skip to main content
10.1145/3581961.3609898acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Autonomous Vehicle and External Road User Interfaces: Mapping of Standards Gaps and Opportunities

Published:18 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an interaction scenario-based design space for autonomous vehicles (AVs) and external road users (ERU)s, emphasizing the gaps and fragmented approach in current standards development. We first provide an overview of research in AV-ERU interactions and ongoing standards and policy development efforts. We then outline the AV-ERU ecosystem and identify key information modes that encapsulate potential interaction scenarios, such as states, intent, and responses of AVs. We describe the elements of the design space, including the interfaces, interactors and agents, modalities of interaction, and design considerations. We demonstrate the application of our design space and map existing standards to highlight its significance as a comprehensive tool for future standards development. We discuss the need for collaborative efforts among stakeholders to expedite and reduce bias in the establishment of standards.

References

  1. James M. Anderson, Nidhi Kalra, Karlyn D. Stanley, Paul Sorensen, Constantine Samaras, and Oluwatobi A. Oluwatola. 2014. The Promise and Perils of Autonomous Vehicle Technology. RAND Corporation, n.a, 9–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5hhwgz.9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jonas Bärgman. 2019. SHAPE-IT: Supporting the interaction of Humans and Automated vehicles: Preparing for the Environment of Tomorrow. https://www.shape-it.eu/about/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jinkang Cai, Weiwen Deng, Haoran Guang, Ying Wang, Jiangkun Li, and Juan Ding. 2022. A survey on data-driven scenario generation for automated vehicle testing. Machines 10, 11 (2022), 1101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Michael Clamann, Miles Aubert, and Mary Cummings. 2017. Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles. In n.a. n.a, n.a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Aditya Deshmukh, Zifei Wang, Aaron Gunn, Huizhong Guo, Rini Sherony, Fred Feng, Brian Lin, Shan Bao, and Feng Zhou. 2023. A systematic review of safety-critical scenarios between automated vehicles and vulnerable road users. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11291 n.d, n.d (2023), n.d.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ETSI. 2009. TR102638-V1.1.1-intelligent transport systems (ITS). https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/102600_102699/102638/ 01.01.01_60/tr_102638v010101p.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Surabhi Gupta, Maria Vasardani, and Stephan Winter. 2018. Negotiation between vehicles and pedestrians for the right of way at intersections. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 20, 3 (2018), 888–899.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. W. Jenness, A. K. Benedick, J. Singer, S. Yahoodik, E. Petraglia, J. Jaffe, J. M. Sullivan, and A. K Pradhan. 2021. Automated Driving Systems’ Communication of Intent With Shared Road Users. Technical Report DOT HS 813 148. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58325Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pantelis Kanellopoulos. 2020. Proceedings of the interACT Final Event. Technical Report interACT D7.3. European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, Grant Agreement No 723395. https://www.interact-roadautomation.eu/wp-content/uploads/interACT_D7.3_Proceedings-of-the-interACT-Final-Event_v-1.0_website.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eva Kassens-Noor, Meng Cai, Zeenat Kotval-Karamchandani, and Travis Decaminada. 2021. Autonomous vehicles and mobility for people with special needs. Transportation research part A: policy and practice 150 (2021), 385–397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Soyeon Kim, Tarek Kabbani, Duygu Serbes, Riender Happee, A Hartavi, and René van Egmond. 2022. A new approach to sound design in automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2022 Annual Conference. n.a, n.a, 149–159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Na Liu, Alexandros Nikitas, and Simon Parkinson. 2020. Exploring expert perceptions about the cyber security and privacy of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: A thematic analysis approach. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 75 (2020), 66–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. B Mehler. 2021. Considerations Regarding Introduction of Optical and/or Audible Signals Intended to Signal the Status & Intent of Automated Vehicle Systems. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/ECE-TRANS-WP1-2021-Presentation-21e.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nobuhiro Mizuno, Akira Yoshizawa, Akihiro Hayashi, and Takeshi Kawashima. 2018. Estimation of Drivers ‘ Awareness of Pedestrians. In 2018 IEEE 17th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC). n.a, n.a, 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCI-CC.2018.8482052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. n.a. 2018. Road Vehicles — Ergonomic aspects of external visual communication from automated vehicles to other road users. Standard. International Organization for Standardization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. n.a. 2019. Automated Driving System Marker Lamp J3134-201905. Standard. Society of Automotive Engineers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. n.d. n.d. At Motional, Anyone Can Press the Red Button | Motional. https://motional.com/news/motional-anyone-can-press-red-buttonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. n.d. n.d. Digital Audi Matrix LED headlights: one million pixels dancing in step | audi.com. https://www.audi.com/en/innovation/e-mobility/matrix-led-headlights.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. n.d. n.d. A Path Forward: Using AI to Improve Remote Vehicle Assistance for AVs | Motional. https://motional.com/news/path-forward-using-ai-improve-remote-vehicle-assistance-avsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Michael Rettenmaier, Moritz Pietsch, Jonas Schmidtler, and Klaus Bengler. 2019. Passing through the bottleneck-the potential of external human-machine interfaces. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, n.a, n.a, 1687–1692.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sayo Shingu. 2022. MassRobotics hosted the second Socially Aware Autonomous Mobility (SAAM) consortium. https://www.massrobotics.org/massrobotics-hosted-the-second-socially-aware-autonomous-mobility-saam-consortium/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sayo Shingu. 2023. Socially aware autonomous mobility lightning talks. https://www.massrobotics.org/socially-aware-autonomous-mobility-lightning-talks/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. SingaporeLTA. 2019. Autonomous Vehicles - Get to Know Them Better: Identifying AVs and Trials on Roads. https://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltagov/en/industry_innovations/ technologies/ autonomous_vehicles.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Edward R Straub and Kristin E Schaefer. 2019. It takes two to Tango: Automated vehicles and human beings do the dance of driving–Four social considerations for policy. Transportation research part A: policy and practice 122 (2019), 173–183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilbert Tabone, Joost de Winter, Claudia Ackermann, Jonas Bärgman, Martin Baumann, Shuchisnigdha Deb, Colleen Emmenegger, Azra Habibovic, Marjan Hagenzieker, P.A. Hancock, Riender Happee, Josef Krems, John D. Lee, Marieke Martens, Natasha Merat, Don Norman, Thomas B. Sheridan, and Neville A. Stanton. 2021. Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: Expert perspectives. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 9 (2021), 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100293Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Siyuan Zhou, Xu Sun, Bingjian Liu, and Gary Burnett. 2022. Factors Affecting Pedestrians’ Trust in Automated Vehicles: Literature Review and Theoretical Model. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 52, 3 (2022), 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3112956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Selin Zileli, Stephen Boyd Davis, and Jiayu Wu. 2019. Towards transparency between the autonomous vehicle and the pedestrian. Design and Semantics of Form and Movement, DesForm 2019: Beyond Intelligence n.a, n.a (2019), 96–104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Autonomous Vehicle and External Road User Interfaces: Mapping of Standards Gaps and Opportunities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        AutomotiveUI '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
        September 2023
        382 pages
        ISBN:9798400701122
        DOI:10.1145/3581961

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 September 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Work in Progress
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

        Upcoming Conference

      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)80
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format