ABSTRACT
The rise of social media platforms has facilitated the formation of echo chambers, which are online spaces where users predominantly encounter viewpoints that reinforce their existing beliefs while excluding dissenting perspectives. This phenomenon significantly hinders information dissemination across communities and fuels societal polarization. Therefore, it is crucial to develop methods for quantifying echo chambers. In this paper, we present the Echo Chamber Score (ECS), a novel metric that assesses the cohesion and separation of user communities by measuring distances between users in the embedding space. In contrast to existing approaches, ECS is able to function without labels for user ideologies and makes no assumptions about the structure of the interaction graph. To facilitate measuring distances between users, we propose EchoGAE, a self-supervised graph autoencoder-based user embedding model that leverages users' posts and the interaction graph to embed them in a manner that reflects their ideological similarity. To assess the effectiveness of ECS, we use a Twitter dataset consisting of four topics - two polarizing and two non-polarizing. Our results showcase ECS's effectiveness as a tool for quantifying echo chambers and shedding light on the dynamics of online discourse.
- M. Cinelli, G. De Francisci Morales, A. Galeazzi, W. Quattrociocchi, and M. Starnini, "The echo chamber effect on social media," PNAS, vol. 118, no. 9, p. e2023301118, Mar. 2021.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- L. Terren and R. Borge-Bravo, "Echo chambers on social media: A systematic review of the literature," RCR, vol. 9, pp. 99--118, Mar. 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Alatawi, L. Cheng, A. Tahir, M. Karami, B. Jiang, T. Black, and H. Liu, "A survey on echo chambers on social media: Description, detection and mitigation," Dec. 2021.Google Scholar
- G. Villa, G. Pasi, and M. Viviani, "Echo chamber detection and analysis," SNAM, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 78, Aug. 2021.Google Scholar
- S. C. Rhodes, "Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and fake news: How social media conditions individuals to be less critical of political misinformation," PolComm, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1--22, Jan. 2022.Google Scholar
- M. Del Vicario, A. Bessi, F. Zollo, F. Petroni, A. Scala, G. Caldarelli, H. E. Stanley, and W. Quattrociocchi, "The spreading of misinformation online," PNAS, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 554--559, Jan. 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Diaz Ruiz and T. Nilsson, "Disinformation and echo chambers: How disinformation circulates on social media through identity-driven controversies," JPP&M, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 18--35, Jan. 2023.Google Scholar
- F. Baumann, P. Lorenz-Spreen, I. M. Sokolov, and M. Starnini, "Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks," Physical Review Letters, vol. 124, no. 4, p. 048301, Jan. 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Wolfowicz, D. Weisburd, and B. Hasisi, "Examining the interactive effects of the filter bubble and the echo chamber on radicalization," JEC, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 119--141, Mar. 2023.Google Scholar
- K. Garimella, G. D. F. Morales, A. Gionis, and M. Mathioudakis, "Quantifying controversy on social media," ACM Transactions on Social Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1--27, Feb. 2018.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Guerra, W. M. Jr, C. Cardie, and R. Kleinberg, "A measure of polarization on social media networks based on community boundaries," ICWSM, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 215--224, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Cota, S. C. Ferreira, R. Pastor-Satorras, and M. Starnini, "Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks," EPJ Data Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1--13, Dec. 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Matakos, E. Terzi, and P. Tsaparas, "Measuring and moderating opinion polarization in social networks," DMKD, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1480--1505, Sep. 2017.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Musco, C. Musco, and C. E. Tsourakakis, "Minimizing polarization and disagreement in social networks," in WWW '18, 2018, pp. 369--378.Google Scholar
- T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, "Variational graph auto-encoders," 2016.Google Scholar
- M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook, "Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks," ARSO, vol. 27, no. 1, 2001.Google Scholar
- Y. Yang and J. Eisenstein, "Overcoming language variation in sentiment analysis with social attention," TACL, vol. 5, pp. 295--307, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Kovacs and A. M. Kleinbaum, "Language-style similarity and social networks," Psychological Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 202--213, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Cossard, G. D. F. Morales, K. Kalimeri, Y. Mejova, D. Paolotti, and M. Starnini, "Falling into the echo chamber: The italian vaccination debate on twitter," ICWSM, vol. 14, pp. 130--140, May 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Reimers and I. Gurevych, "Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks," Aug. 2019.Google Scholar
- A. Rashed, M. Kutlu, K. Darwish, T. Elsayed, and C. Bayrak, "Embeddings-based clustering for target specific stances: The case of a polarized turkey," ICWSM, vol. 15, pp. 537--548, May 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Barberá, J. T. Jost, J. Nagler, J. A. Tucker, and R. Bonneau, "Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?" Psychol. Sci., vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1531--1542, Oct. 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. H. DeGroot, "Reaching a consensus," JASA, vol. 69, no. 345, 1974.Google Scholar
- A. J. Morales, J. Borondo, J. C. Losada, and R. M. Benito, "Measuring political polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of venezuela," Chaos, vol. 25, no. 3, 2015.Google Scholar
- H. Xiong and Z. Li, "Clustering validation measures," in Data Clustering. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2014.Google Scholar
- P. J. Rousseeuw, "Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis," JCAM, vol. 20, pp. 53--65, Nov. 1987.Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre, "Fast unfolding of communities in large networks," JSTAT, 2008.Google Scholar
- V. A. Traag, L. Waltman, and N. J. van Eck, "From louvain to leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities," SciRep, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019.Google Scholar
- V. Morini, L. Pollacci, and G. Rossetti, "Toward a standard approach for echo chamber detection: Reddit case study," ApplSci, 2021.Google Scholar
- F. H. Calderón, L.-K. Cheng, M.-J. Lin, Y.-H. Huang, and Y.-S. Chen, "Content-based echo chamber detection on social media platforms," in ASONAM '19, Aug. 2019, pp. 597--600.Google Scholar
- H. Emamgholizadeh, M. Nourizade, M. S. Tajbakhsh, M. Hashminezhad, and F. N. Esfahani, "A framework for quantifying controversy of social network debates using attributed networks: Biased random walk," SNAM, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 90, Dec. 2020.Google Scholar
- J. Jiang, X. Ren, and E. Ferrara, "Retweet-bert: Political leaning detection using language features and information diffusion on social networks," Jul. 2022.Google Scholar
- A. Badawy, K. Lerman, and E. Ferrara, "Who falls for online political manipulation?" in WWW '19, May 2019, pp. 162--168.Google Scholar
- A. Bovet and H. A. Makse, "Influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 us presidential election," NatComm, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 7, 2019.Google Scholar
- E. Ferrara, H. Chang, E. Chen, G. Muric, and J. Patel, "Characterizing social media manipulation in the 2020 u.s. presidential election," First Monday, Oct. 2020.Google Scholar
- F. Parés, D. Garcia-Gasulla, A. Vilalta, J. Moreno, E. Ayguadé, J. Labarta, U. Cortés, and T. Suzumura, "Fluid communities: A competitive, scalable and diverse community detection algorithm," Oct. 2017.Google Scholar
- L. van der Maaten and G. Hinton, "Visualizing data using t-sne," JMLR, vol. 9, no. 86, pp. 2579--2605, 2008.Google Scholar
- M. Jacomy, T. Venturini, S. Heymann, and M. Bastian, "Forceatlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the gephi software," PLOS ONE, vol. 9, no. 6, 2014.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Quantifying the Echo Chamber Effect: An Embedding Distance-based Approach
Recommendations
Retweets Amplify the Echo Chamber Effect
ASONAM '23: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and MiningThe growing prominence of social media in public discourse has led to a greater scrutiny of the quality of online information and the role it plays in amplifying political polarization. However, studies of polarization on social media platforms like ...
(Anti-)Echo Chamber Participation: Examining Contributor Activity Beyond the Chamber
SMSociety '18: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and SocietyThe existence of echo chambers as a phenomenon in social media has been widely debated in recent years. This research examines the social news website Reddit, where users engage with each other indirectly as part of topic-based communities. These ...
Inside the echo chamber: Linguistic underpinnings of misinformation on Twitter
WEBSCI '24: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science ConferenceSocial media users drive the spread of misinformation online by sharing posts that include erroneous information or commenting on controversial topics with unsubstantiated arguments often in earnest. Work on echo chambers has suggested that users’ ...
Comments