skip to main content
10.1145/3563657.3595998acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Awedyssey: Design Tensions in Eliciting Self-transcendent Emotions in Virtual Reality to Support Mental Well-being and Connection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Access to nature and feeling connection is critical for mental health and well-being. These benefits may be mediated by self-transcendent emotions evoked by nature. We need to explore the capacity of technology to offer such experiences when we lack access to the restorative power of nature. Despite growing research validating this capacity, there is a lack of articulated design knowledge of how such experiences can be created. Here, we explore a technologically-mediated support for mental well-being through an agile design approach informed by self-transcendent emotion theory and transformative experience design. We developed Awedyssey as a sensory deprivation countermeasure experience in virtual reality (VR) and as a part of a public exhibition. We gathered qualitative feedback through interviews, diaries, and surveys. From this data we identified design tensions for designing complex emotional experiences when considering the diversity of individuals and dual effects of designing for realism, autonomy, vastness, and comfort.

References

  1. 2021. Seeing the Earth’s Glow From Space. http://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/seeing-the-earths-glow-from-spaceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sun Joo Ahn, Joshua Bostick, Elise Ogle, Kristine L Nowak, Kara T McGillicuddy, and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2016. Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21, 6 (2016), 399–419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Allison P Anderson, Michael D Mayer, Abigail M Fellows, Devin R Cowan, Mark T Hegel, and Jay C Buckey. 2017. Relaxation with immersive natural scenes presented using virtual reality. Aerospace medicine and human performance 88, 6 (2017), 520–526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig L Anderson, Maria Monroy, and Dacher Keltner. 2018. Awe in nature heals: Evidence from military veterans, at-risk youth, and college students.Emotion 18, 8 (2018), 1195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gloria Avrech. 2002. Aurora borealis: Finding the inner light. Psychological Perspectives 44, 1 (2002), 70–79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Matthew T Ballew and Allen M Omoto. 2018. Absorption: How nature experiences promote awe and other positive emotions. Ecopsychology 10, 1 (2018), 26–35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lisbeth C Bethelmy and José A Corraliza. 2019. Transcendence and sublime experience in nature: Awe and inspiring energy. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2019), 509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Johannes Blum, Christoph Rockstroh, and Anja S Göritz. 2019. Heart rate variability biofeedback based on slow-paced breathing with immersive virtual reality nature scenery. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019), 2172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Mark Blythe, Elizabeth Buie, 2021. Designs on Transcendence: Sketches of a TX machine. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 15, 1 (2021), 1–131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis.American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 21, 1 (2021), 37–47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Matthew HEM Browning, Katherine J Mimnaugh, Carena J Van Riper, Heidemarie K Laurent, and Steven M LaValle. 2020. Can simulated nature support mental health? Comparing short, single-doses of 360-degree nature videos in virtual reality with the outdoors. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2020), 2667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Elizabeth Buie. 2016. Transcendhance: a game to facilitate techno-spiritual design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1367–1374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Elizabeth Buie and Mark Blythe. 2013. Spirituality: there’s an app for that!(but not a lot of research). In CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 2315–2324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. John T Cacioppo and Louise C Hawkley. 2009. Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in cognitive sciences 13, 10 (2009), 447–454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sarah Hian May Chan, Lin Qiu, Gianluca Esposito, Ky Phong Mai, Kim-Pong Tam, and Jian Cui. 2021. Nature in virtual reality improves mood and reduces stress: evidence from young adults and senior citizens. Virtual reality (2021), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Susan K Chen and Myriam Mongrain. 2021. Awe and the interconnected self. The Journal of Positive Psychology 16, 6 (2021), 770–778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Alice Chirico, Pietro Cipresso, David B Yaden, Federica Biassoni, Giuseppe Riva, and Andrea Gaggioli. 2017. Effectiveness of immersive videos in inducing awe: an experimental study. Scientific reports 7, 1 (2017), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Alice Chirico, Robert R Clewis, David B Yaden, and Andrea Gaggioli. 2021. Nature versus art as elicitors of the sublime: A virtual reality study. PloS one 16, 3 (2021), e0233628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Alice Chirico, Francesco Ferrise, Lorenzo Cordella, and Andrea Gaggioli. 2018. Designing awe in virtual reality: An experimental study. Frontiers in psychology 8 (2018), 2351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alice Chirico and Andrea Gaggioli. 2019. When Virtual Feels Real: Comparing Emotional Responses and Presence in Virtual and Natural Environments. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 22, 3 (Feb. 2019), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0393Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Alice Chirico, Marta Pizzolante, Alexandra Kitson, Elena Gianotti, Bernhard E Riecke, and Andrea Gaggioli. 2022. Defining Transformative Experiences: A Conceptual Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Alexander Choukér and Alexander C Stahn. 2020. COVID-19—The largest isolation study in history: the value of shared learnings from spaceflight analogs. npj Microgravity 6, 1 (2020), 1–7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yuwan Dai, Tonglin Jiang, and Miao Miao. 2022. Uncovering the Effects of Awe on Meaning in Life. Journal of Happiness Studies 23, 7 (2022), 3517–3529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Beatrice de Gelder, Jari Kätsyri, and Aline W. de Borst. 2018. Virtual reality and the new psychophysics. British Journal of Psychology 109, 3 (Aug. 2018), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Nina Döllinger, Carolin Wienrich, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2021. Challenges and opportunities of immersive technologies for mindfulness meditation: a systematic review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021), 644683.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Megan E Edwards, Peter J Helm, Steven Pratscher, B Ann Bettencourt, and Jamie Arndt. 2023. The Impact of Awe on Existential Isolation: Evidence for Contrasting Pathways. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2023), 01461672221144597.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Laura Ermi and Frans MÀyrÀ. 2005. Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In DIGRA. Vancouver, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Megan Evans and Edwin B Fisher. 2022. Social isolation and mental health: the role of nondirective and directive social support. Community mental health journal 58, 1 (2022), 20–40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Rachel R Feinberg, Udaya Lakshmi, Matthew J Golino, and Rosa I Arriaga. 2022. ZenVR: Design Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Learning System for Meditation. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Gustav Freytag and Elias J. MacEwan. 1894. Freytag’s Technique of the drama. Scott, Foresman and company, New York. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008560042Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Andrea Gaggioli. 2016. Transformative experience design. Human computer confluence. Transforming human experience through symbiotic technologies (2016), 96–121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Andrea Gaggioli, Giuseppe Riva, Dorian Peters, and Rafael A. Calvo. 2017. Positive Technology, Computing, and Design: Shaping a Future in Which Technology Promotes Psychological Well-Being. In Emotions and Affect in Human Factors and Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier, 477–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801851-4.00018-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Shaun Gallagher, Bruce Janz, Lauren Reinerman, Jörg Trempler, and Patricia Bockelman. 2015. A neurophenomenology of awe and wonder: Towards a non-reductionist cognitive science. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Paul Gilbert (Ed.). 2017. Compassion: Concepts, Research and Applications. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315564296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Paul Gilbert. 2020. Compassion: From Its Evolution to a Psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Devin M Gill, Mirinda M Whitaker, Zachary Olpin, and Jeanine K Stefanucci. 2022. The perceived duration of vast spaces is mediated by awe. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 84, 8 (2022), 2562–2581.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. David R Glowacki, Rhoslyn Roebuck Williams, Mark D Wonnacott, Olivia M Maynard, Rachel Freire, James E Pike, and Mike Chatziapostolou. 2022. Group VR experiences can produce ego attenuation and connectedness comparable to psychedelics. Scientific Reports 12, 1 (2022), 8995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. David R Glowacki, Mark D Wonnacott, Rachel Freire, Becca R Glowacki, Ella M Gale, James E Pike, Tiu de Haan, Mike Chatziapostolou, and Oussama Metatla. 2020. Isness: using multi-person VR to design peak mystical type experiences comparable to psychedelics. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sean P Goldy, Nickolas M Jones, and Paul K Piff. 2022. The Social Effects of an Awesome Solar Eclipse. Psychological Science (2022), 09567976221085501.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Amie M Gordon, Jennifer E Stellar, Craig L Anderson, Galen D McNeil, Daniel Loew, and Dacher Keltner. 2017. The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe.Journal of personality and social psychology 113, 2 (2017), 310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Madhav Goyal, Sonal Singh, Erica MS Sibinga, Neda F Gould, Anastasia Rowland-Seymour, Ritu Sharma, Zackary Berger, Dana Sleicher, David D Maron, Hasan M Shihab, 2014. Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA internal medicine 174, 3 (2014), 357–368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Simone Grassini, Giulia Virginia Segurini, and Mika Koivisto. 2022. Watching nature videos promotes physiological restoration: evidence from the modulation of alpha waves in electroencephalography. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Jenny M Groarke, Emma Berry, Lisa Graham-Wisener, Phoebe E McKenna-Plumley, Emily McGlinchey, and Cherie Armour. 2020. Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study. PloS one 15, 9 (2020), e0239698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Diane Gromala, Xin Tong, Amber Choo, Mehdi Karamnejad, and Chris D Shaw. 2015. The virtual meditative walk: virtual reality therapy for chronic pain management. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 521–524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Adam W Hanley, Michael Dambrun, and Eric L Garland. 2020. Effects of mindfulness meditation on self-transcendent states: perceived body boundaries and spatial frames of reference. Mindfulness 11, 5 (2020), 1194–1203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Terry Hartig, Richard Mitchell, Sjerp De Vries, and Howard Frumkin. 2014. Nature and health. Annual review of public health 35 (2014), 207–228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Louise C Hawkley and John T Cacioppo. 2010. Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of behavioral medicine 40, 2 (2010), 218–227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. John F Helliwell and Lara B Aknin. 2018. Expanding the social science of happiness. Nature human behaviour 2, 4 (2018), 248–252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao Hu, Xuhui Lin, Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga, Huilan Xu, 2020. Impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on lifestyle behaviors and their association with subjective well-being among the general population in mainland China: cross-sectional study. Journal of medical Internet research 22, 8 (2020), e21176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Valerie J Janesick. 2015. " Stretching" exercises for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Simo Järvelä, Benjamin Cowley, Mikko Salminen, Giulio Jacucci, Juho Hamari, and Niklas Ravaja. 2021. Augmented virtual reality meditation: Shared dyadic biofeedback increases social presence via respiratory synchrony. ACM Transactions on Social Computing 4, 2 (2021), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Sangwon Jung, Oğuz “Oz” Buruk, and Juho Hamari. 2022. Psychedelic VR Experience: An Exploratory Study on Cosmic Flow. 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (2022), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3569219.3569391Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Jon Kabat-Zinn. 2003. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Adam S Kahn and Aaron Castelán Cargile. 2021. Immersive and interactive awe: Evoking awe via presence in virtual reality and online videos to prompt prosocial behavior. Human Communication Research 47, 4 (2021), 387–417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Kampgrounds of America Inc.2022. A New Chapter in North American Camping. Technical Report. https://koa.com/north-american-camping-report/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Stephen Kaplan. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of environmental psychology 15, 3 (1995), 169–182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Dacher Keltner and Jonathan Haidt. 2003. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and emotion 17, 2 (2003), 297–314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. James N. Kirby. 2017. Compassion Interventions: The Programmes, the Evidence, and Implications for Research and Practice. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 90, 3 (2017), 432–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Alexandra Kitson, Elizabeth Buie, Ekaterina R Stepanova, Alice Chirico, Bernhard E Riecke, and Andrea Gaggioli. 2019. Transformative experience design: designing with interactive technologies to support transformative experiences. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Alexandra Kitson, Alice Chirico, Andrea Gaggioli, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2020. A review on research and evaluation methods for investigating self-transcendence. Frontiers in psychology 11 (2020), 547687.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Alexandra Kitson, Mirjana Prpa, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2018. Immersive interactive technologies for positive change: a scoping review and design considerations. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 1354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Alexandra Kitson, Thecla Schiphorst, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2018. Are You Dreaming? A Phenomenological Study on Understanding Lucid Dreams as a Tool for Introspection in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173917Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Alexandra J. Kitson, Ekaterina R Stepanova, Ivan Abdo Aguilar, Natasha Wainwright, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2020. Designing Mind(set) and Setting for Profound Emotional Experiences in Virtual Reality. In DIS ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 655–668. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395560 https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3357236.3395560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Ilkka Kosunen, Mikko Salminen, Simo Järvelä, Antti Ruonala, Niklas Ravaja, and Giulio Jacucci. 2016. RelaWorld: neuroadaptive and immersive virtual reality meditation system. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 208–217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Ming Kuo. 2015. How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Frontiers in psychology (2015), 1093.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Niclas Kuper, Nick Modersitzki, Le Vy Phan, and John Rauthmann. 2021. The situation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A snapshot in Germany. PloS one 16, 2 (2021), e0245719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Nicholas Leigh-Hunt, David Bagguley, Kristin Bash, Victoria Turner, Stephen Turnbull, Nicole Valtorta, and Woody Caan. 2017. An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness. Public health 152 (2017), 157–171.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Grace YS Leung, Hadar Hazan, and Christian S Chan. 2022. Exposure to nature in immersive virtual reality increases connectedness to nature among people with low nature affinity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 83 (2022), 101863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Michael R Levenson, Patricia A Jennings, Carolyn M Aldwin, and Ray W Shiraishi. 2005. Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development 60, 2 (2005), 127–143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Jeff Levin and Lea Steele. 2005. The transcendent experience: conceptual, theoretical, and epidemiologic perspectives. Explore 1, 2 (2005), 89–101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Hongyi Li, Yujun Ding, Bing Zhao, Yuhang Xu, and Wei Wei. 2022. Effects of immersion in a simulated natural environment on stress reduction and emotional arousal: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Hansen Li, Xing Zhang, Hongying Wang, Zongqian Yang, Haowei Liu, Yang Cao, and Guodong Zhang. 2021. Access to nature via virtual reality: A mini-review. Frontiers in psychology 12 (2021), 725288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Johan Liedgren, Pieter Desmet, and Andrea Gaggioli. 2023. Liminal design: A conceptual framework and three-step approach for developing technology that delivers transcendence and deeper experiences. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023), 275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Rong-Mao Lin, You-Juan Hong, Hui-Wen Xiao, and Rong Lian. 2020. Dispositional awe and prosocial tendency: The mediating roles of selftranscendent meaning in life and spiritual self-transcendence. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 48, 12 (2020), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Stefan Liszio and Maic Masuch. 2019. Interactive immersive virtual environments cause relaxation and enhance resistance to acute stress. Annu Rev Cyberther Telemed 17 (2019), 65–71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Pinyao Liu, Ekaterina R Stepanova, Alexandra Kitson, Thecla Schiphorst, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2022. Virtual Transcendent Dream: Empowering People through Embodied Flying in Virtual Reality. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Jingni Ma, Dongrong Zhao, Naihong Xu, and Jinmei Yang. 2022. The Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality (VR) Based Mindfulness Training on Improvement Mental-Health in Adults: A Narrative Systematic Review. Explore (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. I Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-computer interaction 7, 1 (1992), 91–139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Silvana Malaver Turbay, Igor Igorevich Segrovets, George Chernyshov, Jiawen Han, Christopher Changmok Kim, and Kai Kunze. 2022. Ethereal Phenomena-Interactive Art, Meditation, and Breathing Biofeedback: From Mind and Body Wellness Towards Self-Transcendence. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Osmo Mattila, Arto Korhonen, Essi Pöyry, Kaisa Hauru, Jani Holopainen, and Petri Parvinen. 2020. Restoration in a virtual reality forest environment. Computers in Human Behavior 107 (2020), 106295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. F Stephan Mayer, Cynthia McPherson Frantz, Emma Bruehlman-Senecal, and Kyffin Dolliver. 2009. Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and behavior 41, 5 (2009), 607–643.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Noah Miller, John Desnoyers-Stewart, Ekaterina R. Stepanova, Alexandra Kitson, Jim Bizzochhi, and B. E. Riecke. 2022. Sipping the Virtual Elixir: An autoethnographic close reading of Ayahuasca Kosmik Journey a self-transcendent virtual experience. Virtual Creativity 12, 1 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Matthew C. Mishkind, Aaron M. Norr, Andrea C. Katz, and Greg M. Reger. 2017. Review of Virtual Reality Treatment in Psychiatry: Evidence Versus Current Diffusion and Use. Current Psychiatry Reports 19, 11 (Sept. 2017), 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0836-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Maria Monroy and Dacher Keltner. 2022. Awe as a Pathway to Mental and Physical Health. Perspectives on Psychological Science (2022), 17456916221094856.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Jessica Isbely Montana, Marta Matamala-Gomez, Marta Maisto, Petar Aleksandrov Mavrodiev, Cesare Massimo Cavalera, Barbara Diana, Fabrizia Mantovani, and Olivia Realdon. 2020. The benefits of emotion regulation interventions in virtual reality for the improvement of wellbeing in adults and older adults: a systematic review. Journal of clinical medicine 9, 2 (2020), 500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Masataka Nakayama, Yuki Nozaki, Pamela M Taylor, Dacher Keltner, and Yukiko Uchida. 2020. Individual and cultural differences in predispositions to feel positive and negative aspects of awe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 51, 10 (2020), 771–793.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Adeleh Nejati, Susan Rodiek, and Mardelle Shepley. 2016. Using visual simulation to evaluate restorative qualities of access to nature in hospital staff break areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 148 (2016), 132–138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. S Katherine Nelson-Coffey, Peter M Ruberton, Joseph Chancellor, Jessica E Cornick, Jim Blascovich, and Sonja Lyubomirsky. 2019. The proximal experience of awe. PloS one 14, 5 (2019), e0216780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Ann W Nguyen, Robert Joseph Taylor, Harry Owen Taylor, and Linda M Chatters. 2020. Objective and subjective social isolation and psychiatric disorders among African Americans. Clinical Social Work Journal 48, 1 (2020), 87–98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Michaela C Pascoe, Michael de Manincor, Jana Tseberja, Mats Hallgren, Peter A Baldwin, and Alexandra G Parker. 2021. Psychobiological mechanisms underlying the mood benefits of meditation: A narrative review. Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology 6 (2021), 100037.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. David R Patterson, Sydney Drever, Maryam Soltani, Sam R Sharar, Shelley Wiechman, Walter J Meyer, and Hunter G Hoffman. 2023. A comparison of interactive immersive virtual reality and still nature pictures as distraction-based analgesia in burn wound care. Burns 49, 1 (2023), 182–192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Trisha Petitte, Jennifer Mallow, Emily Barnes, Ashley Petrone, Taura Barr, and Laurie Theeke. 2015. A systematic review of loneliness and common chronic physical conditions in adults. The open psychology journal 8, Suppl 2 (2015), 113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Paul K Piff, Pia Dietze, Matthew Feinberg, Daniel M Stancato, and Dacher Keltner. 2015. Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior.Journal of personality and social psychology 108, 6 (2015), 883.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. José J Pizarro, Nekane Basabe, Itziar Fernández, Pilar Carrera, Pedro Apodaca, Carlos I Man Ging, Olaia Cusi, and Darío Páez. 2021. Self-transcendent emotions and their social effects: awe, elevation and kama muta promote a human identification and motivations to help others. Frontiers in psychology (2021), 3882.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Alison Pritchard, Miles Richardson, David Sheffield, and Kirsten McEwan. 2020. The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of happiness studies 21 (2020), 1145–1167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Mirjana Prpa, Thecla Schiphorst, Kivanç Tatar, and Philippe Pasquier. 2018. Respire: a breath away from the experience in virtual environment. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Denise Quesnel and Bernhard E Riecke. 2018. Are you awed yet? How virtual reality gives us awe and goose bumps. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 2158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Denise Quesnel, Ekaterina R Stepanova, Ivan A Aguilar, Patrick Pennefather, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2018. Creating AWE: artistic and scientific practices in research-based design for exploring a profound immersive installation. In 2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM). IEEE, 1–207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Clara Rastelli, Antonino Greco, Yoed N Kenett, Chiara Finocchiaro, and Nicola De Pisapia. 2022. Simulated visual hallucinations in virtual reality enhance cognitive flexibility. Scientific reports 12, 1 (2022), 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Gerhard Reese, Jasmin Stahlberg, and Claudia Menzel. 2022. Digital shinrin-yoku: Do nature experiences in virtual reality reduce stress and increase well-being as strongly as similar experiences in a physical forest?Virtual Reality (2022), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Simon Riches, Lisa Azevedo, Leanne Bird, Sara Pisani, and Lucia Valmaggia. 2021. Virtual reality relaxation for the general population: a systematic review. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology 56, 10 (2021), 1707–1727.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Giuseppe Riva, Brenda K. Wiederhold, and Fabrizia Mantovani. 2019. Neuroscience of Virtual Reality: From Virtual Exposure to Embodied Medicine. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 22, 1 (Jan. 2019), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.29099.griGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. Grace N Rivera, Matthew Vess, Joshua A Hicks, and Clay Routledge. 2020. Awe and meaning: Elucidating complex effects of awe experiences on meaning in life. European Journal of Social Psychology 50, 2 (2020), 392–405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Melanie Rudd, Kathleen D Vohs, and Jennifer Aaker. 2012. Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological science 23, 10 (2012), 1130–1136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Roly Russell, Anne D Guerry, Patricia Balvanera, Rachelle K Gould, Xavier Basurto, Kai MA Chan, Sarah Klain, Jordan Levine, and Jordan Tam. 2013. Humans and nature: how knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual review of environment and resources 38 (2013), 473–502.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Diana Scates, Joan I Dickinson, Kathleen Sullivan, Holly Cline, and Rama Balaraman. 2020. Using nature-inspired virtual reality as a distraction to reduce stress and pain among cancer patients. Environment and Behavior 52, 8 (2020), 895–918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  108. Minjae Seo, Shiyu Yang, and Sean M Laurent. 2022. No one is an island: Awe encourages global citizenship identification.Emotion (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Emma Seppala, Timothy Rossomando, and James R Doty. 2013. Social connection and compassion: Important predictors of health and well-being. Social Research: An International Quarterly 80, 2 (2013), 411–430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  110. Chris Shaw, Diane Gromala, and Meehae Song. 2011. The meditation chamber: towards self-modulation. In Metaplasticity in virtual worlds: Aesthetics and semantic concepts. IGI Global, 121–133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Michelle N Shiota, Dacher Keltner, and Amanda Mossman. 2007. The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and emotion 21, 5 (2007), 944–963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Jacek Sliwinski, Mary Katsikitis, and Christian Martyn Jones. 2017. A review of interactive technologies as support tools for the cultivation of mindfulness. Mindfulness 8 (2017), 1150–1159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  113. Pia Spangenberger, Sonja Maria Geiger, and Sarah-Christin Freytag. 2022. Becoming nature: effects of embodying a tree in immersive virtual reality on nature relatedness. Scientific Reports 12, 1 (2022), 1311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  114. Jennifer E Stellar, Amie M Gordon, Paul K Piff, Daniel Cordaro, Craig L Anderson, Yang Bai, Laura A Maruskin, and Dacher Keltner. 2017. Self-transcendent emotions and their social functions: Compassion, gratitude, and awe bind us to others through prosociality. Emotion Review 9, 3 (2017), 200–207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. Jennifer E Stellar, Neha John-Henderson, Craig L Anderson, Amie M Gordon, Galen D McNeil, and Dacher Keltner. 2015. Positive affect and markers of inflammation: discrete positive emotions predict lower levels of inflammatory cytokines.Emotion 15, 2 (2015), 129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Ekaterina R Stepanova, John Desnoyers-Stewart, Kristina Höök, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2022. Strategies for Fostering a Genuine Feeling of Connection in Technologically Mediated Systems. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. Ekaterina R Stepanova, John Desnoyers-Stewart, Philippe Pasquier, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2020. JeL: Breathing Together to Connect with Others and Nature. In ACM DIS. ACM, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 1–14. https://youtu.be/vwb4jX4x-c4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Ekaterina R Stepanova, Denise Quesnel, and Bernhard Riecke. 2018. Transformative experiences become more accessible through virtual reality. In 2018 IEEE Workshop on Augmented and Virtual Realities for Good (VAR4Good). IEEE, 1–3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. Ekaterina R Stepanova, Denise Quesnel, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2019. Space—a virtual frontier: how to design and evaluate a virtual reality experience of the overview effect. Frontiers in Digital Humanities (2019), 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Ekaterina R. Stepanova, Denise Quesnel, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2019. Understanding AWE: Can a Virtual Journey, Inspired by the Overview Effect, Lead to an Increased Sense of Interconnectedness?Frontiers in Digital Humanities 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2019.00009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  121. Ekaterina R Stepanova, Denise Quesnel, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2019. Understanding AWE: Can a virtual journey, inspired by the overview effect, lead to an increased sense of interconnectedness?Frontiers in Digital Humanities 6 (2019), 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Karin Tanja-Dijkstra, Sabine Pahl, Mathew P White, Melissa Auvray, Robert J Stone, Jackie Andrade, Jon May, Ian Mills, and David R Moles. 2018. The soothing sea: a virtual coastal walk can reduce experienced and recollected pain. Environment and behavior 50, 6 (2018), 599–625.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Nađa Terzimehić, Renate Häuslschmid, Heinrich Hussmann, and m.c. schraefel. 2019. A Review & Analysis of Mindfulness Research in HCI: Framing Current Lines of Research and Future Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Andrew L Thomson and Jason T Siegel. 2017. Elevation: A review of scholarship on a moral and other-praising emotion. The Journal of Positive Psychology 12, 6 (2017), 628–638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  125. Fynn-Mathis Trautwein, Philipp Kanske, Anne Böckler, and Tania Singer. 2020. Differential Benefits of Mental Training Types for Attention, Compassion, and Theory of Mind. Cognition 194 (Jan. 2020), 104039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104039Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  126. Stefano Triberti and Giuseppe Riva. 2016. Being Present in Action: A Theoretical Model About the “Interlocking” Between Intentions and Environmental Affordances. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. Piercarlo Valdesolo and Jesse Graham. 2014. Awe, uncertainty, and agency detection. Psychological science 25, 1 (2014), 170–178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. Michiel van Elk, Annika Karinen, Eva Specker, Eftychia Stamkou, and Matthijs Baas. 2016. ‘Standing in awe’: The effects of awe on body perception and the relation with absorption. Collabra 2, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Tyler J VanderWeele, Jeffery Fulks, John F Plake, and Matthew T Lee. 2021. National well-being measures before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in online samples. Journal of General Internal Medicine 36, 1 (2021), 248–250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. R Swamy Venuturupalli, Timothy Chu, Marcus Vicari, Amit Kumar, Natalie Fortune, and Ben Spielberg. 2019. Virtual reality–based biofeedback and guided meditation in rheumatology: a pilot study. ACR open rheumatology 1, 10 (2019), 667–675.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Edward A Vessel and Steven Russo. 2015. Effects of reduced sensory stimulation and assessment of countermeasures for sensory stimulation augmentation. NASA Report (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Jay Vidyarthi. 2012. Sonic Cradle: Evoking Mindfulness through Immersive Interaction Design. Master’s thesis. Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canada. https://theses.lib.sfu.ca/thesis/etd7542Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. Jay Vidyarthi, Bernhard E Riecke, and Diane Gromala. 2012. Sonic Cradle: designing for an immersive experience of meditation by connecting respiration to music. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. 408–417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. Frank White. 1998. The overview effect: Space exploration and human evolution. AIAA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Ross G White and Catharina Van Der Boor. 2020. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and initial period of lockdown on the mental health and well-being of adults in the UK. BJPsych open 6, 5 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  136. Carolin Wienrich, Nina Döllinger, and Rebecca Hein. 2021. Behavioral Framework of Immersive Technologies (BehaveFIT): How and Why Virtual Reality Can Support Behavioral Change Processes. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Polly W. Wiessner. 2014. Embers of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 39 (Sept. 2014), 14027–14035. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404212111 Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  138. Bas Wijk. 2021. How Virtual Reality Offers a Different Perspective: An Approach to Stimulate Connectedness by Eliciting Awe. Master’s thesis. University of Twente.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Kaylie Wilson and Grace Scorsone. 2021. The use of virtual reality technologies to reduce anxiety and improve experience in chemotherapy patients during treatment. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021), 88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  140. World Bank. 2020. Urban Development. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overviewGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. David Bryce Yaden, Jonathan Haidt, Ralph W. Hood, David R. Vago, and Andrew B. Newberg. 2017. The varieties of self-transcendent experience.Review of General Psychology 21, 2 (2017), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000102Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  142. David Bryce Yaden, Jonathan Haidt, Ralph W Hood Jr, David R Vago, and Andrew B Newberg. 2017. The varieties of self-transcendent experience. Review of general psychology 21, 2 (2017), 143–160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. David B Yaden, Jonathan Iwry, Kelley J Slack, Johannes C Eichstaedt, Yukun Zhao, George E Vaillant, and Andrew B Newberg. 2016. The overview effect: Awe and self-transcendent experience in space flight.Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 3, 1 (2016), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. David B Yaden, Scott Barry Kaufman, Elizabeth Hyde, Alice Chirico, Andrea Gaggioli, Jia Wei Zhang, and Dacher Keltner. 2019. The development of the Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S): A multifactorial measure for a complex emotion. The journal of positive psychology 14, 4 (2019), 474–488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. Gaochao Zhang, Guowei Wu, and Jun Yang. 2023. The restorative effects of short-term exposure to nature in immersive virtual environments (IVEs) as evidenced by participants’ brain activities. Journal of Environmental Management 326 (2023), 116830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  146. Huanhuan Zhao, Heyun Zhang, Yan Xu, Wen He, and Jiamei Lu. 2019. Why are people high in dispositional awe happier? The roles of meaning in life and materialism. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2019), 1208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. Bin Zhu, Anders Hedman, and Haibo Li. 2017. Designing digital mindfulness: Presence-in and presence-with versus presence-through. In THE 2017 ACM SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI’17). ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY, 2685–2695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Awedyssey: Design Tensions in Eliciting Self-transcendent Emotions in Virtual Reality to Support Mental Well-being and Connection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DIS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 2023
        2717 pages
        ISBN:9781450398930
        DOI:10.1145/3563657

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 July 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

        Upcoming Conference

        DIS '24
        Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 1 - 5, 2024
        IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format