skip to main content
10.1145/3593434.3593470acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Identifying Characteristics of the Agile Development Process That Impact User Satisfaction

Published:14 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of Agile development processes that impact user satisfaction. We used user reviews of OSS smartphone apps and various data from version control systems to examine the relationships, especially time-series correlations, between user satisfaction and development metrics that are expected to be related to user satisfaction. Although no metrics conclusively indicate an improved user satisfaction, motivation of the development team, the ability to set appropriate work units, the appropriateness of work rules, and the improvement of code maintainability should be considered as they are correlated with improved user satisfaction. In contrast, changes in the release frequency and workload are not correlated.

References

  1. Katarzyna Biesialska, Xavier Franch, and Victor Muntés-Mulero. 2021. Big Data analytics in Agile software development: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology 132 (2021), 106448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106448Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Christina G. Chi and Dogan Gursoy. 2009. Employee satisfaction, customer satisfaction, and financial performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Hospitality Management 28, 2 (2009), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.08.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gilbert A. Churchill and Carol Surprenant. 1982. An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research 19, 4 (1982), 491–504. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151722Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gouri Deshpande and Jon Rokne. 2018. User Feedback from Tweets vs App Store Reviews: An Exploratory Study of Frequency, Timing and Content. In 2018 5th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Requirements Engineering (AIRE). 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIRE.2018.00008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Iris Figalist, Marco Dieffenbacher, Isabella Eigner, Jan Bosch, Helena Holmström Olsson, and Christoph Elsner. 2020. Mining Customer Satisfaction on B2B Online Platforms using Service Quality and Web Usage Metrics. In 2020 27th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC). 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC51365.2020.00052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jim Highsmith and Martin Fowler. 2001. The Agile Manifesto. Software Development Magazine 9, 8 (2001), 29–30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Hutto and Eric Gilbert. 2014. VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 8, 1 (May 2014), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sunder Kekre, Mayuram S. Krishnan, and Kannan Srinivasan. 1995. Drivers of Customer Satisfaction for Software Products: Implications for Design and Service Support. Management Science 41, 9 (1995), 1456–1470. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2633041Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Eetu Kupiainen, Mika V. Mäntylä, and Juha Itkonen. 2015. Using metrics in Agile and Lean Software Development – A systematic literature review of industrial studies. Information and Software Technology 62 (2015), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.02.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Barween Hikmat Al Kurdi, Muhammad Turki Alshurideh, and Ahmad Salih Mheidi Alnaser. 2020. The impact of employee satisfaction on customer satisfaction: Theoretical and empirical underpinning. Management Science Letters 10 (2020), 3561–3570.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lidia López, Xavier Burgués, Silverio Martínez-Fernández, Anna Maria Vollmer, Woubshet Behutiye, Pertti Karhapää, Xavier Franch, Pilar Rodríguez, and Markku Oivo. 2022. Quality measurement in agile and rapid software development: A systematic mapping. Journal of Systems and Software 186 (2022), 111187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111187Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ehsan Noei and Kelly Lyons. 2019. A Survey of Utilizing User-Reviews Posted on Google Play Store. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CASCON ’19). IBM Corp., USA, 54–63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ehsan Noei, Feng Zhang, and Ying Zou. 2021. Too Many User-Reviews! What Should App Developers Look at First?IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 47, 2 (2021), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2893171Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. V. Jeeva Padmini, H. M. N. Dilum Bandara, and Indika Perera. 2015. Use of software metrics in agile software development process. In 2015 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon). 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCon.2015.7112365Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Sebastiano Panichella, Andrea Di Sorbo, Emitza Guzman, Corrado A. Visaggio, Gerardo Canfora, and Harald C. Gall. 2015. How can i improve my app? Classifying user reviews for software maintenance and evolution. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2015.7332474Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kamonphop Srisopha and Reem Alfayez. 2018. Software Quality through the Eyes of the End-User and Static Analysis Tools: A Study on Android OSS Applications. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Qualities and Their Dependencies (Gothenburg, Sweden) (SQUADE ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3194095.3194096Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Identifying Characteristics of the Agile Development Process That Impact User Satisfaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EASE '23: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
      June 2023
      544 pages
      ISBN:9798400700446
      DOI:10.1145/3593434

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 June 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate71of232submissions,31%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)181
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format