skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Linguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social Media

Published:26 April 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this work, we examine the linguistic signature of online racial microaggressions (acts) and how it differs from that of personal narratives recalling experiences of such aggressions (recalls) by Black social media users. We manually curate and annotate a corpus of acts and recalls fromin-the-wild social media discussions, and verify labels with Black workshop participants. We leverage Natural Language Processing (NLP) and qualitative analysis on this data to classify (RQ1), interpret (RQ2), and characterize (RQ3) the language underlying acts and recalls of racial microaggressions in the context of racism in the U.S. Our findings show that neural language models (LMs) can classify acts and recalls with high accuracy (RQ1) with contextual words revealing themes that associate Blacks with objects that reify negative stereotypes (RQ2). Furthermore, overlapping linguistic signatures between acts and recalls serve functionally different purposes (RQ3), providing broader implications to the current challenges in content moderation systems on social media.

References

  1. 2010-09--10. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In A Networked Self (0 ed.), Zizi Papacharissi (Ed.). Routledge, 47--66. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876527--8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kupiri Ackerman-Barger, Dowin Boatright, Rosana Gonzalez-Colaso, Regina Orozco, and Darin Latimore. 2020. Seeking Inclusion Excellence. Academic Medicine 95, 5 (May 2020), 758--763. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Shiza Ali, Mohammad Hammas Saeed, Esraa Aldreabi, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Savvas Zannettou, and Gianluca Stringhini. 2021-06--21. Understanding the Effect of Deplatforming on Social Networks. In 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021 (New York, NY, USA) (WebSci '21). Association for Computing Machinery, 187--195. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447535.3462637Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bobby Allyn. 2020. It's ?our fault': Nextdoor CEO takes blame for deleting of black lives matter posts. https://tinyurl.com/3353yeb4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L. Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2016-05-07. Understanding Social Media Disclosures of Sexual Abuse Through the Lenses of Support Seeking and Anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose California USA). ACM, 3906--3918. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858096Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Zahra Ashktorab and Jessica Vitak. 2016. Designing Cyberbullying Mitigation and Prevention Solutions through Participatory Design With Teenagers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3895--3905. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858548Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Shervin Assari and Maryam Moghani Lankarani. 2018. Depressive Symptoms and Self-Esteem in White and Black Older Adults in the United States. Brain sciences 8, 6 (2018), 105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Agathe Balayn, Jie Yang, Zoltan Szlavik, and Alessandro Bozzon. 2021. Automatic Identification of Harmful, Aggressive, Abusive, and Offensive Language on theWeb: A Survey of Technical Biases Informed by Psychology Literature. Trans. Soc. Comput. 4, 3, Article 11 (oct 2021), 56 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. James Banks. 2010. Regulating hate speech online. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24, 3 (2010), 233--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Daniel Bar-Tal. 2017. Self-censorship as a socio-political-psychological phenomenon: Conception and research. Political Psychology 38 (2017), 37--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Daniel Bar-Tal. 2017. Self-censorship: The conceptual framework. Self-censorship in contexts of conflict: Theory and research (2017), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mario L. Barnes. 2015. Law & Society Review 49, 1 (2015), 279--282. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43670469Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Roy F Baumeister, Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer, and Kathleen D Vohs. 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Review of general psychology 5, 4 (2001), 323--370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Su Lin Blodgett, Lisa Green, and Brendan O'Connor. 2016. Demographic dialectal variation in social media: A case study of African-American English. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.08868 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Su Lin Blodgett, Q. Vera Liao, Alexandra Olteanu, Rada Mihalcea, Michael Muller, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Chenhao Tan, and Qian Yang. 2022. Responsible Language Technologies: Foreseeing and Mitigating Harms. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 152, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3516502Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Arthur W Blume, Laura V Lovato, Bryan N Thyken, and Natasha Denny. 2012. The relationship of microaggressions with alcohol use and anxiety among ethnic minority college students in a historically White institution. Cultural diversity and ethnic minority psychology 18, 1 (2012), 45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Y Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam T Kalai. 2016. Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings. Advances in neural information processing systems 29 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Courtney M. Bonam, Hilary B. Bergsieker, and Jennifer L. Eberhardt. 2016. Polluting Black space. 145 (2016), 1561--1582. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000226 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Valeria Borsotti and Pernille Bjorn. 2022. Humor and Stereotypes in Computing: An Equity-focused Approach to Institutional Accountability. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 31 (07 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10606-022-09440--9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Danah Boyd. 2010. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:158379198Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Luke Breitfeller, Emily Ahn, David Jurgens, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2019--11. Finding Microaggressions in the Wild: A Case for Locating Elusive Phenomena in Social Media Posts. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (Hong Kong, China). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1664--1674. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19--1176Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jerome S Bruner. 1957. On perceptual readiness. Psychological review 64, 2 (1957), 123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tommaso Caselli, Valerio Basile, Jelena Mitrovic, Inga Kartoziya, and Michael Granitzer. 2020. I Feel Offended, Don't Be Abusive! Implicit/Explicit Messages in Offensive and Abusive Language. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France, 6193--6202. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.760Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicoletta Cavazza and Margherita Guidetti. 2014. Swearing in political discourse: Why vulgarity works. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33, 5 (2014), 537--547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Stevie Chancellor, Yannis Kalantidis, Jessica A. Pater, Munmun De Choudhury, and David A. Shamma. 2017. Multimodal Classification of Moderated Online Pro-Eating Disorder Content. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3213--3226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025985Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Stevie Chancellor, Zhiyuan (Jerry) Lin, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. ?This Post Will Just Get Taken Down": Characterizing Removed Pro-Eating Disorder Social Media Content. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1157--1162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Chaitrali Gandhi, Matthew Wortley Mustelier, and Eric Gilbert. 2019. Crossmod: A Cross-Community Learning-based System to Assist Reddit Moderators. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Mattia Samory, Shagun Jhaver, Hunter Charvat, Amy Bruckman, Cliff Lampe, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. The Internet's hidden rules: An empirical study of Reddit norm violations at micro, meso, and macro scales. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lijuan Chen, Yanyan Lan, Liang Pang, Jiafeng Guo, and Xueqi Cheng. 2021. Toward the Understanding of Deep Text Matching Models for Information Retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07081 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. ElaineWChun and Adrienne Lo. 2015. Language and racialization. In The Routledge handbook of linguistic anthropology. Routledge, 220--233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Chrissy Cook, Jie Cai, and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2022. Awe Versus Aww: The Effectiveness of Two Kinds of Positive Emotional Stimulation on Stress Reduction for Online Content Moderators. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (2022), 1 -- 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Juliet M. Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Lillian Lee, Bo Pang, and Jon Kleinberg. 2012. Echoes of Power: Language Effects and Power Differences in Social Interaction. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (Lyon, France) (WWW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 699--708. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187931Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Anubrata Das, Brandon Dang, and Matthew Lease. 2020. Fast, Accurate, and Healthier: Interactive Blurring Helps Moderators Reduce Exposure to Harmful Content. In AAAI Conference on Human Computation & Crowdsourcing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. 1989. Why do we tell the same stories?: Law reform, critical librarianship, and the triple helix dilemma. Stanford Law Review (1989), 207--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. 1991. Images of the outsider in American law and culture: Can free expression remedy systemic social ills. Cornell L. Rev. 77 (1991), 1258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. 1993. Critical Race Theory: An Annotated Bibliography. Virginia Law Review 79, 2 (1993), 461--516. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1073418Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Xiaohan Ding, Michael Horning, and Eugenia H. Rho. 2023. Same Words, Different Meanings: Semantic Polarization in Broadcast Media Language Forecasts Polarity in Online Public Discourse. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 17, 1 (Jun. 2023), 161--172. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22135Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Nicola Döring and M Rohangis Mohseni. 2019. Male dominance and sexism on YouTube: results of three content analyses. Feminist Media Studies 19, 4 (2019), 512--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Bryan Dosono. 2018. AAPI Identity Work on Reddit: Toward Social Support and Collective Action. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 373--378. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3152697Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Bryan Dosono and Bryan Semaan. 2019. Moderation Practices as Emotional Labor in Sustaining Online Communities: The Case of AAPI Identity Work on Reddit. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Mengnan Du, Varun Manjunatha, Rajiv Jain, Ruchi Deshpande, Franck Dernoncourt, Jiuxiang Gu, Tong Sun, and Xia Hu. 2021. Towards interpreting and mitigating shortcut learning behavior of NLU models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06922 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Maeve Duggan. 2017. 1 in 4 Black Americans have faced online harassment because of their race or ethnicity. https://tinyurl.com/5n8n845eGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Jr. Dulaney, Earl F. 2006. Changes in Language Behavior as a Function of Veracity. Human Communication Research 9, 1 (03 2006), 75--82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468--2958.1982.tb00684.x arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/hcr/article-PDF/9/1/75/22343175/jhumcom0075.PDFGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Anca Dumitrache, Oana Inel, Benjamin Timmermans, Carlos Ortiz, Robert-Jan Sips, Lora Aroyo, and Chris Welty. 2021. Empirical methodology for crowdsourcing ground truth. Semantic Web 12, 3 (2021), 403--421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Elizabeth Dwoskin, Nitasha Tiku, and Craig Timberg. 2021. Facebook's race-blind practices around hate speech came at the expense of black users, newdocuments show. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebookalgorithm-biased-race/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Sara E Shaw and Julia Bailey. 2009. Discourse analysis: what is it and why is it relevant to family practice? Family Practice 26, 5 (06 2009), 413--419. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmp038 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/fampra/article-PDF/26/5/413/1779242/cmp038.PDFGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Upol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael Muller, Mark O. Riedl, and Justin D. Weisz. 2021. Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI Systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 82, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Mai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi, Jordyn Seybolt, Munmun De Choudhury, and Diyi Yang. 2021--11. Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speech. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic). Association for Computational Linguistics, 345--363. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.29Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Rob Eschmann. 2021. Digital Resistance: How Online Communication Facilitates Responses to Racial Microaggressions. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 7, 2 (2021), 264--277. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220933307 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220933307Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Rob Eschmann, Jacob Groshek, Rachel Chanderdatt, Khea Chang, and Maysa Whyte. 2020. Making a Microaggression: Using Big Data and Qualitative Analysis to Map the Reproduction and Disruption of Microaggressions through Social Media. Social Media Society 6, 4 (2020), 2056305120975716. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120975716 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120975716Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Andre Espaillat, Danielle Panna, Dianne L. Goede, Matthew J. Gurka, Maureen A Novak, and Zareen Zaidi. 2019. An exploratory study on microaggressions in medical school: What are they and why should we care? Perspectives on Medical Education 8 (2019), 143 -- 151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Philomena Essed. 1991. Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Sage Publications, Inc. Pages: x, 322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Allyson Ettinger. 2020. What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 8 (2020), 34--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Jessica L. Feuston, Alex S. Taylor, and Anne Marie Piper. 2020. Conformity of Eating Disorders through Content Moderation. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1, Article 40 (may 2020), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3392845Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Meira Gebel. 2020. Black creators say Tiktok still secretly hides their content. https://www.digitaltrends.com/socialmedia/ black-creators-claim-tiktok-still-secretly-blocking-content/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. James Paul Gee. 2014. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Arpita Ghosh, Satyen Kale, and Preston McAfee. 2011. Who Moderates the Moderators? Crowdsourcing Abuse Detection in User-Generated Content. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (San Jose, California, USA) (EC '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 167--176. https://doi.org/10. 1145/1993574.1993599Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Graham R Gibbs. 2018. Analyzing qualitative data. Vol. 6. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Tarleton Gillespie. 2022. Do Not Recommend? Reduction as a Form of Content Moderation. Social Media Society 8, 3 (2022), 20563051221117552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Phillip Atiba Goff, Jennifer L Eberhardt, Melissa J Williams, and Matthew Christian Jackson. 2008. Not yet human: implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of personality and social psychology 94, 2 (2008), 292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Joseph P Goodwin. 2002. Stories in the time of cholera: Racial profiling during a medical nightmare. JSTOR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Robert Gorwa, Reuben Binns, and Christian Katzenbach. 2020. Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society 7, 1 (2020), 2053951719897945. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Jonathan Grudin. 1988. Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. 85--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Jessica Guynn. July 2019. Facebook while black: Users call it getting ?Zucked' say talking about racism is censored as hate speech. Usa today 24 (July 2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Oliver L. Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, and AndreaWegner. 2021. Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users: Marginalization and Moderation Gray Areas. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 466 (oct 2021), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479610Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Joanne M Hall and Becky Fields. 2015. ?It's killing us!" Narratives of Black adults about microaggression experiences and related health stress. Global qualitative nursing research 2 (2015), 2333393615591569.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Chayla Haynes, Saran Stewart, and Evette Allen. 2016. Three paths, one struggle: Black women and girls battling invisibility in U.S classrooms. Journal of Negro Education 85, 3 (2016), 380--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Danula Hettiachchi and Jorge Goncalves. 2020. Towards Effective Crowd-Powered Online Content Moderation. In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction (Fremantle, WA, Australia) (OZCHI'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 342--346. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369491Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Sharon Heung, Mahika Phutane, Shiri Azenkot, Megh Marathe, and Aditya Vashistha. 2022. Nothing Micro About It: Examining Ableist Microaggressions on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Athens, Greece) (ASSETS '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 27, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544801Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Jon Hurwitz and Mark Peffley. 1997. Public Perceptions of Race and Crime: The Role of Racial Stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science 41 (04 1997), 375. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111769Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Jevan A. Hutson, Jessie G. Taft, Solon Barocas, and Karen Levy. 2018. Debiasing Desire: Addressing Bias & Discrimination on Intimate Platforms. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 73 (Nov 2018), 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Miyako Inoue. 2018. Word for word: Verbatim as political technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology 47 (2018), 217--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Shagun Jhaver, Darren Scott Appling, Eric Gilbert, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. "Did You Suspect the Post Would Be Removed?": Understanding User Reactions to Content Removals on Reddit. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 192 (nov 2019), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Shagun Jhaver, Christian Boylston, Diyi Yang, and Amy Bruckman. 2021. Evaluating the effectiveness of deplatforming as a moderation strategy on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Shagun Jhaver, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2019. Does transparency in moderation really matter? User behavior after content removal explanations on reddit. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Shagun Jhaver, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2019. Does Transparency in Moderation Really Matter? User Behavior After Content Removal Explanations on Reddit. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 150 (nov 2019), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359252Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Shagun Jhaver, Sucheta Ghoshal, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. Online Harassment and Content Moderation: The Case of Blocklists. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 2, Article 12 (mar 2018), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3185593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Prerna Juneja, Deepika Rama Subramanian, and Tanushree Mitra. 2020. Through the Looking Glass: Study of Transparency in Reddit's Moderation Practices. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, GROUP, Article 17 (jan 2020), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375197Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Harmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana, Hanna Wallach, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2020. Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376219Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Micere Keels, Myles Durkee, and Elan Hope. 2017. The psychological and academic costs of school-based racial and ethnic microaggressions. American Educational Research Journal 54, 6 (2017), 1316--1344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Kennedy Kelis. 2021. Deconstructing The ?13/50" Argument. https://detester.org/publications/162kennedyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Ben Kew. 2018. Poll: Two-thirds of Conservatives don't trust Facebook, believe social media censors conservatives. Breitbart (29 Aug 2018). https://tinyurl.com/pzavznpbGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Gohar Feroz Khan, Bobby Swar, and Sang Kon Lee. 2014--10-01. Social Media Risks and Benefits: A Public Sector Perspective. 32, 5 (2014--10-01), 606--627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314524701 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Sara B. Kiesler, Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, and Aniket Kittur. 2010. Regulating Behavior in Online Communities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Yubo Kou and Xinning Gui. 2020. Mediating Community-AI Interaction through Situated Explanation: The Case of AI-Led Moderation. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 102 (oct 2020), 27 pages. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3415173Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Yubo Kou and Xinning Gui. 2021. Flag and Flaggability in Automated Moderation: The Case of Reporting Toxic Behavior in an Online Game Community. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 437, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445279Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Vivian Lai, Samuel Carton, Rajat Bhatnagar, Q. Vera Liao, Yunfeng Zhang, and Chenhao Tan. 2022. Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content Moderation. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 54, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501999Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers. Biometrics (1977), 363--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Alyssa Lees, Daniel Borkan, Ian Kivlichan, Jorge Nario, and Tesh Goyal. 2021-04. Capturing Covertly Toxic Speech via Crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Bridging Human--Computer Interaction and Natural Language Processing (Online). Association for Computational Linguistics, 14--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Bruno Lepri, Nuria Oliver, Emmanuel Letouzé, Alex Pentland, and Patrick Vinck. 2018. Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes: The Premise, the Proposed Solutions, and the Open Challenges. Philosophy & Technology 31 (12 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0279-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Weiwen Leung, Zheng Zhang, Daviti Jibuti, Jinhao Zhao, Maximilian Klein, Casey Pierce, Lionel Robert, and Haiyi Zhu. 2020. Race, Gender and Beauty: The Effect of Information Provision on Online Hiring Biases. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376874Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Jessa Lingel. 2019. The gentrifcation of the internet. https://culturedigitally.org/2019/03/the-gentrification-of-theinternet/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Daniel Link, Bernd Hellingrath, and Jie Ling. 2016. A Human-in-the-Loop Approach for Semi-Automated Content Moderation. In International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Yang Liu, Christopher Whitfield, Tianyang Zhang, Amanda Hauser, Taeyonn Reynolds, and Mohd Anwar. 2021. Monitoring COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of social media using natural language processing and machine learning. Health Information Science and Systems 9, 1 (June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-021-00158--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Eds.), Vol. 30. Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/ 8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Paper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Andreas Madsen, Siva Reddy, and Sarath Chandar. 2022-04--29. Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Survey. arXiv:2108.04840 [cs]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Andrea Marshall, Angela D. Pack, Sarah A. Owusu, Rainbo Hultman, David Drake, Florentine U. N. Rutaganira, Maria Namwanje, Chantell S. Evans, Edgar Garza-Lopez, Samantha C. Lewis, Cristina Termini, Salma AshShareef, Innes Hicsasmaz, Brittany L. Taylor, Melanie R. McReynolds, Haysetta D. Shuler, and Antentor O. Hinton. 2021. Responding and navigating racialized microaggressions in STEM. Pathogens and Disease 79 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Binny Mathew, Anurag Illendula, Punyajoy Saha, Soumya Sarkar, Pawan Goyal, and Animesh Mukherjee. 2020. Hate Begets Hate: A Temporal Study of Hate Speech. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 92 (oct 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Ryan Moore. 2017. The New Jim Crow. Macat Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912282586Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Samantha L Moore-Berg, Boaz Hameiri, and Emile G Bruneau. 2022. Empathy, dehumanization, and misperceptions: A media intervention humanizes migrants and increases empathy for their plight but only if misinformation about migrants is also corrected. Social Psychological and Personality Science 13, 2 (2022), 645--655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. Michael Muller and Thomas Erickson. 2018. In the Data Kitchen: A Review (a Design Fiction on Data Science). In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188407Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Michael Muller, Christine T. Wolf, Josh Andres, Michael Desmond, Narendra Nath Joshi, Zahra Ashktorab, Aabhas Sharma, Kristina Brimijoin, Qian Pan, Evelyn Duesterwald, and Casey Dugan. 2021. Designing Ground Truth and the Social Life of Labels. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 94, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Kevin L Nadal, Katie E Griffin, Yinglee Wong, Sahran Hamit, and Morgan Rasmus. 2014. The impact of racial microaggressions on mental health: Counseling implications for clients of color. Journal of Counseling & Development 92, 1 (2014), 57--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. Kate G Niederhoffer and James W Pennebaker. 2002. Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21, 4 (2002), 337--360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. Poppy Noor. 2020. The celebrities who are doing anti-racism right. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/ 15/selena-gomez-anti-racism-celebrities-getting-it-rightGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Fayika Farhat Nova, Michael Ann DeVito, Pratyasha Saha, Kazi Shohanur Rashid, Shashwata Roy Turzo, Sadia Afrin, and Shion Guha. 2021. ?Facebook Promotes More Harassment" Social Media Ecosystem, Skill and Marginalized Hijra Identity in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Fayika Farhat Nova, MD. Rashidujjaman Rifat, Pratyasha Saha, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Shion Guha. 2019. Online Sexual Harassment over Anonymous Social Media in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Ahmedabad, India) (ICTD '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D.R. Smith, Alexandra To, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020-04--21. Critical Race Theory for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu HI USA). ACM, 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. Jason A Okonofua, Gregory M Walton, and Jennifer L Eberhardt. 2016. A vicious cycle: A social--psychological account of extreme racial disparities in school discipline. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11, 3 (2016), 381--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  112. Joon Sung Park, Lindsay Popowski, Carrie Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2022. Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Bend, OR, USA) (UIST '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 74, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526113.3545616Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Joon Sung Park, Joseph Seering, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2022. Measuring the Prevalence of Anti-Social Behavior in Online Communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (2022), 1 -- 29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. John Pavlopoulos, Jeffrey Sorensen, Lucas Dixon, Nithum Thain, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2020. Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 4296--4305. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. Jennifer L. Eberhardt PhD. 2020-03-03. Biased: Uncovering the Hidden Prejudice That Shapes What We See, Think, and Do. Penguin. Google-Books-ID: hpDODwAAQBAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Ben Hutchinson, and Margaret Mitchell. 2019--11. Perturbation Sensitivity Analysis to Detect Unintended Model Biases. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (Hong Kong, China). Association for Computational Linguistics, 5740--5745. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19--1578Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. Emilee Rader, Kelley Cotter, and Janghee Cho. 2018. Explanations as Mechanisms for Supporting Algorithmic Transparency. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173677Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Aneeta Rattan and Jennifer L Eberhardt. 2010. The role of social meaning in inattentional blindness: When the gorillas in our midst do not go unseen. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, 6 (2010), 1085--1088.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. Elizabeth Reid, Regan L. Mandryk, Nicole A. Beres, Madison Klarkowski, and Julian Frommel. 2022. Feeling Good and In Control: In-Game Tools to Support Targets of Toxicity. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CHI PLAY, Article 235 (oct 2022), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3549498Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. Angela Reyes. 2017. Language, identity, and stereotype among Southeast Asian American youth: The other Asian. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Eugenia Ha Rim Rho, Oliver L. Haimson, Nazanin Andalibi, Melissa Mazmanian, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2017-05-02. Class Confessions: Restorative Properties in Online Experiences of Socioeconomic Stigma. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, 3377--3389. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025921Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Eugenia Ha Rim Rho, Gloria Mark, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2018. Fostering civil discourse online: Linguistic behavior in comments of# metoo articles across political perspectives. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Eugenia Ha Rim Rho and Melissa Mazmanian. 2019. Hashtag burnout? a control experiment investigating how political hashtags shape reactions to news content. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Eugenia Ha Rim Rho and Melissa Mazmanian. 2020-04--21. Political Hashtags & the Lost Art of Democratic Discourse. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu HI USA). ACM, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376542Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  125. Marco Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. ?Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics, San Diego, California, 97--101. https://doi. org/10.18653/v1/N16--3020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. Travis Riddle and Stacey Sinclair. 2019. Racial disparities in school-based disciplinary actions are associated with county-level rates of racial bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 17 (2019), 8255--8260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. Sarah Roberts. 2018. Digital detritus: ?Error' and the logic of opacity in social media content moderation. First Monday 23 (03 2018). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i3.8283Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  128. Maarten Sap, Dallas Card, Saadia Gabriel, Yejin Choi, and Noah A. Smith. 2019-07. The Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Florence, Italy). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1668--1678. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19--1163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  129. Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Stacy M. Branham, and Foad Hamidi. 2018. Safe Spaces and Safe Places: Unpacking Technology-Mediated Experiences of Safety and Harm with Transgender People. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 155 (nov 2018), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274424Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  130. Christoph Schneider, Markus Weinmann, and Jan Vom Brocke. 2018. Digital nudging: guiding online user choices through interface design. Commun. ACM 61, 7 (2018), 67--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. Daniel J Simons and Christopher F Chabris. 1999. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. perception 28, 9 (1999), 1059--1074.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. C. Estelle Smith, William Lane, Hannah Miller Hillberg, Daniel Kluver, Loren Terveen, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2021. Effective Strategies for Crowd-Powered Cognitive Reappraisal Systems: A Field Deployment of the Flip*Doubt Web Application for Mental Health. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 417 (oct 2021), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479561Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. Jean Y. Song, Sangwook Lee, Jisoo Lee, Mina Kim, and Juho Kim. 2023. ModSandbox: Facilitating Online Community Moderation Through Error Prediction and Improvement of Automated Rules. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 107, 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581057Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. Michael Spencer. 2017. Microaggressions and Social Work Practice, Education, and Research. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work 26 (02 2017), 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2016.1268989Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  135. Miriah Steiger, Timir J Bharucha, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Martin J. Riedl, and Matthew Lease. 2021. The Psychological Well-Being of Content Moderators: The Emotional Labor of Commercial Moderation and Avenues for Improving Support. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 341, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3411764.3445092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  136. Stefan Stieglitz and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2013. Emotions and information diffusion in social media-sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of management information systems 29, 4 (2013), 217--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  137. Derald Wing Sue, Sarah Alsaidi, Michael N Awad, Elizabeth Glaeser, Cassandra Z Calle, and Narolyn Mendez. 2019. Disarming racial microaggressions: Microintervention strategies for targets, White allies, and bystanders. American Psychologist 74, 1 (2019), 128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  138. Derald Wing Sue, Christina M Capodilupo, Gina C Torino, Jennifer M Bucceri, Aisha Holder, Kevin L Nadal, and Marta Esquilin. 2007. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. American psychologist 62, 4 (2007), 271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Derald Wing Sue and Lisa Beth Spanierman. 2020. Microaggressions in everyday life, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Pages: xx, 349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. S Shyam Sundar, Haiyan Jia, T Franklin Waddell, and Yan Huang. 2015. Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME) four models for explaining how interface features affect user psychology. The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (2015), 47--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Mukund Sundararajan, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. 2017. Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16747630Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. Nicolas Suzor, Sarah Myers West, Andrew Quodling, and Jillian York. 2019. What do we mean when we talk about transparency? Towards meaningful transparency in commercial content moderation. International Journal of Communication 13 (2019), 1526--1543. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/126386/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. Michael Swart, Ylana Lopez, Arunesh Mathur, and Marshini Chetty. 2020. Is This An Ad?: Automatically Disclosing Online Endorsements On YouTube With AdIntuition. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376178Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  144. Yla R. Tausczik and James W. Pennebaker. 2010. The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29, 1 (2010), 24--54. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0261927X09351676 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  145. Hibby Thach, Samuel Mayworm, Daniel Delmonaco, and Oliver Haimson. 0. (In)visible moderation: A digital ethnography of marginalized users and content moderation on Twitch and Reddit. New Media & Society 0, 0 (0), 14614448221109804. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221109804 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221109804Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  146. Roelien C. Timmer, David Liebowitz, Surya Nepal, and Salil S. Kanhere. 2021--12. Can pre-trained Transformers be used in detecting complex sensitive sentences? - A Monsanto case study. In 2021 Third IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA). 90--97. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TPSISA52974.2021.00010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. Alexandra To, Hillary Carey, Geoff Kaufman, and Jessica Hammer. 2021. Reducing Uncertainty and Offering Comfort: Designing Technology for Coping with Interpersonal Racism. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 398, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445590Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  148. Alexandra To, Wenxia Sweeney, Jessica Hammer, and Geoff Kaufman. 2020. ?They Just Don't Get It": Towards Social Technologies for Coping with Interpersonal Racism. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  149. Stephen M Utych. 2018. Negative affective language in politics. American Politics Research 46, 1 (2018), 77--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  150. Sonja Utz and Johannes Breuer. 2016. Informational benefits from social media use for professional purposes: Results from a longitudinal study. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 10, 4 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  151. Michael Veale, Max Van Kleek, and Reuben Binns. 2018. Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  152. James Vincent. 2020. Nextdoor CEO says it's ?our fault' moderators deleted black lives matter posts. https: //www.theverge.com/2020/7/2/21311046/nextdoor-ceo-admits-fault-moderators-racial-bias-black-lives-matterGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. Zeerak Waseem, Thomas Davidson, Dana Warmsley, and Ingmar Weber. 2017. Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtasks. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 78--84. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17--3012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  154. Kelly Welch. 2007. Black Criminal Stereotypes and Racial Profiling. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 23, 3 (2007), 276--288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986207306870 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986207306870Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  155. Sarah Myers West. 2018. Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: User interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society 20, 11 (2018), 4366--4383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818773059 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818773059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  156. Monnica T Williams, Matthew D Skinta, and Renée Martin-Willett. 2021. After Pierce and Sue: A revised racial microaggressions taxonomy. Perspectives on Psychological Science 16, 5 (2021), 991--1007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  157. Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. Volunteer Moderators in Twitch Micro Communities: How They Get Involved, the Roles They Play, and the Emotional Labor They Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300390Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  158. Austin Wright, Omar Shaikh, Haekyu Park, Will Epperson, Muhammed Ahmed, Stephane Pinel, Duen Chau, and Diyi Yang. 2021. RECAST: Enabling User Recourse and Interpretability of Toxicity Detection Models with Interactive Visualization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 (04 2021), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3449280Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  159. Austin P Wright, Omar Shaikh, Haekyu Park, Will Epperson, Muhammed Ahmed, Stephane Pinel, Diyi Yang, and Duen Horng Chau. 2020. RECAST: Interactive Auditing of Automatic Toxicity Detection Models. In The Eighth InternationalWorkshop of Chinese CHI (Honolulu, HI, USA) (Chinese CHI 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 80--82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3403676.3403691Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  160. Qunfang Wu, Louisa Kayah Williams, Ellen Simpson, and Bryan Semaan. 2022. Conversations About Crime: Re-Enforcing and Fighting Against Platformed Racism on Reddit. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW1, Article 54 (apr 2022), 38 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  161. Yan Xia, Haiyi Zhu, Tun Lu, Peng Zhang, and Ning Gu. 2020. Exploring Antecedents and Consequences of Toxicity in Online Discussions: A Case Study on Reddit. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 108 (oct 2020), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415179Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  162. Qian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn Rosé, and John Zimmerman. 2020. Re-Examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376301Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  163. Savvas Zannettou, Mai ElSherief, Elizabeth Belding, Shirin Nilizadeh, and Gianluca Stringhini. 2020. Measuring and characterizing hate speech on news websites. In 12th ACM Conference on Web Science. 125--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Linguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social Media

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      April 2024
      6294 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3661497
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2024
      Published in pacmhci Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)60
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)60

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader