skip to main content
10.1145/3544794.3558472acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Towards Detecting Complete Chest Recoil from Smartphone Vibration Strength during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Published:27 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Chest compressions (CC) is the most important means of treating sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). A critical factor of CC is complete chest recoil after each compression such that it returns to its initial position with no force exerted on the chest. For the first time, we show that commodity smartphones can estimate full chest recoil for providing real-time feedback. In our approach, a vibrating smartphone is placed between the patient’s chest and the rescuer’s hand. With our VibCPR system we research how accurate incomplete chest recoil can be detected from the vibration strength measured by the accelerometer at the moment of decompression. In an initial study, 24 participants apply our system to perform 10,950 CC. Based on a leave-one-subject-out evaluation, VibCPR correctly detects incomplete chest recoil at 80%, 75% and 72% balanced accuracy for three different smartphones, respectively.

References

  1. Tomohiro Amemiya and Taro Maeda. 2013. Poster: depth and rate estimation for chest compression CPR with smartphone. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 125–126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Rolf Lefering, Rudolph W Koster, Siobhán Masterson, Bernd W Böttiger, Johan Herlitz, Jan Wnent, Ingvild BM Tjelmeland, Fernando Rosell Ortiz, Holger Maurer, 2016. EuReCa ONE 27 Nations, ONE Europe, ONE Registry: A prospective one month analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in 27 countries in Europe. Resuscitation 105(2016), 188–195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnes Gruenerbl, Gerald Pirkl, Eloise Monger, Mary Gobbi, and Paul Lukowicz. 2015. Smart-watch life saver: smart-watch interactive-feedback system for improving bystander CPR. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 19–26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Stefan Hermann, Paula Breitling, Tobias Röddiger, and Michael Beigl. 2021. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Support: Comparison of Wrist-, Chest-, and Ear-Worn Devices and Estimation Algorithms. In 2021 International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 28–32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gierad Laput, Robert Xiao, and Chris Harrison. 2016. Viband: High-fidelity bio-acoustic sensing using commodity smartwatch accelerometers. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 321–333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Seungjae Lee, Yeongtak Song, Jongshill Lee, Jaehoon Oh, Tae Ho Lim, Chiwon Ahn, and In Young Kim. 2021. Development of Smart-Ring-Based Chest Compression Depth Feedback Device for High Quality Chest Compressions: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Biosensors 11, 2 (2021), 35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Christian Lins, Andreas Klausen, Sandra Hellmers, Andreas Hein, and Sebastian Fudickar. 2018. Staying Alive-CPR Quality Parameters from Wrist-worn Inertial Sensor Data with Evolutionary Fitted Sinusoidal Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.07692(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tsung-Chien Lu, Yi Chen, Te-Wei Ho, Yao-Ting Chang, Yi-Ting Lee, Yu-Siang Wang, Yen-Pin Chen, Chia-Ming Fu, Wen-Chu Chiang, Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, 2018. A novel depth estimation algorithm of chest compression for feedback of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation based on a smartwatch. Journal of biomedical informatics 87 (2018), 60–65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dana Niles, Jon Nysaether, Robert Sutton, Akira Nishisaki, Benjamin S Abella, Kristy Arbogast, Matthew R Maltese, Robert A Berg, Mark Helfaer, and Vinay Nadkarni. 2009. Leaning is common during in-hospital pediatric CPR, and decreased with automated corrective feedback. Resuscitation 80, 5 (2009), 553–557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dana E Niles, Robert M Sutton, Vinay M Nadkarni, Andrew Glatz, Mathias Zuercher, Matthew R Maltese, Joar Eilevstjønn, Benjamin S Abella, Lance B Becker, and Robert A Berg. 2011. Prevalence and hemodynamic effects of leaning during CPR. Resuscitation 82(2011), S23–S26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Theresa M Olasveengen, Federico Semeraro, Giuseppe Ristagno, Maaret Castren, Anthony Handley, Artem Kuzovlev, Koenraad G Monsieurs, Violetta Raffay, Michael Smyth, Jasmeet Soar, 2021. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: basic life support. Resuscitation 161(2021), 98–114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. CS Park, IG Kang, SJ Heo, YS Chae, HJ Kim, SS Park, MJ Lee, and WJ Jeong. 2014. A randomised, cross over study using a mannequin model to evaluate the effects on CPR quality of real-time audio-visual feedback provided by a smartphone application. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine 21, 3 (2014), 153–160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gavin D Perkins, Anthony J Handley, Rudolph W Koster, Maaret Castrén, Michael A Smyth, Theresa Olasveengen, Koenraad G Monsieurs, Violetta Raffay, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Volker Wenzel, 2015. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 95(2015), 81–99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yeongtak Song, Jaehoon Oh, and Youngjoon Chee. 2015. A new chest compression depth feedback algorithm for high-quality CPR based on smartphone. Telemedicine and e-Health 21, 1 (2015), 36–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Demetris Yannopoulos, Scott McKnite, Tom P Aufderheide, Gardar Sigurdsson, Ronald G Pirrallo, David Benditt, and Keith G Lurie. 2005. Effects of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 64, 3 (2005), 363–372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Joyce Yeung, Reylon Meeks, Dana Edelson, Fang Gao, Jasmeet Soar, and Gavin D Perkins. 2009. The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: a systematic review. Resuscitation 80, 7 (2009), 743–751.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Shibo Zhang, Qiuyang Xu, Sougata Sen, and Nabil Alshurafa. 2020. VibroScale: turning your smartphone into a weighing scale. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 176–179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mathias Zuercher, Ronald W Hilwig, James Ranger-Moore, Jon Nysaether, Vinay M Nadkarni, Marc D Berg, Karl B Kern, Robert Sutton, and Robert A Berg. 2010. Leaning during chest compressions impairs cardiac output and left ventricular myocardial blood flow in piglet cardiac arrest. Critical care medicine 38, 4 (2010), 1141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards Detecting Complete Chest Recoil from Smartphone Vibration Strength during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISWC '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
        September 2022
        141 pages
        ISBN:9781450394246
        DOI:10.1145/3544794

        Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 December 2022

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

        Upcoming Conference

      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)59
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format