skip to main content
10.1145/3626252.3630861acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

From Workshops to Classrooms: Faculty Experiences with Implementing Inclusive Design Principles

Published:07 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer science (CS) and information technology (IT) curricula are grounded in theoretical and technical skills. Topics like equity and inclusive design are rarely found in mainstream student studies. This results in graduates with outdated practices and limitations in software development. A research project was conducted to educate the faculty to integrate inclusive software design into the CS undergraduate curriculum. The objective is to produce graduates with the ability to develop inclusive software.

This experience report presents the results of teaching inclusive design throughout the four-year CS and IT curriculum, focusing on the impact on faculty. This easy-to-adopt, high-impact approach improved student retention and classroom climate, broadening participation. Research questions address faculty understanding of inclusive software design, the approach's feasibility, improvement in students' ability to design equitable software, and assessment of the inclusiveness culture for students in computing programs.

Faculty attended a summer workshop to learn about inclusive design and update their teaching materials to include the GenderMag method. Beginning in CS0 and CS1 and continuing through Senior Capstone, faculty used updated course assignments to include inclusive design in 10 courses for 44 sections taught. Faculty outcomes are positive, with the planning to include inclusive design and working with other department faculty most engaging. Faculty were impressed by student ownership and adoption of inclusive design methods, particularly in the culminating capstone senior project.

References

  1. ACM/IEEE Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula Association for Computing Machinery, Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science, December 20, 2013. https://www.acm.org/education/curricula-recommendations, Last retrieved Aug. 16, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology 2023--2023, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2023--2024/ Last retrieved Aug. 16, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Margaret Burnett, Simone Stumpf, Jamie Macbeth, Stephann Makri, Laura Beckwith, Irwin Kwan, Anicia Peters, and William Jernigan. 2016. GenderMag: A method for evaluating software's gender inclusiveness. Interacting with Computers 28, 6 (Oct. 2016), 760--787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. MIT PressGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mariam Guizani, Lara Letaw, Margaret Burnett and Anita Sarma, "Gender Inclusivity as a Quality Requirement: Practices and Pitfalls," in IEEE Software, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 7--11, Nov.-Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1109/MS.2020.3019540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. GenderMag website, https://gendermag.org/ Last accessed on Aug. 16, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Margaret Burnett, Zoe Steine-Hanson, and Alannah Oleson, "The GenderMag-Teach Project," CHI '19 Extended Abstracts, Glasgow, Scotland. https://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~burnett/Reprints/eduCHI19-GenderMagTeach-preprint.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Christopher Mendez, Lara Letaw, Margeret Burnett, Simone Stumpf, Anita Sarma, and Claudia Hilderbrand. (2019, October). From GenderMag to InclusiveMag: An inclusive design meta-method. In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 97--106). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/VLHCC.2019.8818889Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Margaret Burnett. 2020. Doing Inclusive Design: From GenderMag in the Trenches to Inclusive Mag in the Research Lab. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3399715.3400871Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lara Letaw, Rosalinda Garcia, Patricia Morreale, Gail Verdi, Heather Garcia, Geraldine Jimena Noa, Spencer P. Madsen, Maria Jesus Alzugaray-Orellana and Margaret M. Burnett. "Educating Educators to Integrate Inclusive Design Across a 4-Year CS Degree Program." ArXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.02748Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rosalinda Garcia, Patricia Morreale, Lara Letaw, Amreeta Chatterjee, Pankati Patel, Sarah Yang, Isaac Tijerina Escobar, Geraldine Jimena Noa, and Margaret Burnett. 2023. "Regular" CS × Inclusive Design = Smarter Students and Greater Diversity. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 23, 3, Article 34 (September 2023), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3603535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anna Szlavi and Leandro S Guedes (2023). Gender Inclusive Design in Technology: Case Studies and Guidelines. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Soares, M.M. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14030. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-031--35699--5_25Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Erin Sanders, Casey Shapiro, Shannon Toma, Hannah W. Sayson, Marc Levis-Fitzgerald, Tracy Johnson, and Victoria L. Sork. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00230--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lara Letaw, Rosalinda Garcia, Heather Garcia, Christopher Perdriau, and Margaret Burnett. 2021. Changing the Online Climate via the Online Students: Effects of Three Curricular Interventions on Online CS Students' Inclusivity. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 42--59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nidhi Rajendra Palan, Vicki L. Hanson, Matt Huenerfauth, and Stephanie Ludi. 2017. Teaching Inclusive Thinking in Undergraduate Computing. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 399--400. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134808Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Stephanie Ludi, Matt Huenerfauth, Vicki Hanson, Nidhi Rajendra Palan, and Paula Conn. 2018. Teaching Inclusive Thinking to Undergraduate Students in Computing Programs. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 717--722. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159512Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Alannah Oleson, Christopher Mendez, Zoe Steine-Hanson, Claudia Hilderbrand, Christopher Perdriau, Margaret Burnett, and Amy J. Ko. 2018. Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching Inclusive Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69--77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Alannah Oleson, Meron Solomon, Christopher Perdriau, and Amy Ko. 2023. Teaching Inclusive Design Skills with the CIDER Assumption Elicitation Technique. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 30, 1, Article 6 (February 2023), 49 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3549074Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Christopher Lynnly Hovey, Lecia Barker, and Vaughan Nagy. 2019. Survey Results on Why CS Faculty Adopt New Teaching Practices. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 483--489. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tony Kopppi, Madeleine Roberts, and Golshah Naghdy, "Perceptions of a gender-inclusive curriculum among Australian Information and Communications Technology academics," Proc. of the 14th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2012), Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Vol. 123, M. de Raadt and A. Carbone, Eds. pp. 7--13. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9206&context=infopapersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Heather L. Reynolds & Katherine Dowell Kearns (2017) A Planning Tool for Incorporating Backward Design, Active Learning, and Authentic Assessment in the College Classroom, College Teaching, 65:1, 17--27, DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2016.1222575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. GenderMag for Educators, https://gendermag.org/educators.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Otter.ai - Voice Meeting Notes & Real-time Transcription. (n.d.). https://otter.ai/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. From Workshops to Classrooms: Faculty Experiences with Implementing Inclusive Design Principles

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1
        March 2024
        1583 pages
        ISBN:9798400704239
        DOI:10.1145/3626252

        Copyright © 2024 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 March 2024

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)86
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader