skip to main content
10.1145/3636555.3636939acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A Case Study on University Student Online Learning Patterns Across Multidisciplinary Subjects

Published:18 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

This case study explores the online learning patterns of a cohort of first-year university students in two subjects: a compulsory science subject and an introductory programming subject, by analysing trace data from the Learning Management Systems (LMS). The methodology extends existing learning analytics techniques to incorporate temporal aspects of students’ learning, such as session duration and weekly online behaviours. By examining over 82,000 learning actions, the research unveils significant variations in students’ online learning strategies between subjects, offering deeper insights into these differences and their associated challenges. The study seeks to initiate broader discussions in learning analytics, emphasising the need to comprehend students’ diverse online learning experiences and encouraging further exploration in future research.

References

  1. Nora’ayu Ahmad Uzir, Dragan Gašević, Wannisa Matcha, Jelena Jovanović, and Abelardo Pardo. 2020. Analytics of time management strategies in a flipped classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36, 1 (Feb. 2020), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Rachel Baker, Di Xu, Jihyun Park, Renzhe Yu, Qiujie Li, Bianca Cung, Christian Fischer, Fernando Rodriguez, Mark Warschauer, and Padhraic Smyth. 2020. The benefits and caveats of using clickstream data to understand student self-regulatory behaviors: opening the black box of learning processes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 17, 1 (Dec. 2020), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00187-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Abhinava Barthakur, Vitomir Kovanovic, Srecko Joksimovic, George Siemens, Michael Richey, and Shane Dawson. 2021. Assessing program-level learning strategies in MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior 117 (April 2021), 106674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. John Biggs. 1999. What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development 18, 1 (April 1999), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Abi Brooker, Sarah Brooker, and Jeanette Lawrence. 2017. First year students’ perceptions of their difficulties. Student Success 8, 1 (March 2017), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i1.352Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Paula G. de Barba, Donia Malekian, Eduardo A. Oliveira, James Bailey, Tracii Ryan, and Gregor Kennedy. 2020. The importance and meaning of session behaviour in a MOOC. Computers & Education 146 (March 2020), 103772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103772Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Alexis Gabadinho, Gilbert Ritschard, Nicolas S Müller, and Matthias Studer. 2011. Analyzing and Visualizing State Sequences in R with TraMineR. Journal of Statistical Software 40, 4 (2011), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i04Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jelena Jovanović, Dragan Gašević, Shane Dawson, Abelardo Pardo, and Negin Mirriahi. 2017. Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. The Internet and Higher Education 33 (April 2017), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kirsty Kitto, Ben Hicks, and Simon Buckingham Shum. 2023. Using causal models to bridge the divide between big data and educational theory. British Journal of Educational Technology (April 2023), bjet.13321. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13321Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Vitomir Kovanović, Dragan Gašević, Srećko Joksimović, Marek Hatala, and Olusola Adesope. 2015. Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education 27 (Oct. 2015), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Eva Kyndt, Inneke Berghmans, Filip Dochy, and Lydwin Bulckens. 2014. ‘Time is not enough.’ Workload in higher education: a student perspective. Higher Education Research & Development 33, 4 (July 2014), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863839Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Allison Littlejohn, Nina Hood, Colin Milligan, and Paige Mustain. 2016. Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education 29 (April 2016), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jorge Maldonado-Mahauad, Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, René F. Kizilcec, Nicolás Morales, and Jorge Munoz-Gama. 2018. Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior 80 (March 2018), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Wannisa Matcha, Dragan Gašević, Nora’ayu Ahmad Uzir, Jelena Jovanović, Abelardo Pardo, Lisa Lim, Jorge Maldonado-Mahauad, Sheridan Gentili, Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, and Yi-Shan Tsai. 2020. Analytics of Learning Strategies: Role of Course Design and Delivery Modality. Journal of Learning Analytics 7, 2 (Sept. 2020), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2020.72.3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Wannisa Matcha, Dragan Gašević, Jelena Jovanović, Nora’ayu Ahmad Uzir, Chris W Oliver, Andrew Murray, and Danijela Gasevic. 2020. Analytics of learning strategies: the association with the personality traits. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. ACM, Frankfurt Germany, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375534Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, Jake Vanderplas, Alexandre Passos, David Cournapeau, Matthieu Brucher, Matthieu Perrot, and Édouard Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, null (nov 2011), 2825–2830.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Oleksandra Poquet, Jelena Jovanovic, and Abelardo Pardo. 2023. Student Profiles of Change in a University Course: A Complex Dynamical Systems Perspective. In LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. ACM, Arlington TX USA, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1145/3576050.3576077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. John Saint, Yizhou Fan, Dragan Gašević, and Abelardo Pardo. 2022. Temporally-focused analytics of self-regulated learning: A systematic review of literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 3 (2022), 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100060Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mohammed Saqr, Sonsoles López-Pernas, Jelena Jovanović, and Dragan Gašević. 2023. Intense, turbulent, or wallowing in the mire: A longitudinal study of cross-course online tactics, strategies, and trajectories. The Internet and Higher Education 57 (April 2023), 100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100902Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Allen M. Tough. 1971. The adult’s learning projects: a fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning. Number no. 1 in Research in education series. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nora’ayu Ahmad Uzir, Dragan Gašević, Jelena Jovanović, Wannisa Matcha, Lisa-Angelique Lim, and Anthea Fudge. 2020. Analytics of time management and learning strategies for effective online learning in blended environments. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. ACM, Frankfurt Germany, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375493Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Philip H. Winne. 2020. Construct and consequential validity for learning analytics based on trace data. Computers in Human Behavior 112 (Nov. 2020), 106457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106457Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Dan Ye and Svoboda Pennisi. 2022. Using trace data to enhance Students’ self-regulation: A learning analytics perspective. The Internet and Higher Education 54 (June 2022), 100855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100855Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Case Study on University Student Online Learning Patterns Across Multidisciplinary Subjects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      LAK '24: Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference
      March 2024
      962 pages
      ISBN:9798400716188
      DOI:10.1145/3636555

      Copyright © 2024 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 March 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)55
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format