skip to main content
10.1145/3594739.3610692acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

LayTex: A Design Tool for Generating Customized Textile Sensor Layouts in Wearable Computing

Published:08 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smart textile sensors have attracted increasing interest in the domain of wearable computing for human motion monitoring. Previous studies have shown that textile sensor layout has a major impact on the effectiveness and performance of wearable prototypes. However, it is still a trick and time-consuming issue to determine textile sensor layout in a quantitative approach as it involves figuring out the number, placement, and even orientations of sensors, yet there is no streamlined digital platform or tool specifically addressing this issue. In this paper, we introduce LayTex, a digital tool capable of generating layout proposals for personalized scenarios, which aims at facilitating designers and researchers to construct prototypes efficiently. The preliminary evaluation with designers on smart garments for scoliosis indicates that LayTex has great potential to lower the barriers and simplify the process of textile prototype construction.

References

  1. Arianna Carnevale, Emiliano Schena, Domenico Formica, Carlo Massaroni, Umile Giuseppe Longo, and Vincenzo Denaro. 2021. Skin Strain Analysis of the Scapular Region and Wearables Design. Sensors 21, 17 (2021), 5761.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Peteris Eizentals, Alexei Katashev, Alexander Oks, and Guna Semjonova. 2020. Smart shirt system for compensatory movement retraining assistance: Feasibility study. Health and Technology 10 (2020), 861–874.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Mohsen Gholami, Ahmad Rezaei, Tyler J Cuthbert, Christopher Napier, and Carlo Menon. 2019. Lower body kinematics monitoring in running using fabric-based wearable sensors and deep convolutional neural networks. Sensors 19, 23 (2019), 5325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sufeng Hu, Miaoding Dai, Tianyun Dong, and Tao Liu. 2019. A textile sensor for long durations of human motion capture. Sensors 19, 10 (2019), 2369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Yichu Jin, Christina M Glover, Haedo Cho, Oluwaseun A Araromi, Moritz A Graule, Na Li, Robert J Wood, and Conor J Walsh. 2020. Soft sensing shirt for shoulder kinematics estimation. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 4863–4869.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kai Kunze and Paul Lukowicz. 2014. Sensor placement variations in wearable activity recognition. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13, 4 (2014), 32–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Yutian Li, Xuhong Miao, Li Niu, Gaoming Jiang, and Pibo Ma. 2019. Human motion recognition of knitted flexible sensor in walking cycle. Sensors 20, 1 (2019), 35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Irvin Hussein Lopez-Nava and Angelica Munoz-Melendez. 2016. Wearable inertial sensors for human motion analysis: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal 16, 22 (2016), 7821–7834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Corinne Mattmann, Oliver Amft, Holger Harms, Gerhard Troster, and Frank Clemens. 2007. Recognizing upper body postures using textile strain sensors. In 2007 11th IEEE international symposium on wearable computers. IEEE, 29–36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mohammad Iman Mokhlespour Esfahani, Omid Zobeiri, Behzad Moshiri, Roya Narimani, Mohammad Mehravar, Ehsan Rashedi, and Mohamad Parnianpour. 2017. Trunk motion system (TMS) using printed body worn sensor (BWS) via data fusion approach. Sensors 17, 1 (2017), 112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mohammad Tavassolian, Tyler J Cuthbert, Christopher Napier, JingYang Peng, and Carlo Menon. 2020. Textile-based inductive soft strain sensors for fast frequency movement and their application in wearable devices measuring multiaxial hip joint angles during running. Advanced Intelligent Systems 2, 4 (2020), 1900165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Linh Q Vu, K Han Kim, Lawrence JH Schulze, and Sudhakar L Rajulu. 2020. Lumbar posture assessment with fabric strain sensors. Computers in Biology and Medicine 118 (2020), 103624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jilong Wang, Chunhong Lu, and Kun Zhang. 2020. Textile-based strain sensor for human motion detection. Energy & Environmental Materials 3, 1 (2020), 80–100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. LayTex: A Design Tool for Generating Customized Textile Sensor Layouts in Wearable Computing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UbiComp/ISWC '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing & the 2023 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computing
          October 2023
          822 pages
          ISBN:9798400702006
          DOI:10.1145/3594739

          Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 October 2023

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)182
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format