skip to main content
10.1145/3554364.3559118acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Embodiment in interactive installations: results from a systematic literature review

Published:19 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ubiquitous and pervasive technologies, alongside the expanding role of the computer in our lives, present new dimensions to the concept of embodiment within the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) field. Interactive installations, in particular, afford the technological and conceptual exploration of embodiment due to a high degree of creative freedom and more open objectives, making it a promising context to be investigated. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review on approaches to embodiment in the context of interactive installations. We searched four major digital libraries and screened a total of 3245 studies following a protocol described in the paper. The final selection consists of 67 entries. Our analysis shows a multitude of theoretical and practical approaches to embodiment in interactive installations, but also significant compatibility and combined use. We present detailed summaries of and discussion on how embodiment is conceptualized, put into practice, and what technologies are involved, revealing new perspectives and possibilities for investigating embodiment in HCI.

References

  1. Ruth A. Baer. 2003. Mindfulness Training as a Clinical Intervention: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 10, 2 (2003), 125--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2011. The Human-Artifact Model: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Artifact Ecologies. Human-Computer Interaction 26, 4 (2011), 315--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kirk Warren Brown and Richard M. Ryan. 2003. The Benefits of Being Present: Mindfulness and Its Role in Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 4 (2003), 822--848. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jerome S. Bruner. 1966. Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eric Deng, Bilge Mutlu, and Maja J Mataric. 2019. Embodiment in Socially Interactive Robots. Foundations and Trends® in Robotics 7, 4 (2019), 251--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Greg Downey. 2010. 'Practice without theory': a neuroanthropological perspective on embodied learning. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16, s1 (2010), S22--S40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Shaun Gallagher. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 294 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. James J. Gibson. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. David Gough, Sandy Oliver, and James Thomas. 2012. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yolande Harris and Bert Bongers. 2002. Approaches to creating interactivated spaces, from intimate to inhabited interfaces. Organised Sound 7, 3 (2002), 239--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Katherine Hayles. 1996. Embodied Virtuality: Or How to Put Bodies Back into the Picture. In Immersed in Technology: Art and Virtual Environments. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kristina Höök, Martin P. Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio. 2016. Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3131--3142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. David Howes. 2013. The Expanding Field of Sensory Studies. http://www.sensorystudies.org/sensorial-investigations/the-expanding-field-of-sensory-studies/ Accessed May 28, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Katherine Isbister, Elena Márquez Segura, and Edward F. Melcer. 2018. Social Affordances at Play: Game Design Toward Socio-Technical Innovation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces Between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI '97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mark Johnson. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mauri Kaipainen, Niklas Ravaja, Pia Tikka, Rasmus Vuori, Roberto Pugliese, Marco Rapino, and Tapio Takala. 2011. Enactive Systems and Enactive Media: Embodied Human-Machine Coupling beyond Interfaces. Leonardo 44, 5 (13 Sep 2011), 433--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jonghwa Kim and Elisabeth André. 2008. Emotion recognition based on physiological changes in music listening. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30, 12 (2008), 2067--2083. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Scott R. Klemmer, Björn Hartmann, and Leila Takayama. 2006. How Bodies Matter: Five Themes for Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (University Park, PA, USA) (DIS '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 140--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ksenia Kolykhalova, Paolo Alborno, Antonio Camurri, and Gualtiero Volpe. 2016. A Serious Games Platform for Validating Sonification of Human Full-Body Movement Qualities. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing (Thessaloniki, GA, Greece) (MOCO '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 39, 5 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Carly Kontra, Susan Goldin-Meadow, and Sian L. Beilock. 2012. Embodied Learning Across the Life Span. Topics in Cognitive Science 4, 4 (2012), 731--739. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. George Lakoff. 2008. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Michael R. Levenson, Patricia A. Jennings, Carolyn M. Aldwin, and Ray W. Shiraishi. 2005. Self-Transcendence: Conceptualization and Measurement. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development 60, 2 (2005), 127--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Robb Lindgren and David DeLiema. 2022. Viewpoint, embodiment, and roles in STEM learning technologies. Educational technology research and development 70, 3 (01 Jun 2022), 1009--1034. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Robb Lindgren and Mina Johnson-Glenberg. 2013. Emboldened by Embodiment: Six Precepts for Research on Embodied Learning and Mixed Reality. Educational Researcher 42, 8 (2013), 445--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. V. Magagnin, M. Mauri, P. Cipresso, L. Mainardi, En Brown, S. Cerutti, M. Villamira, and R. Barbieri. 2010. Heart Rate Variability and Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Assessment of Affective States by Bivariate Autoregressive Spectral Analysis. Computing in cardiology 37, 5737930 (2010), 145--148. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22158520Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G. Altman, and The PRISMA Group. 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine 6, 7 (07 2009), 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lizzie Muller, Greg Turner, George Khut, and Ernest Edmonds. 2006. Creating Affective Visualisations for a Physiologically Interactive Artwork. In Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 651--657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Karen Nakamura. 2013. Making Sense of Sensory Ethnography: The Sensual and the Multisensory. American Anthropologist 115, 1 (2013), 132--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Alva Noë. 2004. Action in Perception. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Alva Noë. 2009. Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Donald A. Norman. 1988. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Rosalind W. Picard. 2000. Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Matthew Reason and Dee Reynolds. 2010. Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Related Pleasures: An Inquiry into Audience Experiences of Watching Dance. Dance Research Journal 42, 2 (2010), 49--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Pedro Sanches, Kristina Höök, Elsa Vaara, Claus Weymann, Markus Bylund, Pedro Ferreira, Nathalie Peira, and Marie Sjölinder. 2010. Mind the Body! Designing a Mobile Stress Management Application Encouraging Personal Reflection. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Maria V. Sanchez-Vives and Mel Slater. 2005. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 4 (01 Apr 2005), 332--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Thecla Schiphorst. 2009. Soft(n): Toward a Somaesthetics of Touch. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI EA '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2427--2438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Mark S. Schwartz and Frank Andrasik. 2017. Biofeedback, Fourth Edition: A Practitioner's Guide. Guilford Publications, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Richard Shusterman. 2012. Thinking Through the Body: Essays in Somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Jonathan Steuer. 2006. Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication 42, 4 (02 2006), 73--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Dag Svanæs. 2013. Interaction Design for and with the Lived Body: Some Implications of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 1, Article 8 (apr 2013), 30 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jelle Van Dijk. 2018. Designing for Embodied Being-in-the-World: A Critical Analysis of the Concept of Embodiment in the Design of Hybrids. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2, 1 (2018), 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1993. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Mark Weiser. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265, 3 (1991), 94--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Margaret Wilson. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 4 (01 Dec 2002), 625--636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Embodiment in interactive installations: results from a systematic literature review

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IHC '22: Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        October 2022
        482 pages
        ISBN:9781450395069
        DOI:10.1145/3554364

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 October 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader