skip to main content
10.1145/3597512.3597528acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagestasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Responsible AI and the Arts: The Ethical and Legal Implications of AI in the Arts and Creative Industries

Published:11 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This position piece starts to examine the ways in which AI-based autonomous technologies have begun to influence a range of human activities in the arts and creative industries.The rise of AI-generated art could potentially transform the act of creation and impact our understandings of creativity – from painting, writing, and music composition, to video animation. At the same time, there is increasing debate about the social, ethical, and legal implications of using these tools (eg copyright, biased data sets, devaluing artistic processes). Responsible Innovation (RI) could have a crucial role to play in understanding and responding to the complexity of debates.

We will explore and unpack how artists, AI developers and associated audiences/consumers of art have started to approach some of these issues. We will use these ideas as a starting point to explicate and further develop discourses surrounding the challenges associated with these technologies in the context of the creative industries. Finally, we will investigate how and if these challenges might be addressed.

References

  1. Christine Aicardi, Lise Bitsch, Saheli Datta Burton, Kathinka Evers, Michele Farisco, Tara Mahfoud, Nikolas Rose, Achim Rosemann, Arleen Salles, Bernd Stahl, and Inga Ulnicane. 2021. Opinion on Trust and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence - Ethics&Society, The Human Brain Project. (Nov. 2021). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4588648 Publisher: Zenodo.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Edwards Benji. 2022. Artist finds private medical record photos in popular AI training data set. Arstechnica (Sept. 2022). https://arstechnica-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/09/artist-finds-private-medical-record-photos-in-popular-ai-training-data-set/amp/?fbclid=IwAR2JUxsvbViz0b783SAum4HCcLEe0Do8IP5BpS4KuC0J4RImkr12txi90tUGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Vittoria Benzine. 2022. ’A.I. Should Exclude Living Artists From Its Database,’ Says One Painter Whose Works Were Used to Fuel Image Generators. Artnet News (Sept. 2022). https://news.artnet.com/art-world/a-i-should-exclude-living-artists-from-its-database-says-one-painter-whose-works-were-used-to-fuel-image-generators-2178352 Section: Science & Tech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Enrico Bonadio and Nicola Lucchi. 2019. How Far Can Copyright Be Stretched? Framing the Debate on Whether New and Different Forms of Creativity Can Be Protected. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3495223Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E. Bonadio and L. McDonagh. 2020. Artificial Intelligence as Producer and Consumer of Copyright Works: Evaluating the Consequences of Algorithmic Creativity. Intellectual Property Quarterly 2 (April 2020), 112–137. http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=380&productid=6791 Publisher: Sweet and Maxwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dan Burk. 2019. Algorithmic Fair Use. University of Chicago Law Review 86, 2 (March 2019). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol86/iss2/10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sian Cain. 2023. ‘This song sucks’: Nick Cave responds to ChatGPT song written in style of Nick Cave. The Guardian (Jan. 2023). https://www.theguardian.com/music/2023/jan/17/this-song-sucks-nick-cave-responds-to-chatgpt-song-written-in-style-of-nick-caveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Theodoros Chiou. 2022. Copyright ownership challenge arising from AI-generated works of art: A time to stand and stare. In Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage. Edward Elgar Publishing, 250–273. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781800376915/book-part-9781800376915-21.xml Section: Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabriele Dente. 2023. Solar (the history of humanity drawn by machines). https://www.gabrieledente.it/projects-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ahmed Elgamal. 2018. AI Is Blurring the Definition of Artist. American Scientist (Dec. 2018). https://www.americanscientist.org/article/ai-is-blurring-the-definition-of-artistGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. European Union Intellectual Property Office.2022. Study on the impact of artificial intelligence on the infringement and enforcement of copyright and designs.Publications Office, LU. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2814/062663Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans. 2023. Is this Australia’s most controversial photo?news (Feb. 2023). https://www.news.com.au/technology/gadgets/cameras/man-or-machine-is-this-australias-most-controversial-photo/news-story/bfd17c03d661d7b1a41aba3e64205e31 Section: News.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sean M. Fiil-Flynn, Brandon Butler, Michael Carroll, Or Cohen-Sasson, Carys Craig, Lucie Guibault, Peter Jaszi, Bernd Justin Jütte, Ariel Katz, João Pedro Quintais, Thomas Margoni, Allan Rocha de Souza, Matthew Sag, Rachael Samberg, Luca Schirru, Martin Senftleben, Ofer Tur-Sinai, and Jorge L. Contreras. 2022. Legal reform to enhance global text and data mining research. Science 378, 6623 (2022), 951–953. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add6124 _eprint: https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.add6124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Joss Fong. 2022. The text-to-image revolution, explained. Vox (June 2022). https://www.vox.com/23150422/text-to-image-ai-deep-learningGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Katherine B. Forrest. 2018. Copyright Law and Artificial Intelligence: Emerging Issues. Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 65 (2018), 355. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jocoso65&id=409&div=&collection=Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitch Goodwin. 2022. Synthetic futures: my journey into the emotional, poetic world of AI art making. The Conversation (Oct. 2022). http://theconversation.com/synthetic-futures-my-journey-into-the-emotional-poetic-world-of-ai-art-making-188533Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Drew Harwell. 2022. He used AI to win a fine-arts competition. Was it cheating?Washington Post (Sept. 2022). https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/midjourney-artificial-intelligence-state-fair-colorado/ Section: Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Aaron Hertzmann. 2022. Give this AI a few words of description and it produces a stunning image – but is it art?The Conversation (June 2022). http://theconversation.com/give-this-ai-a-few-words-of-description-and-it-produces-a-stunning-image-but-is-it-art-184363Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Khari Johnson. 2023. Chatbots Got Big—and Their Ethical Red Flags Got Bigger. Wired (Feb. 2023). https://www.wired.com/story/chatbots-got-big-and-their-ethical-red-flags-got-bigger/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonathan Jones. 2022. Incoherent, creepy and gorgeous: we asked six leading artists to make work using AI – and here are the results. The Guardian (Dec. 2022). https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2022/dec/01/six-leading-british-artists-making-art-with-aiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Molly Killeen. 2023. Generative AI keeps creative industries on their toes. www.euractiv.com (Jan. 2023). https://www.euractiv.com/section/artificial-intelligence/news/generative-ai-keeps-creative-industries-on-their-toes/ Section: Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. David Leslie, Christopher Burr, Mhairi Aitken, Michael Katell, Morgan Briggs, and Cami Rincon. 2021. Human Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law Assurance Framework for AI Systems: A Proposal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4027875Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Theodore McKenzie. 2022. The Crow: An AI Film that Won Cannes Short Film Festival. (Sept. 2022). https://80.lv/articles/the-crow-an-ai-film-that-won-cannes-short-film-festival/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rachel Metz. 2022. These artists found out their work was used to train AI. Now they’re furious | CNN Business. CNN (Oct. 2022). https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/21/tech/artists-ai-images/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Péter Mezei. 2021. ’You AIn’t Seen Nothing yet’ – Arguments against the Protectability of AI-generated Outputs by Copyright Law. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3890051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Piotr Mirowski, Kory W. Mathewson, Jaylen Pittman, and Richard Evans. 2022. Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: An Evaluation by Industry Professionals. http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14958 arXiv:2209.14958 [cs].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Nik Popli. 2022. He Made A Children’s Book Using AI. Artists Are Not Happy. Time (Dec. 2022). https://time.com/6240569/ai-childrens-book-alice-and-sparkle-artists-unhappy/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kevin Roose. 2022. An A.I.-Generated Picture Won an Art Prize. Artists Aren’t Happy.The New York Times (Sept. 2022). https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-intelligence-artists.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sigal Samuel. 2022. A new AI draws delightful and not-so-delightful images. Vox (April 2022). https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23023538/ai-dalle-2-openai-bias-gpt-3-incentivesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sarah Shaffi. 2023. ‘It’s the opposite of art’: why illustrators are furious about AI. The Guardian (Jan. 2023). https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/jan/23/its-the-opposite-of-art-why-illustrators-are-furious-about-aiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Chris Smith. 2022. Coding and chatbot AI trump Turing test. (Dec. 2022). https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/interviews/coding-and-chatbot-ai-trump-turing-test Section: Interviews with scientists.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tracey Spicer. 2023. AI art replicates inequity at scale. We need to learn about its biases – and outsmart the algorithm. The Guardian (Feb. 2023). https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/feb/24/ai-art-replicates-inequity-at-scale-we-need-to-learn-about-its-biases-and-outsmart-the-algorithmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jack Stilgoe, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42, 9 (Nov. 2013), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Vox. 2022. Bonus video: What AI art means for human artists. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFBfrZ-N3G4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Richard Whiddington. 2023. Digital Artist Refik Anadol Has Hypnotized the World With His Swirling A.I. Art Landscapes—Here Are 5 Essential Works to Know. Artnet News (Feb. 2023). https://news.artnet.com/art-world/5-refik-anadol-works-to-know-2259071 Section: Art World.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Shlomit Yanisky-Ravid. 2017. Generating Rembrandt: Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Accountability in the 3A Era–The Human-like Authors are Already Here- A New Model. Mich. St. L. Rev. 2017 (Jan. 2017), 659. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/956Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Kayla Yup, Jan 23, and 2023. 2023. What AI art means for society, according to Yale experts. Yale Daily News (Jan. 2023). https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2023/01/23/what-ai-art-means-for-society-according-to-yale-experts/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Responsible AI and the Arts: The Ethical and Legal Implications of AI in the Arts and Creative Industries

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        TAS '23: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems
        July 2023
        426 pages
        ISBN:9798400707346
        DOI:10.1145/3597512

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 July 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format