skip to main content
10.1145/3610419.3610425acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Joint Space Trajectory Controller for Modular Reconfigurable Manipulator

Published:02 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present, control strategies for modular and reconfigurable manipulator. Control strategies for conventional robot is well defined. Here we have implemented PD controller in joint space. Unified Robot Description File(URDF) is used to model kinematics and dynamic model of robot. This paper illustrates and implements the PD control law on modular manipulator with cases of reconfigurations with unconventional twist angle. To compare the performance of the controller we implement the same control on conventional four degree of freedom(DoF) Kinova MICO robot. Control input has been designed using a PD control strategy considering the error between desired pose and current pose. The numerical simulation is carried out on MATLAB.

References

  1. [n. d.]. URDF. http://wiki.ros.org/urdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gabriella Acaccia, Luca Bruzzone, and Roberto Razzoli. 2008. A modular robotic system for industrial applications. Assembly Automation (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Z.M. Bi, W.J. Zhang, I.-M. Chen, and S.Y.T. Lang. 2007. Automated geneartion of the D–H parameters for configuration design of modular manipulators. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 23, 5 (2007), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2006.02.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R Cohen, MG Lipton, MQ Dai, and B Benhabib. 1992. Conceptual design of a modular robot. (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Anubhav Dogra, Sakshay Mahna, Srikant Sekhar Padhee, and Ekta Singla. 2022. Unified modeling of unconventional modular and reconfigurable manipulation system. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 78 (2022), 102385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Anubhav Dogra, Srikant Sekhar Padhee, and Ekta Singla. 2022. Optimal Synthesis of Unconventional Links for Modular Reconfigurable Manipulators. Journal of Mechanical Design 144, 8 (2022), 083304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bo Dong, Fan Zhou, Keping Liu, and Yuanchun Li. 2020. Decentralized robust optimal control for modular robot manipulators via critic-identifier structure-based adaptive dynamic programming. Neural Computing and Applications 32, 8 (2020), 3441–3458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Raouf Fareh, Sofiane Khadraoui, Mohammed Baziyad, and Maamar Bettayeb. 2020. Synergetic workspace tracking control for 4-dof robot manipulator. In Proceedings of the 2020 12th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering. 189–193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kazi M. Hossain, Carl A. Nelson, and Prithviraj Dasgupta. 2017. Enumeration of Configurations and Their Kinematics for ModRED II Modular Robots. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 9, 5 (06 2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036740 arXiv:https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/mechanismsrobotics/article-pdf/9/5/054501/6258343/jmr_009_05_054501.pdf054501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Su-Hau Hsu and Li-Chen Fu. 2006. A fully adaptive decentralized control of robot manipulators. Automatica 42, 10 (2006), 1761–1767.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Laura Kelmar and Pradeep K Khosla. 1990. Automatic generation of forward and inverse kinematics for a reconfigurable modular manipulator system. Journal of Robotic Systems 7, 4 (1990), 599–619.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jason A. Kereluk and M. Reza Emami. 2017. Task-based optimization of reconfigurable robot manipulators. Advanced Robotics 31, 16 (2017), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2017.1362995 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2017.1362995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Guangjun Liu, Sajan Abdul, and Andrew A Goldenberg. 2006. Distributed modular and reconfigurable robot control with torque sensing. In 2006 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. IEEE, 384–389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Takafumi Matsumaru. 1995. Design and control of the modular robot system: TOMMS. In Proceedings of 1995 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Vol. 2. IEEE, 2125–2131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Vassilis C. Moulianitis, Aris I. Synodinos, Charalampos D. Valsamos, and Nikos A. Aspragathos. 2016. Task-Based Optimal Design of Metamorphic Service Manipulators. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 8, 6 (09 2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033665 arXiv:https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/mechanismsrobotics/article-pdf/8/6/061011/6256744/jmr_008_06_061011.pdf061011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Xinan Pan, Hongguang Wang, Yong Jiang, and Jizhong Xiao. 2013. Automatic kinematic modelling of a modular reconfigurable robot. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 35, 7 (2013), 922–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331212459538 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331212459538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Michael G Rodd. 1987. Introduction to robotics: Mechanics and control: John J. Craig.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Samuel Schuler, Valentin Kaufmann, Patrick Houghton, and Gerhard S Székely. 2006. Design and development of a joint for the dextrous robot arm. In Ninth ESA Workshop on Advanced Space Technologies for Robotics and Automation, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Nov. 28–30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Satwinder Singh and Ekta Singla. 2016. Realization of task-based designs involving DH parameters: a modular approach. Intelligent Service Robotics 9, 3 (2016), 289–296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A Valente. 2016. Reconfigurable industrial robots—An integrated approach to design the joint and link modules and configure the robot manipulator. In Advances in Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots II. Springer, 779–794.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alchan Yun, Deaho Moon, Junhyoung Ha, Sungchul Kang, and Woosub Lee. 2020. ModMan: An Advanced Reconfigurable Manipulator System With Genderless Connector and Automatic Kinematic Modeling Algorithm. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5, 3 (2020), 4225–4232. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.2994486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lu Zhu and Yuanchun Li. 2010. Decentralized adaptive neural network control for reconfigurable manipulators. In 2010 Chinese Control and Decision Conference. IEEE, 1760–1765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Joint Space Trajectory Controller for Modular Reconfigurable Manipulator

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AIR '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Advances in Robotics
      July 2023
      583 pages
      ISBN:9781450399807
      DOI:10.1145/3610419

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 November 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format