skip to main content
10.1145/3652920.3652943acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Holistic Patient Assessment System using Digital Twin for XR Medical Teleconsultation

Published:01 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Assessing a patient’s social and environmental factors is crucial in medical treatment due to their impact on overall quality of life and treatment outcomes. However, current industrial solutions and research on augmented reality and virtual reality telehealth have primarily focused on training or physician collaboration, thereby overlooking the importance of assessing patients’ non-medical factors in the consulting environment. To address this issue, we propose a holistic patient assessment system in an extended reality (XR) teleconsultation environment, based on clinical evidence from the literature. By utilizing the digital twin (DT) of the patient’s environment and a physical examination assistance tool, healthcare professionals can effectively assess non-medical factors and enhance diagnosis accuracy. Through evaluations by current healthcare professionals, our system has been medically validated for its adequate integration of crucial factors in medicine and potential for real-world deployment. We believe that our system could envision a new line of research in future XR telehealth, particularly in the context of patient-centered and inclusive care.

References

  1. Leslie B Altimier. 2004. Healing environments: for patients and providers. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews 4, 2 (2004), 89–92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Augmedix. 2024. Home. https://augmedix.com/ Accessed on 2024-02-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nilufar Baghaei, Lehan Stemmet, Imran Khaliq, Atefeh Ahmadi, Ilona Halim, Hai-Ning Liang, Wenge Xu, Mark Billinghurst, and Richard Porter. 2021. Designing individualised virtual reality applications for supporting depression: A feasibility study. In Companion of the 2021 ACM SIGCHI symposium on engineering interactive computing systems. 6–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nazleen Bharmal, Kathryn Pitkin Derose, Melissa Felician, and Margaret M Weden. 2015. Understanding the upstream social determinants of health. California: RAND (2015), 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Paula Braveman, Susan Egerter, and David R Williams. 2011. The social determinants of health: coming of age. Annual review of public health 32 (2011), 381–398.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassandra Siyun Chen, Sally Wai-Chi Chan, Moon Fai Chan, Suk Foon Yap, Wenru Wang, and Yanika Kowitlawakul. 2017. Nurses’ perceptions of psychosocial care and barriers to its provision: A qualitative study. Journal of nursing research 25, 6 (2017), 411–418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Isabel De La Torre-Díez, Miguel López-Coronado, Cesar Vaca, Jesús Saez Aguado, and Carlos de Castro. 2015. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health 21, 2 (2015), 81–85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Vito Del Vecchio, Mariangela Lazoi, and Marianna Lezzi. 2023. Digital Twin and Extended Reality in Industrial Contexts: A Bibliometric Review. In International Conference on Extended Reality. Springer, 269–283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Susana Dinis, Emília Duarte, Paulo Noriega, Luís Teixeira, Elisângela Vilar, and Francisco Rebelo. 2013. Evaluating emotional responses to the interior design of a hospital room: A study using virtual reality. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience in Novel Technological Environments: Second International Conference, DUXU 2013, Held as Part of HCI International 2013, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 21-26, 2013, Proceedings, Part III 2. Springer, 475–483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. E Ray Dorsey, Meredith A Achey, Christopher A Beck, Denise B Beran, Kevin M Biglan, Cynthia M Boyd, Peter N Schmidt, Richard Simone, Allison W Willis, Nicholas B Galifianakis, 2016. National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for people with Parkinson’s disease: interest and barriers. Telemedicine and e-Health 22, 7 (2016), 590–598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Christian Fikar and Patrick Hirsch. 2017. Home health care routing and scheduling: A review. Computers & Operations Research 77 (2017), 86–95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shilpa N Gajarawala and Jessica N Pelkowski. 2021. Telehealth benefits and barriers. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 17, 2 (2021), 218–221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Danilo Gasques, Janet G Johnson, Tommy Sharkey, Yuanyuan Feng, Ru Wang, Zhuoqun Robin Xu, Enrique Zavala, Yifei Zhang, Wanze Xie, Xinming Zhang, 2021. ARTEMIS: A collaborative mixed-reality system for immersive surgical telementoring. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. James S Gordon. 1982. Holistic medicine: advances and shortcomings. Western Journal of Medicine 136, 6 (1982), 546.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Raz Gross, Yehuda Sasson, and Joseph Zohar. 1998. Healing environment in psychiatric hospital design. General hospital psychiatry 20, 2 (1998), 108–114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tobias Grundgeiger, Alea Münz, Paul Schlosser, and Oliver Happel. 2023. Supervising Multiple Operating Rooms Using a Head-Worn display: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Experience of Supervising Anesthesiologists and Their Co-Workers. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Aslı Günay. 2017. Conceptualization of positive pregnancy experience with the integration of mobile health technologies. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradley D Hunter, Brad Neiger, and Joshua West. 2011. The importance of addressing social determinants of health at the local level: the case for social capital. Health & social care in the community 19, 5 (2011), 522–530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Md Serajul Islam. 2018. Treat patient, not just the disease: holistic needs assessment for haematological cancer patients. Oncology reviews 12, 2 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Timothy Onosahwo Iyendo, Patrick Chukwuemeke Uwajeh, and Ezennia Stephen Ikenna. 2016. The therapeutic impacts of environmental design interventions on wellness in clinical settings: a narrative review. Complementary therapies in clinical practice 24 (2016), 174–188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Simon Kimmel, Vanessa Cobus, and Wilko Heuten. 2021. opticARe-Augmented Reality Mobile Patient Monitoring in Intensive Care Units. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Tara Kiran and Andrew D Pinto. 2016. Swimming ‘upstream’to tackle the social determinants of health., 138–140 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Clemens Scott Kruse, Nicole Krowski, Blanca Rodriguez, Lan Tran, Jackeline Vela, and Matthew Brooks. 2017. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ open 7, 8 (2017), e016242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Steven A Lavender, Carolyn M Sommerich, Elizabeth B-N Sanders, Kevin D Evans, Jing Li, Radin Zaid Radin Umar, and Emily S Patterson. 2020. Developing evidence-based design guidelines for medical/surgical hospital patient rooms that meet the needs of staff, patients, and visitors. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal 13, 1 (2020), 145–178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jie Li, Guo Chen, Huib De Ridder, and Pablo Cesar. 2020. Designing a social vr clinic for medical consultations. In Extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sophie Maria, Helena M Mentis, Geoffroy Canlorbe, and Ignacio Avellino. 2023. Supporting Collaborative Discussions In Surgical Teleconsulting Through Augmented Reality Head Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Patti A Mataxen and L Denise Webb. 2019. Telehealth nursing: More than just a phone call. Nursing2022 49, 4 (2019), 11–13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicola Mead and Peter Bower. 2000. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social science & medicine 51, 7 (2000), 1087–1110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Medical Xpress. 2020. The hand-made tale of an Indian amputee and his limbs. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-03-hand-made-tale-indian-amputee-limbs.html Accessed on 2024-01-02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ian James Mills. 2017. A person-centred approach to holistic assessment. Primary dental journal 6, 3 (2017), 18–23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jennifer J Moffatt and Diann S Eley. 2010. The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians. Australian Health Review 34, 3 (2010), 276–281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Hyeongil Nam, Chanhee Kim, Kangsoo Kim, Ji-Young Yeo, and Jong-Il Park. 2022. An Emotionally Responsive Virtual Parent for Pediatric Nursing Education: A Framework for Multimodal Momentary and Accumulated Interventions. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, 365–374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. World Health Organization 2010. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. World Health Organization 2010. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states. Report on the second global survey on eHealth.World Health Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Pamela J Potter and Noreen Frisch. 2007. Holistic assessment and care: presence in the process. Nursing Clinics of North America 42, 2 (2007), 213–228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Vickie Ragsdale and Graham J McDougall Jr. 2008. The changing face of long-term care: looking at the past decade. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 29, 9 (2008), 992–1001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Ready Player Me. 2023. Ready Player Me - Virtual Reality Avatars. https://readyplayer.me/ Accessed on 2023-12-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Haya R Rubin. 1998. Status report–an investigation to determine whether the built environment affects patients’ medical outcomes.. In Journal of healthcare design: proceedings from the... Symposium on Healthcare Design. Symposium on Healthcare Design, Vol. 10. National Symposium on Healthcare Design, Inc., 11–13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Parisa Sabetsarvestani, Fateme Mohammadi, Banafsheh Tehranineshat, Mostafa Bijani, and Zhila Fereidouni. 2022. Barriers to efficient management of in-home care: A qualitative content analysis. Nursing Open 9, 2 (2022), 1200–1209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Yasir Saleem, Anshuman Darbari, Rahul Sharma, Amit Vashisth, and Anish Gupta. 2022. Recent advancements in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass technology for better outcomes of pediatric cardiac surgery. The Cardiothoracic Surgeon 30, 1 (2022), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Danny Schott, Matthias Kunz, Tom Wunderling, Florian Heinrich, Rüdiger Braun-Dullaeus, and Christian Hansen. 2023. CardioGenesis4D: Interactive Morphological Transitions of Embryonic Heart Development in a Virtual Learning Environment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 5 (2023), 2615–2625.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Qilei Sun, Jiayou Huang, Haodong Zhang, Paul Craig, Lingyun Yu, and Eng Gee Lim. 2023. Design and Development of a Mixed Reality Acupuncture Training System. In 2023 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 265–275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Roger S Ulrich. 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. science 224, 4647 (1984), 420–421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Unity Asset Store. 2023. Male Human Body Anatomy Systems. https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/3d/characters/male-human-body-anatomy-systems-186588 Accessed on 2023-12-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Unity Technologies. 2024. Unity. https://unity.com/kr Accessed on 2024-01-02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2024. Social Determinants of Health. https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health Accessed on 2024-02-16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Yao-Chin Wang, Bilegjin Ganzorig, Chieh-Chen Wu, Usman Iqbal, Hafsah Arshed Ali Khan, Wan-Shan Hsieh, Wen-Shan Jian, and Yu-Chuan Jack Li. 2018. Patient satisfaction with dermatology teleconsultation by using MedX. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 167 (2018), 37–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. David R Williams, Manuela V Costa, Adebola O Odunlami, and Selina A Mohammed. 2008. Moving upstream: how interventions that address the social determinants of health can improve health and reduce disparities. Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP 14, Suppl (2008), S8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. World Health Organization. 2023. Tenth Global Conference on Health Promotion. https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/tenth-global-conference-on-health-promotion Accessed on 2023-12-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. World Health Organization. 2024. Health Equity. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-equity#tab=tab_1 Accessed on 2024-01-02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. XRHealth. 2023. Home. https://www.xr.health/ Accessed on 2024-02-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Kevin Yu, Ulrich Eck, Frieder Pankratz, Marc Lazarovici, Dirk Wilhelm, and Nassir Navab. 2022. Duplicated reality for co-located augmented reality collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 5 (2022), 2190–2200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Kevin Yu, Daniel Roth, Robin Strak, Frieder Pankratz, Julia Reichling, Clemens Kraetsch, Simon Weidert, Marc Lazarovici, Nassir Navab, and Ulrich Eck. 2023. Mixed Reality 3D Teleconsultation for Emergency Decompressive Craniotomy: An Evaluation with Medical Residents. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, 662–671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Zoom Video Communications. 2023. Zoom. https://www.zoom.us Accessed on 2023-12-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Holistic Patient Assessment System using Digital Twin for XR Medical Teleconsultation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)67

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format