skip to main content
10.1145/3563657.3596060acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Calming Down in Lockdown: Rethinking Technologies for a Slower Pace of Life

Published:10 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study investigated Australian older adults’ response to the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, the adjustments they made to their activities, technology use, and social relations, to inform how technology design could be inspired by these adaptations. Online interviews revealed that some sorely missed social interactions, however, most enjoyed having a greater agency to curate their own activities and slowing down as a result of lockdown. These findings prompted us to rethink the design space of temporal design from the perspective of those craving an ongoing impact of slowness in their lives. We suggest that designing for a slower pace of life can be inspired by people’s response to life circumstances in lockdown, complementing the original concept of slow technology which seeks to intervene in a fast-paced life to encourage people to slow down and reflect. We conclude by proposing three new design pathways based on this new standpoint.

References

  1. Saeed Abdullah, Mark Matthews, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Geri Gay, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2014. Towards Circadian Computing: "Early to Bed and Early to Rise" Makes Some of Us Unhealthy and Sleep Deprived. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Seattle, Washington) (UbiComp ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632100Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tedros Adhanom. 2020. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. https://www.who.intGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Malek Alaoui and Myriam Lewkowicz. 2013. A LivingLab Approach to Involve Elderly in the Design of Smart TV Applications Offering Communication Services. In Online Communities and Social Computing, A. Ant Ozok and Panayiotis Zaphiris (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 325–334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Aloha Hufana Ambe, Alessandro Soro, Daniel Johnson, and Margot Brereton. 2022. From Collaborative Habituation to Everyday Togetherness: A Long-Term Study of Use of the Messaging Kettle. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 29, 1 (2022), 1–47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Pollie Barden, Rob Comber, David Green, Daniel Jackson, Cassim Ladha, Tom Bartindale, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Tony Stockman, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Telematic Dinner Party: Designing for Togetherness through Play and Performance. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317964Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Caleb Bond. 2021. Melbourne to overtake Buenos Aires as world’s most locked-down city on October 4. https://www.heraldsun.com.auGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Margot Brereton. 2013. Habituated Objects: Everyday Tangibles That Foster the Independent Living of an Elderly Woman. Interactions 20, 4 (July 2013), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2486227.2486233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, Kate Vaisutis, and Paul Roe. 2015. The Messaging Kettle: Prototyping Connection over a Distance between Adult Children and Older Parents. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 713–716. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702462Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Toni Calasanti. 2015. Combating Ageism: How Successful Is Successful Aging?The Gerontologist 56, 6 (07 2015), 1093–1101. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv076 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article-pdf/56/6/1093/9936714/gnv076.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Alyssa Yenyi Chan, Celene Ting, Lai Gwen Chan, and Zoe Jane-Lara Hildon. 2022. “The emotions were like a roller-coaster”: a qualitative analysis of e-diary data on healthcare worker resilience and adaptation during the COVID-19 outbreak in Singapore. Human Resources for Health 20, 1 (2022), 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Annie T. Chen, Shaoqing Ge, Susie Cho, Andrew K. Teng, Frances Chu, George Demiris, and Oleg Zaslavsky. 2020. Reactions to COVID-19, information and technology use, and social connectedness among older adults with pre-frailty and frailty. Geriatric Nursing (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.08.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Bor-rong Chen and Bryan Kate. 2011. PAMSys: Long-Term Physical Activity Monitoring with Single Wearable Motion Sensor. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Wireless Health (San Diego, California) (WH ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 21, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2077546.2077570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jyoti Choudrie, Sutee Pheeraphuttranghkoon, and Soheil Davari. 2020. The digital divide and older adult population adoption, use and diffusion of mobile phones: a quantitative study. Information Systems Frontiers 22, 3 (2020), 673–695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Samuel Cornell, Brooke Nickel, Erin Cvejic, Carissa Bonner, Kirsten J. McCaffery, Julie Ayre, Tessa Copp, Carys Batcup, Jennifer Isautier, Thomas Dakin, and Rachael Dodd. 2022. Positive outcomes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 33, 2 (2022), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.494 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hpja.494Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Elizabeth V. Cyarto, Frances Batchelor, Steven Baker, and Briony Dow. 2016. Active Ageing with Avatars: A Virtual Exercise Class for Older Adults. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Launceston, Tasmania, Australia) (OzCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010944Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sylvie Droit-Volet, Natalia Martinelli, Johann Chevalère, Clément Belletier, Guillaume Dezecache, Sandrine Gil, and Pascal Huguet. 2021. The Persistence of Slowed Time Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Two Longitudinal Studies in France. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.721716Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jeannette Durick, Toni Robertson, Margot Brereton, Frank Vetere, and Bjorn Nansen. 2013. Dispelling Ageing Myths in Technology Design. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (Adelaide, Australia) (OzCHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jeannette Durick, Toni Robertson, Margot Brereton, Frank Vetere, and Bjorn Nansen. 2013. Dispelling Ageing Myths in Technology Design. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (Adelaide, Australia) (OzCHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Cindy L. Ehlers, Ellen Frank, and David J. Kupfer. 1988. Social Zeitgebers and Biological Rhythms: A Unified Approach to Understanding the Etiology of Depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 45, 10 (10 1988), 948–952. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800340076012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Carina Finn. 2020. How tech is helping elderly fight coronavirus lockdown loneliness. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/tech-helping-elderly-fight-coronavirus-lockdown-loneliness-200402185238544.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Christian Fuchs. 2020. Everyday life and everyday communication in coronavirus capitalism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 18, 1 (2020), 375–399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ben Fullerton. 2010. Designing for Solitude. Interactions 17, 6 (Nov. 2010), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/1865245.1865247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. William Gaver, Andy Boucher, John Bowers, Mark Blythe, Nadine Jarvis, David Cameron, Tobie Kerridge, Alex Wilkie, Robert Phillips, and Peter Wright. 2011. The Photostroller: Supporting Diverse Care Home Residents in Engaging with the World. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1757–1766. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979198Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. André Hajek and Hans-Helmut König. 2019. The association between use of online social networks sites and perceived social isolation among individuals in the second half of life: results based on a nationally representative sample in Germany. BMC Public Health 19, 1 (2019), 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow technology–designing for reflection. Personal and ubiquitous computing 5, 3 (2001), 201–212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Søren Tranberg Hansen. 2011. Robot Games for Elderly. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Lausanne, Switzerland) (HRI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 413–414. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957808Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Timothy B. Smith, Mark Baker, Tyler Harris, and David Stephenson. 2015. Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10, 2 (2015), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352PMID: 25910392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. K. Höök. 2018. Designing with the Body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. MIT Press. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=9oZ0DwAAQBAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sinh Huynh, Hwee-Pink Tan, and Youngki Lee. 2017. Towards Unobtrusive Mental Well-Being Monitoring for Independent-Living Elderly. In Proceedings of the 4th International on Workshop on Physical Analytics (Niagara Falls, New York, USA) (WPA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3092305.3092311Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Patricia E Kahlbaugh, Amanda J Sperandio, Ashley L Carlson, and Jerry Hauselt. 2011. Effects of playing Wii on well-being in the elderly: Physical activity, loneliness, and mood. Activities, Adaptation & Aging 35, 4 (2011), 331–344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Serpil Karaoğlu and Özge Subaşı. 2021. Time and Aging: Designing for Time in Retirement. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi-org.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/10.1145/3411763.3451761Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Azmina Karimi and Carman Neustaedter. 2012. From High Connectivity to Social Isolation: Communication Practices of Older Adults in the Digital Age. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141559Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tero Kivimäki, Konstantinos Liolis, Ulcay Yildizoglu, Lasse Kaila, Antti-Matti Vainio, Stratis Konakas, Polyxeni Katsiouli, Harri Pensas, Kasperi Summanen, Spyros Pantazis, Heikki Moisio, Ilias Andrikopoulos, and Jukka Vanhala. 2012. On an Advanced ICT-Enabled System for the Social Inclusion of the Elderly. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (Heraklion, Crete, Greece) (PETRA ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2413097.2413115Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Toru Kobayashi, Taishi Miyazaki, Rinsuke Uchida, Hiroe Tanaka, and Kenichi Arai. 2018. Social Media Agency Robot for Elderly People. Journal of Information Processing 26 (2018), 736–746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Audrey Lebrasseur, Noémie Fortin-Bédard, Josiane Lettre, Emilie Raymond, Eve-Line Bussières, Nolwenn Lapierre, Julie Faieta, Claude Vincent, Louise Duchesne, Marie-Christine Ouellet, 2021. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults: rapid review. JMIR aging 4, 2 (2021), e26474.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Hung-Chi Lee, Wenn-Chieh Tsai, Po-Hao Wang, Rung-Huei Liang, and Jane Hsu. 2014. The Reflexive Printer: Embodying Personal Memory for Social Provocation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS Companion ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598784.2602792Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Elizabeth C. Lefferts, Joseph M. Saavedra, Bong Kil Song, and Duck-chul Lee. 2022. Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults. Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, 6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Jinhui Li. 2014. Examining the Impact of Game Interventions on Depression among Older Adults. In Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI PLAY ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2659009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Michael Liedtke. 2015. ’The problem is humans can’t keep up with all the technology they have created’. https://www.businessinsider.com/the-problem-is-humans-cant-keep-up-with-all-the-technology-they-have-created-2015-7?IR=TGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ann Light, Tuck W. Leong, and Toni Robertson. 2015. Ageing Well with CSCW. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway, Nina Boulus-Rødje, Gunnar Ellingsen, Tone Bratteteig, Margunn Aanestad, and Pernille Bjørn (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 295–304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ann Light, Sonja Pedell, Toni Robertson, Jenny Waycott, Jeanette Bell, Jeannette Durick, and Tuck Wah Leong. 2016. What’s Special about Aging. Interactions 23, 2 (Feb. 2016), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/2886011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Siân E. Lindley. 2015. Making Time. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work &; Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675157Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Victoria Luong, Sarah Burm, Bryce J. M. Bogie, Lindsay Cowley, Jennifer M. Klasen, Anna MacLeod, and Kori A. LaDonna. 2022. A phenomenological exploration of the impact of COVID-19 on the medical education community. Medical Education 56, 8 (2022), 815–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14793 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/medu.14793Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Daniel López Gómez. 2015. Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 93 (2015), 91 – 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.015 Science, Technology and the “Grand Challenge” of Ageing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Melissa Mazmanian, Ingrid Erickson, and Ellie Harmon. 2015. Circumscribed Time and Porous Time: Logics as a Way of Studying Temporality. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work &; Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1453–1464. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675231Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jamie S McPhee, David P French, Dean Jackson, James Nazroo, Neil Pendleton, and Hans Degens. 2016. Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology 17, 3 (2016), 567–580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Sophie Meixner. 2020. International travel is discouraged across the world, but Australia’s outbound travel ban sets it apart. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-31/coronavirus-covid-outbound-international-travel-ban-morrison/12605404Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Nancy Morrow-Howell, Natalie Galucia, and Emma Swinford. 2020. Recovering from the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus on Older Adults. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 32, 4-5 (2020), 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1759758 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1759758PMID: 32336225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Heather L. O’Brien, Ido Roll, Andrea Kampen, and Nilou Davoudi. 2022. Rethinking (Dis)engagement in human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior 128 (2022), 107109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. William Odom. 2015. Understanding Long-Term Interactions with a Slow Technology: An Investigation of Experiences with FutureMe. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702221Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. William Odom, Erik Stolterman, and Amy Yo Sue Chen. 2021. Extending a Theory of Slow Technology for Design through Artifact Analysis. Human–Computer Interaction 0, 0 (2021), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1913416 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1913416Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. William T. Odom, Abigail J. Sellen, Richard Banks, David S. Kirk, Tim Regan, Mark Selby, Jodi L. Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2014. Designing for Slowness, Anticipation and Re-Visitation: A Long Term Field Study of the Photobox. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1961–1970. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557178Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Australian Government Department of Health. 2020. Fact sheet: For older Australians about COVID-19. https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/04/coronavirus-covid-19-information-for-older-australians_3.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruth Ogden. 2021. Distortions to the passage of time during England’s second national lockdown: A role for depression. Plos one 16, 4 (2021), e0250412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Ruth S. Ogden. 2020. The passage of time during the UK Covid-19 lockdown. PLOS ONE 15, 7 (07 2020), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235871Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Gary M Olson and Judith S Olson. 2000. Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction: New Agendas for Human-Computer Interaction 15, 2-3 (2000), 139–178. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Gary M Olson, Judith S Olson, and Gina Venolia. 2009. What still matters about distance. Proceedings of HCIC (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Rita Orji, Julita Vassileva, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2013. LunchTime: A Slow-Casual Game for Long-Term Dietary Behavior Change. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 17, 6 (Aug. 2013), 1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0590-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Sanjana P Padala, Ashlyn M Jendro, and Lillian C Orr. 2020. Facetime to reduce behavioral problems in a nursing home resident with Alzheimer’s dementia during COVID-19. Psychiatry research 288 (2020), 113028.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Marta Panzeri, Roberta Ferrucci, Angela Cozza, and Lilybeth Fontanesi. 2020. Changes in Sexuality and Quality of Couple Relationship During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020), 2523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565823Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Filomena Papa, Bartolomeo Sapio, and M. Felicia Pelagalli. 2011. User Experience of Elderly People with Digital Television: A Qualitative Investigation. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (Lisbon, Portugal) (EuroITV ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/2000119.2000165Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Sonja Pedell, Frank Vetere, Lars Kulik, Elizabeth Ozanne, and Alan Gruner. 2010. Social Isolation of Older People: The Role of Domestic Technologies. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (Brisbane, Australia) (OZCHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 164–167. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Harri Pensas, Konstantinos Liolis, George Kouvatseas, Antti-Matti Vainio, Benjamin Wimmer, Lasse Kaila, Tero Kivimäki, Satu Laitinen, and Jukka Vanhala. 2011. AMCOSOP: A Social Networking System for the Elderly. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (Tampere, Finland) (MindTrek ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 329–331. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181099Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Carlo Petrini. 2003. Slow food : the case for taste. Columbia University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Paula R Pietromonaco and Nickola C Overall. 2020. Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships.American Psychologist (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Mike. Proulx. 2012. Social TV how marketers can reach and engage audiences by connecting television to the web, social media, and mobile (1st ed. ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Larissa Pschetz and Michelle Bastian. 2018. Temporal Design: Rethinking time in design. Design Studies 56 (2018), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Larissa Pschetz, Michelle Bastian, and Christopher Speed. 2016. Temporal design: Looking at time as social coordination. In DRS 2016 Proceedings. Design Research Society, Brighton, United Kingdom, 2109–2122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Hayley Robinson, Bruce MacDonald, Ngaire Kerse, and Elizabeth Broadbent. 2013. The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 14, 9 (2013), 661–667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Natalie Grace Rodrigues, Claudia Qin Yun Han, Ya Su, Piyanee Klainin-Yobas, and Xi Vivien Wu. 2022. Psychological impacts and online interventions of social isolation amongst older adults during COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 78, 3 (2022), 609–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15063 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jan.15063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Nancy Smith, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. Designing for Cohabitation: Naturecultures, Hybrids, and Decentering the Human in Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1714–1725. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025948Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Alessandro Soro, Margot Brereton, Tshering Dema, Jessica L. Oliver, Min Zhen Chai, and Aloha May Hufana Ambe. 2018. The Ambient Birdhouse: An IoT Device to Discover Birds and Engage with Nature. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173971Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Carolyn Strauss and Alastair Fuad-Luke. 2008. The slow design principles. Proceedings of the Changing the Change 14 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, Alessandro Soro, Paul Roe, Anita Lee Hong, and Margot Brereton. 2017. Situational When: Designing for Time Across Cultures. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6461–6474. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025936Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Josephine Tovey. 2021. I quit food delivery apps – the absurd convenience was not worth the cost. https://www.theguardian.com/food/2021/feb/11/i-quit-food-delivery-apps-the-absurd-convenience-was-not-worth-the-costGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Gabriela Tullius and Gamze Dogan. 2020. PrecRec: Supporting Older Adults Sharing Recipes. In Proceedings of the Conference on Mensch Und Computer (Magdeburg, Germany) (MuC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404983.3410005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Joeri Vermeulen, Johan Bilsen, Ronald Buyl, Delphine De Smedt, Léonardo Gucciardo, Gilles Faron, and Maaike Fobelets. 2022. Women’s experiences with being pregnant and becoming a new mother during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 32 (2022), 100728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100728Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. John Vines, Gary Pritchard, Peter Wright, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2015. An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 1, Article 2 (Feb. 2015), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696867Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Ron Wakkary, Doenja Oogjes, Henry W. J. Lin, and Sabrina Hauser. 2018. Philosophers Living with the Tilting Bowl. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi-org.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/10.1145/3173574.3173668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Daniel M Walker, Jennifer L Hefner, Naleef Fareed, Timothy R Huerta, and Ann Scheck McAlearney. 2020. Exploring the digital divide: age and race disparities in use of an inpatient portal. Telemedicine and e-Health 26, 5 (2020), 603–613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Amee Morgans, Elizabeth Ozanne, and Lars Kulik. 2016. Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 745–757. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858458Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1997. The Coming Age of Calm Technology. Springer New York, New York, NY, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0685-9_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. G. Clare Wenger and Vanessa Burholt. 2004. Changes in Levels of Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older People in a Rural Area: A Twenty–Year Longitudinal Study. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement 23, 2 (2004), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1353/cja.2004.0028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Svetlana Yarosh, Stephen Cuzzort, Hendrik Müller, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2009. Developing a Media Space for Remote Synchronous Parent-Child Interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Como, Italy) (IDC ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1145/1551788.1551806Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Rebecca P. Yu, Ryan J. McCammon, Nicole B. Ellison, and Kenneth M. Langa. 2016. The relationships that matter: social network site use and social wellbeing among older adults in the United States of America. Ageing and Society 36, 9 (2016), 1826–1852. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15000677Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Paola Zaninotto, Eleonora Iob, Panayotes Demakakos, and Andrew Steptoe. 2022. Immediate and Longer-Term Changes in the Mental Health and Well-being of Older Adults in England During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Psychiatry 79, 2 (02 2022), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.3749Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Mingqian Zhao, Zhutian Chen, Ke Lu, Chaoran Li, Huamin Qu, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2016. Blossom: Design of a Tangible Interface for Improving Intergenerational Communication for the Elderly. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Interactive Technology and Ageing Populations (Kochi, Japan) (ITAP ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/2996267.2996276Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Larissa Cardoso Zimmermann, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, and Maria da Graça Campos Pimentel. 2019. EPARS: Elderly Physical Activity Reminder System Using Smartphone and Wearable Sensors. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (London, United Kingdom) (UbiComp/ISWC ’19 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341162.3350845Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Calming Down in Lockdown: Rethinking Technologies for a Slower Pace of Life

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DIS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
          July 2023
          2717 pages
          ISBN:9781450398930
          DOI:10.1145/3563657

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 July 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

          Upcoming Conference

          DIS '24
          Designing Interactive Systems Conference
          July 1 - 5, 2024
          IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format