Ramis Nasibullov
ABSTRACT
Recently, the comprehensive utilization of digital technologies in higher education has revealed a number of problem areas that must be addressed in the near future. These issues include the provision of high-quality educational material that meets the criteria for updating the content of higher education, the adoption of digital formats for evaluating students' achievements, psychological support for students in digital learning, the instruction of individuals with special educational needs, and the provision of student technical equipment in digital-learning conditions. To resolve these issues, three strategies must be employed: technical, systemic, and health-saving. Through the employment of digital technology in education, these techniques will enable the most effective structuring of the educational process. The study's goal is to create a complete model for the application of instructional, corrective, health-improving, and health-saving actions with students in the context of digital learning at a university. Instructors, teachers, and students pursuing pedagogical studies may find the research material valuable.
- Alger, M., Jordan, J., Velegol, D. 2019. Digitally Coupled Learning and Innovation Processes. ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2019 58 (50), 22445-22455.Google Scholar
- Amhag, L., Hellström, L., Stigmar, M. 2019. Teacher Educators' Use of Digital Tools and Needs for Digital Competence in Higher Education, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35, 4, 203-220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 17.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. 2001. Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. In Introduction: Making the move to peer learning. Routledge. 196 p.Google Scholar
- Chatti, M.A., Agustiawan, M.R., Jarke, M., & Specht, M. 2010. Toward a personal learning environment framework. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(4), 66-85.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chen, R. 2010. Investigating models for pre-service teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32-42.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gabdulchakov, V.F., Kusainov, A.K. & Kalimullin, A.M. 2016. Education Reform at the Science University and the New Strategy for Training Science Teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, Volume 11, Issue 3, 163-172.Google Scholar
- Kaku M. 2011. Physics of the Future: How Science Will Shape Human Destiny and our Daily Lives by the Year 2100 New-York, London, Toronto: Doubleday, 542 p.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, M., & Dunn, T. J. 2018. Improving the Use of Technology Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education in the UK: A Qualitative Visualization of Students’ Views. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 76-89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lisitskaya, L.G., Tkachenko, I.V., Evdokimova, E.V., Pavlenko, I.V. 2015. Training of Future Teachers by Means of Humanities in the Light of Teacher's Professional Standard. The Social Sciences, 10: 2131-2135.Google Scholar
- Mannila, L., Nordén, L., Pears, A. 2018. Digital Competence, Teacher Self-Efficacy and Training Needs. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 78–85.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Niess M.L. 2005. Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shaidullina, A. R., Sheymardanov, S. F., Ganieva, Y. N., Yakovlev, S. A., Khairullina, E. R., Biktemirova, M. K., & Kashirina, I. B. 2015. The Peculiarities of the Advanced Training of the Future Specialists for the Competitive High-Tech Industry in the Process of Integration of Education, Science and Industry. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (2 S3), 43.Google Scholar
- Ungar, O.A., & Baruch, A.F. 2016. Perceptions of teacher educators regarding ICT implementation. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Life Long Learning, 12, 279-296.Google Scholar
- Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & Van Braak, J. 2013. Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wu, Y.T., & Wang, L.-J. 2015. The exploration of elementary school teachers’ internet self-efficacy and information commitments: A study in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 18 (1), 211-222.Google Scholar
- Webb M. & Cox M. 2004 A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 235-286.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wiliam, D. 2013. Assessment: The bridge between teaching and learning. Voices from the Middle, 21(2), 15.Google Scholar
- Zhu, Z.T., Yu, M.H. & Riezebos, P. 2016. A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 4.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A Digital Learning Model for Teacher Education: Implementation Experience.
Recommendations
Blended learning at pre-service teacher education in Turkey: A systematic review
The literature shows an increase in blended learning implementations (Ný=ý74) at faculties of education in Turkey whereas pre-service and in-service teachers' ICT competencies have been identified as one of the areas where they are in need of ...
A review of empirical research on blended learning in teacher education programs
Although blended learning has been considered as an important alternative approach that can overcome various limitations related to both face-to-face and online learning, there is relatively limited empirical studies on blended learning approach in ...
Comments