parsing on Freebase from question-answer pairs. In EMNLP. 15331544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Berdasco Ana, López Gustavo, Díaz-Oreiro Ignacio, Quesada Luis, and Guerrero Luis A.. 2019. User experience comparison of intelligent personal assistants: Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri and Cortana. In UCAmI(MDPI Proceedings, Vol. 31). MDPI, 51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Berre Guillaume Le and Langlais Philippe. 2020. Attending knowledge facts with BERT-like models in question-answering: Disappointing results and some explanations. In Canadian AI(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12109). Springer, 356367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] Bhattacharjee Santanu, Haque Rejwanul, Wenniger Gideon Maillette de Buy, and Way Andy. 2020. Investigating query expansion and coreference resolution in question answering on BERT. In NLDB(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12089). Springer, 4759.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Bollacker Kurt, Evans Colin, Paritosh Praveen, Sturge Tim, and Taylor Jamie. 2008. Freebase: A collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In SIGMOD. 12471250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13] Bordes Antoine, Usunier Nicolas, Chopra Sumit, and Weston Jason. 2015. Large-scale simple question answering with memory networks. CoRR abs/1506.02075 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Chada Rakesh. 2019. Gendered pronoun resolution using BERT and an extractive question answering formulation. CoRR abs/1906.03695 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Chapman Adriane and Jagadish H. V.. 2009. Why not? In SIGMOD. ACM, 523534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Chen David L. and Dolan William B.. 2011. Collecting highly parallel data for paraphrase evaluation. In ACL. The Association for Computer Linguistics, 190200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Chen Wenhu, Chang Ming-Wei, Schlinger Eva, Wang William, and Cohen William W.. 2020. Open question answering over tables and text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10439 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Chiang Ting-Rui, Ye Hao-Tong, and Chen Yun-Nung. 2020. An empirical study of content understanding in conversational question answering. In AAAI. AAAI Press, 75787585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Chiang Wei-Lin, Li Zhuohan, Lin Zi, Sheng Ying, Wu Zhanghao, Zhang Hao, Zheng Lianmin, Zhuang Siyuan, Zhuang Yonghao, Gonzalez Joseph E., Stoica Ion, and Xing Eric P.. 2023. Vicuna: An Open-source Chatbot Impressing GPT-4 with 90%* ChatGPT Quality. Retrieved from https://lmsys.org/blog/2023-03-30-vicuna/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Choi Eunsol, He He, Iyyer Mohit, Yatskar Mark, Yih Wen-tau, Choi Yejin, Liang Percy, and Zettlemoyer Luke. 2018. QuAC: Question answering in context. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.07036 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. [21] Christmann Philipp, Roy Rishiraj Saha, Abujabal Abdalghani, Singh Jyotsna, and Weikum Gerhard. 2019. Look before you hop: Conversational question answering over knowledge graphs using judicious context expansion. In CIKM. ACM, 729738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Clark Kevin and Manning Christopher D.. 2016. Improving coreference resolution by learning entity-level distributed representations. In ACL.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Clark Peter, Cowhey Isaac, Etzioni Oren, Khot Tushar, Sabharwal Ashish, Schoenick Carissa, and Tafjord Oyvind. 2018. Think you have solved question answering? Try ARC, the AI2 reasoning challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05457 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Cohen Daniel, Yang Liu, and Croft W. Bruce. 2018. WikiPassageQA: A benchmark collection for research on non-factoid answer passage retrieval. In SIGIR. 11651168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. [25] Curto Sérgio, Mendes Ana Cristina, Curto Pedro, Coheur Luísa, and Costa Ângela. 2014. JUST.ASK, a QA system that learns to answer new questions from previous interactions. In LREC. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 26032607.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Damljanovic Danica, Agatonovic Milan, and Cunningham Hamish. 2010. Natural language interfaces to ontologies: Combining syntactic analysis and ontology-based lookup through the user interaction. In ESWC(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6088). Springer, 106120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. [27] Das Abhishek, Kottur Satwik, Gupta Khushi, Singh Avi, Yadav Deshraj, Moura José M. F., Parikh Devi, and Batra Dhruv. 2017. Visual dialog. In CVPR. 326335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Das Rajarshi, Dhuliawala Shehzaad, Zaheer Manzil, and McCallum Andrew. 2019. Multi-step retriever-reader interaction for scalable open-domain question answering. In ICLR (Poster). OpenReview.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] Devlin Jacob, Chang Ming-Wei, Lee Kenton, and Toutanova Kristina. 2018. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30] Dhingra Bhuwan, Mazaitis Kathryn, and Cohen William W.. 2017. Quasar: Datasets for question answering by search and reading. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.03904 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [31] Do Tuong, Tran Huy, Do Thanh-Toan, Tjiputra Erman, and Tran Quang D.. 2019. Compact trilinear interaction for visual question answering. In ICCV. IEEE, 392401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Dunn Matthew, Sagun Levent, Higgins Mike, Guney V. Ugur, Cirik Volkan, and Cho Kyunghyun. 2017. SearchQA: A newQ&A dataset augmented with context from a search engine. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05179 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Fagin Ronald, Lotem Amnon, and Naor Moni. 2003. Optimal aggregation algorithms for middleware. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 66, 4 (2003), 614656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. [34] Feng Minwei, Xiang Bing, Glass Michael R., Wang Lidan, and Zhou Bowen. 2015. Applying deep learning to answer selection: A study and an open task. In ASRU. 813820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Ferrández Antonio and Peral Jesús. 2010. The benefits of the interaction between data warehouses and question answering. In EDBT/ICDT Workshops (ACM International Conference Proceeding Series). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. [36] Fukumoto Jun-ichi, Aburai Noriaki, and Yamanishi Ryosuke. 2013. Interactive document expansion for answer extraction of question answering system. In KES(Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 22). Elsevier, 9911000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Gao Peng, You Haoxuan, Zhang Zhanpeng, Wang Xiaogang, and Li Hongsheng. 2019. Multi-modality latent interaction network for visual question answering. In ICCV. IEEE, 58245834.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Gordon Daniel, Kembhavi Aniruddha, Rastegari Mohammad, Redmon Joseph, Fox Dieter, and Farhadi Ali. 2018. IQA: Visual question answering in interactive environments. In CVPR. Computer Vision Foundation/IEEE Computer Society, 40894098.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Goyal Yash, Khot Tejas, Summers-Stay Douglas, Batra Dhruv, and Parikh Devi. 2017. Making the V in VQA matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answering. In CVPR. 69046913.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Guo Daya, Tang Duyu, Duan Nan, Zhou Ming, and Yin Jian. 2018. Dialog-to-action: Conversational question answering over a large-scale knowledge base. In NeurIPS 2018. 29462955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. [41] Guo Wenya, Zhang Ying, Yang Jufeng, and Yuan Xiaojie. 2021. Re-attention for visual question answering. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 30 (2021), 67306743.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Habibi Maryam, Mahdabi Parvaz, and Popescu-Belis Andrei. 2016. Question answering in conversations: Query refinement using contextual and semantic information. Data Knowl. Eng. 106 (2016), 3851.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Han Hojae, Choi Seungtaek, Park Haeju, and Hwang Seung-won. 2019. MICRON: Multigranular interaction for contextualizing representation in non-factoid question answering. In EMNLP/IJCNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 58895894.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Hazrina Sofian, Sharef Nurfadhlina Mohd, Ibrahim Hamidah, Murad Masrah Azrifah Azmi, and Noah Shahrul Azman Mohd.. 2017. Review on the advancements of disambiguation in semantic question answering system. Inf. Process. Manag. 53, 1 (2017), 5269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] He Shizhu, Liu Kang, and An Weiting. 2019. Learning to align question and answer utterances in customer service conversation with recurrent pointer networks. In AAAI. AAAI Press, 134141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Hirschman Lynette and Gaizauskas Robert J.. 2001. Natural language question answering: The view from here. Nat. Lang. Eng. 7, 4 (2001), 275300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. [47] Hong Yining, Wang Jialu, Jia Yuting, Zhang Weinan, and Wang Xinbing. 2019. Academic reader: An interactive question answering system on academic literatures. In AAAI. AAAI Press, 98559856.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. [48] Hu Jun, Qian Shengsheng, Fang Quan, and Xu Changsheng. 2018. Attentive interactive convolutional matching for community question answering in social multimedia. In ACM Multimedia. ACM, 456464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. [49] Huang Hsin-Yuan, Choi Eunsol, and Yih Wen-tau. 2018. FlowQA: Grasping flow in history for conversational machine comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.06683 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. [50] Hulburd Eric. 2020. Exploring BERT parameter efficiency on the Stanford question answering dataset v2.0. CoRR abs/2002.10670 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. [51] Jang Yunseok, Song Yale, Yu Youngjae, Kim Youngjin, and Kim Gunhee. 2017. TGIF-QA: Toward spatio-temporal reasoning in visual question answering. In CVPR. IEEE Computer Society, 13591367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Jia Zhen, Pramanik Soumajit, Roy Rishiraj Saha, and Weikum Gerhard. 2021. Complex temporal question answering on knowledge graphs. In CIKM. 792802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. [53] Jin Weike, Zhao Zhou, Gu Mao, Yu Jun, Xiao Jun, and Zhuang Yueting. 2019. Multi-interaction network with object relation for video question answering. In ACM Multimedia. ACM, 11931201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. [54] Joshi Mandar, Choi Eunsol, Weld Daniel S., and Zettlemoyer Luke. 2017. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03551 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. [55] Ju Ying, Zhao Fubang, Chen Shijie, Zheng Bowen, Yang Xuefeng, and Liu Yunfeng. 2019. Technical report on Conversational Question Answering. CoRR abs/1909.10772 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. [56] Kacupaj Endri, Singh Kuldeep, Maleshkova Maria, and Lehmann Jens. 2022. Contrastive representation learning for conversational question answering over knowledge graphs. In CIKM. 925934.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. [57] Kafle Kushal and Kanan Christopher. 2017. An analysis of visual question answering algorithms. In ICCV. 19651973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. [58] Kaiser Magdalena, Roy Rishiraj Saha, and Weikum Gerhard. 2020. Conversational question answering over passages by leveraging word proximity networks. In SIGIR. ACM, 21292132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. [59] Khot Tushar, Clark Peter, Guerquin Michal, Jansen Peter, and Sabharwal Ashish. 2020. QASC: A dataset for question answering via sentence composition. In AAAI. 80828090.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. [60] Kim Kyung-Min, Heo Min-Oh, Choi Seong-Ho, and Zhang Byoung-Tak. 2017. DeepStory: Video story QA by deep embedded memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00836 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. [61] Konstantinova Natalia and Orasan Constantin. 2013. Interactive question answering. In Emerging Applications of Natural Language Processing: Concepts and New Research. IGI Global, 149169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Kottur Satwik, Moura José M. F., Parikh Devi, Batra Dhruv, and Rohrbach Marcus. 2018. Visual coreference resolution in visual dialog using neural module networks. In ECCV. 153169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. [63] Ranjay Krishna, Yuke Zhu, Oliver Groth, Justin Johnson, Kenji Hata, Joshua Kravitz, Stephanie Chen, Yannis Kalantidis, Li-Jia Li, David A. Shamma, Michael S. Bernstein, and Li Fei-Fei. 2017. Visual genome: Connecting language and vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 123, 1 (2017), 3273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. [64] Kulkarni Mayank and Boyer Kristy Elizabeth. 2018. Toward data-driven tutorial question answering with deep learning conversational models. In BEA@NAACL-HLT. Association for Computational Linguistics, 273283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. [65] Kumar Girish, Henderson Matthew, Chan Shannon, Nguyen Hoang, and Ngoo Lucas. 2018. Question-answer selection in user to user marketplace conversations. In IWSDS(Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 579). Springer, 397403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. [66] Kundu Souvik, Lin Qian, and Ng Hwee Tou. 2020. Learning to identify follow-up questions in conversational question answering. In ACL. Association for Computational Linguistics, 959968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. [67] Kuo Chia-Chih, Luo Shang-Bao, and Chen Kuan-Yu. 2020. An audio-enriched bert-based framework for spoken multiple-choice question answering. In INTERSPEECH. ISCA, 41734177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. [68] Latcinnik Veronica and Berant Jonathan. 2020. Explaining question answering models through text generation. CoRR abs/2004.05569 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. [69] Lee Changyoon, Han Donghoon, Jin Hyoungwook, and Oh Alice. 2019. automaTA: Human-machine interaction for answering context-specific questions. In L@S. ACM, 44:1–44:4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. [70] Lei Jie, Yu Licheng, Bansal Mohit, and Berg Tamara L.. 2018. TVQA: Localized, compositional video question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.01696 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. [71] Li Fei and Jagadish H. V.. 2014. Constructing an interactive natural language interface for relational databases. Proc. VLDB Endow. 8, 1 (2014), 7384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. [72] Li Huayu, Min Martin Renqiang, Ge Yong, and Kadav Asim. 2017. A context-aware attention network for interactive question answering. In KDD. ACM, 927935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. [73] Li Qing, Fu Jianlong, Yu Dongfei, Mei Tao, and Luo Jiebo. 2018. Tell-and-answer: Towards explainable visual question answering using attributes and captions. In EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 13381346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. [74] Li Qian, Su Hui, Niu Cheng, Wang Daling, Li Zekang, Feng Shi, and Zhang Yifei. 2019. Answer-supervised question reformulation for enhancing conversational machine comprehension. In MRQA@EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 3847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. [75] Li Qing, Tao Qingyi, Joty Shafiq R., Cai Jianfei, and Luo Jiebo. 2018. VQA-E: Explaining, elaborating, and enhancing your answers for visual questions. In ECCV(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11211). Springer, 570586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. [76] Li Ronghan, Jiang Zejun, Wang Lifang, Lu Xinyu, and Zhao Meng. 2020. Directional attention weaving for text-grounded conversational question answering. Neurocomputing 391 (2020), 1324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. [77] Li Tianle, Ma Xueguang, Zhuang Alex, Gu Yu, Su Yu, and Chen Wenhu. 2023. Few-shot in-context learning for knowledge base question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01750 (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. [78] Li Yuncheng, Song Yale, Cao Liangliang, Tetreault Joel R., Goldberg Larry, Jaimes Alejandro, and Luo Jiebo. 2016. TGIF: A new dataset and benchmark on animated GIF description. In CVPR. IEEE Computer Society, 46414650.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. [79] Liu Aiting, Huang Ziqi, Lu Hengtong, Wang Xiaojie, and Yuan Caixia. 2019. BB-KBQA: BERT-based knowledge base question answering. In CCL(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11856). Springer, 8192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. [80] Liu Siyuan, Bhowmick Sourav S., Zhang Wanlu, Wang Shu, and Huang Wanyi. 2018. NEURON: An interactive natural language interface for understanding query execution plans in RDBMS. CoRR abs/1805.05670 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. [81] Liu Song, Zhong Yixin, and Ren Fuji. 2013. Interactive question answering based on FAQ. In CCL(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8202). Springer, 7384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. [82] Liu Yuhang, Wei Wei, and hu. 2022. Declaration-based prompt tuning for visual question answering. In IJCAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. [83] Lockett James, Wijesinghe Sanith, Phillips Jasper, Gross Ian, Schoenfeld Michael, Hiranpat Walter T., Marlow Phillip J., Coarr Matt, and Hu Qian. 2019. Intelligent voice agent and service (iVAS) for interactive and multimodal question and answers. In FQAS(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11529). Springer, 396402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. [84] Lopez Vanessa, Unger Christina, Cimiano Philipp, and Motta Enrico. 2013. Evaluating question answering over linked data. J. Web Semant. 21 (2013), 313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. [85] Maitra Anutosh, Garg Shivam, and Sengupta Shubhashis. 2020. Enabling interactive answering of procedural questions. In NLDB(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12089). Springer, 7381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. [86] Mandya Angrosh, Bollegala Danushka, and Coenen Frans. 2019. Evaluating co-reference chains based conversation history in conversational question answering. In PACLING(Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1215). Springer, 280292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. [87] Mandya Angrosh, O’Neill James, Bollegala Danushka, and Coenen Frans. 2020. Do not let the history haunt you: Mitigating compoundingerrors in conversational question answering. In LREC. European Language Resources Association, 20172025.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. [88] Marino Kenneth, Rastegari Mohammad, Farhadi Ali, and Mottaghi Roozbeh. 2019. OK-VQA: A visual question answering benchmark requiring external knowledge. In CVPR. 31953204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. [89] Mass Yosi, Roitman Haggai, Erera Shai, Rivlin Or, Weiner Bar, and Konopnicki David. 2019. A study of BERT for non-factoid question-answering under passage length constraints. CoRR abs/1908.06780 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. [90] McCarley J. S.. 2019. Pruning a BERT-based question answering model. CoRR abs/1910.06360 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. [91] Mendes Pablo N., Jakob Max, and Bizer Christian. 2012. DBpedia: A Multilingual Cross-domain Knowledge Base. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. [92] Mészáros Tamás and Dobrowiecki Tadeusz P.. 2017. Agent-based reconfigurable natural language interface to robotsHuman-agent interaction using task-specific controlled natural languages. In ICAART. SciTePress, 632639.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. [93] Mihaylov Todor, Clark Peter, Khot Tushar, and Sabharwal Ashish. 2018. Can a suit of armor conduct electricity? A new dataset for open book question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02789 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. [94] Moon Seungwhan, Shah Pararth, Kumar Anuj, and Subba Rajen. 2019. Memory graph networks for explainable memory-grounded question answering. In CoNLL. Association for Computational Linguistics, 728736.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. [95] Müller Thomas, Piccinno Francesco, Shaw Peter, Nicosia Massimo, and Altun Yasemin. 2019. Answering conversational questions on structured data without logical forms. In EMNLP/IJCNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 59015909.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. [96] Naeem M. Asif, Ullah Saif, and Bajwa Imran Sarwar. 2012. Interacting with data warehouse by using a natural language interface. In NLDB(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7337). Springer, 372377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. [97] Nakov Preslav, Màrquez Lluís, Magdy Walid, Moschitti Alessandro, Glass James, and Randeree Bilal. 2019. Semeval-2015 task 3: Answer selection in community question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.11403 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. [98] Nie Allen, Bennett Erin D., and Goodman Noah D.. 2019. Learning to explain: Answering why-questions via rephrasing. CoRR abs/1906.01243 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. [99] Nothdurft Florian and Minker Wolfgang. 2016. Justification and transparency explanations in dialogue systems to maintain human-computer trust. In Situated Dialog in Speech-based Human-computer Interaction. Springer, 4150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. [100] Osama Reham A., El-Makky Nagwa M., and Torki Marwan. 2019. Question answering using hierarchical attention on top of BERT features. In MRQA@EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 191195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. [101] Otegi Arantxa, Gonzalez-Agirre Aitor, Campos Jon Ander, Soroa Aitor, and Agirre Eneko. 2020. Conversational question answering in low resource scenarios: A dataset and case study for basque. In LREC. European Language Resources Association, 436442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. [102] Park Jinyoung, Choi Hyeong Kyu, Ko Juyeon, Park Hyeonjin, Kim Ji-Hoon, Jeong Jisu, Kim Kyungmin, and Kim Hyunwoo. 2023. Relation-aware language-graph transformer for question answering. In AAAI. 1345713464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. [103] Park Jungin, Lee Jiyoung, and Sohn Kwanghoon. 2021. Bridge to answer: Structure-aware graph interaction network for video question answering. In CVPR. 1552615535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. [104] Pennington Jeffrey, Socher Richard, and Manning Christopher D.. 2014. GloVE: Global vectors for word representation. In EMNLP. 15321543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. [105] Perera Rivindu and Nand Parma. 2014. Interaction history based answer formulation for question answering. In KESW(Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 468). Springer, 128139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. [106] Petukhova Volha, Putra Desmond Darma, Chernov Alexandr, and Klakow Dietrich. 2015. Understanding questions and extracting answers: Interactive quiz game application design. In LTC(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10930). Springer, 246261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. [107] Pradhan Akshit, Shukla Pragya, Patra Pallavi, Pathak Rohit, and Jena Ajay Kumar. 2018. Enhancing interaction with social networking sites for visually impaired people by using textual and visual question answering. In CICBA(Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1031). Springer, 314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. [108] Qi Zihao, Bertero Dario, Wood Ian D., and Fung Pascale. 2019. Incorporate user representation for personal question answer selection using siamese network. In ICASSP. IEEE, 75407544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. [109] Qu Chen, Yang Liu, Chen Cen, Qiu Minghui, Croft W. Bruce, and Iyyer Mohit. 2020. Open-retrieval conversational question answering. In SIGIR. ACM, 539548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. [110] Qu Chen, Yang Liu, Qiu Minghui, Croft W. Bruce, Zhang Yongfeng, and Iyyer Mohit. 2019. BERT with history answer embedding for conversational question answering. In SIGIR. ACM, 11331136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. [111] Qu Chen, Yang Liu, Qiu Minghui, Zhang Yongfeng, Chen Cen, Croft W. Bruce, and Iyyer Mohit. 2019. Attentive history selection for conversational question answering. In CIKM. ACM, 13911400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. [112] Rajpurkar Pranav, Jia Robin, and Liang Percy. 2018. Know what you don’t know: Unanswerable questions for SQuAD. In ACL. Association for Computational Linguistics, 784789.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  113. [113] Rajpurkar Pranav, Zhang Jian, Lopyrev Konstantin, and Liang Percy. 2016. SQuAD: 100, 000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In EMNLP. The Association for Computational Linguistics, 23832392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  114. [114] Reddy Siva, Chen Danqi, and Manning Christopher D.. 2019. CoQA: A conversational question answering challenge. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics 7 (2019), 249266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. [115] Ren Mengye, Kiros Ryan, and Zemel Richard S.. 2015. Exploring models and data for image question answering. In NIPS. 29532961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. [116] Riley Heather and Sridharan Mohan. 2019. Integrating non-monotonic logical reasoning and inductive learning with deep learning for explainable visual question answering. Front. Robot. AI 6 (2019), 125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. [117] Rücklé Andreas and Gurevych Iryna. 2017. End-to-end non-factoid question answering with an interactive visualization of neural attention weights. In ACL (System Demonstrations). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1924.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. [118] Saha Amrita, Pahuja Vardaan, Khapra Mitesh M., Sankaranarayanan Karthik, and Chandar Sarath. 2018. Complex sequential question answering: Towards learning to converse over linked question answer pairs with a knowledge graph. arXiv:1801.10314 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. [119] Sakata Wataru, Shibata Tomohide, Tanaka Ribeka, and Kurohashi Sadao. 2019. FAQ retrieval using query-question similarity and BERT-based query-answer relevance. In SIGIR. ACM, 11131116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. [120] Saxena Apoorv, Kochsiek Adrian, and Gemulla Rainer. 2022. Sequence-to-sequence knowledge graph completion and question answering. In ACL. 28142828.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. [121] Schwarzer Malte, Düver Jonas, Ploch Danuta, and Lommatzsch Andreas. 2016. An interactive e-government question answering system. In LWDA(CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1670). CEUR-WS.org, 7482.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. [122] Sen Bhaskar, Gopal Nikhil, and Xue Xinwei. 2020. Support-BERT: Predicting quality of question-answer pairs in MSDN using deep bidirectional transformer. CoRR abs/2005.08294 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. [123] Shao Huan, Xu Yunlong, Ji Yi, Yang Jianyu, and Liu Chunping. 2019. Intra-modality feature interaction using self-attention for visual question answering. In ICONIP(Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1143). Springer, 215222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  124. [124] Shao Zhenwei, Yu Zhou, Wang Meng, and Yu Jun. 2023. Prompting large language models with answer heuristics for knowledge-based visual question answering. In CVPR. 1497414983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  125. [125] Shen Tao, Geng Xiubo, Qin Tao, Guo Daya, Tang Duyu, Duan Nan, Long Guodong, and Jiang Daxin. 2019. Multi-task learning for conversational question answering over a large-scale knowledge base. In EMNLP-IJCNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 24422451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  126. [126] Shi Lei, Geng Shijie, Shuang Kai, Hori Chiori, Liu Songxiang, Gao Peng, and Su Sen. 2020. Multi-layer content interaction through quaternion product for visual question answering. In ICASSP. IEEE, 44124416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. [127] Shin Andrew, Ushiku Yoshitaka, and Harada Tatsuya. 2018. Customized image narrative generation via interactive visual question generation and answering. In CVPR. Computer Vision Foundation/IEEE Computer Society, 89258933.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  128. [128] Siblini Wissam, Pasqual Charlotte, Lavielle Axel, and Cauchois Cyril. 2019. Multilingual question answering from formatted text applied to conversational agents. CoRR abs/1910.04659 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. [129] Sorokin Daniil and Gurevych Iryna. 2018. Interactive instance-based evaluation of knowledge base question answering. In EMNLP (Demonstration). Association for Computational Linguistics, 114119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. [130] Su Lixin, Guo Jiafeng, Fan Yixing, Lan Yanyan, Zhang Ruqing, and Cheng Xueqi. 2019. An adaptive framework for conversational question answering. In AAAI. AAAI Press, 1004110042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. [131] Su Yu, Awadallah Ahmed Hassan, Wang Miaosen, and White Ryen W.. 2018. Natural language interfaces with fine-grained user interaction: A case study on web APIs. In SIGIR. ACM, 855864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  132. [132] Su Yu, Sun Huan, Sadler Brian, Srivatsa Mudhakar, Gür Izzeddin, Yan Zenghui, and Yan Xifeng. 2016. On generating characteristic-rich question sets for QA evaluation. In EMNLP. 562572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  133. [133] Sugiyama Hiroaki, Meguro Toyomi, and Higashinaka Ryuichiro. 2016. Evaluation of question-answering system about conversational agent’s personality. In IWSDS(Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 427). Springer, 183194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. [134] Sundar Anirudh and Heck Larry. 2022. Multimodal conversational AI: A survey of datasets and approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.06907 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. [135] Tafjord Oyvind, Dalvi Bhavana, and Clark Peter. 2022. Entailer: Answering questions with faithful and truthful chains of reasoning. In EMNLP. 20782093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  136. [136] Tan Yiming, Min Dehai, Li Yu, Li Wenbo, Hu Nan, Chen Yongrui, and Qi Guilin. 2023. Can ChatGPT replace traditional KBQA models? An in-depth analysis of the question answering performance of the GPT LLM family. In International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 348367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  137. [137] Taori Rohan, Gulrajani Ishaan, Zhang Tianyi, Dubois Yann, Li Xuechen, Guestrin Carlos, Liang Percy, and Hashimoto Tatsunori B.. 2023. Stanford Alpaca: An Instruction-following LLaMA model. Retrieved from https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpacaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. [138] Team Gemini, Anil Rohan, Borgeaud Sebastian, Wu Yonghui, Alayrac Jean-Baptiste, Yu Jiahui, Soricut Radu, Schalkwyk Johan, Dai Andrew M., Hauth Anja, et al. 2023. Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. [139] Vakulenko Svitlana, Longpre Shayne, Tu Zhucheng, and Anantha Raviteja. 2021. Question rewriting for conversational question answering. In WSDM. ACM, 355363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  140. [140] Vakulenko Svitlana, Longpre Shayne, Tu Zhucheng, and Anantha Raviteja. 2021. Question rewriting for conversational question answering. In WSDM. 355363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  141. [141] Aken Betty van, Winter Benjamin, Löser Alexander, and Gers Felix A.. 2019. How does BERT answer questions?: A layer-wise analysis of transformer representations. In CIKM. ACM, 18231832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. [142] Waltinger Ulli, Breuing Alexa, and Wachsmuth Ipke. 2012. Connecting question answering and conversational agents—Contextualizing German questions for interactive question answering systems. Künstliche Intell. 26, 4 (2012), 381390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  143. [143] Wang Mengqiu, Smith Noah A., and Mitamura Teruko. 2007. What is the jeopardy model? A quasi-synchronous grammar for QA. In EMNLP-CoNLL. 2232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. [144] Wang Zhiguo, Ng Patrick, Ma Xiaofei, Nallapati Ramesh, and Xiang Bing. 2019. Multi-passage BERT: A globally normalized BERT model for open-domain question answering. In EMNLP/IJCNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 58775881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  145. [145] Weston Jason, Bordes Antoine, Chopra Sumit, Rush Alexander M., Merriënboer Bart Van, Joulin Armand, and Mikolov Tomas. 2015. Towards AI-complete question answering: A set of prerequisite toy tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.05698 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. [146] Wong Wilson, Cavedon Lawrence, Thangarajah John, and Padgham Lin. 2012. Mixed-initiative conversational system using question-answer pairs mined from the web. In CIKM. ACM, 27072709.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  147. [147] Wong Wilson, Cavedon Lawrence, Thangarajah John, and Padgham Lin. 2012. Strategies for mixed-initiative conversation management using question-answer pairs. In COLING. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, 28212834.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. [148] Wong Wilson, Thangarajah John, and Padgham Lin. 2011. Health conversational system based on contextual matching of community-driven question-answer pairs. In CIKM. ACM, 25772580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  149. [149] Wu Fei, Duan Xinyu, Xiao Jun, Zhao Zhou, Tang Siliang, Zhang Yin, and Zhuang Yueting. 2017. Temporal interaction and causal influence in community-based question answering. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29, 10 (2017), 23042317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  150. [150] Wu Jinmeng, Mu Tingting, Thiyagalingam Jeyarajan, and Goulermas John Yannis. 2020. Building interactive sentence-aware representation based on generative language model for community question answering. Neurocomputing 389 (2020), 93107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  151. [151] Wu Zhiyong, Kao Ben, Wu Tien-Hsuan, Yin Pengcheng, and Liu Qun. 2020. PERQ: Predicting, explaining, and rectifying failed questions in KB-QA systems. In WSDM. ACM, 663671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  152. [152] Xie Zhipeng. 2017. Enhancing document-based question answering via interaction between question words and POS tags. In NLPCC(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10619). Springer, 136147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. [153] Xiong Kun, Cui Anqi, Zhang Zefeng, and Li Ming. 2016. Neural contextual conversation learning with labeled question-answering pairs. CoRR abs/1607.05809 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  154. [154] Xu Jun, Mei Tao, Yao Ting, and Rui Yong. 2016. MSR-VTT: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language. In CVPR. IEEE Computer Society, 52885296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  155. [155] Xu Jingjing, Wang Yuechen, Tang Duyu, Duan Nan, Yang Pengcheng, Zeng Qi, Zhou Ming, and Sun Xu. 2019. Asking clarification questions in knowledge-based question answering. In EMNLP-IJCNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 16181629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  156. [156] Yang Wei, Xie Yuqing, Lin Aileen, Li Xingyu, Tan Luchen, Xiong Kun, Li Ming, and Lin Jimmy. 2019. End-to-end open-domain question answering with BERTserini. In NAACL-HLT (Demonstrations). Association for Computational Linguistics, 7277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. [157] Yang Wei, Xie Yuqing, Tan Luchen, Xiong Kun, Li Ming, and Lin Jimmy. 2019. Data augmentation for BERT fine-tuning in open-domain question answering. CoRR abs/1904.06652 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  158. [158] Yang Yi, Yih Wen-tau, and Meek Christopher. 2015. WikiQA: A challenge dataset for open-domain question answering. In EMNLP. 20132018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  159. [159] Yang Zekun, Garcia Noa, Chu Chenhui, Otani Mayu, Nakashima Yuta, and Takemura Haruo. 2020. BERT representations for video question answering. In WACV. IEEE, 15451554.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  160. [160] Yang Zhilin, Qi Peng, Zhang Saizheng, Bengio Yoshua, Cohen William W., Salakhutdinov Ruslan, and Manning Christopher D.. 2018. HotpotQA: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09600 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  161. [161] Yih Wen-tau, Richardson Matthew, Meek Christopher, Chang Ming-Wei, and Suh Jina. 2016. The value of semantic parse labeling for knowledge base question answering. In ACL. 201206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  162. [162] Yuan Xingdi, Côté Marc-Alexandre, Fu Jie, Lin Zhouhan, Pal Chris, Bengio Yoshua, and Trischler Adam. 2019. Interactive language learning by question answering. In EMNLP/IJCNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 27962813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  163. [163] Zdrok Oksana. 2023. The Rise of Generative Question Answering with LLMs. Retrieved from https://shelf.io/blog/the-rise-of-generative-question-answering-with-llms/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  164. [164] Zhang Hongzhi, Xu Guandong, Liang Xiao, Huang Tinglei, and Fu Kun. 2018. An attention-based word-level interaction model: Relation detection for knowledge base question answering. CoRR abs/1801.09893 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  165. [165] Zhang Sheng, Zhang Xin, Wang Hui, Cheng Jiajun, Li Pei, and Ding Zhaoyun. 2017. Chinese medical question answer matching using end-to-end character-level multi-Scale CNNs. Appl. Sci. 7, 8 (2017), 767.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  166. [166] Zhang Sheng, Zhang Xin, Wang Hui, Guo Lixiang, and Liu Shanshan. 2018. Multi-scale attentive interaction networks for chinese medical question answer selection. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 7406174071.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  167. [167] Zhang Xinbo, Zou Lei, and Hu Sen. 2019. An interactive mechanism to improve question answering systems via feedback. In CIKM. ACM, 13811390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  168. [168] Zhang Yingying, Qian Shengsheng, Fang Quan, and Xu Changsheng. 2019. Multi-modal knowledge-aware hierarchical attention network for explainable medical question answering. In ACM Multimedia. ACM, 10891097.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  169. [169] Zheng Weiguo, Cheng Hong, Yu Jeffrey Xu, Zou Lei, and Zhao Kangfei. 2019. Interactive natural language question answering over knowledge graphs. Inf. Sci. 481 (2019), 141159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  170. [170] Zhong Wanjun, Gao Yifan, Ding Ning, Qin Yujia, Liu Zhiyuan, Zhou Ming, Wang Jiahai, Yin Jian, and Duan Nan. 2022. ProQA: Structural prompt-based pre-training for unified question answering. In NAACL-HLT. 42304243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  171. [171] Zhou Guangyou, Zhou Yin, He Tingting, and Wu Wensheng. 2016. Learning semantic representation with neural networks for community question answering retrieval. Knowl.-Based Syst. 93 (2016), 7583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  172. [172] Zhou Zhiheng, Lan Man, Wu Yuanbin, and Lang Jun. 2017. Single turn Chinese emotional conversation generation based on information retrieval and question answering. In IALP. IEEE, 103106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  173. [173] Zhu Chenguang, Zeng Michael, and Huang Xuedong. 2018. SDNet: Contextualized attention-based deep network for conversational question answering. CoRR abs/1812.03593 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  174. [174] Zhu Yuke, Groth Oliver, Bernstein Michael, and Fei-Fei Li. 2016. Visual7W: Grounded question answering in images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 49955004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Interactive Question Answering Systems: Literature Review

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Computing Surveys
              ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 56, Issue 9
              September 2024
              980 pages
              ISSN:0360-0300
              EISSN:1557-7341
              DOI:10.1145/3613649
              • Editors:
              • David Atienza,
              • Michela Milano
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 8 May 2024
              • Online AM: 11 April 2024
              • Accepted: 2 April 2024
              • Revised: 8 March 2024
              • Received: 17 July 2022
              Published in csur Volume 56, Issue 9

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • survey
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)164
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)153

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            Full Text

            View this article in Full Text.

            View Full Text