skip to main content
research-article

Effect of Wind on Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption: Sensitivity Analyses and Implications for Range Estimation and Optimal Routing

Published:08 April 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The energy consumption of electric vehicles (EVs) depends on multiple factors. As it affects vehicle range, energy consumption must be accurately predicted. After a summary of the relevant literature, this article focuses on two sensitivity studies: one on the impact of wind on energy consumption, and the other on the identifiability of wind in the absence of vehicles’ speed and acceleration profiles. The studies show that wind has a significant impact on the energy consumption for a trip, and without high-resolution knowledge of the acceleration and instantaneous velocity, minor variations in the wind condition do not drastically alter the energy consumption distribution. After that, data sources for the information on the wind velocity and direction are discussed. A data-driven approach based on fuzzy set theory is proposed to incorporate wind into the energy prediction; the best model from this approach shows a notable improvement (3.62%) over the currently implemented production-level predictive model for energy consumption on a dataset of 35,139 real-world trips; the improvement is even more pronounced (~ 7%) for trips with more substantial headwind or tailwind level. Recognizing the interplay between range prediction and route selection, we consider a Markov Decision Process (MDP) framework for battery-charge- and travel-time-aware optimal route planning that accounts for the impact of the wind and includes stops at the charging stations. Finally, we propose a framework that includes wind in the operation of EVs, which consists of learning the impact of wind, incorporating wind forecasting into range and energy prediction, and using that prediction to perform optimal routing.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] 2021. Global and Regional Weather Forecast Accuracy Overview 2017-2020. Retrieved from https://www.forecastwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/Global_and_Regional_Weather_Forecast_Accuracy_Overview_2017-2020.pdf. Accessed Dec 1, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] 2023. Global Wind Atlas. Retrieved from https://globalwindatlas.info. Accessed Dec 1, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] 2014. Michigan Average Wind Speed ZIP Code Rank. Retrieved from http://www.usa.com/rank/michigan-state--average-wind-speed--zip-code-rank.htm. Accessed Dec 1, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] 2014. U.S. Average Wind Speed State Rank. Retrieved from http://www.usa.com/rank/us--average-wind-speed--state-rank.htm. Accessed Dec 1, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] 2023. U.S. Wind Climatology National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). Retrieved from https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/wind/maps. Accessed Dec 1, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] 2023. Windiest States [Updated April 2023]. Retrieved from https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/windiest-states. Accessed Dec 1, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] 2022. The OnPoint Advantage. Retrieved from https://weathersource.com/products/. Accessed Dec 1, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Akdağ Seyit A. and Dinler Ali. 2009. A new method to estimate Weibull parameters for wind energy applications. Energy Conversion and Management 50, 7 (2009), 17611766. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Bechtold Bastian, Fletcher Patrick, Seamusholden, and Gorur-Shandilya Srinivas. 2021. Bastibe/Violinplot-Matlab: A Good Starting Point, Zenodo. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Bi Jun, Wang Yongxing, Sai Qiuyue, and Ding Cong. 2019. Estimating remaining driving range of battery electric vehicles based on real-world data: A case study of Beijing, China. Energy 169, 4 (2019), 833843. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Bishop Justin, Martin Niall, and Boies Adam. 2014. Cost-effectiveness of alternative powertrains for reduced energy use and CO2 emissions in passenger vehicles. Applied Energy 124, 12 (2014), 4461. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Bokare Prashant Shridhar and Maurya Akhilesh Kumar. 2017. Acceleration-deceleration behaviour of various vehicle types. Transportation Research Procedia 25, 6 (2017), 47334749. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Borunda Mónica, Jaramillo O. A., Reyes Alberto, and Ibargüengoytia Pablo H.. 2016. Bayesian networks in renewable energy systems: A bibliographical survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 62, 10 (Sept. 2016), 3245. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Cano Rafael, Sordo Carmen, and Gutiérrez José M.. 2004. Applications of Bayesian networks in meteorology. In Advances in Bayesian Networks. Kacprzyk Janusz, Gámez José A., Moral Serafín, and Salmerón Antonio (Eds.), Vol. 146, Springer, Berlin, 309328. DOI:Series Title: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Çeven Süleyman, Albayrak Ahmet, and Bayır Raif. 2020. Real-time range estimation in electric vehicles using fuzzy logic classifier. Computers & Electrical Engineering 83, 3 (2020), 106577. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Cook Jeffrey, Kolmanovsky Ilya, McNamara David, Nelson Edward, and Prasad Venkatesh. 2007. Control, computing and communications: Technologies for the twenty-first century model T. Proceedings of the IEEE 95, 2 (2007), 334355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Cros Marie-Josée. 2015. Markov Decision Processes (MDP) Toolbox. Retrieved from https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/25786-markov-decision-processes-mdp-toolbox. Accessed Dec 1, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Dollinger Manfred and Fischerauer Gerhard. 2021. Model-based range prediction for electric cars and trucks under real-world conditions. Energies 14, 18 (2021), 5804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Felipe Jiménez, Amarillo Juan Carlos, Naranjo Jose Eugenio, Serradilla Francisco, and Díaz Alberto. 2015. Energy consumption estimation in electric vehicles considering driving style. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 101106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Fotouhi Abbas, Shateri Neda, Laila Dina Shona, and Auger Daniel J.. 2021. Electric vehicle energy consumption estimation for a fleet management system. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 15, 1 (2021), 4054.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Hao Xu, Wang Hewu, Lin Zhenhong, and Ouyang Minggao. 2020. Seasonal effects on electric vehicle energy consumption and driving range: A case study on personal, taxi, and ridesharing vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production 249, 8 (2020), 119403. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] He Ming Zhe, Huo Shuan, Hemida Hassan, Soper David, Sterling Mark, and Baker Chris. 2022. The flow around a lorry platoon subject to a crosswind–a detached eddy simulation. Frontiers in Future Transportation 3, 1 (2022), 14. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Holmes J. D. and Bekele S.. 2020. Wind Loading of Structures. CRC Press. 2020031522Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Hu Jianming and Wang Jianzhou. 2015. Short-term wind speed prediction using empirical wavelet transform and Gaussian process regression. Energy 93, 19 (Dec. 2015), 14561466. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Jayakumar Adithya, Ingrosso Fabio, Rizzoni Giorgio, Meyer Jason, and Doering Jeff. 2014. Crowd sourced energy estimation in connected vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference. IEEE, 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Jiang Yu, Song Zhe, and Kusiak Andrew. 2013. Very short-term wind speed forecasting with Bayesian structural break model. Renewable Energy 50, 2 (Feb. 2013), 637647. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Lee Chung-Hong and Wu Chih-Hung. 2015. A novel big data modeling method for improving driving range estimation of EVs. IEEE Access 3, 1 (2015), 19801993. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Liu Da, Niu Dongxiao, Wang Hui, and Fan Leilei. 2014. Short-term wind speed forecasting using wavelet transform and support vector machines optimized by genetic algorithm. Renewable Energy 62, 2 (Feb. 2014), 592597. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Liu Kai, Wang Jiangbo, Yamamoto Toshiyuki, and Morikawa Takayuki. 2018. Exploring the interactive effects of ambient temperature and vehicle auxiliary loads on electric vehicle energy consumption. Applied Energy 227, 19 (2018), 324331. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Luo W., Taylor M. C., and Parker S. R.. 2008. A comparison of spatial interpolation methods to estimate continuous wind speed surfaces using irregularly distributed data from England and Wales. International Journal of Climatology 28, 7 (June 2008), 947959. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Lydia Mau, Kumar Suresh, Selvakumar A. Immanuel, and Kumar G. Edwin Prem. 2016. Linear and non-linear autoregressive models for short-term wind speed forecasting. Energy Conversion and Management 112, 6 (March 2016), 115124. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] MacNeille Perry, Gusikhin Oleg, Jennings Mark, Soto Ciro, and Rapolu Sujith. 2013. Integration of traffic simulation and propulsion modeling to estimate energy consumption for battery electric vehicles. In Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications, Nuno Pina, Janusz Kacprzyk, and Joaquim Filipe (Eds.). Springer, 319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Mao Lang, Fotouhi Abbas, Shateri Neda, and Ewin Nathan. 2022. A multi-mode electric vehicle range estimator based on driving pattern recognition. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 236, 6 (2022), 26772697.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Marcu Bogdan and Browand Fred. 1999. Aerodynamic Forces Experienced by a 3-vehicle Platoon in a Crosswind. Technical Report. SAE technical paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Oliva Javier A., Weihrauch Christoph, and Bertram Torsten. 2013. Model-based remaining driving range prediction in electric vehicles by using particle filtering and Markov chains. In Proceedings of the 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition. IEEE, 110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Pedregosa Fabian, Varoquaux Gaël, Gramfort Alexandre, Michel Vincent, Thirion Bertrand, Grisel Olivier, Blondel Mathieu, Prettenhofer Peter, Weiss Ron, Dubourg Vincent, Vanderplas Jake, Passos Alexandre, Cournapeau David, Brucher Matthieu, Perrot Matthieu, and Duchesnay Edouard. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 1 (2011), 28252830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Sarrafan Kaveh, Sutanto Danny, Muttaqi Kashem M., and Town Graham. 2017. Accurate range estimation for an electric vehicle including changing environmental conditions and traction system efficiency. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation 7, 2 (2017), 117124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Sousa Jorge and Gorlé Catherine. 2019. Computational urban flow predictions with Bayesian inference: Validation with field data. Building and Environment 154, 8 (May 2019), 1322. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Szwabowski Steven, MacNeille Perry, Kolmanovsky Ilya, and Filev Dimitar. 2010. In-vehicle Ambient Condition Sensing based on Wireless Internet Access. Technical Report. SAE Technical Paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] Thorgeirsson Adam Thor, Scheubner Stefan, Fünfgeld Sebastian, and Gauterin Frank. 2021. Probabilistic prediction of energy demand and driving range for electric vehicles with federated learning. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology 2, 1 (2021), 151161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. [41] Tran Trung Bach, Kolmanovsky Ilya, Biberstein Erik, Makke Omar, Tharayil Marina, and Gusikhin Oleg. 2023. Wind sensitivity of electric vehicle energy consumption and influence on range prediction and Optimal Vehicle Routes. In Proceedings of the1st IEEE International Conference on Mobility: Operations, Services, and Technologies. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Tsybakov Alexandre B.. 2009. Introduction to Nonparametric Estimation. Springer, New York, NY ; London. OCLC: ocn300399286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Varga Bogdan Ovidiu, Sagoian Arsen, and Mariasiu Florin. 2019. Prediction of electric vehicle range: A comprehensive review of current issues and challenges. Energies 12, 5 (2019), 946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Zefreh Mohammad Maghrour and Török Ádám. 2020. Distribution of traffic speed in different traffic conditions: An empirical study in Budapest. Transport 35, 1 (March 2020), 6886. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Effect of Wind on Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption: Sensitivity Analyses and Implications for Range Estimation and Optimal Routing

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Journal on Autonomous Transportation Systems
              ACM Journal on Autonomous Transportation Systems  Volume 1, Issue 2
              June 2024
              127 pages
              EISSN:2833-0528
              DOI:10.1145/3613595
              • Editors:
              • Vaneet Aggarwal,
              • Satish V. Ukkusuri
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 8 April 2024
              • Online AM: 20 November 2023
              • Accepted: 5 November 2023
              • Revised: 28 September 2023
              • Received: 30 April 2023
              Published in jats Volume 1, Issue 2

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)141
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)40

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            Full Text

            View this article in Full Text.

            View Full Text