skip to main content
10.1145/3597638.3608409acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding Challenges and Opportunities in Body Movement Education of People who are Blind or have Low Vision

Published:22 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Actively participating in body movement such as dance, sports, and fitness activities is challenging for people who are blind or have low vision (BLV). Teachers primarily rely on verbal instructions and physical demonstrations with limited accessibility. Recent work shows that technology can support body movement education for BLV people. However, there is limited involvement with the BLV community and their teachers to understand their needs. By conducting a series of two surveys, 23 interviews and four focus groups, we gather the voices and perspectives of BLV people and their teachers. This provides a rich understanding of the challenges of body movement education. We identify ten major themes, four key design challenges, and propose potential solutions. We encourage the assistive technologies community to co-design potential solutions to these identified design challenges promoting the quality of life of BLV people and supporting the teachers in the provision of inclusive education.

References

  1. Jack A. Adams. 1987. Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills.Psychological Bulletin 101, 1 (Jan. 1987), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.41Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Marco Aggravi, Gionata Salvietti, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2016. Haptic Assistive Bracelets for Blind Skier Guidance. In Proceedings of the 7th Augmented Human International Conference 2016(AH ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2875194.2875249Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Majed Al Zayer, Sam Tregillus, Jiwan Bhandari, Dave Feil-Seifer, and Eelke Folmer. 2016. Exploring the Use of a Drone to Guide Blind Runners. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Reno, Nevada, USA) (ASSETS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 263–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982204Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tomohiro Amemiya and Hisashi Sugiyama. 2010. Orienting Kinesthetically: A Haptic Handheld Wayfinder for People with Visual Impairments. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 3, 2 (Nov. 2010), 6:1–6:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/1857920.1857923Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cédric Anthierens, Didier Groux, and Vincent Hugel. 2018. Sensory navigation guide for visually impaired sea kayakers. Journal of Field Robotics 35, 5 (2018), 732–747.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Halim Cagri Ates, Alexander Fiannaca, and Eelke Folmer. 2015. Immersive Simulation of Visual Impairments Using a Wearable See-through Display. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680551Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Maryam Bandukda, Catherine Holloway, Aneesha Singh, Giulia Barbareschi, and Nadia Berthouze. 2021. Opportunities for Supporting Self-Efficacy Through Orientation & Mobility Training Technologies for Blind and Partially Sighted People. In Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Virtual Event, USA) (ASSETS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 32, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471224Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Albert Bandura. 1997. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W.H. Freeman, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tiziana Battistin, Nadir Dalla Pozza, Silvia Trentin, Giovanni Volpin, Andrea Franceschini, and Antonio Rodà. 2023. Co-designed mini-games for children with visual impairment: a pilot study on their usability. Multimedia Tools and Applications 82, 4 (Feb. 2023), 5291–5313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13665-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the "Other". In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Andreas Bergsland and Robert Wechsler. 2015. Composing Interactive Dance Pieces for the MotionComposer, a Device for Persons with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA) (NIME 2015). The School of Music and the Center for Computation and Technology (CCT), Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, 20–23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Faine Bisset. 2016. The lived experience of university students with visual impairments and their sighted partners’ participation in inclusive social ballroom dance. Ph. D. Dissertation. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Aditya Bodi, Pooyan Fazli, Shasta Ihorn, Yue-Ting Siu, Andrew T Scott, Lothar Narins, Yash Kant, Abhishek Das, and Ilmi Yoon. 2021. Automated Video Description for Blind and Low Vision Users. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451810Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Boni Boswell, Bomna Ko, and Seok Yoon. 2022. Experiences and motivations of dancers with and without disabilities in inclusive dance. Sport, Education and Society (03 2022), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2047018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Braille Authority of North America (BANA). 2010. Guidelines and Standards for Tactile Graphics. The Braille Authority of North America, USA. http://www.brailleauthority.org/tg/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacinta Brinsley, Matthew Smout, and Kade Davison. 2021. Satisfaction with Online Versus In-Person Yoga During COVID-19. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 27, 10 (Oct. 2021), 893–896. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2021.0062 Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Phoebe Brosnan, Maya Nauphal, and Martha C. Tompson. 2021. Acceptability and feasibility of the online delivery of hatha yoga: A systematic review of the literature. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 60 (Aug. 2021), 102742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Audun Brunes, Eli Krokstad, and Liv Berit Augestad. 2017. How to succeed? Physical activity for individuals who are blind. British Journal of Visual Impairment 35, 3 (2017), 264–274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Matthew Butler, Leona Holloway, Samuel Reinders, Cagatay Goncu, and Kim Marriott. 2021. Technology Developments in Touch-Based Accessible Graphics: A Systematic Review of Research 2010-2020. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445207Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Michele Capella-McDonnall. 2007. The need for health promotion for adults who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 101, 3 (2007), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0710100302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Triston Cooper, Heather Lai, and Jenna Gorlewicz. 2022. Do You Hear What I Hear: The Balancing Act of Designing an Electronic Hockey Puck for Playing Hockey Non-Visually. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 15, 1 (March 2022), 4:1–4:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3507660Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. José Rodrigues Dias, Rui Penha, Leonel Morgado, Pedro Alves da Veiga, Elizabeth Simão Carvalho, and Adérito Fernandes-Marcos. 2019. Tele-Media-Art:Feasibility Tests of Web-Based Dance Education for the Blind Using Kinect and Sound Synthesis of Motion. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI) 15, 2 (2019), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.2019040102 Publisher: IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Qicheng Ding, Jiangtao Gong, Jingwei Sun, Penghui Xu, Liuxin Zhang, Qianying Wang, and Yu Zhang. 2019. HeliCoach: A Drone-Based System Supporting Orientation and Mobility Training for the Visually Impaired. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312763Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Margaret P. Duggar. 1968. What Can Dance Be to Someone who Cannot See?Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation 39, 5 (May 1968), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221473.1968.10611719Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Josée Duquette, Mathieu Douville, Khatoune Temisjian, Laura Steinmander, Guylaine Cataford, Tiiu Poldma, Jacques Gresset, Rosa Pinniger, Rhonda Brown, Jacqueline Simpson, 2012. Tango Through Different Eyes: Adapting Tango Classes for Seniors with Visual Impairment. INLB, Longueuil Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Polly K. Edman. 1992. Tactile Graphics. AFB Press, Arlington, VA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferhat Esatbeyoglu, Tn Kirk, and Justin A Haegele. 2021. “Like I’m flying”: Capoeira dance experiences of youth with visual impairments. British Journal of Visual Impairment (Nov. 2021), 026461962110597. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196211059756Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Itamar Rocha Filho, Felipe Honorato, J. Wallace Lucena, J. Pedro Teixeira, and Tiago Maritan. 2021. An Approach for Automatic Description of Characters for Blind People. In Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web(WebMedia ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3470482.3479617Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Eelke Folmer. 2015. Exploring the use of an aerial robot to guide blind runners. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing112 (July 2015), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809915.2809916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. S. Ford and T. Minshall. 2019. Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Additive Manufacturing 25 (2019), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sally French. 1992. Simulation Exercises in Disability Awareness Training: A Critique. Disability, Handicap & Society 7, 3 (Jan. 1992), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780261Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Louise Fryer. 2016. An Introduction to Audio Description: A practical guide. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wei Gai, Meng Qi, Lu Wang, Chenglei Yang, Juan Liu, Yulong Bian, Gerard De Melo, Shijun Liu, and Xiangxu Meng. 2019. Catch the Shadow: Person Tracking Under Occlusion with a Single RGB-D Camera. In 2019 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI). 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATC-SCALCOM-IOP-SCI.2019.00114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Claire Garrett. [n. d.]. Andy Dreams. https://childsply.wixsite.com/catalogue/product-page/andy-dreamsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Barbara Gasperetti, Matthew Milford, Danielle Blanchard, Stephen P. Yang, Lauren Lieberman, and John T. Foley. 2010. Dance Dance Revolution and EyeToy Kinetic Modifications for Youths with Visual Impairments. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 81, 4 (April 2010), 15–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2010.10598459Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Joy Goodman-Deane, Patrick M. Langdon, P. John Clarkson, Nicholas HM Caldwell, and Ahmed M. Sarhan. 2007. Equipping Designers by Simulating the Effects of Visual and Hearing Impairments. In Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Tempe, Arizona, USA) (Assets ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 241–242. https://doi.org/10.1145/1296843.1296892Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Darren Guinness, Annika Muehlbradt, Daniel Szafir, and Shaun K. Kane. 2019. RoboGraphics: Dynamic Tactile Graphics Powered by Mobile Robots. In Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353804Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Justin A Haegele and Lauren J Lieberman. 2019. Movement and visual impairment: Research and practice. In The Routledge handbook of visual impairment. Routledge, 189–201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Liang He, Ruolin Wang, and Xuhai Xu. 2020. PneuFetch: Supporting Blind and Visually Impaired People to Fetch Nearby Objects via Light Haptic Cues. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383095Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Elizabeth A. Holbrook, Jennifer L. Caputo, Tara L. Perry, Dana K. Fuller, and Don W. Morgan. 2009. Physical Activity, Body Composition, and Perceived Quality of Life of Adults with Visual Impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 103, 1 (Jan. 2009), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0910300104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Leona Holloway, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Matthew Butler, Madhuka Thisuri De Silva, Kirsten Ellis, Cagatay Goncu, Kate Stephens, and Kim Marriott. 2022. Animations at Your Fingertips: Using a Refreshable Tactile Display to Convey Motion Graphics for People who are Blind or have Low Vision. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544797Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Jonggi Hong, Alisha Pradhan, Jon E. Froehlich, and Leah Findlater. 2017. Evaluating Wrist-Based Haptic Feedback for Non-Visual Target Finding and Path Tracing on a 2D Surface. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Stephan Huber, Anastasia Alieva, and Aaron Lutz. 2022. Vibrotactile Navigation for Visually Impaired People. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Athens, Greece) (ASSETS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 86, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3550387Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Elisabeth Hästbacka, Mikael Nygård, and Fredrica Nyqvist. 2016. Barriers and facilitators to societal participation of people with disabilities: A scoping review of studies concerning European countries. Alter 10, 3 (July 2016), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2016.02.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Kristina Höök, Steve Benford, Paul Tennent, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Miquel Alfaras, Juan Martinez Avila, Christine Li, Joseph Marshall, Claudia Daudén Roquet, Pedro Sanches, Anna Ståhl, Muhammad Umair, Charles Windlin, and Feng Zhou. 2021. Unpacking Non-Dualistic Design: The Soma Design Case. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 6 (Dec. 2021), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462448Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Alon Ilsar and Gail Kenning. 2020. Inclusive improvisation through sound and movement mapping: from DMI to ADMI. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416988Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Gesu India, Mohit Jain, and Manohar Swaminathan. 2021. Understanding Motivations and Barriers to Exercise Among People with Blindness in India. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Carmelo Ardito, Rosa Lanzilotti, Alessio Malizia, Helen Petrie, Antonio Piccinno, Giuseppe Desolda, and Kori Inkpen (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85623-6_27Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Eva A. Jaarsma, Rienk Dekker, Steven A. Koopmans, Pieter U. Dijkstra, and Jan H. B. Geertzen. 2014. Barriers to and facilitators of sports participation in people with visual impairments. Adapted physical activity quarterly: APAQ 31, 3 (July 2014), 240–264. https://doi.org/10.1123/2013-0119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Myounghoon Jeon, Nazneen Nazneen, Ozum Akanser, Abner Ayala-Acevedo, and Bruce Walker. 2012. "Listen2dRoom": helping blind individuals understand room layouts. In CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1577–1582. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223675Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Lucy Jiang and Richard Ladner. 2022. Co-Designing Systems to Support Blind and Low Vision Audio Description Writers. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3550394Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Luiz Alberto Queiroz Cordovil Júnior, Gabriel Tadayoshi Rodrigues Oka, Moisés Pereira Bastos, Renan Lima Baima, Nilton Cesar Ferst, Ana Carolina Oliveira Lima, Ana Isabel Martins, and Nelson Pacheco Rocha. 2022. Trajectory Correction for Visually Impaired Athletes on 100 m Paralympic Races. In Comprehensible Science(Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems), Tatiana Antipova (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85799-8_33Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Jeeeun Kim and Tom Yeh. 2015. Toward 3D-Printed Movable Tactile Pictures for Children with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2815–2824. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702144Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Shin Kim, Kun-pyo Lee, and Tek-Jin Nam. 2016. Sonic-Badminton: Audio-Augmented Badminton Game for Blind People. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1922–1929. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892510Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Eunjeong Ko, Jin Sun Ju, and Eun Yi Kim. 2011. Situation-based indoor wayfinding system for the visually impaired. In The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility(ASSETS ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049545Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Makoto Kobayashi and Hisayuki Tatsumi. 2021. Floor-Volleyball Motion Feedback System for Visually Impaired Players. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers(ICETC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/3436756.3437020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Masaki Kuribayashi, Seita Kayukawa, Hironobu Takagi, Chieko Asakawa, and Shigeo Morishima. 2021. LineChaser: A Smartphone-Based Navigation System for Blind People to Stand in Lines. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 33, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445451Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Steve Landau. 2013. An Interactive web-based tool for sorting textbook images prior to adaptation to accessible format: Year 1 Final Report. (2013). http://diagramcenter.org/decision-tree.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Matthieu Lapeyre, Pierre Rouanet, Jonathan Grizou, Steve Nguyen, Fabien Depraetre, Alexandre Le Falher, and Pierre-Yves Oudeyer. 2014. Poppy Project: Open-Source Fabrication of 3D Printed Humanoid Robot for Science, Education and Art. 6. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01096338Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Miyoung Lee, Weimo Zhu, Elizabeth Ackley-Holbrook, Diana G. Brower, and Bryan McMurray. 2014. Calibration and validation of the Physical Activity Barrier Scale for persons who are blind or visually impaired. Disability and Health Journal 7, 3 (July 2014), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.02.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Lauren J. Lieberman, Cathy Houston-Wilson, and Francis M. Kozub. 2002. Perceived Barriers to Including Students with Visual Impairments in General Physical Education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 19, 3 (July 2002), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.19.3.364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Shelby K Long, Nicole D Karpinsky, Hilal Döner, and Jeremiah D Still. 2016. Using a mobile application to help visually impaired individuals explore the outdoors. In Advances in Design for Inclusion: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Design for Inclusion, July 27-31, 2016, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA. Springer, Springer, Cham, 213–223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Jeehan Malik, Mitchell Majure, Hana Gabrielle Rubio Bidon, Regan Lamoureux, and Kyle Rector. 2021. Increasing Access to Trainer-led Aerobic Exercise for People with Visual Impairments through a Sensor Mat System. In Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3476557Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Marcella Mandanici and Antonio Rodà. 2020. Large-Scale Interactive Environments for Mobility Training and Experience Sharing of Blind Children. In Technological Trends in Improved Mobility of the Visually Impaired, Sara Paiva (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16450-8_12Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Bogusław Marek. 2011. Playing and learning with Fleximan. Retrieved April 26, 2023 from https://hungryfingers.com/fleximan.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. José Marmeleira and Luis Laranjo. 2020. Physical activity for adults with visual impairments: Benefits, barriers, and intervention strategies. In Movement and Visual Impairment. Routledge, 115–130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. José Marmeleira, Luis Laranjo, Olga Marques, and Catarina Pereira. 2014. Physical Activity Patterns in Adults Who Are Blind as Assessed by Accelerometry. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 31, 3 (July 2014), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.2013-0039Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Daniel J. McDonough, Melina A. Helgeson, Wenxi Liu, and Zan Gao. 2022. Effects of a remote, YouTube-delivered exercise intervention on young adults’ physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Sport and Health Science 11, 2 (March 2022), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.07.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Takahiro Miura, Masaya Fujito, Masaki Matsuo, Masatsugu Sakajiri, Junji Onishi, and Tsukasa Ono. 2018. AcouSTTic: A training application of acoustic sense on Sound Table Tennis (STT). In Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 16th International Conference, ICCHP 2018, Linz, Austria, July 11-13, 2018, Proceedings, Part II 16. Springer, Springer, Cham, 3–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Takahiro Miura, Shimpei Soga, Masaki Matsuo, Masatsugu Sakajiri, Junji Onishi, and Tsukasa Ono. 2018. GoalBaural: A Training Application for Goalball-related Aural Sense. In Proceedings of the 9th Augmented Human International Conference(AH ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3174910.3174916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Anthony Morelli. 2010. Haptic/audio based exergaming for visually impaired individuals. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing96 (Jan. 2010), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/1731849.1731859Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Tony Morelli, John Foley, Luis Columna, Lauren Lieberman, and Eelke Folmer. 2010. VI-Tennis: a vibrotactile/audio exergame for players who are visually impaired. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games(FDG ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/1822348.1822368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Tony Morelli, John Foley, and Eelke Folmer. 2010. Vi-bowling: a tactile spatial exergame for individuals with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility(ASSETS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Annika Muehlbradt, Varsha Koushik, and Shaun K. Kane. 2017. Goby: A Wearable Swimming Aid for Blind Athletes. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 377–378. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134822Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. David Mycock and Gyozo Molnar. 2020. ’The blind leading the blind’-A reflection on coaching blind football. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity 14, 3 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Mallikarjuna N. Nadagouda, Vandita Rastogi, and Megan Ginn. 2020. A review on 3D printing techniques for medical applications. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 28 (June 2020), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.05.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Rosiana Natalie, Jolene Loh, Huei Suen Tan, Joshua Tseng, Ian Luke Yi-Ren Chan, Ebrima H Jarjue, Hernisa Kacorri, and Kotaro Hara. 2021. The Efficacy of Collaborative Authoring of Video Scene Descriptions. In Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Megan O’Connell, Lauren J. Lieberman, and Susan Petersen. 2006. The use of Tactile Modeling and Physical Guidance as Instructional Strategies in Physical Activity for Children who are Blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 100, 8 (Aug. 2006), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0610000804Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2009. (2 ed.). 141–145 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Round Table on Information Access for People with Print Disabilities Inc.2022. Guidelines for Producing Accessible Graphics. Round Table on Information Access for People with Print Disabilities Inc.,, Pyrmont, NSW, Australia. https://printdisability.org/guidelines/graphics-2022/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Jonathan Oommen, David Bews, Mohsen Sheikh Hassani, Yuu Ono, and James R. Green. 2018. A Wearable Electronic Swim Coach for Blind Athletes. In 2018 IEEE Life Sciences Conference (LSC). 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSC.2018.8572105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Aparna Padman, Jisha D. Saiju, Prabitha Prasad, Sheethu Gopal, and P.P. Hema. 2020. Location Tracking for Blind Swimmers. In 2020 International Conference on Power Electronics and Renewable Energy Applications (PEREA). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/PEREA51218.2020.9339790Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Dominika Palivcová, Miroslav Macík, and Zdeněk Míkovec. 2020. Interactive Tactile Map as a Tool for Building Spatial Knowledge of Visually Impaired Older Adults. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382912Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Steve Paxton, Anne Kilcoyne, and Kate Mount. 1993. On the Braille in the Body: An Account of the Touchdown Dance Integrated Workshops with the Visually Impaired and the Sighted. Dance Research 11, 1 (April 1993), 3–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290603Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Mahika Phutane, Julie Wright, Brenda Veronica Castro, Lei Shi, Simone R. Stern, Holly M. Lawson, and Shiri Azenkot. 2022. Tactile Materials in Practice: Understanding the Experiences of Teachers of the Visually Impaired. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 15, 3, Article 17 (jul 2022), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3508364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Joseph Ramsay and Hyung Jin Chang. 2020. Body Pose Sonification for a View-Independent Auditory Aid to Blind Rock Climbers. In 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). 3403–3410. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV45572.2020.9093462 ISSN: 2642-9381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Kyle Rector. 2020. Technological advances (1 ed.). Routledge, 161–172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Kyle Rector, Rachel Bartlett, and Sean Mullan. 2018. Exploring Aural and Haptic Feedback for Visually Impaired People on a Track: A Wizard of Oz Study. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Galway, Ireland) (ASSETS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236345Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Kyle Rector, Lauren Milne, Richard E. Ladner, Batya Friedman, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges with Exercise Technologies for People who are Blind or Low-Vision. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility(ASSETS ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809846Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Kyle Rector, Roger Vilardaga, Leo Lansky, Kellie Lu, Cynthia L. Bennett, Richard E. Ladner, and Julie A. Kientz. 2017. Design and Real-World Evaluation of Eyes-Free Yoga: An Exergame for Blind and Low-Vision Exercise. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 9, 4 (April 2017), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022729Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Mike Richardson, Karin Petrini, and Michael Proulx. 2022. Climb-o-Vision: A Computer Vision Driven Sensory Substitution Device for Rock Climbing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519680Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Masaaki Sadasue, Daichi Tagami, Sayan Sarcar, and Yoichi Ochiai. 2021. Blind-Badminton. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Media, Learning and Assistive Environments(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Margherita Antona and Constantine Stephanidis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78095-1_36Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Jayesh Saini and Esyin Chew. 2022. The Role of 3D-Technologies in Humanoid Robotics: A Systematic Review for 3D-Printing in Modern Social Robots. In Recent Trends in Mechatronics Towards Industry 4.0(Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering), Ahmad Fakhri Ab. Nasir, Ahmad Najmuddin Ibrahim, Ismayuzri Ishak, Nafrizuan Mat Yahya, Muhammad Aizzat Zakaria, and Anwar P. P. Abdul Majeed (Eds.). Springer, Singapore, 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4597-3_26Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Johnny Saldaña. 2021. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2021), 1–440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Anthony Scavarelli and Robert J. Teather. 2017. VR Collide! Comparing Collision-Avoidance Methods Between Co-Located Virtual Reality Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI EA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2915–2921. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053180Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Jenny Seham. 2012. Dance partners: A model of inclusive arts education for children and teens with different abilities. The intersection of arts education and special education: Exemplary programs and approaches (2012), 81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Jenny Seham and Anna J. Yeo. 2015. Extending Our Vision: Access to Inclusive Dance Education for People with Visual Impairment. Journal of Dance Education 15, 3 (July 2015), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2015.1059940Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Samridha Shrestha, Daohan Lu, Hanlin Tian, Qiming Cao, Julie Liu, John-Ross Rizzo, William H Seiple, Maurizio Porfiri, and Yi Fang. 2020. Active crowd analysis for pandemic risk mitigation for blind or visually impaired persons. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020 Workshops: Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part IV 16. Springer, 422–439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Yue-Ting Siu. 2019. Foundations and recommendations for research in access technology. In The Routledge Handbook of Visual Impairment (1 ed.), John Ravenscroft (Ed.). Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019. | Series: Routledge international handbooks, 205–219. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315111353-14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Joel Snyder. 2014. The Visual Made Verbal: A Comprehensive Training Manual and Guide to the History and Applications of Audio Description. American Council of the Blind. https://adp.acb.org/articles/TheVisualMadeVerbal.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Yoonji Song and Jiye Kim. 2015. Mingle: Wearable Devices for Enhancing Communications and Activities between the Blind and Ordinary People through a Waltz. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2725435Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Brooke E. Starkoff, Elizabeth K. Lenz, Lauren Lieberman, and John Foley. 2016. Sedentary behavior in adults with visual impairments. Disability and Health Journal 9, 4 (Oct. 2016), 609–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.05.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Saiganesh Swaminathan, Yellina Yim, Scott E Hudson, Cynthia L Bennett, and Patrick Carrington. 2021. From Tactile to NavTile: Opportunities and Challenges with Multi-Modal Feedback for Guiding Surfaces during Non-Visual Navigation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445716Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Sheng Tan, Linghan Zhang, Zi Wang, and Jie Yang. 2019. MultiTrack: Multi-User Tracking and Activity Recognition Using Commodity WiFi. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300766Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Garreth W. Tigwell. 2021. Nuanced Perspectives Toward Disability Simulations from Digital Designers, Blind, Low Vision, and Color Blind People. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 378, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445620Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Wendy Timmons and John Ravenscroft. 2019. Using expressive movement and haptics to explore kinaesthetic empathy, aesthetic and physical literacy. In The Routledge Handbook of Visual Impairment (1 ed.), John Ravenscroft (Ed.). Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019. | Series: Routledge international handbooks, 275–287. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315111353-18Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. Yujia Wang, Wei Liang, Haikun Huang, Yongqi Zhang, Dingzeyu Li, and Lap-Fai Yu. 2021. Toward Automatic Audio Description Generation for Accessible Videos. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445347Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Michiharu Watanabe, Takahiro Miura, Masaki Matsuo, Masatsugu Sakajiri, and Junji Onishi. 2022. GoalBaural-II: An Acoustic Virtual Reality Training Application for Goalball Players to Recognize Various Game Conditions. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Klaus Miesenberger, Georgios Kouroupetroglou, Katerina Mavrou, Roberto Manduchi, Mario Covarrubias Rodriguez, and Petr Penáz (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_10Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Tim Weissker, Pauline Bimberg, and Bernd Froehlich. 2021. An Overview of Group Navigation in Multi-User Virtual Reality. In 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00073Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. Chi-Jui Wu, Steven Houben, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2017. EagleSense: Tracking People and Devices in Interactive Spaces Using Real-Time Top-View Depth-Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3929–3942. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025562Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Tina Yao, Soojeong Yoo, and Callum Parker. 2022. Evaluating Virtual Reality as a Tool for Empathic Modelling of Vision Impairment: Insights from a Simulated Public Interactive Display Experience. In Proceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) (OzCHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/3520495.3520519Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. Zhen Ye, Aishe Dun, Hanming Jiang, Cuifang Nie, Shulian Zhao, Tao Wang, and Jing Zhai. 2020. The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education 20, 1 (Sept. 2020), 335. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02242-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  112. Beste F. Yuksel, Soo Jung Kim, Seung Jung Jin, Joshua Junhee Lee, Pooyan Fazli, Umang Mathur, Vaishali Bisht, Ilmi Yoon, Yue-Ting Siu, and Joshua A. Miele. 2020. Increasing Video Accessibility for Visually Impaired Users with Human-in-the-Loop Machine Learning. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Qing Zhang, Giulia Barbareschi, Yifei Huang, Juling Li, Yun Suen Pai, Jamie Ward, and Kai Kunze. 2022. Seeing Our Blind Spots: Smart Glasses-Based Simulation to Increase Design Students’ Awareness of Visual Impairment. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Bend, OR, USA) (UIST ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 42, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526113.3545687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Michelle R. Zitomer. 2016. ‘Dance Makes Me Happy’: experiences of children with disabilities in elementary school dance education. Research in Dance Education 17, 3 (Sept. 2016), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2016.1223028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Challenges and Opportunities in Body Movement Education of People who are Blind or have Low Vision

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ASSETS '23: Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
      October 2023
      1163 pages
      ISBN:9798400702204
      DOI:10.1145/3597638

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ASSETS '23 Paper Acceptance Rate55of182submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)162
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)51

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format