skip to main content
research-article

GRACE: A General Graph Convolution Framework for Attributed Graph Clustering

Published:22 February 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Attributed graph clustering (AGC) is an important problem in graph mining as more and more complex data in real-world have been represented in graphs with attributed nodes. While it is a common practice to leverage both attribute and structure information for improved clustering performance, most existing AGC algorithms consider only a specific type of relations, which hinders their applicability to integrate various complex relations into node attributes for AGC. In this article, we propose GRACE, an extended graph convolution framework for AGC tasks. Our framework provides a general and interpretative solution for clustering many different types of attributed graphs, including undirected, directed, heterogeneous and hyper attributed graphs. By building suitable graph Laplacians for each of the aforementioned graph types, GRACE can seamlessly perform graph convolution on node attributes to fuse all available information for clustering. We conduct extensive experiments on 14 real-world datasets of four different graph types. The experimental results show that GRACE outperforms the state-of-the-art AGC methods on the different graph types in terms of clustering quality, time, and memory usage.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Agarwal Sameer, Branson Kristin, and Belongie Serge J.. 2006. Higher order learning with graphs. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Akbas Esra and Zhao Peixiang. 2017. Attributed graph clustering: An attribute-aware graph embedding approach. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.Diesner Jana, Ferrari Elena, and Xu Guandong (Eds.), ACM, 305308. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Andersen Reid, Chung Fan, and Lang Kevin. 2007. Using PageRank to locally partition a graph. Internet Mathematics 4, 01 (2007), 3564. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Bai Song, Zhang Feihu, and Torr Philip H. S.. 2021. Hypergraph convolution and hypergraph attention. Pattern Recognit. 110 (2021), 107637. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Belkin Mikhail and Niyogi Partha. 2003. Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Computation 15, 6 (2003), 13731396. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Cai Deng, He Xiaofei, Han Jiawei, and Huang Thomas S.. 2010. Graph regularized nonnegative matrix factorization for data representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 33, 8 (2010), 15481560.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Cai Deng, He Xiaofei, Han Jiawei, and Huang Thomas S.. 2011. Graph regularized nonnegative matrix factorization for data representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 33, 8 (2011), 15481560. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Chan T.-H. Hubert and Liang Zhibin. 2020. Generalizing the hypergraph Laplacian via a diffusion process with mediators. Theoretical Computer Science 806, 1 (2020), 416428. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Chen Siheng, Sandryhaila Aliaksei, Moura José M. F., and Kovacevic Jelena. 2014. Signal denoising on graphs via graph filtering. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing.872876. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Cheng Hong, Zhou Yang, and Yu Jeffrey Xu. 2011. Clustering large attributed graphs: A balance between structural and attribute similarities. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 5, 2 (2011), 12:1–12:33. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] Chung Fan. 2005. Laplacians and the cheeger inequality for directed graphs. Annals of Combinatorics 9, 1 (2005), 119. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Dang T. A. and Viennet Emmanuel. 2012. Community detection based on structural and attribute similarities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Society. 712.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Delalleau Olivier, Bengio Yoshua, and Roux Nicolas Le. 2005. Efficient non-parametric function induction in semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.Society for Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 96103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Dhillon Inderjit S., Guan Yuqiang, and Kulis Brian. 2004. Kernel k-means: Spectral clustering and normalized cuts. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 551556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Ding Chris and He Xiaofeng. 2004. K-means clustering via principal component analysis. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning. 29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Ding Chris, He Xiaofeng, and Simon Horst D.. 2005. On the equivalence of nonnegative matrix factorization and spectral clustering. In Proceedings of the 2005 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 606610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Du Rundong, Drake Barry L., and Park Haesun. 2017. Hybrid clustering based on content and connection structure using joint nonnegative matrix factorization. J. of Global Optimization 74, 4 (2019), 861–877.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Fan Wenqi, Ma Yao, Li Qing, Wang Jianping, Cai Guoyong, Tang Jiliang, and Yin Dawei. 2022. A graph neural network framework for social recommendations. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 34, 5 (2022), 20332047. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Feng Yifan, You Haoxuan, Zhang Zizhao, Ji Rongrong, and Gao Yue. 2018. Hypergraph neural networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Grover Aditya and Leskovec Jure. 2016. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Guo Ting, Pan Shirui, Zhu Xingquan, and Zhang Chengqi. 2018. CFOND: Consensus factorization for co-clustering networked data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 31, 4 (2018), 706719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Hu Ziniu, Dong Yuxiao, Wang Kuansan, and Sun Yizhou. 2020. Heterogeneous graph transformer. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. Association for Computing Machinery, 2704–2710.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23] Huang Chao, Xu Huance, Xu Yong, Dai Peng, Xia Lianghao, Lu Mengyin, Bo Liefeng, Xing Hao, Lai Xiaoping, and Ye Yanfang. 2021. Knowledge-aware coupled graph neural network for social recommendation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 35, 5 (2021), 41154122. Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/16533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Vaibhav Vaibhav, Po-Yao Huang, and Robert E. Frederking. 2019. RWR-GAE: Random walk regularization for graph auto encoders. arXiv:1908.04003. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Huang Zhichao, Ye Yunming, Li Xutao, Liu Feng, and Chen Huajie. 2017. Joint weighted nonnegative matrix factorization for mining attributed graphs. In Proceedings of the Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining—21st Pacific-Asia Conference.Kim Jinho, Shim Kyuseok, Cao Longbing, Lee Jae-Gil, Lin Xuemin, and Moon Yang-Sae (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10234, 368–380. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Shi Jianbo and Malik J.. 2000. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22, 8 (2000), 888905. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. [27] Kamhoua Barakeel Fanseu, Zhang Lin, Ma Kaili, Cheng James, Li Bo, and Han Bo. 2021. HyperGraph convolution based attributed HyperGraph clustering. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Kipf Thomas N. and Welling Max. 2016. Variational graph auto-encoders. In Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Bayesian Deep Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] Kipf Thomas N. and Welling Max. 2017. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30] Kuang Da, Ding Chris, and Park Haesun. 2012. Symmetric nonnegative matrix factorization for graph clustering. In Proceedings of the 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 106117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Kumar Tarun, Vaidyanathan Sankaran, Ananthapadmanabhan Harini, Parthasarathy Srinivasan, and Ravindran Balaraman. 2018. Hypergraph clustering: A modularity maximization approach. Appl. Netw. Sci. 5, 1 (2020), 52. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Lee Daniel D. and Seung H. Sebastian. 2000. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.Leen Todd K., Dietterich Thomas G., and Tresp Volker (Eds.), MIT, 556562. Retrieved from http://papers.nips.cc/paper/1861-algorithms-for-non-negative-matrix-factorization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Leordeanu Marius and Sminchisescu Cristian. 2012. Efficient hypergraph clustering. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] Leskovec Jure and McAuley Julian. 2012. Learning to discover social circles in ego networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Pereira F., Burges C. J. C., Bottou L., and Weinberger K. Q. (Eds.), Vol. 25. Curran Associates, Inc., 539547. Retrieved from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2012/file/7a614fd06c325499f1680b9896beedeb-Paper.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Li Chensheng, Qin Xiaowei, Xu Xiaodong, Yang Dujia, and Wei Guo. 2020. Scalable graph convolutional networks with fast localized spectral filter for directed graphs. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 105634105644. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Li Jianxin, Peng Hao, Cao Yuwei, Dou Yingtong, Zhang Hekai, Yu Philip S., and He Lifang. 2021. Higher-order attribute-enhancing heterogeneous graph neural networks. arXiv:2104.07892. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.07892.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Li Pan and Milenkovic Olgica. 2017. Inhomogeneous hypergraph clustering with applications. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Guyon I., Luxburg U. V., Bengio S., Wallach H., Fergus R., Vishwanathan S., and Garnett R. (Eds.), Vol. 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 23082318. Retrieved from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/a50abba8132a77191791390c3eb19fe7-Paper.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. [38] Li Q., Han Z., and Wu X.-M.. 2018. Deeper insights into graph convolutional networks for semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Li Xiang, Kao Ben, Ren Zhaochun, and Yin Dawei. 2019. Spectral clustering in heterogeneous information networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; The 31st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference; The 9th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, 42214228. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. [40] Lin Zhiping and Kang Zhao. 2021. Graph filter-based multi-view attributed graph clustering. In Proceedings of the 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Zhou Zhi-Hua (Ed.), International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 27232729. DOI:Main Track.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. [41] Liu Zhiwei, Yang Liangwei, Fan Ziwei, Peng Hao, and Yu Philip S.. 2021. Federated social recommendation with graph neural network. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (2021). DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Luxburg Ulrike. 2004. A tutorial on spectral clustering. Statistics and Computing 17, 4 (2004), 395416. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Ma Yi, Hao Jianye, Yang Yaodong, Li Han, Jin Junqi, and Chen Guangyong. 2019. Spectral-based graph convolutional network for directed graphs. arXiv:1907.08990. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] MacQueen James. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability.281297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. [45] MacQueen James. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press, 281297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. [46] Malliaros Fragkiskos D. and Vazirgiannis Michalis. 2013. Clustering and community detection in directed networks: A survey. Physics Reports 533, 4 (2013), 95–142. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] McAuley Julian J. and Leskovec Jure. 2012. Learning to discover social circles in ego networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25: 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2012.Bartlett Peter L., Pereira Fernando C. N., Burges Christopher J. C., Bottou Léon, and Weinberger Kilian Q. (Eds.), 548556. Retrieved from http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4532-learning-to-discover-social-circles-in-ego-networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Neville Jennifer, Adler Micah, and Jensen David. 2003. Clustering relational data using attribute and link information. In Proceedings of the Text Mining and Link Analysis Workshop, 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 915.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. [49] Pan Shirui, Hu Ruiqi, Long Guodong, Jiang Jing, Yao Lina, and Zhang Chengqi. 2018. Adversarially regularized graph autoencoder for graph embedding. In Proceedings of the IJCAI. 26092615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. [50] Perozzi Bryan, Al-Rfou Rami, and Skiena Steven. 2014. Deepwalk: Online learning of social representations. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 701710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. [51] Qin Yaoyao, Jia Caiyan, and Li Yafang. 2016. Community detection using nonnegative matrix factorization with orthogonal constraint. In Proceedings of the 2016 8th International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence. 4954. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Rodriguez J. A.. 2002. On the laplacian eigenvalues and metric parameters of hypergraphs. Linear and Multilinear Algebra 50, 1 (2002), 114. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. [53] Sadikaj Ylli, Velaj Yllka, Behzadi Sahar, and Plant Claudia. 2021. Spectral clustering of attributed multi-relational graphs. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Association for Computing Machinery, 14311440. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. [54] Saito Shota, Mandic Danilo P., and Suzuki Hideyuki. 2017. Hypergraph p-Laplacian: A differential geometry view. In AAAI. 3984–3991. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI18/paper/view/17386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. [55] Satuluri Venu and Parthasarathy Srinivasan. 2011. Symmetrizations for clustering directed graphs.In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Extending Database Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 343354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. [56] Sengupta Srijan and Chen Yuguo. 2015. SPECTRAL CLUSTERING IN HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS. Statistica Sinica 25, 3 (2015), 10811106. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24721222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. [57] Shi Jinghan, Ji Houye, Shi Chuan, Wang Xiao, Zhang Zhiqiang, and Zhou Jun. 2020. Heterogeneous graph neural network for recommendation. In ICML Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. [58] Shuman D. I., Narang S. K., Frossard P., Ortega A., and Vandergheynst P.. 2013. The emerging field of signal processing on graphs: Extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 30, 3 (2013), 8398. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. [59] Sun Heli, He Fang, Huang Jianbin, Sun Yizhou, Li Yang, Wang Chenyu, He Liang, Sun Zhongbin, and Jia Xiaolin. 2020. Network embedding for community detection in attributed networks. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 14, 3 (2020), 36:1–36:25. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. [60] Sun Yizhou, Han Jiawei, Zhao Peixiang, Yin Zhijun, Cheng Hong, and Wu Tianyi. 2009. RankClus: Integrating clustering with ranking for heterogeneous information network analysis.In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 565576. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. [61] Sun Yizhou, Yu Yintao, and Han Jiawei. 2009. Ranking-based clustering of heterogeneous information networks with star network schema. Ranking-based clustering of heterogeneous information networks with star network schema. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 797806. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. [62] Sun Yizhou, Yu Yintao, and Han Jiawei. 2009. Ranking-based clustering of heterogeneous information networks with star network schema. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Association for Computing Machinery, 797806. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. [63] Takai Yuuki, Miyauchi Atsushi, Ikeda Masahiro, and Yoshida Yuichi. 2020. Hypergraph clustering based on PageRank. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & and Data Mining. 1970–1978. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. [64] Tong Zekun, Liang Yuxuan, Sun Changsheng, Li Xinke, Rosenblum David, and Lim Andrew. 2020. Digraph inception convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Larochelle H., Ranzato M., Hadsell R., Balcan M. F., and Lin H. (Eds.), Vol. 33. Curran Associates, Inc., 1790717918. Retrieved from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/file/cffb6e2288a630c2a787a64ccc67097c-Paper.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. [65] Veličković Petar, Cucurull Guillem, Casanova Arantxa, Romero Adriana, Liò Pietro, and Bengio Yoshua. 2018. Graph attention networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations. Retrieved from https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJXMpikCZ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. [66] Wang Chun, Pan Shirui, Hu Ruiqi, Long Guodong, Jiang Jing, and Zhang Chengqi. 2019. Attributed graph clustering: A deep attentional embedding approach. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Kraus Sarit (Ed.), Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 36703676. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. [67] Wang Chun, Pan Shirui, Long Guodong, Zhu Xingquan, and Jiang Jing. 2017. Mgae: Marginalized graph autoencoder for graph clustering. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 889898.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. [68] Wang Daixin, Cui Peng, and Zhu Wenwu. 2016. Structural deep network embedding. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Krishnapuram Balaji, Shah Mohak, Smola Alexander J., Aggarwal Charu C., Shen Dou, and Rastogi Rajeev (Eds.), ACM, 12251234. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. [69] Wang Xiao, Jin Di, Cao Xiaochun, Yang Liang, and Zhang Weixiong. 2016. Semantic community identification in large attribute networks. In Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Schuurmans Dale and Wellman Michael P. (Eds.), AAAI,265271. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI16/paper/view/11964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. [70] Wang Xiao, Liu Nian, Han Hui, and Shi Chuan. 2021. Self-supervised heterogeneous graph neural network with co-contrastive learning. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, 1726–1736. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. [71] Whang Joyce, Du Rundong, Jung Sangwon, Lee Geon, Drake Barry, Liu Qingqing, Kang Seonggoo, and Park Haesun. 2020. MEGA: Multi-view semi-supervised clustering of hypergraphs. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 13, 5 (2020), 698711. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. [72] Wu Felix, Souza Amauri, Zhang Tianyi, Fifty Christopher, Yu Tao, and Weinberger Kilian. 2019. Simplifying graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning. 68616871.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. [73] Wu Zonghan, Pan Shirui, Chen Fengwen, Long Guodong, Zhang Chengqi, and Yu Philip S.. 2021. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32, 1 (2021), 4–24. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. [74] Xia Rongkai, Pan Y., Du Lei, and Yin J.. 2014. Robust multi-view spectral clustering via low-rank and sparse decomposition. In Proceedings of the AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. [75] Xu Keyulu, Hu Weihua, Leskovec Jure, and Jegelka Stefanie. 2019. How powerful are graph neural networks?. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations. Retrieved from https://openreview.net/forum?id=ryGs6iA5Km.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. [76] Xu Wei, Liu Xin, and Gong Yihong. 2003. Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.Clarke Charles L. A., Cormack Gordon V., Callan Jamie, Hawking David, and Smeaton Alan F. (Eds.), ACM, 267273. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. [77] Xu Zhiqiang, Ke Yiping, Wang Yi, Cheng Hong, and Cheng James. 2012. A model-based approach to attributed graph clustering. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. [78] Xu Zhiqiang, Ke Yiping, Wang Yi, Cheng Hong, and Cheng James. 2012. A model-based approach to attributed graph clustering. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.Candan K. Selçuk, Chen Yi, Snodgrass Richard T., Gravano Luis, and Fuxman Ariel (Eds.), ACM, 505516. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. [79] Xu Zhiqiang, Ke Yiping, Wang Yi, Cheng Hong, and Cheng James. 2014. GBAGC: A general Bayesian framework for attributed graph clustering. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 9, 1 (2014), 5:1–5:43. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. [80] Yadati Naganand, Nimishakavi Madhav, Yadav Prateek, Nitin Vikram, Louis Anand, and Talukdar Partha. 2019. HyperGCN: A new method for training graph convolutional networks on hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc., 15091520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. [81] Yang Cheng, Liu Zhiyuan, Zhao Deli, Sun Maosong, and Chang Edward Y.. 2015. Network representation learning with rich text information. In Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Yang Qiang and Wooldridge Michael J. (Eds.), AAAI,21112117. Retrieved from http://ijcai.org/Abstract/15/299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. [82] Yang Jaewon, McAuley Julian J., and Leskovec Jure. 2013. Community detection in networks with node attributes. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining.Xiong Hui, Karypis George, Thuraisingham Bhavani M., Cook Diane J., and Wu Xindong (Eds.), IEEE Computer Society, 11511156. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. [83] Yang Tianbao, Jin Rong, Chi Yun, and Zhu Shenghuo. 2009. Combining link and content for community detection: A discriminative approach. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 927936. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. [84] Zhang Xiaotong, Liu Han, Li Qimai, and Wu Xiao-Ming. 2019. Attributed graph clustering via adaptive graph convolution. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-19). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 4327–4333. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. [85] Zhou Dengyong, Huang Jiayuan, and Scholkopf Bernhard. 2005. Learning from labeled and unlabeled data on a directed graph. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. [86] Zhou Dengyong, Huang Jiayuan, and Schölkopf Bernhard. 2006. Learning with hypergraphs: Clustering, classification, and embedding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference, B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, and T. Hoffman (Eds.). Vol. 19. 16011608. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2006/file/dff8e9c2ac33381546d96deea9922999-Paper.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. [87] Zhou Jie, Cui Ganqu, Zhang Zhengyan, Yang Cheng, Liu Zhiyuan, and Sun Maosong. 2020. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications. AI Open 1 (2020), 2666–6510. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. [88] Zhou Y., Cheng Hong, and Yu J. X.. 2009. Graph clustering based on structural/attribute similarities. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 2, 1 (2009), 718729. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. [89] Zhou Yang, Cheng Hong, and Yu Jeffrey Xu. 2009. Graph clustering based on structural/attribute similarities. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 2, 1 (2009), 718729. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. [90] Zhou Yang, Cheng Hong, and Yu Jeffrey Xu. 2010. Clustering large attributed graphs: An efficient incremental approach. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.Webb Geoffrey I., Liu Bing, Zhang Chengqi, Gunopulos Dimitrios, and Wu Xindong (Eds.), IEEE Computer Society, 689698. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. [91] Zhou Yang and Liu Ling. 2013. Social influence based clustering of heterogeneous information networks. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 338346. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. GRACE: A General Graph Convolution Framework for Attributed Graph Clustering

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
      ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data  Volume 17, Issue 3
      April 2023
      379 pages
      ISSN:1556-4681
      EISSN:1556-472X
      DOI:10.1145/3583064
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 February 2023
      • Online AM: 24 June 2022
      • Accepted: 7 June 2022
      • Revised: 23 May 2022
      • Received: 27 January 2022
      Published in tkdd Volume 17, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format