skip to main content
10.1145/3627050.3630739acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

REPTILE: a Tool for Replay-driven Continual Learning in IIoT

Published:22 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an automated Machine Learning (ML) tool designed as a continual learning pipeline to adapt to evolving data streams in the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). This tool creates ML experiences, starting with training a neural network model. It then iteratively refines this model using fresh data while judiciously replaying pertinent historical data segments. When applied to IIoT sensor data, our tool ensures sustained ML performance amid evolving data dynamics while preventing the undue accumulation of obsolete sensor data. We have successfully assessed our tool across three industrial datasets and affirm its efficacy in dynamic knowledge retention and adaptation.

References

  1. Paolo Bellavista, Roberto Della Penna, Luca Foschini, and Domenico Scotece. 2020. Machine learning for predictive diagnostics at the edge: An IIoT practical example. In ICC’20. 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arda Goknil, Phu Nguyen, Sagar Sen, Dimitra Politaki, Harris Niavis, Karl John Pedersen, Abdillah Suyuthi, Abhilash Anand, and Amina Ziegenbein. 2023. A Systematic Review of Data Quality in CPS and IoT for Industry 4.0. Comput. Surveys 55, 14s, Article 327 (2023), 38 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Erik Johannes Husom, Simeon Tverdal, Arda Goknil, and Sagar Sen. 2022. UDAVA: an unsupervised learning pipeline for sensor data validation in manufacturing. In CAIN’22. 159–169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mauro Isaja, Phu Nguyen, Arda Goknil, Sagar Sen, Erik Johannes Husom, Simeon Tverdal, Abhilash Anand, Yunman Jiang, Karl John Pedersen, Per Myrseth, 2023. A blockchain-based framework for trusted quality data sharing towards zero-defect manufacturing. Computers in Industry 146 (2023), 103853.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. iterative.ai. Visited in 2022. Open-source Version Control System for Machine Learning Projects. https://dvc.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin Maschler, Thi Thu Huong Pham, and Michael Weyrich. 2021. Regularization-based Continual Learning for Anomaly Detection in Discrete Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 104 (2021), 452–457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Benjamin Maschler, Hannes Vietz, Nasser Jazdi, and Michael Weyrich. 2020. Continual learning of fault prediction for turbofan engines using deep learning with elastic weight consolidation. In ETFA’20, Vol. 1. 959–966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sagar Sen, Erik Johannes Husom, Arda Goknil, Dimitra Politaki, Simeon Tverdal, Phu Nguyen, and Nicolas Jourdan. 2023. Virtual sensors for erroneous data repair in manufacturing a machine learning pipeline. Computers in Industry 149 (2023), 103917.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sagar Sen, Erik Johannes Husom, Arda Goknil, Simeon Tverdal, and Phu Nguyen. 2023. Uncertainty-aware Virtual Sensors for Cyber-Physical Systems. IEEE Software (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sagar Sen, Erik Johannes Husom, Arda Goknil, Simeon Tverdal, Phu Hong Nguyen, and Iker Mancisidor. 2022. Taming Data Quality in AI-Enabled Industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Software 39, 6 (2022), 35–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sagar Sen, Simon Myklebust Nielsen, Erik Johannes Husom, Arda Goknil, Simeon Tverdal, and Leonardo Sastoque Pinilla. 2023. Replay-driven continual learning for the industrial internet of things. In CAIN’23. IEEE, 43–55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wen Sun, Jiajia Liu, and Yanlin Yue. 2019. AI-enhanced offloading in edge computing: When machine learning meets industrial IoT. IEEE Network 33, 5 (2019), 68–74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hasan Tercan, Philipp Deibert, and Tobias Meisen. 2022. Continual learning of neural networks for quality prediction in production using memory aware synapses and weight transfer. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 33, 1 (2022), 283–292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Simeon Tverdal, Arda Goknil, Phu Nguyen, Erik Johannes Husom, Sagar Sen, Jan Ruh, and Francesca Flamigni. 2023. Edge-based Data Profiling and Repair as a Service for IoT. In IoT’23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3627050.3627065Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IoT '23: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Internet of Things
    November 2023
    299 pages
    ISBN:9798400708541
    DOI:10.1145/3627050

    Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 March 2024

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • demonstration
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate28of84submissions,33%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format