skip to main content
10.1145/3571600.3571630acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards Realistic Underwater Dataset Generation and Color Restoration✱

Published:12 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recovery of true color from underwater images is an ill-posed problem. This is because the wide-band attenuation coefficients for the RGB color channels depend on object range, reflectance, etc. which are difficult to model. Also, there is backscattering due to suspended particles in water. Thus, most existing deep-learning based color restoration methods, which are trained on synthetic underwater datasets, do not perform well on real underwater data. This can be attributed to the fact that synthetic data cannot accurately represent real conditions. To address this issue, we use an image to image translation network to bridge the gap between the synthetic and real domains by translating images from synthetic underwater domain to real underwater domain. Using this multimodal domain adaptation technique, we create a dataset that can capture a diverse array of underwater conditions. We then train a simple but effective CNN based network on our domain adapted dataset to perform color restoration. Code and pre-trained models can be accessed at https://github.com/nehamjain10/TRUDGCR

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. A. Shahrizan A. Ghani and N. Ashidi M. Isa. 2015. Enhancement of low quality underwater image through integrated global and local contrast correction. Applied Soft Computing 37 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Akkaynak and T. Treibitz. 2018. A revised underwater image formation model. In IEEE CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Akkaynak and T. Treibitz. 2019. Sea-thru: A method for removing water from underwater images. In IEEE CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. O. Ancuti, C. Ancuti, C. De Vleeschouwer, and P. Bekaert. 2018. Color Balance and Fusion for Underwater Image Enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 27, 1 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dana Berman, Deborah Levy, Shai Avidan, and Tali Treibitz. 2020. Underwater Single Image Color Restoration Using Haze-Lines and a New Quantitative Dataset. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. P. Charbonnier, L. Blanc-Feraud, G. Aubert, and M. Barlaud. 1994. Two deterministic half-quadratic regularization algorithms for computed imaging. In IEEE ICIP, Vol. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Fabbri, M. J. Islam, and J. Sattar. 2018. Enhancing Underwater Imagery Using Generative Adversarial Networks. In IEEE ICRA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Xueyang Fu, Peixian Zhuang, Yue Huang, Yinghao Liao, Xiao-Ping Zhang, and Xinghao Ding. 2014. A retinex-based enhancing approach for single underwater image. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 4572–4576. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2014.7025927Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zhenqi Fu, Huangxing Lin, Yan Yang, Shu Chai, Liyan Sun, Yue Huang, and Xinghao Ding. 2022. Unsupervised Underwater Image Restoration: From a Homology Perspective. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 36, 1 (Jun. 2022), 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i1.19944Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Adrian Galdran, David Pardo, Artzai Picón, and Aitor Alvarez-Gila. 2015. Automatic Red-Channel underwater image restoration. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 26 (2015), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2014.11.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Han, M. Shoeiby, T. Malthus, E. Botha, J. Anstee, S. Anwar, R. Wei, L. Petersson, and M. A. Armin. 2021. Single Underwater Image Restoration by Contrastive Learning. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Muhammad Suzuri Hitam, Ezmahamrul Afreen Awalludin, Wan Nural Jawahir Hj Wan Yussof, and Zainuddin Bachok. 2013. Mixture contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization for underwater image enhancement. In 2013 International Conference on Computer Applications Technology (ICCAT). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAT.2013.6522017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Xun Huang and Serge Belongie. 2017. Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalization. In ICCV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. X. Huang, M. Y. Liu, S. Belongie, and J. Kautz. 2018. Multimodal unsupervised image-to-image translation. In ECCV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. J. Islam, Y. Xia, and J. Sattar. 2020. Fast underwater image enhancement for improved visual perception. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5, 2 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Johnson, A. Alahi, and L. Fei-Fei. 2016. Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In ECCV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C. Li, S. Anwar, J. Hou, R. Cong, C. Guo, and W. Ren. 2021. Underwater Image Enhancement via Medium Transmission-Guided Multi-Color Space Embedding. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Li, S. Anwar, and F. Porikli. 2020. Underwater scene prior inspired deep underwater image and video enhancement. Pattern Recognition 98(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Li, C. Guo, W. Ren, R. Cong, J. Hou, S. Kwong, and D. Tao. 2019. An underwater image enhancement benchmark dataset and beyond. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Li, C. Guo, W. Ren, R. Cong, J. Hou, S. Kwong, and D. Tao. 2020. An Underwater Image Enhancement Benchmark Dataset and Beyond. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. C. Li, J. Guo, S. Chen, Y. Tang, Y. Pang, and J. Wang. 2016. Underwater image restoration based on minimum information loss principle and optical properties of underwater imaging. In IEEE ICIP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. C. Y. Li, J. C. Guo, R. M. Cong, Y. W. Pang, and B. Wang. 2016. Underwater Image Enhancement by Dehazing With Minimum Information Loss and Histogram Distribution Prior. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 25, 12 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Risheng Liu, Xin Fan, Ming Zhu, Minjun Hou, and Zhongxuan Luo. 2020. Real-World Underwater Enhancement: Challenges, Benchmarks, and Solutions Under Natural Light. IEEE Trans. Cir. and Sys. for Video Technol. 30, 12 (dec 2020), 4861–4875. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2019.2963772Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. P. M Uplavikar, Z. Wu, and Z. Wang. 2019. All-in-One Underwater Image Enhancement Using Domain-Adversarial Learning. In IEEE CVPR Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. P. Kohli N. Silberman, D. Hoiem and R. Fergus. 2012. Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images. In ECCV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. K. Panetta, C. Gao, and S. Agaian. 2015. Human-visual-system-inspired underwater image quality measures. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 41, 3 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Y. T. Peng, K. Cao, and P. C. Cosman. 2018. Generalization of the Dark Channel Prior for Single Image Restoration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 27 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Y. T. Peng and P. C. Cosman. 2017. Underwater Image Restoration Based on Image Blurriness and Light Absorption. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26, 4 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox. 2015. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. P. K. Sharma, I. Bisht, and A. Sur. 2021. Wavelength-based Attributed Deep Neural Network for Underwater Image Restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07910(2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhou Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.R. Sheikh, and E.P. Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 4 (2004), 600–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. S. Woo, J. Park, J. Y. Lee, and I. S. Kweon. 2018. CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module. In ECCV 2018, V. Ferrari, M. Hebert, C. Sminchisescu, and Y. Weiss (Eds.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. M. Yang and A. Sowmya. 2015. An underwater color image quality evaluation metric. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 24, 12 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. S. W. Zamir, A. Arora, S. Khan, M. Hayat, F. S. Khan, M. H. Yang, and L. Shao. 2021. Multi-Stage Progressive Image Restoration. In CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards Realistic Underwater Dataset Generation and Color Restoration✱

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICVGIP '22: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
        December 2022
        506 pages
        ISBN:9781450398220
        DOI:10.1145/3571600

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 May 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate95of286submissions,33%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)45
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format