skip to main content
10.1145/3623509.3633373acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Body Transformation: An Experiential Quality of Sensory Feedback Wearables for Altering Body Perception

Published:11 February 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Body perception has a significant impact on people’s motor, emotional, and social functioning. We evaluated the potential of four different existing wearable prototypes, which provide sound or haptic bodily feedback to alter body perception. In a Research through Design workshop, we invited professional dancers as expert study participants to explore and assess our prototypes. Based on the workshop’s insights, we articulate the experiential quality of Body Transformation, which characterizes how dancers perceive and experience their bodies while interacting with such prototypes. The quality encompasses a perceptual and holistic transformation, impacting the feelings about body, movement and emotions, and where the sensory feedback’s evocative power is crucial. Additionally, it elicits different transformation valuations. We contribute a deeper understanding of the impact of sensory feedback on body perception, its potential for transforming people’s overall body experience, and methodological insights on the potential of working with dancers to evaluate wearable sensory technology.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Baptiste Caramiaux, Marcos Serrano, and Frédéric Bevilacqua. 2012. Movement Qualities As Interaction Modality. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318071 event-place: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rachel Andrew, Marika Tiggemann, and Levina Clark. 2016. Positive body image and young women’s health: Implications for sun protection, cancer screening, weight loss and alcohol consumption behaviours. Journal of Health Psychology 21, 1 (Jan. 2016), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314520814Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Karen Anne Cochrane, Kristina Mah, Anna Ståhl, Claudia Núñez-Pacheco, Madeline Balaam, Naseem Ahmadpour, and Lian Loke. 2022. Body Maps: A Generative Tool for Soma-based Design. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3502262Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Simon Asplund and Martin Jonsson. 2018. SWAY - Designing for Balance and Posture Awareness. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (TEI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 470–475. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173262Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mark J. Berentsen, Marit Bentvelzen, and Paweł W. Woźniak. 2021. MTBalance: Assisting Novice Mountain Bikers with Real-Time Proprioceptive Feedback. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, ISS, Article 506 (nov 2021), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488551Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ilias Bergström and Martin Jonsson. 2016. Sarka: Sonification and Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1:1–1:8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948910.2948922 event-place: Thessaloniki, GA, Greece.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Frédéric Bevilacqua, Eric O. Boyer, Jules Françoise, Olivier Houix, Patrick Susini, Agnès Roby-Brami, and Sylvain Hanneton. 2016. Sensori-Motor Learning with Movement Sonification: Perspectives from Recent Interdisciplinary Studies. Frontiers in Neuroscience 10 (2016). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2016.00385Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniel Bisig and Pablo Palacio. 2016. Neural Narratives: Dance with Virtual Body Extensions. In MOCO. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948910.2948925Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bettina Bläsing, Beatriz Calvo-Merino, Emily S. Cross, Corinne Jola, Juliane Honisch, and Catherine J. Stevens. 2012. Neurocognitive control in dance perception and performance. Acta Psychologica 139, 2 (Feb. 2012), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Luis Botella García del Cid, Emma Ribas Rabert, and Jesús Benito Ruiz. 2009. Evaluación Psicométrica de la Imagen Corporal: Validación de la versión española del multidimensional body self relations questionnaire (MBSRQ). Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica (2009). https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=281921775006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Botvinick and J. Cohen. 1998. Rubber hands ’feel’ touch that eyes see [8]. Nature 391, 6669 (1998), 756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 4 (Aug. 2019), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Harry Brenton, Andrea Kleinsmith, and Marco Gillies. 2014. Embodied Design of Dance Visualisations. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617995.2618017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Courtney Brown. 2019. Machine Tango: An Interactive Tango Dance Performance. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 565–569. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3301263Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kendall J. Burdick, Seiver K. Jorgensen, Megan O. Holmberg, Samantha P. Kultgen, Taylor N. Combs, and Joseph J. Schlesinger. 2018. Benefits of sonification and haptic displays with physiologic variables to improve patient safety. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 35, 1 (Nov. 2018), 020001. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000941 Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Baptiste Caramiaux, Frédéric Bevilacqua, Tommaso Bianco, Norbert Schnell, Olivier Houix, and Patrick Susini. 2014. The Role of Sound Source Perception in Gestural Sound Description. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 11, 1 (April 2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2536811 Place: New York, NY, USA Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Daniel Cesarini, Davide Calvaresi, Chiara Farnesi, Diego Taddei, Stefano Frediani, Bodo E. Ungerechts, and Thomas Hermann. 2016. MEDIATION: An eMbEddeD System for Auditory Feedback of Hand-water InterAcTION while Swimming. Procedia Engineering 147 (Jan. 2016), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.301Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Matthew Clark and Afsaneh Doryab. 2023. Sounds of Health: Using Personalized Sonification Models to Communicate Health Information. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 4 (Jan. 2023), 206:1–206:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3570346Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sunje Clausen, Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Christian P. Janssen, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2021. Action sounds informing own body perception influence gender identity and social cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.688170Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Karen Cochrane, Lian Loke, Matthew Leete, Andrew Campbell, and Naseem Ahmadpour. 2021. Understanding the First Person Experience of Walking Mindfulness Meditation Facilitated by EEG Modulated Interactive Soundscape. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Salzburg, Austria) (TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440637Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Karen Anne Cochrane, Lian Loke, Andrew Campbell, Matthew Leete, and Naseem Ahmadpour. 2020. An Interactive Soundscape to Assist Group Walking Mindfulness Meditation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Movement and Computing (Jersey City/Virtual, NJ, USA) (MOCO ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 21, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3401956.3404240Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Katri K Cornelissen, Helena Widdrington, Kristofor McCarty, Thomas V Pollet, Martin J Tovée, and Piers L Cornelissen. 2019. Are attitudinal and perceptual body image the same or different? Evidence from high-level adaptation. Body Image 31 (2019), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.08.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Luke Dahl, Christopher Knowlton, and Antonia Zaferiou. 2019. Developing real-time sonification with optical motion capture to convey balance-related metrics to dancers. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3347122.3359600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Frédérique. De Vignemont. 2018. Mind the body: An exploration of bodily self-awareness. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Frédérique De Vignemont, Henrik H. Ehrsson, and Patrick Haggard. 2005. Bodily illusions modulate tactile perception. Current Biology 15, 14 (2005), 1286–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.067Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Joaquín Roberto Díaz Durán. 2022. Interfaz Ciborg. Dispositivo interactivo para reflexionar la relación arte, tecnología y cuerpo en la performance. (2022). https://ruidera.uclm.es/xmlui/handle/10578/29737 Accepted: 2022-04-26T08:45:54Z Publisher: Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hesham Elsayed, Martin Weigel, Florian Müller, Martin Schmitz, Karola Marky, Sebastian Günther, Jan Riemann, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2020. VibroMap: Understanding the Spacing of Vibrotactile Actuators across the Body. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 4 (Dec. 2020), 125:1–125:16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sara Eriksson, Kristina Höök, Richard Shusterman, Dag Svanes, Carl Unander-Scharin, and Åsa Unander-Scharin. 2020. Ethics in Movement: Shaping and Being Shaped in Human-Drone Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376678Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Karlheinz Essl. 2022. Karlheinz Essl: RTC-lib - Real Time Composition Library for Max and Pd (1992-2022) for macOS and Windows. https://www.essl.at/works/rtc.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Daniel Fallman. 2011. The New Good: Exploring the Potential of Philosophy of Technology to Contribute to Human-computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979099Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sarah Fdili Alaoui. 2019. Making an Interactive Dance Piece: Tensions in Integrating Technology in Art. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322289 event-place: San Diego, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Frank Feltham, Lian Loke, Elise van den Hoven, Jeffrey Hannam, and Bert Bongers. 2013. The Slow Floor: Increasing Creative Agency While Walking on an Interactive Surface. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rebecca Fiebrink. 2019. Machine Learning Education for Artists, Musicians, and Other Creative Practitioners. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 19, 4 (Sept. 2019), 31:1–31:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Rebecca Fiebrink, Dan Trueman, and Perry R Cook. 2009. A Meta-Instrument for Interactive, On-the-fly Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME’09)(NIME’09). 280–285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jodi Forlizzi, John Zimmerman, Paul Hekkert, and Ilpo Koskinen. 2018. Let’s Get Divorced: Constructing Knowledge Outcomes for Critical Design and Constructive Design Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 395–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3197395Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Emma Frid, Jonas Moll, Roberto Bresin, and Eva-Lotta Sallnäs Pysander. 2019. Haptic feedback combined with movement sonification using a friction sound improves task performance in a virtual throwing task. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 13, 4 (Dec. 2019), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-018-0264-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Shaun Gallagher. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 294 pages. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199271941.001.0001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. William Gaver. 2012. What Should We Expect from Research Through Design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Klaske A. Glashouwer, Roosmarijn M. L. van der Veer, Fayanadya Adipatria, Peter J. de Jong, and Silja Vocks. 2019. The role of body image disturbance in the onset, maintenance, and relapse of anorexia nervosa: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review 74 (Dec. 2019), 101771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101771Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Keith Evan Green. 2019. Strange Places: Loci of Design Inspiration. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3300998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sarah Grogan. 2021. Body Image (4th ed.). Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003100041Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Tobias Großhauser, Bettina Bläsing, Corinna Spieth, and Thomas Hermann. 2012. Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Sonification of Motion and Foot Pressure in Dance Teaching and Training. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 60, 7/8 (2012). https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2528002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Carlos Guedes. 2007. Establishing a musical channel of communication between dancers and musicians in computer-mediated collaborations in dance performance. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on New interfaces for musical expression(NIME ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 417–418. https://doi.org/10.1145/1279740.1279843Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Kelly S. Hale and Kay M. Stanney. 2004. Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 24, 2 (March 2004), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2004.1274059 Conference Name: IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Aurie Hsu and Steven Kemper. 2019. The Hybrid Body and Sonic-Cyborg Performance in Why Should Our Bodies End at the Skin?. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 547–551. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3301255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong Concepts: Intermediate-level Knowledge in Interaction Design Research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3 (Oct. 2012), 23:1–23:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362371Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Ryan Ingebritsen, Christopher Knowlton, Hugh Sato, and Erica Mott. 2020. Social Movements: A Case Study in Dramaturgically-Driven Sound Design for Contemporary Dance Performance to Mediate Human-Human Interaction. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374955Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Corinne Jola, Angharad Davis, and Patrick Haggard. 2011. Proprioceptive integration and body representation: insights into dancers’ expertise. Experimental Brain Research 213, 2 (Sept. 2011), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2743-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Martin Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, Johanna Mercurio, Anna Karlsson, Naveen Ramani, and Kristina Höök. 2016. The Aesthetics of Heat: Guiding Awareness with Thermal Stimuli. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Stephan Jürgens, Nuno N. Correia, and Raul Masu. 2021. The Body Beyond Movement: (Missed) Opportunities to Engage with Contemporary Dance in HCI. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440624Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Jakob Karolus, Felix Bachmann, Thomas Kosch, Albrecht Schmidt, and Paweł W. Woźniak. 2021. Facilitating Bodily Insights Using Electromyography-Based Biofeedback during Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction (Toulouse & Virtual, France) (MobileHCI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447526.3472027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Pavel Karpashevich, Eva Hornecker, Michaela Honauer, and Pedro Sanches. 2018. Reinterpreting Schlemmer’s Triadic Ballet: Interactive Costume for Unthinkable Movements. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61:1–61:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173635Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Pavel Karpashevich, Pedro Sanches, Rachael Garrett, Yoav Luft, Kelsey Cotton, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, and Kristina Höök. 2022. Touching Our Breathing through Shape-Change: Monster, Organic Other, or Twisted Mirror. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 29, 3 (Feb. 2022), 22:1–22:40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490498Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Konstantina Kilteni, Antonella Maselli, Konrad P. Kording, and Mel Slater. 2015. Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00141Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Konstantina Kilteni, Jean-Marie Normand, Maria V Sanchez-Vives, and Mel Slater. 2012. Extending Body Space in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Very Long Arm Illusion. PLOS ONE 7, 7 (July 2012), e40867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040867 Publisher: Public Library of Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Keina Konno, Richi Owaki, Yoshito Onishi, Ryo Kanda, Sheep, Akiko Takeshita, Tsubasa Nishi, Naoko Shiomi, Kyle McDonald, Satoru Higa, Motoi Shimizu, Yosuke Sakai, Yasuaki Kakehi, Kazuhiro Jo, Yoko Ando, Kazunao Abe, and Takayuki Ito. 2016. Dividual Plays Experimental Lab: An installation derived from Dividual Plays. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2856346Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Ilpo Koskinen, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redström, and Stephan Wensveen. 2012. Design Research Through Practice. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385502-2.00015-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Yosuke Kurihara, Taku Hachisu, Katherine J. Kuchenbecker, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2013. Virtual Robotization of the Human Body via Data-Driven Vibrotactile Feedback. In Advances in Computer Entertainment(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Dennis Reidsma, Haruhiro Katayose, and Anton Nijholt (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03161-3_8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Bigna Lenggenhager, Tej Tadi, Thomas Metzinger, and Olaf Blanke. 2007. Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness.Science (New York, N.Y.) 317, 5841 (2007), 1096–1099. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143439Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Judith Ley-Flores, Eslam Alshami, Aneesha Singh, Frédéric Bevilacqua, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Ophelia Deroy, and Ana Tajadura-Jiménez. 2022. Effects of pitch and musical sounds on body-representations when moving with sound. Scientific Reports 12, 1 (2022), 2676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06210-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Judith Ley-Flores, Frédéric Bevilacqua, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Ana Tajadura-Jiménez. 2019. Altering body perception and emotion in physically inactive people through movement sonification. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 3rd-6th September, 2019, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Judith Ley-Flores, Laia Turmo Vidal, Nadia Berthouze, Aneesha Singh, Frédéric Bevilacqua, and Ana Tajadura-Jiménez. 2021. SoniBand: Understanding the Effects of Metaphorical Movement Sonifications on Body Perception and Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Lian Loke, Astrid T. Larssen, and Toni Robertson. 2005. Labanotation for Design of Movement-based Interaction. In Proceedings of the Second Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment(IE ’05). Creativity & Cognition Studios Press, Sydney, Australia, Australia, 113–120. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1109180.1109197Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Lian Loke and Toni Robertson. 2010. Studies of dancers: Moving from experience to interaction design. International Journal of Design 4, 2 (2010). http://search.proquest.com/openview/65d82e8ef58af379e1e881cdf45114b6/1?pq-origsite=gscholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Matthew R. Longo and Patrick Haggard. 2012. What Is It Like to Have a Body?Current Directions in Psychological Science 21, 2 (2012), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411434982Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Jonas Löwgren. 2007. Fluency as an Experiential Quality in Augmented Spaces. International Journal of Design 1, 3 (Dec 2007), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Jonas Löwgren. 2007. Pliability As An Experiential Quality: Exploring The Aesthetics Of Interaction Design. ARTIFACT 1 (Oct 2007), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460600976165Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Jonas Löwgren. 2009. Toward an Articulation of Interaction Esthetics. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 15, 2 (2009), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614560903117822Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Tomosuke Maeda and Tetsuo Kurahashi. 2019. TherModule: Wearable and Modular Thermal Feedback System Based on a Wireless Platform. In Proceedings of the 10th Augmented Human International Conference 2019 (Reims, France) (AH2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311823.3311826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Angelo Maravita and Atsushi Iriki. 2004. Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 2 (Feb. 2004), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Svetlana Mironcika, Joanne Pek, Jochem Franse, and Ya Shu. 2016. Whoosh Gloves: Interactive Tool to Form a Dialog Between Dancer and Choreographer. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 729–732. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2872958Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Joseph W. Newbold, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Nicolas E. Gold, Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, and Amanda CdC Williams. 2016. Musically Informed Sonification for Chronic Pain Rehabilitation: Facilitating Progress & Avoiding Over-Doing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5698–5703. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Stina Nylander, Alex Kent, and Jakob Tholander. 2014. Swing Sound: Experiencing the Golf Swing Through Sound. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 443–446. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2574789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Pablo Palacio and Daniel Bisig. 2017. Piano&Dancer: Interaction Between a Dancer and an Acoustic Instrument. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing(MOCO ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Jeroen Peeters, Ambra Trotto, and Stoffel Kuenen. 2016. MoCap Tango: Traces of Complexity. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2856544Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Edgar F Pierce and Myra L Daleng. 1998. Distortion of Body Image among Elite Female Dancers. Perceptual and Motor Skills 87, 3 (Dec. 1998), 769–770. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.87.3.769 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Ivelina V. Piryankova, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, Javier Romero, Stephan De La Rosa, Michael J. Black, and Betty J. Mohler. 2014. Can I Recognize My Body’s Weight? The Influence of Shape and Texture on the Perception of Self. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 11, 3 (Sept. 2014), 13:1–13:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2641568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Ivelina V Piryankova, Hong Yu Wong, Sally A Linkenauger, Catherine Stinson, Matthew R Longo, Heinrich H Bülthoff, and Betty J Mohler. 2014. Owning an overweight or underweight body: distinguishing the physical, experienced and virtual body. PloS one 9, 8 (Aug. 2014), e103428–e103428. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103428 Publisher: Public Library of Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Olga Pollatos, Anne-Lene Kurz, Jessica Albrecht, Tatjana Schreder, Anna Maria Kleemann, Veronika Schöpf, Rainer Kopietz, Martin Wiesmann, and Rainer Schandry. 2008. Reduced perception of bodily signals in anorexia nervosa. Eating Behaviors 9, 4 (Dec. 2008), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2008.02.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Jean-Philippe Rivière, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Baptiste Caramiaux, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2018. How Do Dancers Learn To Dance?: A First-person Perspective of Dance Acquisition by Expert Contemporary Dancers. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6:1–6:7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3212721.3212723 event-place: Genoa, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Jean-Philippe Rivière, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Baptiste Caramiaux, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2019. Capturing Movement Decomposition to Support Learning and Teaching in Contemporary Dance. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 86:1–86:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Stephen Roddy and Dermot Furlong. 2014. Embodied aesthetics in auditory display. Organised Sound 19 (2014). Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771813000423Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Rachel F. Rodgers, Elizabeth Donovan, Tara Cousineau, Kayla Yates, Kayla McGowan, Elizabeth Cook, Alice S. Lowy, and Debra L. Franko. 2018. BodiMojo: Efficacy of a Mobile-Based Intervention in Improving Body Image and Self-Compassion among Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 47 (7 2018), 1363–1372. Issue 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10964-017-0804-3/TABLES/2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Giulio Rosati, Antonio Rodà, Federico Avanzini, and Stefano Masiero. 2013. On the role of auditory feedback in robot-assisted movement training after stroke: review of the literature. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2013 (2013), 586138. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/586138Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Josef Roth, Jan Ehlers, Christopher Getschmann, and Florian Echtler. 2021. TempoWatch: a Wearable Music Control Interface for Dance Instructors. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3442461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Nina Schaffert, Thenille Braun Janzen, Klaus Mattes, and Michael H. Thaut. 2019. A Review on the Relationship Between Sound and Movement in Sports and Rehabilitation. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00244Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Nina Schaffert and Klaus Mattes. 2015. Interactive Sonification in Rowing: Acoustic Feedback for On-Water Training. IEEE MultiMedia 22, 1 (Jan. 2015), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2015.9 Conference Name: IEEE MultiMedia.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Thecla Schiphorst. 2011. Self-evidence: Applying Somatic Connoisseurship to Experience Design. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Daniel S. Scholz, Sönke Rhode, Michael Großbach, Jens Rollnik, and Eckart Altenmüller. 2015. Moving with music for stroke rehabilitation: a sonification feasibility study. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1337 (March 2015), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12691Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Tim Schürmann, Betty Jo Mohler, Jan Peters, and Philipp Beckerle. 2019. How Cognitive Models of Human Body Experience Might Push Robotics., 14 pages. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnbot.2019.00014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Ralf Schwarzer. 1992. Self-Efficacy, Physical Symptoms, and Rehabilitation of Chronic Disease. In Self-Efficacy, Ralf Schwarzer (Ed.). Taylor & Francis. Num Pages: 110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo, Michael Bruner, Nathan Ayres, Christine Bergeron, and Alexandra Pooley. 2019. Upwell: Performative Immersion Hybridizing Two Worlds. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 571–575. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3301264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Andrea Serino and Patrick Haggard. 2010. Touch and the body. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 34, 2 (feb 2010), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.04.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Matthias Seuter, Max Pfeiffer, Gernot Bauer, Karen Zentgraf, and Christian Kray. 2017. Running with Technology: Evaluating the Impact of Interacting with Wearable Devices on Running Movement. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), 101:1–101:17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130966Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Richard Shusterman. 2008. Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Roland Sigrist, Georg Rauter, Laura Marchal-Crespo, Robert Riener, and Peter Wolf. 2015. Sonification and haptic feedback in addition to visual feedback enhances complex motor task learning. Experimental Brain Research 233, 3 (March 2015), 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4167-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Roland Sigrist, Georg Rauter, Robert Riener, and Peter Wolf. 2013. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20, 1 (Feb. 2013), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  98. Aneesha Singh, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Amanda CdeC Williams. 2017. Supporting Everyday Function in Chronic Pain Using Wearable Technology. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17, 3903–3915. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025947Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Aneesha Singh, Stefano Piana, Davide Pollarolo, Gualtiero Volpe, Giovanna Varni, Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Amanda CdeC Williams, Antonio Camurri, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2016. Go-with-the-Flow: Tracking, Analysis and Sonification of Movement and Breathing to Build Confidence in Activity Despite Chronic Pain. Human–Computer Interaction 31, 3-4 (July 2016), 335–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2015.1085310 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2015.1085310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Genevieve Smith-Nunes, Alex Shaw, and Camilla Neale. 2018. PainByte: Chronic Pain and BioMedical Engineering Through the Lens of Classical Ballet & Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–497. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Salvador Soto-Faraco, Daria Kvasova, Emmanuel Biau, Nara Ikumi, Manuela Ruzzoli, Luis Morís-Fernández, and Mireia Torralba. 2019. Multisensory Interactions in the Real World. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781108578738Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Daniel Spelmezan, Anke Hilgers, and Jan Borchers. 2009. A language of tactile motion instructions. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services(MobileHCI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/1613858.1613896Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Tasha R. Stanton, G. Lorimer Moseley, Arnold Y. L. Wong, and Gregory N. Kawchuk. 2017. Feeling stiffness in the back: a protective perceptual inference in chronic back pain. Scientific Reports 7, 1 (Aug. 2017), 9681. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09429-1 Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. Jelle Stienstra, Kees Overbeeke, and Stephan Wensveen. 2011. Embodying Complexity through Movement Sonification: Case Study on Empowering the Speed-Skater. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity (Alghero, Italy) (CHItaly). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037296.2037310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Jelle Stienstra, Kees Overbeeke, and Stephan Wensveen. 2011. Embodying Complexity Through Movement Sonification: Case Study on Empowering the Speed-skater. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity(CHItaly). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037296.2037310 event-place: Alghero, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Anna Ståhl, Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Pedro Sanches, and Kristina Höök. 2022. Making New Worlds – Transformative Becomings with Soma Design. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Ana Tajadura-Jimenez, Judith Ley-Flores, Omar Valdiviezo, Aneesha Singh, Milagrosa Sanchez-Martin, Joaquin Diaz Duran, and Elena Márquez Segura. 2022. Exploring the Design Space for Body Transformation Wearables to Support Physical Activity through Sensitizing and Bodystorming. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Movement and Computing(MOCO ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537972.3538001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, D. Banakou, N. Bianchi-Berthouze, and M. Slater. 2017. Embodiment in a Child-Like Talking Virtual Body Influences Object Size Perception, Self-Identification, and Subsequent Real Speaking. Scientific Reports 7, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09497-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Maria Basia, Ophelia Deroy, Merle Fairhurst, Nicolai Marquardt, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2015. As Light as your Footsteps: Altering Walking Sounds to Change Perceived Body Weight, Emotional State and Gait. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2943–2952. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Ana. Tajadura-Jiménez, N. Bianchi-Berthouze, E. Furfaro, and F. Bevilacqua. 2015. Sonification of surface tapping changes behavior, surface perception, and emotion. IEEE Multimedia 22, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2015.14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Merle T. Fairhurst, and Ophelia Deroy. 2022. Sensing the body through sound. The Routledge Handbook of Bodily Awareness (11 2022), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321542-21Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  112. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, S. Grehl, and M. Tsakiris. 2012. The other in me: Interpersonal multisensory stimulation changes the mental representation of the self. PLoS ONE 7, 7 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040682Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  113. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Torsten Marquardt, David Swapp, Norimichi Kitagawa, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2016. Action Sounds Modulate Arm Reaching Movements. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016), 1391. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01391 ISBN: 1664-1078.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Joseph Newbold, Linge Zhang, Patricia Rick, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2019. As Light as You Aspire to Be. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300888Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Manos Tsakiris, Torsten Marquardt, and Bianchi Berthouze Nadia. 2015. Action sounds update the mental representation of arm dimension: Contributions of kinaesthesia and agency. Frontiers in Psychology 6, May (2015), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00689Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Aleksander Valjamae, and Kristi Kuusk. 2020. Altering One’s Body-perception Through E-Textiles and Haptic Metaphors. Frontiers in Robotics and AI (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Aleksander Väljamäe, Iwaki Toshima, Toshitaka Kimura, Manos Tsakiris, and Norimichi Kitagawa. 2012. Action sounds recalibrate perceived tactile distance. Current Biology 22, 13 (2012), R516–R517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.028 ISBN: 1879-0445 (Electronic)\r0960-9822 (Linking) Publisher: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  118. Paul Tennent, Joe Marshall, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Charles Windlin, Kristina Höök, and Miquel Alfaras. 2020. Soma Design and Sensory Misalignment. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376812Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. J Kevin Thompson and Eric Stice. 2001. Thin-Ideal Internalization: Mounting Evidence for a New Risk Factor for Body-Image Disturbance and Eating Pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science 10, 5 (Oct. 2001), 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00144 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  120. Milka Trajkova and Francesco Cafaro. 2018. Takes Tutu to Ballet: Designing Visual and Verbal Feedback for Augmented Mirrors. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (March 2018), 38:1–38:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3191770Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  121. Milka Trajkova, Francesco Cafaro, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2019. Designing for Ballet Classes: Identifying and Mitigating Communication Challenges Between Dancers and Teachers. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322312 event-place: San Diego, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Manos Tsakiris † and Patrick Haggard. 2005. Experimenting with the acting self. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22, 3-4 (May 2005), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000158 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  123. Vasiliki Tsaknaki. 2021. The Breathing Wings: An Autobiographical Soma Design Exploration of Touch Qualities through Shape-Change Materials. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021(DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1266–1279. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Laia Turmo Vidal, Yinchu Li, Martin Stojanov, Karin B Johansson, Beatrice Tylstedt, and Lina Eklund. 2023. Towards Advancing Body Maps as Research Tool in Interaction Design. (2023), 470–475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Laia Turmo Vidal, Elena Márquez Segura, Luis Parrilla Bel, and Annika Waern. 2020. Training Technology Probes Across Fitness Practices: Yoga, Circus and Weightlifting. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382862Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. Laia Turmo Vidal, Elena Márquez Segura, and Annika Waern. 2023. Intercorporeal Biofeedback for Movement Learning. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30, 3 (June 2023), 43:1–43:40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. Laia Turmo Vidal, Hui Zhu, and Abraham Riego-Delgado. 2020. BodyLights: Open-Ended Augmented Feedback to Support Training Towards a Correct Exercise Execution. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376268Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. Laia Turmo Vidal, Hui Zhu, Annika Waern, and Elena Márquez Segura. 2021. The Design Space of Wearables for Sports and Fitness Practices. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445700Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  129. Björn van der Hoort, Arvid Guterstam, and H Henrik Ehrsson. 2011. Being Barbie: The Size of One’s Own Body Determines the Perceived Size of the World. PLOS ONE 6, 5 (May 2011), e20195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020195 Publisher: Public Library of Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. Elizabeth Walton and Wendy E. Mackay. 2022. Dance Transitions: What Forms of Technology Best Support Professional Dancers as They Learn New Movement Styles?. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517448Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. Daniel M. Wolpert and Zoubin Ghahramani. 2000. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience 3, 11 (Nov. 2000), 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/81497 Number: 11 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  132. Mikoklaj P. Wozniak, Julia Dominiak, Michal Pieprzowski, Piotr ladonski, Krzysztof Grudzien, Lars Lischke, Andrzej Romanowski, and Pawel W. Wozniak. 2020. Subtletee: Augmenting Posture Awareness for Beginner Golfers. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, ISS, Article 204 (nov 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427332Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. Qiushi Zhou, Cheng Cheng Chua, Jarrod Knibbe, Jorge Goncalves, and Eduardo Velloso. 2021. Dance and Choreography in HCI: A Two-Decade Retrospective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445804Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Body Transformation: An Experiential Quality of Sensory Feedback Wearables for Altering Body Perception

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        TEI '24: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
        February 2024
        1058 pages
        ISBN:9798400704024
        DOI:10.1145/3623509

        Copyright © 2024 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 February 2024

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format